diff mbox

[2/2] fbdev: ssd1307fb: check return value while setting offset

Message ID 1420705079-3741-3-git-send-email-prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Lad, Prabhakar Jan. 8, 2015, 8:17 a.m. UTC
this patch checks the return value of write command while
setting the display offset.

Signed-off-by: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Maxime Ripard Jan. 8, 2015, 9:32 a.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 08:17:59AM +0000, Lad, Prabhakar wrote:
> this patch checks the return value of write command while
> setting the display offset.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>

Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>

Thanks!
Maxime
Tomi Valkeinen Jan. 13, 2015, 11:43 a.m. UTC | #2
On 08/01/15 10:17, Lad, Prabhakar wrote:
> this patch checks the return value of write command while
> setting the display offset.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c
> index 70e3ce8..a7ecaa6 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c
> @@ -342,7 +342,7 @@ static int ssd1307fb_ssd1306_init(struct ssd1307fb_par *par)
>  
>  	/* set display offset value */
>  	ret = ssd1307fb_write_cmd(par->client, SSD1307FB_SET_DISPLAY_OFFSET);
> -	ret = ssd1307fb_write_cmd(par->client, 0x20);
> +	ret = ret & ssd1307fb_write_cmd(par->client, 0x20);
>  	if (ret < 0)
>  		return ret;

Hrm, what's that supposed to do? If both calls to ssd1307fb_write_cmd()
return an error, they are anded, resulting in a garbage error code...

 Tomi
Lad, Prabhakar Jan. 13, 2015, 11:53 a.m. UTC | #3
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> wrote:
> On 08/01/15 10:17, Lad, Prabhakar wrote:
>> this patch checks the return value of write command while
>> setting the display offset.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c
>> index 70e3ce8..a7ecaa6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c
>> +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c
>> @@ -342,7 +342,7 @@ static int ssd1307fb_ssd1306_init(struct ssd1307fb_par *par)
>>
>>       /* set display offset value */
>>       ret = ssd1307fb_write_cmd(par->client, SSD1307FB_SET_DISPLAY_OFFSET);
>> -     ret = ssd1307fb_write_cmd(par->client, 0x20);
>> +     ret = ret & ssd1307fb_write_cmd(par->client, 0x20);
>>       if (ret < 0)
>>               return ret;
>
> Hrm, what's that supposed to do? If both calls to ssd1307fb_write_cmd()
> return an error, they are anded, resulting in a garbage error code...
>
Agreed I have just aligned this to rest of the code in this function.

Maxime if you are OK I'll post a patch returning error then and there ?

Thanks,
--Prabhakar Lad
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fbdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Maxime Ripard Jan. 13, 2015, 1:39 p.m. UTC | #4
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 11:53:01AM +0000, Prabhakar Lad wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> wrote:
> > On 08/01/15 10:17, Lad, Prabhakar wrote:
> >> this patch checks the return value of write command while
> >> setting the display offset.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c | 2 +-
> >>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c
> >> index 70e3ce8..a7ecaa6 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c
> >> @@ -342,7 +342,7 @@ static int ssd1307fb_ssd1306_init(struct ssd1307fb_par *par)
> >>
> >>       /* set display offset value */
> >>       ret = ssd1307fb_write_cmd(par->client, SSD1307FB_SET_DISPLAY_OFFSET);
> >> -     ret = ssd1307fb_write_cmd(par->client, 0x20);
> >> +     ret = ret & ssd1307fb_write_cmd(par->client, 0x20);
> >>       if (ret < 0)
> >>               return ret;
> >
> > Hrm, what's that supposed to do? If both calls to ssd1307fb_write_cmd()
> > return an error, they are anded, resulting in a garbage error code...
> >
> Agreed I have just aligned this to rest of the code in this function.
> 
> Maxime if you are OK I'll post a patch returning error then and there ?

I'm not sure what the question is, but Tomi is right, having two
returns seems the right thing to do.

Maxime
Lad, Prabhakar Jan. 13, 2015, 1:46 p.m. UTC | #5
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Maxime Ripard
<maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 11:53:01AM +0000, Prabhakar Lad wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> wrote:
>> > On 08/01/15 10:17, Lad, Prabhakar wrote:
>> >> this patch checks the return value of write command while
>> >> setting the display offset.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
>> >> ---
>> >>  drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c | 2 +-
>> >>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c
>> >> index 70e3ce8..a7ecaa6 100644
>> >> --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c
>> >> +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c
>> >> @@ -342,7 +342,7 @@ static int ssd1307fb_ssd1306_init(struct ssd1307fb_par *par)
>> >>
>> >>       /* set display offset value */
>> >>       ret = ssd1307fb_write_cmd(par->client, SSD1307FB_SET_DISPLAY_OFFSET);
>> >> -     ret = ssd1307fb_write_cmd(par->client, 0x20);
>> >> +     ret = ret & ssd1307fb_write_cmd(par->client, 0x20);
>> >>       if (ret < 0)
>> >>               return ret;
>> >
>> > Hrm, what's that supposed to do? If both calls to ssd1307fb_write_cmd()
>> > return an error, they are anded, resulting in a garbage error code...
>> >
>> Agreed I have just aligned this to rest of the code in this function.
>>
>> Maxime if you are OK I'll post a patch returning error then and there ?
>
> I'm not sure what the question is, but Tomi is right, having two
> returns seems the right thing to do.
>
OK I'll post a new patch having two separate returns.

Thanks,
--Prabhakar Lad
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fbdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c
index 70e3ce8..a7ecaa6 100644
--- a/drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c
+++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c
@@ -342,7 +342,7 @@  static int ssd1307fb_ssd1306_init(struct ssd1307fb_par *par)
 
 	/* set display offset value */
 	ret = ssd1307fb_write_cmd(par->client, SSD1307FB_SET_DISPLAY_OFFSET);
-	ret = ssd1307fb_write_cmd(par->client, 0x20);
+	ret = ret & ssd1307fb_write_cmd(par->client, 0x20);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;