Message ID | 1408355431-115633-2-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Il 18/08/2014 11:50, Wanpeng Li ha scritto: > fpu_activate hook is introduced by commit 6b52d186 (KVM: Activate fpu on > clts), however, there is no user currently, this patch drop it. > > Reviewed-by: Yang Zhang <yang.z.zhang@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com> > --- > arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 - > arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 1 - > arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 1 - > 3 files changed, 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h > index 5724601..b68f3e5 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h > @@ -710,7 +710,6 @@ struct kvm_x86_ops { > void (*cache_reg)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, enum kvm_reg reg); > unsigned long (*get_rflags)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); > void (*set_rflags)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long rflags); > - void (*fpu_activate)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); > void (*fpu_deactivate)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); > > void (*tlb_flush)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c > index ddf7427..1f49c86 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c > @@ -4349,7 +4349,6 @@ static struct kvm_x86_ops svm_x86_ops = { > .cache_reg = svm_cache_reg, > .get_rflags = svm_get_rflags, > .set_rflags = svm_set_rflags, > - .fpu_activate = svm_fpu_activate, > .fpu_deactivate = svm_fpu_deactivate, > > .tlb_flush = svm_flush_tlb, > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c > index 71cbee5..2963303 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c > @@ -8896,7 +8896,6 @@ static struct kvm_x86_ops vmx_x86_ops = { > .cache_reg = vmx_cache_reg, > .get_rflags = vmx_get_rflags, > .set_rflags = vmx_set_rflags, > - .fpu_activate = vmx_fpu_activate, > .fpu_deactivate = vmx_fpu_deactivate, > > .tlb_flush = vmx_flush_tlb, > Avi/Gleb, do you remember any particular reason for this? Paolo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 08/18/2014 01:20 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 18/08/2014 11:50, Wanpeng Li ha scritto: >> fpu_activate hook is introduced by commit 6b52d186 (KVM: Activate fpu on >> clts), however, there is no user currently, this patch drop it. >> >> Reviewed-by: Yang Zhang <yang.z.zhang@intel.com> >> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com> >> --- >> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 - >> arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 1 - >> arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 1 - >> 3 files changed, 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h >> index 5724601..b68f3e5 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h >> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h >> @@ -710,7 +710,6 @@ struct kvm_x86_ops { >> void (*cache_reg)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, enum kvm_reg reg); >> unsigned long (*get_rflags)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); >> void (*set_rflags)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long rflags); >> - void (*fpu_activate)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); >> void (*fpu_deactivate)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); >> >> void (*tlb_flush)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c >> index ddf7427..1f49c86 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c >> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c >> @@ -4349,7 +4349,6 @@ static struct kvm_x86_ops svm_x86_ops = { >> .cache_reg = svm_cache_reg, >> .get_rflags = svm_get_rflags, >> .set_rflags = svm_set_rflags, >> - .fpu_activate = svm_fpu_activate, >> .fpu_deactivate = svm_fpu_deactivate, >> >> .tlb_flush = svm_flush_tlb, >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c >> index 71cbee5..2963303 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c >> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c >> @@ -8896,7 +8896,6 @@ static struct kvm_x86_ops vmx_x86_ops = { >> .cache_reg = vmx_cache_reg, >> .get_rflags = vmx_get_rflags, >> .set_rflags = vmx_set_rflags, >> - .fpu_activate = vmx_fpu_activate, >> .fpu_deactivate = vmx_fpu_deactivate, >> >> .tlb_flush = vmx_flush_tlb, >> > Avi/Gleb, do you remember any particular reason for this? > IIRC (vaguely) if we expect the fpu to be used in the near future, we activate it eagerly so that we don't fault when it is used. Prevents the sequence: guest user: use fpu #NM host: reflect #NM to guest guest kernel: CLTS guest kernel: switch fpu state #NM host: switch fpu guest kernel: switch fpu state (restarted) guest user: use fpu (restarted) Why was the user removed? Full-time eager fpu? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Il 18/08/2014 12:26, Avi Kivity ha scritto: > > On 08/18/2014 01:20 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> Il 18/08/2014 11:50, Wanpeng Li ha scritto: >>> fpu_activate hook is introduced by commit 6b52d186 (KVM: Activate fpu on >>> clts), however, there is no user currently, this patch drop it. >>> >>> Reviewed-by: Yang Zhang <yang.z.zhang@intel.com> >>> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com> >>> --- >>> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 - >>> arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 1 - >>> arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 1 - >>> 3 files changed, 3 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h >>> b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h >>> index 5724601..b68f3e5 100644 >>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h >>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h >>> @@ -710,7 +710,6 @@ struct kvm_x86_ops { >>> void (*cache_reg)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, enum kvm_reg reg); >>> unsigned long (*get_rflags)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); >>> void (*set_rflags)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long rflags); >>> - void (*fpu_activate)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); >>> void (*fpu_deactivate)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); >>> void (*tlb_flush)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); >>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c >>> index ddf7427..1f49c86 100644 >>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c >>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c >>> @@ -4349,7 +4349,6 @@ static struct kvm_x86_ops svm_x86_ops = { >>> .cache_reg = svm_cache_reg, >>> .get_rflags = svm_get_rflags, >>> .set_rflags = svm_set_rflags, >>> - .fpu_activate = svm_fpu_activate, >>> .fpu_deactivate = svm_fpu_deactivate, >>> .tlb_flush = svm_flush_tlb, >>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c >>> index 71cbee5..2963303 100644 >>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c >>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c >>> @@ -8896,7 +8896,6 @@ static struct kvm_x86_ops vmx_x86_ops = { >>> .cache_reg = vmx_cache_reg, >>> .get_rflags = vmx_get_rflags, >>> .set_rflags = vmx_set_rflags, >>> - .fpu_activate = vmx_fpu_activate, >>> .fpu_deactivate = vmx_fpu_deactivate, >>> .tlb_flush = vmx_flush_tlb, >>> >> Avi/Gleb, do you remember any particular reason for this? >> > > IIRC (vaguely) if we expect the fpu to be used in the near future, we > activate it eagerly so that we don't fault when it is used. > > Prevents the sequence: > > guest user: use fpu > #NM > host: reflect #NM to guest > guest kernel: CLTS > guest kernel: switch fpu state > #NM > host: switch fpu > guest kernel: switch fpu state (restarted) > guest user: use fpu (restarted) > > Why was the user removed? Full-time eager fpu? No, I mean any reason to keep the hooks. In the meanwhile I found it myself: commit 2d04a05bd7e93c13f13a82ac40de4065a99d069b Author: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> Date: Wed Apr 20 15:32:49 2011 +0300 KVM: x86 emulator: emulate CLTS internally Avoid using ctxt->vcpu; we can do everything with ->get_cr() and ->set_cr(). A side effect is that we no longer activate the fpu on emulated CLTS; but that should be very rare. Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> vmx_fpu_activate and svm_fpu_activate are still called on #NM and CLTS, but never from common code after the above patch. Activation on CLTS is currently VMX only; I guess on AMD we could check the decode assists' CR_VALID bit and instruction length to detect CLTS. Paolo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Il 18/08/2014 11:50, Wanpeng Li ha scritto: > fpu_activate hook is introduced by commit 6b52d186 (KVM: Activate fpu on > clts), however, there is no user currently, this patch drop it. > > Reviewed-by: Yang Zhang <yang.z.zhang@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com> > --- > arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 - > arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 1 - > arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 1 - > 3 files changed, 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h > index 5724601..b68f3e5 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h > @@ -710,7 +710,6 @@ struct kvm_x86_ops { > void (*cache_reg)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, enum kvm_reg reg); > unsigned long (*get_rflags)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); > void (*set_rflags)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long rflags); > - void (*fpu_activate)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); > void (*fpu_deactivate)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); > > void (*tlb_flush)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c > index ddf7427..1f49c86 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c > @@ -4349,7 +4349,6 @@ static struct kvm_x86_ops svm_x86_ops = { > .cache_reg = svm_cache_reg, > .get_rflags = svm_get_rflags, > .set_rflags = svm_set_rflags, > - .fpu_activate = svm_fpu_activate, > .fpu_deactivate = svm_fpu_deactivate, > > .tlb_flush = svm_flush_tlb, > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c > index 71cbee5..2963303 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c > @@ -8896,7 +8896,6 @@ static struct kvm_x86_ops vmx_x86_ops = { > .cache_reg = vmx_cache_reg, > .get_rflags = vmx_get_rflags, > .set_rflags = vmx_set_rflags, > - .fpu_activate = vmx_fpu_activate, > .fpu_deactivate = vmx_fpu_deactivate, > > .tlb_flush = vmx_flush_tlb, > Applying shortly to kvm/queue, thanks. Paolo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 08/18/2014 01:51 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 18/08/2014 12:26, Avi Kivity ha scritto: >> On 08/18/2014 01:20 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> Il 18/08/2014 11:50, Wanpeng Li ha scritto: >>>> fpu_activate hook is introduced by commit 6b52d186 (KVM: Activate fpu on >>>> clts), however, there is no user currently, this patch drop it. >>>> >>>> Reviewed-by: Yang Zhang <yang.z.zhang@intel.com> >>>> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com> >>>> --- >>>> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 - >>>> arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 1 - >>>> arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 1 - >>>> 3 files changed, 3 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h >>>> b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h >>>> index 5724601..b68f3e5 100644 >>>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h >>>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h >>>> @@ -710,7 +710,6 @@ struct kvm_x86_ops { >>>> void (*cache_reg)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, enum kvm_reg reg); >>>> unsigned long (*get_rflags)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); >>>> void (*set_rflags)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long rflags); >>>> - void (*fpu_activate)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); >>>> void (*fpu_deactivate)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); >>>> void (*tlb_flush)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); >>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c >>>> index ddf7427..1f49c86 100644 >>>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c >>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c >>>> @@ -4349,7 +4349,6 @@ static struct kvm_x86_ops svm_x86_ops = { >>>> .cache_reg = svm_cache_reg, >>>> .get_rflags = svm_get_rflags, >>>> .set_rflags = svm_set_rflags, >>>> - .fpu_activate = svm_fpu_activate, >>>> .fpu_deactivate = svm_fpu_deactivate, >>>> .tlb_flush = svm_flush_tlb, >>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c >>>> index 71cbee5..2963303 100644 >>>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c >>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c >>>> @@ -8896,7 +8896,6 @@ static struct kvm_x86_ops vmx_x86_ops = { >>>> .cache_reg = vmx_cache_reg, >>>> .get_rflags = vmx_get_rflags, >>>> .set_rflags = vmx_set_rflags, >>>> - .fpu_activate = vmx_fpu_activate, >>>> .fpu_deactivate = vmx_fpu_deactivate, >>>> .tlb_flush = vmx_flush_tlb, >>>> >>> Avi/Gleb, do you remember any particular reason for this? >>> >> IIRC (vaguely) if we expect the fpu to be used in the near future, we >> activate it eagerly so that we don't fault when it is used. >> >> Prevents the sequence: >> >> guest user: use fpu >> #NM >> host: reflect #NM to guest >> guest kernel: CLTS >> guest kernel: switch fpu state >> #NM >> host: switch fpu >> guest kernel: switch fpu state (restarted) >> guest user: use fpu (restarted) >> >> Why was the user removed? Full-time eager fpu? > No, I mean any reason to keep the hooks. If there are no callers, I can't think of any. > In the meanwhile I found it myself: > > commit 2d04a05bd7e93c13f13a82ac40de4065a99d069b > Author: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> > Date: Wed Apr 20 15:32:49 2011 +0300 > > KVM: x86 emulator: emulate CLTS internally > > Avoid using ctxt->vcpu; we can do everything with ->get_cr() and ->set_cr(). > > A side effect is that we no longer activate the fpu on emulated CLTS; but that > should be very rare. > > Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> > > vmx_fpu_activate and svm_fpu_activate are still called on #NM and CLTS, but > never from common code after the above patch. > > Activation on CLTS is currently VMX only; I guess on AMD we could check the > decode assists' CR_VALID bit and instruction length to detect CLTS. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h index 5724601..b68f3e5 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h @@ -710,7 +710,6 @@ struct kvm_x86_ops { void (*cache_reg)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, enum kvm_reg reg); unsigned long (*get_rflags)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); void (*set_rflags)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long rflags); - void (*fpu_activate)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); void (*fpu_deactivate)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); void (*tlb_flush)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c index ddf7427..1f49c86 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c @@ -4349,7 +4349,6 @@ static struct kvm_x86_ops svm_x86_ops = { .cache_reg = svm_cache_reg, .get_rflags = svm_get_rflags, .set_rflags = svm_set_rflags, - .fpu_activate = svm_fpu_activate, .fpu_deactivate = svm_fpu_deactivate, .tlb_flush = svm_flush_tlb, diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c index 71cbee5..2963303 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c @@ -8896,7 +8896,6 @@ static struct kvm_x86_ops vmx_x86_ops = { .cache_reg = vmx_cache_reg, .get_rflags = vmx_get_rflags, .set_rflags = vmx_set_rflags, - .fpu_activate = vmx_fpu_activate, .fpu_deactivate = vmx_fpu_deactivate, .tlb_flush = vmx_flush_tlb,