| Message ID | 1409486979-26869-1-git-send-email-broonie@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On 31 August 2014 17:39, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote: > Many boards share the cpufreq-cpu0 driver meaning that if we enable it in > multi_v7_defconfig we can get a reasonable amount of functional utility for > systems and test coverage for a fairly small increase in kernel size. > > Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> > --- > arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig > index 05c0e7c789df..9799e9d2e222 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig > +++ b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig > @@ -414,3 +414,5 @@ CONFIG_DEBUG_FS=y > CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ=y > CONFIG_LOCKUP_DETECTOR=y > CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_TEGRA_AES=y > +CONFIG_CPU_FREQ=y > +CONFIG_GENERIC_CPUFREQ_CPU0=y Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
On Sunday 31 August 2014 13:09:39 Mark Brown wrote: > Many boards share the cpufreq-cpu0 driver meaning that if we enable it in > multi_v7_defconfig we can get a reasonable amount of functional utility for > systems and test coverage for a fairly small increase in kernel size. > > Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> > Do we need this in 3.17, or should it go in during the merge window? Arnd
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 11:41:01AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Sunday 31 August 2014 13:09:39 Mark Brown wrote: > > Many boards share the cpufreq-cpu0 driver meaning that if we enable it in > > multi_v7_defconfig we can get a reasonable amount of functional utility for > > systems and test coverage for a fairly small increase in kernel size. > > Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> > Do we need this in 3.17, or should it go in during the merge window? It's not a bug fix; it'd be nice to have it there from the point of view of some testing I'm doing on the defconfig and it should be safe but it's not a regression or anything.
On Monday 01 September 2014, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 31 August 2014 17:39, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote: > > Many boards share the cpufreq-cpu0 driver meaning that if we enable it in > > multi_v7_defconfig we can get a reasonable amount of functional utility for > > systems and test coverage for a fairly small increase in kernel size. > > > > Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> > > Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Applied to next/defconfig, thanks! Arnd
diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig index 05c0e7c789df..9799e9d2e222 100644 --- a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig +++ b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig @@ -414,3 +414,5 @@ CONFIG_DEBUG_FS=y CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ=y CONFIG_LOCKUP_DETECTOR=y CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_TEGRA_AES=y +CONFIG_CPU_FREQ=y +CONFIG_GENERIC_CPUFREQ_CPU0=y
Many boards share the cpufreq-cpu0 driver meaning that if we enable it in multi_v7_defconfig we can get a reasonable amount of functional utility for systems and test coverage for a fairly small increase in kernel size. Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> --- arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)