| Message ID | 1414401792-7445-2-git-send-email-linux@rempel-privat.de (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
Hello. On 10/27/2014 12:23 PM, Oleksij Rempel wrote: > it is low cost (?) SoC targeted for market in China and India which > trying to compete with AT91SAM9G25. > Here is some info: > http://www.alphascale.com/index.asp?ics/615.html > One of products: > http://www.aliexpress.com/store/product/2014-hot-sales-FREE-SHIPPING-new-Purple-core-ARM9-development-board-ASM9260T-SDRAM-power-line/433637_1931495721.html > In some cases this SoC looks similar to iMX23/iMX28. But currently it makes no > sense to merge mach code of this devices. Especially because most differences > are already collected mach-mxs folder. > Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <linux@rempel-privat.de> [...] > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-asm9260/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-asm9260/Kconfig > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..33b9b28 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-asm9260/Kconfig > @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ > +config MACH_ASM9260 > + bool "Alphascale ASM9260" > + depends on ARCH_MULTI_V5 > + select CPU_ARM926T > + help > + Support for Alpascale ASM9260 based platform. s/Alpascale/Alphascale/? WBR, Sergei
Am 27.10.2014 um 14:18 schrieb Sergei Shtylyov: > Hello. > > On 10/27/2014 12:23 PM, Oleksij Rempel wrote: > >> it is low cost (?) SoC targeted for market in China and India which >> trying to compete with AT91SAM9G25. > >> Here is some info: >> http://www.alphascale.com/index.asp?ics/615.html > >> One of products: >> http://www.aliexpress.com/store/product/2014-hot-sales-FREE-SHIPPING-new-Purple-core-ARM9-development-board-ASM9260T-SDRAM-power-line/433637_1931495721.html >> > >> In some cases this SoC looks similar to iMX23/iMX28. But currently it >> makes no >> sense to merge mach code of this devices. Especially because most >> differences >> are already collected mach-mxs folder. > >> Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <linux@rempel-privat.de> > > [...] > >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-asm9260/Kconfig >> b/arch/arm/mach-asm9260/Kconfig >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000..33b9b28 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-asm9260/Kconfig >> @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ >> +config MACH_ASM9260 >> + bool "Alphascale ASM9260" >> + depends on ARCH_MULTI_V5 >> + select CPU_ARM926T >> + help >> + Support for Alpascale ASM9260 based platform. > > s/Alpascale/Alphascale/? > > WBR, Sergei thank you.
diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig index 5918d40..1b32023 100644 --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig @@ -849,6 +849,8 @@ config ARCH_VIRT # source "arch/arm/mach-mvebu/Kconfig" +source "arch/arm/mach-asm9260/Kconfig" + source "arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig" source "arch/arm/mach-axxia/Kconfig" diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-asm9260/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-asm9260/Kconfig new file mode 100644 index 0000000..33b9b28 --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/arm/mach-asm9260/Kconfig @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ +config MACH_ASM9260 + bool "Alphascale ASM9260" + depends on ARCH_MULTI_V5 + select CPU_ARM926T + help + Support for Alpascale ASM9260 based platform.
it is low cost (?) SoC targeted for market in China and India which trying to compete with AT91SAM9G25. Here is some info: http://www.alphascale.com/index.asp?ics/615.html One of products: http://www.aliexpress.com/store/product/2014-hot-sales-FREE-SHIPPING-new-Purple-core-ARM9-development-board-ASM9260T-SDRAM-power-line/433637_1931495721.html In some cases this SoC looks similar to iMX23/iMX28. But currently it makes no sense to merge mach code of this devices. Especially because most differences are already collected mach-mxs folder. Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <linux@rempel-privat.de> --- arch/arm/Kconfig | 2 ++ arch/arm/mach-asm9260/Kconfig | 6 ++++++ 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+) create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-asm9260/Kconfig