Message ID | 1418357907-4215-3-git-send-email-harinik@xilinx.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
> @@ -541,6 +541,18 @@ static int cdns_i2c_master_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg *msgs, > * processed with a repeated start. > */ > if (num > 1) { > + /* > + * This controller does not give completion interrupt after a > + * master receive transfer if HOLD bit is set (repeated start), > + * resulting in SW timeout. Hence, if a receive transfer is > + * followed by any other transfer, an error is returned > + * indicating that this sequence is not supported. > + */ > + for (count = 0; count < num-1; count++) { > + if (msgs[count].flags & I2C_M_RD) > + dev_warn(adap->dev.parent, "No support for repeated start when receive is followed by a transfer\n"); > + return -EOPNOTSUPP; > + } > id->bus_hold_flag = 1; > reg = cdns_i2c_readreg(CDNS_I2C_CR_OFFSET); > reg |= CDNS_I2C_CR_HOLD; Have you ever tested this code? There is a huge bug in it :( Also, in the comment, use "message" instead of "transfer". One transfer consists of multiple messages. Maybe the warning can be simplified, too: "can't do repeated start after read messages".
Hi, On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 5:05 PM, Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> wrote: >> @@ -541,6 +541,18 @@ static int cdns_i2c_master_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg *msgs, >> * processed with a repeated start. >> */ >> if (num > 1) { >> + /* >> + * This controller does not give completion interrupt after a >> + * master receive transfer if HOLD bit is set (repeated start), >> + * resulting in SW timeout. Hence, if a receive transfer is >> + * followed by any other transfer, an error is returned >> + * indicating that this sequence is not supported. >> + */ >> + for (count = 0; count < num-1; count++) { >> + if (msgs[count].flags & I2C_M_RD) >> + dev_warn(adap->dev.parent, "No support for repeated start when receive is followed by a transfer\n"); >> + return -EOPNOTSUPP; >> + } >> id->bus_hold_flag = 1; >> reg = cdns_i2c_readreg(CDNS_I2C_CR_OFFSET); >> reg |= CDNS_I2C_CR_HOLD; > > Have you ever tested this code? There is a huge bug in it :( I'm sorry. I'll send another patch with the braces for the if statement. I seem to have tested with only the return statement and no dev_warn. > > Also, in the comment, use "message" instead of "transfer". One transfer > consists of multiple messages. > > Maybe the warning can be simplified, too: "can't do repeated start after > read messages". > I'll do that. Regards, Harini
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cadence.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cadence.c index 5f5d4fa..6538c6c 100644 --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cadence.c +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cadence.c @@ -541,6 +541,18 @@ static int cdns_i2c_master_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg *msgs, * processed with a repeated start. */ if (num > 1) { + /* + * This controller does not give completion interrupt after a + * master receive transfer if HOLD bit is set (repeated start), + * resulting in SW timeout. Hence, if a receive transfer is + * followed by any other transfer, an error is returned + * indicating that this sequence is not supported. + */ + for (count = 0; count < num-1; count++) { + if (msgs[count].flags & I2C_M_RD) + dev_warn(adap->dev.parent, "No support for repeated start when receive is followed by a transfer\n"); + return -EOPNOTSUPP; + } id->bus_hold_flag = 1; reg = cdns_i2c_readreg(CDNS_I2C_CR_OFFSET); reg |= CDNS_I2C_CR_HOLD;