Patchworkβ pci: only release that resource index is less than 3

login
register
about
Submitter Yinghai Lu
Date 2009-10-24 09:25:59
Message ID <4AE2C827.8040905@kernel.org>
Download mbox | patch
Permalink /patch/55705/
State Superseded
Headers show

Comments

Yinghai Lu - 2009-10-24 09:25:59
after

| commit 308cf8e13f42f476dfd6552aeff58fdc0788e566
|
|    PCI: get larger bridge ranges when space is available

found one of resource of peer root bus (0x00) get released from root
resource. later one hotplug device can not get big range anymore.
other peer root buses is ok.

it turns out it is from transparent path.

those resources will be used for pci bridge BAR updated.
so need to limit it to 3.

Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>

---
 drivers/pci/setup-bus.c |    9 +++++++--
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Bjorn Helgaas - 2009-10-26 16:32:57
On Saturday 24 October 2009 03:25:59 am Yinghai Lu wrote:
> after
> 
> | commit 308cf8e13f42f476dfd6552aeff58fdc0788e566
> |
> |    PCI: get larger bridge ranges when space is available
> 
> found one of resource of peer root bus (0x00) get released from root
> resource. later one hotplug device can not get big range anymore.
> other peer root buses is ok.
> 
> it turns out it is from transparent path.
> 
> those resources will be used for pci bridge BAR updated.
> so need to limit it to 3.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
> 
> ---
>  drivers/pci/setup-bus.c |    9 +++++++--
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
> @@ -344,9 +344,14 @@ static struct resource *find_free_bus_re
>  			 * if there is no child under that, we should release
>  			 * and use it. don't need to reset it, pbus_size_* will
>  			 * set it again
> +			 * need to be less 3, otherwise can not write it to
> +			 * bridge, also need to avoid releasing it from
> +			 * transparent bus path
>  			 */
> -			if (!r->child && !release_resource(r))
> -				return r;
> +			if (i < 3 && !r->child) {
> +				if (!release_resource(r))
> +					return r;
> +			}

I am bewildered.

308cf8e13f42f added the release_resource() call here in
find_free_bus_resource().  I don't understand why the release
should be there in the first place -- it doesn't seem to
logically fit there.  A "release" should be connected to an
event, maybe a hot-remove or a move of a device from one place
to another.  It shouldn't be something we do as a side-effect
of searching for a free resource.

Now you're adding the magic number "3", which seems even less
related to the job of "finding an available bus resource."  I'm
guessing the "3" is related to PCI_BRIDGE_RESOURCES or something,
but that should be made explicit, and I really don't think it
belongs in this function.

Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Jesse Barnes - 2009-10-26 17:19:42
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 10:32:57 -0600
Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> wrote:

> On Saturday 24 October 2009 03:25:59 am Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > after
> > 
> > | commit 308cf8e13f42f476dfd6552aeff58fdc0788e566
> > |
> > |    PCI: get larger bridge ranges when space is available
> > 
> > found one of resource of peer root bus (0x00) get released from root
> > resource. later one hotplug device can not get big range anymore.
> > other peer root buses is ok.
> > 
> > it turns out it is from transparent path.
> > 
> > those resources will be used for pci bridge BAR updated.
> > so need to limit it to 3.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
> > 
> > ---
> >  drivers/pci/setup-bus.c |    9 +++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > Index: linux-2.6/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
> > +++ linux-2.6/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
> > @@ -344,9 +344,14 @@ static struct resource *find_free_bus_re
> >  			 * if there is no child under that, we
> > should release
> >  			 * and use it. don't need to reset it,
> > pbus_size_* will
> >  			 * set it again
> > +			 * need to be less 3, otherwise can not
> > write it to
> > +			 * bridge, also need to avoid releasing it
> > from
> > +			 * transparent bus path
> >  			 */
> > -			if (!r->child && !release_resource(r))
> > -				return r;
> > +			if (i < 3 && !r->child) {
> > +				if (!release_resource(r))
> > +					return r;
> > +			}
> 
> I am bewildered.
> 
> 308cf8e13f42f added the release_resource() call here in
> find_free_bus_resource().  I don't understand why the release
> should be there in the first place -- it doesn't seem to
> logically fit there.  A "release" should be connected to an
> event, maybe a hot-remove or a move of a device from one place
> to another.  It shouldn't be something we do as a side-effect
> of searching for a free resource.
> 
> Now you're adding the magic number "3", which seems even less
> related to the job of "finding an available bus resource."  I'm
> guessing the "3" is related to PCI_BRIDGE_RESOURCES or something,
> but that should be made explicit, and I really don't think it
> belongs in this function.

I agree, the 3 is a bit of magic.  The free could probably be shuffled
around a bit too, though it really is related to finding bus
resources.  I was a bit ambivalent about putting it in
find_free_bus_resources but when I started a reply to Yinghai and
looked for a better place it made some sense to leave it as-is.

But if we're going to be adding more logic here, we should probably
figure out a better way of doing it, maybe by adding a new pass to do
the freeing?  I know we've avoided modifying bus resources too much in
the past, but I think that'll be harder and harder to avoid as Windows
moves to that model and platforms begin to expect it.
Yinghai Lu - 2009-10-26 19:38:24
Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Saturday 24 October 2009 03:25:59 am Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> after
>>
>> | commit 308cf8e13f42f476dfd6552aeff58fdc0788e566
>> |
>> |    PCI: get larger bridge ranges when space is available
>>
>> found one of resource of peer root bus (0x00) get released from root
>> resource. later one hotplug device can not get big range anymore.
>> other peer root buses is ok.
>>
>> it turns out it is from transparent path.
>>
>> those resources will be used for pci bridge BAR updated.
>> so need to limit it to 3.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
>>
>> ---
>>  drivers/pci/setup-bus.c |    9 +++++++--
>>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> Index: linux-2.6/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
>> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
>> @@ -344,9 +344,14 @@ static struct resource *find_free_bus_re
>>  			 * if there is no child under that, we should release
>>  			 * and use it. don't need to reset it, pbus_size_* will
>>  			 * set it again
>> +			 * need to be less 3, otherwise can not write it to
>> +			 * bridge, also need to avoid releasing it from
>> +			 * transparent bus path
>>  			 */
>> -			if (!r->child && !release_resource(r))
>> -				return r;
>> +			if (i < 3 && !r->child) {
>> +				if (!release_resource(r))
>> +					return r;
>> +			}
> 
> I am bewildered.
> 
> 308cf8e13f42f added the release_resource() call here in
> find_free_bus_resource().  I don't understand why the release
> should be there in the first place -- it doesn't seem to
> logically fit there.  A "release" should be connected to an
> event, maybe a hot-remove or a move of a device from one place
> to another.  It shouldn't be something we do as a side-effect
> of searching for a free resource.

system with several IOHs, and one pci bridge under one IOH,

one of device under that bridge request big range 256M, and the bridge can not find range it, so the device BAR is not initialized. and the bridge already some range preallocated ( about 8M ) for future hotplug support.

so need to release the resource used by that bridge, so it could get new one.

> 
> Now you're adding the magic number "3", which seems even less
> related to the job of "finding an available bus resource."  I'm
> guessing the "3" is related to PCI_BRIDGE_RESOURCES or something,
> but that should be made explicit, and I really don't think it
> belongs in this function.

find_free_bus_resource is only needed by pbus_size_io and bus_size_mem with pci bridge (not card bus) to find position of 
bridge BAR, so later could update corresponding BAR.

YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Patch

Index: linux-2.6/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
@@ -344,9 +344,14 @@  static struct resource *find_free_bus_re
 			 * if there is no child under that, we should release
 			 * and use it. don't need to reset it, pbus_size_* will
 			 * set it again
+			 * need to be less 3, otherwise can not write it to
+			 * bridge, also need to avoid releasing it from
+			 * transparent bus path
 			 */
-			if (!r->child && !release_resource(r))
-				return r;
+			if (i < 3 && !r->child) {
+				if (!release_resource(r))
+					return r;
+			}
 		}
 	}
 	return NULL;