diff mbox

[RFC,2/5] s390: add pci_iomap_range

Message ID 1418679168-1011-3-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com (mailing list archive)
State Not Applicable
Delegated to: Geert Uytterhoeven
Headers show

Commit Message

Michael S. Tsirkin Dec. 15, 2014, 9:33 p.m. UTC
From: Michael S Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

Virtio drivers should map the part of the range they need, not
necessarily all of it.
To this end, support mapping ranges within BAR on s390.
Since multiple ranges can now be mapped within a BAR, we keep track of
the number of mappings created, and only clear out the mapping for a BAR
when this number reaches 0.

Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
---
 arch/s390/include/asm/pci_io.h |  1 +
 arch/s390/pci/pci.c            | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

Comments

Sebastian Ott Dec. 19, 2014, 2:13 p.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> From: Michael S Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> 
> Virtio drivers should map the part of the range they need, not
> necessarily all of it.
> To this end, support mapping ranges within BAR on s390.
> Since multiple ranges can now be mapped within a BAR, we keep track of
> the number of mappings created, and only clear out the mapping for a BAR
> when this number reaches 0.
> 

I can't say much about the users of this interface but in principle I'm
OK with such a change.

> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> ---
>  arch/s390/include/asm/pci_io.h |  1 +
>  arch/s390/pci/pci.c            | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/pci_io.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/pci_io.h
> index d194d54..25228b3 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/pci_io.h
> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/pci_io.h
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
>  struct zpci_iomap_entry {
>  	u32 fh;
>  	u8 bar;
> +	u16 count;
>  };
> 
>  extern struct zpci_iomap_entry *zpci_iomap_start;
> diff --git a/arch/s390/pci/pci.c b/arch/s390/pci/pci.c
> index 2fa7b14..51cb653 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/pci/pci.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/pci/pci.c
> @@ -259,7 +259,10 @@ void __iowrite64_copy(void __iomem *to, const void *from, size_t count)
>  }
> 
>  /* Create a virtual mapping cookie for a PCI BAR */
> -void __iomem *pci_iomap(struct pci_dev *pdev, int bar, unsigned long max)
> +void __iomem *pci_iomap_range(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> +			      int bar,
> +			      unsigned long offset,
> +			      unsigned long max)
>  {
>  	struct zpci_dev *zdev =	get_zdev(pdev);
>  	u64 addr;
> @@ -270,14 +273,27 @@ void __iomem *pci_iomap(struct pci_dev *pdev, int bar, unsigned long max)
> 
>  	idx = zdev->bars[bar].map_idx;
>  	spin_lock(&zpci_iomap_lock);
> -	zpci_iomap_start[idx].fh = zdev->fh;
> -	zpci_iomap_start[idx].bar = bar;
> +	if (zpci_iomap_start[idx].count++) {
> +		BUG_ON(zpci_iomap_start[idx].fh != zdev->fh ||
> +		       zpci_iomap_start[idx].bar != bar);
> +	} else {
> +		zpci_iomap_start[idx].fh = zdev->fh;
> +		zpci_iomap_start[idx].bar = bar;
> +	}
> +	/* Detect overrun */
> +	BUG_ON(!zpci_iomap_start[idx].count);
>  	spin_unlock(&zpci_iomap_lock);
> 
>  	addr = ZPCI_IOMAP_ADDR_BASE | ((u64) idx << 48);
> -	return (void __iomem *) addr;
> +	return (void __iomem *) addr + offset;
>  }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_iomap);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_iomap_range);
> +
> +void __iomem *pci_iomap(struct pci_dev *dev, int bar, unsigned long maxlen)
> +{
> +	return pci_iomap_range(dev, bar, 0, maxlen);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_iomap);

This was EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL. I guess, for this patch, it should stay that
way. ...Hm, everyone else has this stuff as EXPORT_SYMBOL looks like we
should use that too.

Regards,
Sebastian

> 
>  void pci_iounmap(struct pci_dev *pdev, void __iomem *addr)
>  {
> @@ -285,8 +301,12 @@ void pci_iounmap(struct pci_dev *pdev, void __iomem *addr)
> 
>  	idx = (((__force u64) addr) & ~ZPCI_IOMAP_ADDR_BASE) >> 48;
>  	spin_lock(&zpci_iomap_lock);
> -	zpci_iomap_start[idx].fh = 0;
> -	zpci_iomap_start[idx].bar = 0;
> +	/* Detect underrun */
> +	BUG_ON(!zpci_iomap_start[idx].count);
> +	if (!--zpci_iomap_start[idx].count) {
> +		zpci_iomap_start[idx].fh = 0;
> +		zpci_iomap_start[idx].bar = 0;
> +	}
>  	spin_unlock(&zpci_iomap_lock);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_iounmap);
> -- 
> MST
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sh" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Michael S. Tsirkin Dec. 19, 2014, 2:28 p.m. UTC | #2
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 03:13:37PM +0100, Sebastian Ott wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Dec 2014, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > From: Michael S Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> > 
> > Virtio drivers should map the part of the range they need, not
> > necessarily all of it.
> > To this end, support mapping ranges within BAR on s390.
> > Since multiple ranges can now be mapped within a BAR, we keep track of
> > the number of mappings created, and only clear out the mapping for a BAR
> > when this number reaches 0.
> > 
> 
> I can't say much about the users of this interface but in principle I'm
> OK with such a change.

I don't have an s390 system with pci for testing - could you help me out
by testing this and confirming it doesn't break things?

> > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/s390/include/asm/pci_io.h |  1 +
> >  arch/s390/pci/pci.c            | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> >  2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/pci_io.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/pci_io.h
> > index d194d54..25228b3 100644
> > --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/pci_io.h
> > +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/pci_io.h
> > @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
> >  struct zpci_iomap_entry {
> >  	u32 fh;
> >  	u8 bar;
> > +	u16 count;
> >  };
> > 
> >  extern struct zpci_iomap_entry *zpci_iomap_start;
> > diff --git a/arch/s390/pci/pci.c b/arch/s390/pci/pci.c
> > index 2fa7b14..51cb653 100644
> > --- a/arch/s390/pci/pci.c
> > +++ b/arch/s390/pci/pci.c
> > @@ -259,7 +259,10 @@ void __iowrite64_copy(void __iomem *to, const void *from, size_t count)
> >  }
> > 
> >  /* Create a virtual mapping cookie for a PCI BAR */
> > -void __iomem *pci_iomap(struct pci_dev *pdev, int bar, unsigned long max)
> > +void __iomem *pci_iomap_range(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> > +			      int bar,
> > +			      unsigned long offset,
> > +			      unsigned long max)
> >  {
> >  	struct zpci_dev *zdev =	get_zdev(pdev);
> >  	u64 addr;
> > @@ -270,14 +273,27 @@ void __iomem *pci_iomap(struct pci_dev *pdev, int bar, unsigned long max)
> > 
> >  	idx = zdev->bars[bar].map_idx;
> >  	spin_lock(&zpci_iomap_lock);
> > -	zpci_iomap_start[idx].fh = zdev->fh;
> > -	zpci_iomap_start[idx].bar = bar;
> > +	if (zpci_iomap_start[idx].count++) {
> > +		BUG_ON(zpci_iomap_start[idx].fh != zdev->fh ||
> > +		       zpci_iomap_start[idx].bar != bar);
> > +	} else {
> > +		zpci_iomap_start[idx].fh = zdev->fh;
> > +		zpci_iomap_start[idx].bar = bar;
> > +	}
> > +	/* Detect overrun */
> > +	BUG_ON(!zpci_iomap_start[idx].count);
> >  	spin_unlock(&zpci_iomap_lock);
> > 
> >  	addr = ZPCI_IOMAP_ADDR_BASE | ((u64) idx << 48);
> > -	return (void __iomem *) addr;
> > +	return (void __iomem *) addr + offset;
> >  }
> > -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_iomap);
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_iomap_range);
> > +
> > +void __iomem *pci_iomap(struct pci_dev *dev, int bar, unsigned long maxlen)
> > +{
> > +	return pci_iomap_range(dev, bar, 0, maxlen);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_iomap);
> 
> This was EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL. I guess, for this patch, it should stay that
> way. ...Hm, everyone else has this stuff as EXPORT_SYMBOL looks like we
> should use that too.
> 
> Regards,
> Sebastian

OK, so you want two patches: one with new functionality,
one switching to EXPORT_SYMBOL?


> > 
> >  void pci_iounmap(struct pci_dev *pdev, void __iomem *addr)
> >  {
> > @@ -285,8 +301,12 @@ void pci_iounmap(struct pci_dev *pdev, void __iomem *addr)
> > 
> >  	idx = (((__force u64) addr) & ~ZPCI_IOMAP_ADDR_BASE) >> 48;
> >  	spin_lock(&zpci_iomap_lock);
> > -	zpci_iomap_start[idx].fh = 0;
> > -	zpci_iomap_start[idx].bar = 0;
> > +	/* Detect underrun */
> > +	BUG_ON(!zpci_iomap_start[idx].count);
> > +	if (!--zpci_iomap_start[idx].count) {
> > +		zpci_iomap_start[idx].fh = 0;
> > +		zpci_iomap_start[idx].bar = 0;
> > +	}
> >  	spin_unlock(&zpci_iomap_lock);
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_iounmap);
> > -- 
> > MST
> > 
> > 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sh" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Sebastian Ott Dec. 19, 2014, 3:13 p.m. UTC | #3
On Fri, 19 Dec 2014, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 03:13:37PM +0100, Sebastian Ott wrote:
> > On Mon, 15 Dec 2014, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > From: Michael S Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> > > 
> > > Virtio drivers should map the part of the range they need, not
> > > necessarily all of it.
> > > To this end, support mapping ranges within BAR on s390.
> > > Since multiple ranges can now be mapped within a BAR, we keep track of
> > > the number of mappings created, and only clear out the mapping for a BAR
> > > when this number reaches 0.
> > > 
> > 
> > I can't say much about the users of this interface but in principle I'm
> > OK with such a change.
> 
> I don't have an s390 system with pci for testing - could you help me out
> by testing this and confirming it doesn't break things?

I did some minor tests and nothing broke...

> 
> > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/s390/include/asm/pci_io.h |  1 +
> > >  arch/s390/pci/pci.c            | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> > >  2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/pci_io.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/pci_io.h
> > > index d194d54..25228b3 100644
> > > --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/pci_io.h
> > > +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/pci_io.h
> > > @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
> > >  struct zpci_iomap_entry {
> > >  	u32 fh;
> > >  	u8 bar;
> > > +	u16 count;
> > >  };
> > > 
> > >  extern struct zpci_iomap_entry *zpci_iomap_start;
> > > diff --git a/arch/s390/pci/pci.c b/arch/s390/pci/pci.c
> > > index 2fa7b14..51cb653 100644
> > > --- a/arch/s390/pci/pci.c
> > > +++ b/arch/s390/pci/pci.c
> > > @@ -259,7 +259,10 @@ void __iowrite64_copy(void __iomem *to, const void *from, size_t count)
> > >  }
> > > 
> > >  /* Create a virtual mapping cookie for a PCI BAR */
> > > -void __iomem *pci_iomap(struct pci_dev *pdev, int bar, unsigned long max)
> > > +void __iomem *pci_iomap_range(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> > > +			      int bar,
> > > +			      unsigned long offset,
> > > +			      unsigned long max)
> > >  {
> > >  	struct zpci_dev *zdev =	get_zdev(pdev);
> > >  	u64 addr;
> > > @@ -270,14 +273,27 @@ void __iomem *pci_iomap(struct pci_dev *pdev, int bar, unsigned long max)
> > > 
> > >  	idx = zdev->bars[bar].map_idx;
> > >  	spin_lock(&zpci_iomap_lock);
> > > -	zpci_iomap_start[idx].fh = zdev->fh;
> > > -	zpci_iomap_start[idx].bar = bar;
> > > +	if (zpci_iomap_start[idx].count++) {
> > > +		BUG_ON(zpci_iomap_start[idx].fh != zdev->fh ||
> > > +		       zpci_iomap_start[idx].bar != bar);
> > > +	} else {
> > > +		zpci_iomap_start[idx].fh = zdev->fh;
> > > +		zpci_iomap_start[idx].bar = bar;
> > > +	}
> > > +	/* Detect overrun */
> > > +	BUG_ON(!zpci_iomap_start[idx].count);
> > >  	spin_unlock(&zpci_iomap_lock);
> > > 
> > >  	addr = ZPCI_IOMAP_ADDR_BASE | ((u64) idx << 48);
> > > -	return (void __iomem *) addr;
> > > +	return (void __iomem *) addr + offset;
> > >  }
> > > -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_iomap);
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_iomap_range);
> > > +
> > > +void __iomem *pci_iomap(struct pci_dev *dev, int bar, unsigned long maxlen)
> > > +{
> > > +	return pci_iomap_range(dev, bar, 0, maxlen);
> > > +}
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_iomap);
> > 
> > This was EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL. I guess, for this patch, it should stay that
> > way. ...Hm, everyone else has this stuff as EXPORT_SYMBOL looks like we
> > should use that too.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Sebastian
> 
> OK, so you want two patches: one with new functionality,
> one switching to EXPORT_SYMBOL?

Either that or at least add a note in the patch description.

Regards,
Sebastian

> 
> 
> > > 
> > >  void pci_iounmap(struct pci_dev *pdev, void __iomem *addr)
> > >  {
> > > @@ -285,8 +301,12 @@ void pci_iounmap(struct pci_dev *pdev, void __iomem *addr)
> > > 
> > >  	idx = (((__force u64) addr) & ~ZPCI_IOMAP_ADDR_BASE) >> 48;
> > >  	spin_lock(&zpci_iomap_lock);
> > > -	zpci_iomap_start[idx].fh = 0;
> > > -	zpci_iomap_start[idx].bar = 0;
> > > +	/* Detect underrun */
> > > +	BUG_ON(!zpci_iomap_start[idx].count);
> > > +	if (!--zpci_iomap_start[idx].count) {
> > > +		zpci_iomap_start[idx].fh = 0;
> > > +		zpci_iomap_start[idx].bar = 0;
> > > +	}
> > >  	spin_unlock(&zpci_iomap_lock);
> > >  }
> > >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_iounmap);
> > > -- 
> > > MST
> > > 
> > > 
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sh" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/pci_io.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/pci_io.h
index d194d54..25228b3 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/pci_io.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/pci_io.h
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ 
 struct zpci_iomap_entry {
 	u32 fh;
 	u8 bar;
+	u16 count;
 };
 
 extern struct zpci_iomap_entry *zpci_iomap_start;
diff --git a/arch/s390/pci/pci.c b/arch/s390/pci/pci.c
index 2fa7b14..51cb653 100644
--- a/arch/s390/pci/pci.c
+++ b/arch/s390/pci/pci.c
@@ -259,7 +259,10 @@  void __iowrite64_copy(void __iomem *to, const void *from, size_t count)
 }
 
 /* Create a virtual mapping cookie for a PCI BAR */
-void __iomem *pci_iomap(struct pci_dev *pdev, int bar, unsigned long max)
+void __iomem *pci_iomap_range(struct pci_dev *pdev,
+			      int bar,
+			      unsigned long offset,
+			      unsigned long max)
 {
 	struct zpci_dev *zdev =	get_zdev(pdev);
 	u64 addr;
@@ -270,14 +273,27 @@  void __iomem *pci_iomap(struct pci_dev *pdev, int bar, unsigned long max)
 
 	idx = zdev->bars[bar].map_idx;
 	spin_lock(&zpci_iomap_lock);
-	zpci_iomap_start[idx].fh = zdev->fh;
-	zpci_iomap_start[idx].bar = bar;
+	if (zpci_iomap_start[idx].count++) {
+		BUG_ON(zpci_iomap_start[idx].fh != zdev->fh ||
+		       zpci_iomap_start[idx].bar != bar);
+	} else {
+		zpci_iomap_start[idx].fh = zdev->fh;
+		zpci_iomap_start[idx].bar = bar;
+	}
+	/* Detect overrun */
+	BUG_ON(!zpci_iomap_start[idx].count);
 	spin_unlock(&zpci_iomap_lock);
 
 	addr = ZPCI_IOMAP_ADDR_BASE | ((u64) idx << 48);
-	return (void __iomem *) addr;
+	return (void __iomem *) addr + offset;
 }
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_iomap);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_iomap_range);
+
+void __iomem *pci_iomap(struct pci_dev *dev, int bar, unsigned long maxlen)
+{
+	return pci_iomap_range(dev, bar, 0, maxlen);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_iomap);
 
 void pci_iounmap(struct pci_dev *pdev, void __iomem *addr)
 {
@@ -285,8 +301,12 @@  void pci_iounmap(struct pci_dev *pdev, void __iomem *addr)
 
 	idx = (((__force u64) addr) & ~ZPCI_IOMAP_ADDR_BASE) >> 48;
 	spin_lock(&zpci_iomap_lock);
-	zpci_iomap_start[idx].fh = 0;
-	zpci_iomap_start[idx].bar = 0;
+	/* Detect underrun */
+	BUG_ON(!zpci_iomap_start[idx].count);
+	if (!--zpci_iomap_start[idx].count) {
+		zpci_iomap_start[idx].fh = 0;
+		zpci_iomap_start[idx].bar = 0;
+	}
 	spin_unlock(&zpci_iomap_lock);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_iounmap);