diff mbox

xfstests: remove check_scratch_fs in btrfs/012

Message ID 1409714759-9805-1-git-send-email-bo.li.liu@oracle.com (mailing list archive)
State Not Applicable
Headers show

Commit Message

Liu Bo Sept. 3, 2014, 3:25 a.m. UTC
From: Liu Bo <liub.liubo@gmail.com>

btrfs/012 is a case to verify btrfs-convert feature, it converts an ext4 to
btrfs firstly and do something, then rolls back to ext4.

So at last we have a ext4 on the scratch device, but setting _require_scratch
will force a btrfsck on a ext4 fs because $FSTYP here is btrfs, and it ends up
with a failure report of _check_btrfs_filesystem.

Now that we have deliberately check the final ext4 fs in btrfs/012, just do not
set _require_scratch in this case.

Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <liub.liubo@gmail.com>
---
 tests/btrfs/012 | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Eryu Guan Sept. 19, 2014, 6:37 a.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 11:25:59AM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
> From: Liu Bo <liub.liubo@gmail.com>
> 
> btrfs/012 is a case to verify btrfs-convert feature, it converts an ext4 to
> btrfs firstly and do something, then rolls back to ext4.
> 
> So at last we have a ext4 on the scratch device, but setting _require_scratch
> will force a btrfsck on a ext4 fs because $FSTYP here is btrfs, and it ends up
> with a failure report of _check_btrfs_filesystem.
> 
> Now that we have deliberately check the final ext4 fs in btrfs/012, just do not
> set _require_scratch in this case.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <liub.liubo@gmail.com>
> ---
>  tests/btrfs/012 | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/012 b/tests/btrfs/012
> index f7e5da5..12f6462 100755
> --- a/tests/btrfs/012
> +++ b/tests/btrfs/012
> @@ -52,7 +52,6 @@ _cleanup()
>  # Modify as appropriate.
>  _supported_fs btrfs
>  _supported_os Linux
> -_require_scratch

The test still requires a scratch device, so we cannot simply remove
this line. Now we can use _require_scratch_nocheck helper, and it
works fine based on my test.

Thanks,
Eryu

>  
>  BTRFS_CONVERT_PROG="`set_prog_path btrfs-convert`"
>  MKFS_EXT4_PROG="`set_prog_path mkfs.ext4`"
> -- 
> 1.8.1.4
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Josef Bacik Sept. 19, 2014, 3:02 p.m. UTC | #2
On 09/02/2014 11:25 PM, Liu Bo wrote:
> From: Liu Bo <liub.liubo@gmail.com>
>
> btrfs/012 is a case to verify btrfs-convert feature, it converts an ext4 to
> btrfs firstly and do something, then rolls back to ext4.
>
> So at last we have a ext4 on the scratch device, but setting _require_scratch
> will force a btrfsck on a ext4 fs because $FSTYP here is btrfs, and it ends up
> with a failure report of _check_btrfs_filesystem.
>
> Now that we have deliberately check the final ext4 fs in btrfs/012, just do not
> set _require_scratch in this case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <liub.liubo@gmail.com>

I sent a patch for this already, it's on the fs-tests list.  Thanks,

Josef

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/tests/btrfs/012 b/tests/btrfs/012
index f7e5da5..12f6462 100755
--- a/tests/btrfs/012
+++ b/tests/btrfs/012
@@ -52,7 +52,6 @@  _cleanup()
 # Modify as appropriate.
 _supported_fs btrfs
 _supported_os Linux
-_require_scratch
 
 BTRFS_CONVERT_PROG="`set_prog_path btrfs-convert`"
 MKFS_EXT4_PROG="`set_prog_path mkfs.ext4`"