diff mbox

[v13,07/12] drm: bridge/dw_hdmi: add support for multi-byte register width access

Message ID 1417008759-32257-1-git-send-email-andy.yan@rock-chips.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Andy Yan Nov. 26, 2014, 1:32 p.m. UTC
On rockchip rk3288, only word(32-bit) accesses are
permitted for hdmi registers.  Byte width accesses (writeb,
readb) generate an imprecise external abort.

Signed-off-by: Andy Yan <andy.yan@rock-chips.com>

---

Changes in v13: None
Changes in v12: None
Changes in v11: None
Changes in v10: None
Changes in v9: None
Changes in v8: None
Changes in v7: None
Changes in v6:
- refactor register access without reg_shift

Changes in v5:
- refactor reg-io-width

Changes in v4: None
Changes in v3:
- split multi-register access to one indepent patch

 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/dw_hdmi.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Comments

Philipp Zabel Nov. 26, 2014, 4:34 p.m. UTC | #1
Am Mittwoch, den 26.11.2014, 21:32 +0800 schrieb Andy Yan:
> On rockchip rk3288, only word(32-bit) accesses are
> permitted for hdmi registers.  Byte width accesses (writeb,
> readb) generate an imprecise external abort.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Yan <andy.yan@rock-chips.com>
> 
> ---
> 
> Changes in v13: None
> Changes in v12: None
> Changes in v11: None
> Changes in v10: None
> Changes in v9: None
> Changes in v8: None
> Changes in v7: None
> Changes in v6:
> - refactor register access without reg_shift
> 
> Changes in v5:
> - refactor reg-io-width
> 
> Changes in v4: None
> Changes in v3:
> - split multi-register access to one indepent patch
> 
>  drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/dw_hdmi.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/dw_hdmi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/dw_hdmi.c
> index a53bf63..5e88c8d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/dw_hdmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/dw_hdmi.c
> @@ -100,6 +100,11 @@ struct hdmi_data_info {
>  	struct hdmi_vmode video_mode;
>  };
>  
> +union dw_reg_ptr {
> +	u32 __iomem *p32;
> +	u8 __iomem *p8;
> +};

I see no need to introduce this. Just explicitly multiply the offset in
dw_hdmi_writel.

>  struct dw_hdmi {
>  	struct drm_connector connector;
>  	struct drm_encoder *encoder;
> @@ -121,20 +126,43 @@ struct dw_hdmi {
>  
>  	struct regmap *regmap;
>  	struct i2c_adapter *ddc;
> -	void __iomem *regs;
> +	union dw_reg_ptr regs;

Keep this as void __iomem *

>  	unsigned int sample_rate;
>  	int ratio;
> +
> +	void (*write)(struct dw_hdmi *hdmi, u8 val, int offset);
> +	u8 (*read)(struct dw_hdmi *hdmi, int offset);
>  };
>  
> +static void dw_hdmi_writel(struct dw_hdmi *hdmi, u8 val, int offset)
> +{
> +	writel(val, hdmi->regs.p32 + offset);

hdmi->regs + 4 * offset

> +}
> +
> +static u8 dw_hdmi_readl(struct dw_hdmi *hdmi, int offset)
> +{
> +	return readl(hdmi->regs.p32 + offset);

same here

> +}
> +
> +static void dw_hdmi_writeb(struct dw_hdmi *hdmi, u8 val, int offset)
> +{
> +	writeb(val, hdmi->regs.p8 + offset);
> +}
> +
> +static u8 dw_hdmi_readb(struct dw_hdmi *hdmi, int offset)
> +{
> +	return readb(hdmi->regs.p8 + offset);
> +}
> +
>  static inline void hdmi_writeb(struct dw_hdmi *hdmi, u8 val, int offset)
>  {
> -	writeb(val, hdmi->regs + offset);
> +	hdmi->write(hdmi, val, offset);
>  }
>  
>  static inline u8 hdmi_readb(struct dw_hdmi *hdmi, int offset)
>  {
> -	return readb(hdmi->regs + offset);
> +	return hdmi->read(hdmi, offset);
>  }
>
>  static void hdmi_modb(struct dw_hdmi *hdmi, u8 data, u8 mask, unsigned reg)
> @@ -1508,6 +1536,7 @@ int dw_hdmi_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master,
>  	struct dw_hdmi *hdmi;
>  	struct resource *iores;
>  	int ret, irq;
> +	u32 val = 1;
>  
>  	hdmi = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*hdmi), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!hdmi)
> @@ -1520,6 +1549,22 @@ int dw_hdmi_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master,
>  	hdmi->ratio = 100;
>  	hdmi->encoder = encoder;
>  
> +	of_property_read_u32(np, "reg-io-width", &val);
> +
> +	switch (val) {
> +	case 4:
> +		hdmi->write = dw_hdmi_writel;
> +		hdmi->read = dw_hdmi_readl;
> +		break;
> +	case 1:
> +		hdmi->write = dw_hdmi_writeb;
> +		hdmi->read = dw_hdmi_readb;
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		dev_err(dev, "reg-io-width must be 1 or 4\n");
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
>  	ddc_node = of_parse_phandle(np, "ddc-i2c-bus", 0);
>  	if (ddc_node) {
>  		hdmi->ddc = of_find_i2c_adapter_by_node(ddc_node);
> @@ -1544,9 +1589,9 @@ int dw_hdmi_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master,
>  		return ret;
>  
>  	iores = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> -	hdmi->regs = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, iores);
> -	if (IS_ERR(hdmi->regs))
> -		return PTR_ERR(hdmi->regs);
> +	hdmi->regs.p32 = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, iores);
> +	if (IS_ERR(hdmi->regs.p32))
> +		return PTR_ERR(hdmi->regs.p32);
>  
>  	/* Product and revision IDs */
>  	dev_info(dev,

regards
Philipp
Andy Yan Nov. 28, 2014, 9:43 a.m. UTC | #2
Hi Zabel:
On 2014?11?27? 00:34, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 26.11.2014, 21:32 +0800 schrieb Andy Yan:
>> On rockchip rk3288, only word(32-bit) accesses are
>> permitted for hdmi registers.  Byte width accesses (writeb,
>> readb) generate an imprecise external abort.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andy Yan <andy.yan@rock-chips.com>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes in v13: None
>> Changes in v12: None
>> Changes in v11: None
>> Changes in v10: None
>> Changes in v9: None
>> Changes in v8: None
>> Changes in v7: None
>> Changes in v6:
>> - refactor register access without reg_shift
>>
>> Changes in v5:
>> - refactor reg-io-width
>>
>> Changes in v4: None
>> Changes in v3:
>> - split multi-register access to one indepent patch
>>
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/dw_hdmi.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>   1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/dw_hdmi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/dw_hdmi.c
>> index a53bf63..5e88c8d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/dw_hdmi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/dw_hdmi.c
>> @@ -100,6 +100,11 @@ struct hdmi_data_info {
>>   	struct hdmi_vmode video_mode;
>>   };
>>   
>> +union dw_reg_ptr {
>> +	u32 __iomem *p32;
>> +	u8 __iomem *p8;
>> +};
> I see no need to introduce this. Just explicitly multiply the offset in
> dw_hdmi_writel.
>
     Is there any disadvantage to do like this?
     The compiler can help us do the explicitly multiply by this way.
>>   struct dw_hdmi {
>>   	struct drm_connector connector;
>>   	struct drm_encoder *encoder;
>> @@ -121,20 +126,43 @@ struct dw_hdmi {
>>   
>>   	struct regmap *regmap;
>>   	struct i2c_adapter *ddc;
>> -	void __iomem *regs;
>> +	union dw_reg_ptr regs;
> Keep this as void __iomem *
>
>>   	unsigned int sample_rate;
>>   	int ratio;
>> +
>> +	void (*write)(struct dw_hdmi *hdmi, u8 val, int offset);
>> +	u8 (*read)(struct dw_hdmi *hdmi, int offset);
>>   };
>>   
>> +static void dw_hdmi_writel(struct dw_hdmi *hdmi, u8 val, int offset)
>> +{
>> +	writel(val, hdmi->regs.p32 + offset);
> hdmi->regs + 4 * offset
>
>> +}
>> +
>> +static u8 dw_hdmi_readl(struct dw_hdmi *hdmi, int offset)
>> +{
>> +	return readl(hdmi->regs.p32 + offset);
> same here
>
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void dw_hdmi_writeb(struct dw_hdmi *hdmi, u8 val, int offset)
>> +{
>> +	writeb(val, hdmi->regs.p8 + offset);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static u8 dw_hdmi_readb(struct dw_hdmi *hdmi, int offset)
>> +{
>> +	return readb(hdmi->regs.p8 + offset);
>> +}
>> +
>>   static inline void hdmi_writeb(struct dw_hdmi *hdmi, u8 val, int offset)
>>   {
>> -	writeb(val, hdmi->regs + offset);
>> +	hdmi->write(hdmi, val, offset);
>>   }
>>   
>>   static inline u8 hdmi_readb(struct dw_hdmi *hdmi, int offset)
>>   {
>> -	return readb(hdmi->regs + offset);
>> +	return hdmi->read(hdmi, offset);
>>   }
>>
>>   static void hdmi_modb(struct dw_hdmi *hdmi, u8 data, u8 mask, unsigned reg)
>> @@ -1508,6 +1536,7 @@ int dw_hdmi_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master,
>>   	struct dw_hdmi *hdmi;
>>   	struct resource *iores;
>>   	int ret, irq;
>> +	u32 val = 1;
>>   
>>   	hdmi = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*hdmi), GFP_KERNEL);
>>   	if (!hdmi)
>> @@ -1520,6 +1549,22 @@ int dw_hdmi_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master,
>>   	hdmi->ratio = 100;
>>   	hdmi->encoder = encoder;
>>   
>> +	of_property_read_u32(np, "reg-io-width", &val);
>> +
>> +	switch (val) {
>> +	case 4:
>> +		hdmi->write = dw_hdmi_writel;
>> +		hdmi->read = dw_hdmi_readl;
>> +		break;
>> +	case 1:
>> +		hdmi->write = dw_hdmi_writeb;
>> +		hdmi->read = dw_hdmi_readb;
>> +		break;
>> +	default:
>> +		dev_err(dev, "reg-io-width must be 1 or 4\n");
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +	}
>> +
>>   	ddc_node = of_parse_phandle(np, "ddc-i2c-bus", 0);
>>   	if (ddc_node) {
>>   		hdmi->ddc = of_find_i2c_adapter_by_node(ddc_node);
>> @@ -1544,9 +1589,9 @@ int dw_hdmi_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master,
>>   		return ret;
>>   
>>   	iores = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>> -	hdmi->regs = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, iores);
>> -	if (IS_ERR(hdmi->regs))
>> -		return PTR_ERR(hdmi->regs);
>> +	hdmi->regs.p32 = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, iores);
>> +	if (IS_ERR(hdmi->regs.p32))
>> +		return PTR_ERR(hdmi->regs.p32);
>>   
>>   	/* Product and revision IDs */
>>   	dev_info(dev,
> regards
> Philipp
>
>
>
>
Philipp Zabel Dec. 1, 2014, 12:04 p.m. UTC | #3
Am Freitag, den 28.11.2014, 17:43 +0800 schrieb Andy Yan:
> Hi Zabel:
> On 2014?11?27? 00:34, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, den 26.11.2014, 21:32 +0800 schrieb Andy Yan:
> >> On rockchip rk3288, only word(32-bit) accesses are
> >> permitted for hdmi registers.  Byte width accesses (writeb,
> >> readb) generate an imprecise external abort.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Andy Yan <andy.yan@rock-chips.com>
> >>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> Changes in v13: None
> >> Changes in v12: None
> >> Changes in v11: None
> >> Changes in v10: None
> >> Changes in v9: None
> >> Changes in v8: None
> >> Changes in v7: None
> >> Changes in v6:
> >> - refactor register access without reg_shift
> >>
> >> Changes in v5:
> >> - refactor reg-io-width
> >>
> >> Changes in v4: None
> >> Changes in v3:
> >> - split multi-register access to one indepent patch
> >>
> >>   drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/dw_hdmi.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> >>   1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/dw_hdmi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/dw_hdmi.c
> >> index a53bf63..5e88c8d 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/dw_hdmi.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/dw_hdmi.c
> >> @@ -100,6 +100,11 @@ struct hdmi_data_info {
> >>   	struct hdmi_vmode video_mode;
> >>   };
> >>   
> >> +union dw_reg_ptr {
> >> +	u32 __iomem *p32;
> >> +	u8 __iomem *p8;
> >> +};
> > I see no need to introduce this. Just explicitly multiply the offset in
> > dw_hdmi_writel.
> >
>      Is there any disadvantage to do like this?
>      The compiler can help us do the explicitly multiply by this way.

Four additional lines, a new defined type, a few more changes to struct
dw_hdmi and dw_hdmi_bind necessary.

Technically I see no problem to let the compiler do the multiplication,
my issue is that it ever so slightly obfuscates the code. Instead of
just writing "* 4" in two functions, we get a new union that you need to
know about when looking at struct dw_hdmi and dw_hdmi_bind, regs.p8 is
used but never assigned directly, it's just a tiny bit of additional
effort needed to understand the code. But when the cost to avoid that is
so small...

regards
Philipp
Andy Yan Dec. 1, 2014, 12:46 p.m. UTC | #4
Hi Philipp:
On 2014?12?01? 20:04, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 28.11.2014, 17:43 +0800 schrieb Andy Yan:
>> Hi Zabel:
>> On 2014?11?27? 00:34, Philipp Zabel wrote:
>>> Am Mittwoch, den 26.11.2014, 21:32 +0800 schrieb Andy Yan:
>>>> On rockchip rk3288, only word(32-bit) accesses are
>>>> permitted for hdmi registers.  Byte width accesses (writeb,
>>>> readb) generate an imprecise external abort.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Andy Yan <andy.yan@rock-chips.com>
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> Changes in v13: None
>>>> Changes in v12: None
>>>> Changes in v11: None
>>>> Changes in v10: None
>>>> Changes in v9: None
>>>> Changes in v8: None
>>>> Changes in v7: None
>>>> Changes in v6:
>>>> - refactor register access without reg_shift
>>>>
>>>> Changes in v5:
>>>> - refactor reg-io-width
>>>>
>>>> Changes in v4: None
>>>> Changes in v3:
>>>> - split multi-register access to one indepent patch
>>>>
>>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/dw_hdmi.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>>>    1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/dw_hdmi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/dw_hdmi.c
>>>> index a53bf63..5e88c8d 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/dw_hdmi.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/dw_hdmi.c
>>>> @@ -100,6 +100,11 @@ struct hdmi_data_info {
>>>>    	struct hdmi_vmode video_mode;
>>>>    };
>>>>    
>>>> +union dw_reg_ptr {
>>>> +	u32 __iomem *p32;
>>>> +	u8 __iomem *p8;
>>>> +};
>>> I see no need to introduce this. Just explicitly multiply the offset in
>>> dw_hdmi_writel.
>>>
>>       Is there any disadvantage to do like this?
>>       The compiler can help us do the explicitly multiply by this way.
> Four additional lines, a new defined type, a few more changes to struct
> dw_hdmi and dw_hdmi_bind necessary.
>
> Technically I see no problem to let the compiler do the multiplication,
> my issue is that it ever so slightly obfuscates the code. Instead of
> just writing "* 4" in two functions, we get a new union that you need to
> know about when looking at struct dw_hdmi and dw_hdmi_bind, regs.p8 is
> used but never assigned directly, it's just a tiny bit of additional
> effort needed to understand the code. But when the cost to avoid that is
> so small...
>
> regards
> Philipp
>

   What you said is right, I will change it in PATCH V15
    thanks .
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-rockchip mailing list
> Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/dw_hdmi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/dw_hdmi.c
index a53bf63..5e88c8d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/dw_hdmi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/dw_hdmi.c
@@ -100,6 +100,11 @@  struct hdmi_data_info {
 	struct hdmi_vmode video_mode;
 };
 
+union dw_reg_ptr {
+	u32 __iomem *p32;
+	u8 __iomem *p8;
+};
+
 struct dw_hdmi {
 	struct drm_connector connector;
 	struct drm_encoder *encoder;
@@ -121,20 +126,43 @@  struct dw_hdmi {
 
 	struct regmap *regmap;
 	struct i2c_adapter *ddc;
-	void __iomem *regs;
+	union dw_reg_ptr regs;
 
 	unsigned int sample_rate;
 	int ratio;
+
+	void (*write)(struct dw_hdmi *hdmi, u8 val, int offset);
+	u8 (*read)(struct dw_hdmi *hdmi, int offset);
 };
 
+static void dw_hdmi_writel(struct dw_hdmi *hdmi, u8 val, int offset)
+{
+	writel(val, hdmi->regs.p32 + offset);
+}
+
+static u8 dw_hdmi_readl(struct dw_hdmi *hdmi, int offset)
+{
+	return readl(hdmi->regs.p32 + offset);
+}
+
+static void dw_hdmi_writeb(struct dw_hdmi *hdmi, u8 val, int offset)
+{
+	writeb(val, hdmi->regs.p8 + offset);
+}
+
+static u8 dw_hdmi_readb(struct dw_hdmi *hdmi, int offset)
+{
+	return readb(hdmi->regs.p8 + offset);
+}
+
 static inline void hdmi_writeb(struct dw_hdmi *hdmi, u8 val, int offset)
 {
-	writeb(val, hdmi->regs + offset);
+	hdmi->write(hdmi, val, offset);
 }
 
 static inline u8 hdmi_readb(struct dw_hdmi *hdmi, int offset)
 {
-	return readb(hdmi->regs + offset);
+	return hdmi->read(hdmi, offset);
 }
 
 static void hdmi_modb(struct dw_hdmi *hdmi, u8 data, u8 mask, unsigned reg)
@@ -1508,6 +1536,7 @@  int dw_hdmi_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master,
 	struct dw_hdmi *hdmi;
 	struct resource *iores;
 	int ret, irq;
+	u32 val = 1;
 
 	hdmi = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*hdmi), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!hdmi)
@@ -1520,6 +1549,22 @@  int dw_hdmi_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master,
 	hdmi->ratio = 100;
 	hdmi->encoder = encoder;
 
+	of_property_read_u32(np, "reg-io-width", &val);
+
+	switch (val) {
+	case 4:
+		hdmi->write = dw_hdmi_writel;
+		hdmi->read = dw_hdmi_readl;
+		break;
+	case 1:
+		hdmi->write = dw_hdmi_writeb;
+		hdmi->read = dw_hdmi_readb;
+		break;
+	default:
+		dev_err(dev, "reg-io-width must be 1 or 4\n");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
 	ddc_node = of_parse_phandle(np, "ddc-i2c-bus", 0);
 	if (ddc_node) {
 		hdmi->ddc = of_find_i2c_adapter_by_node(ddc_node);
@@ -1544,9 +1589,9 @@  int dw_hdmi_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master,
 		return ret;
 
 	iores = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
-	hdmi->regs = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, iores);
-	if (IS_ERR(hdmi->regs))
-		return PTR_ERR(hdmi->regs);
+	hdmi->regs.p32 = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, iores);
+	if (IS_ERR(hdmi->regs.p32))
+		return PTR_ERR(hdmi->regs.p32);
 
 	/* Product and revision IDs */
 	dev_info(dev,