Message ID | 1422017048-4792-2-git-send-email-mika.kuoppala@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 02:44:08PM +0200, Mika Kuoppala wrote: > From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> > > For example, > > /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/i915_hangcheck_info: > > Hangcheck active, fires in 15887800ms > render ring: > seqno = -4059 [current -583] > action = 2 > score = 0 > ACTHD = 1ee8 [current 21f980] > max ACTHD = 0 > > v2: Include expiration ETA. Can anyone spot a problem? > v3: Convert for workqueued hangcheck (Mika) > > Tested-By: PRC QA PRTS (Patch Regression Test System Contact: shuang.he@intel.com) (v2) > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> (v2) > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> (v2) > Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c > index 2ad4c48..1502c96 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c > @@ -1219,6 +1219,41 @@ out: > return ret; > } > > +static int i915_hangcheck_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused) > +{ > + struct drm_info_node *node = m->private; > + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(node->minor->dev); > + struct intel_engine_cs *ring; > + int i; > + > + if (!i915.enable_hangcheck) { > + seq_printf(m, "Hangcheck disabled\n"); > + return 0; > + } > + > + if (delayed_work_pending(&dev_priv->gpu_error.hangcheck_work)) { > + seq_printf(m, "Hangcheck active, fires in %dms\n", > + jiffies_to_msecs(dev_priv->gpu_error.hangcheck_work.timer.expires - > + jiffies)); > + } else > + seq_printf(m, "Hangcheck inactive\n"); > + > + for_each_ring(ring, dev_priv, i) { > + seq_printf(m, "%s:\n", ring->name); > + seq_printf(m, "\tseqno = %d [current %d]\n", %u ? > + ring->hangcheck.seqno, ring->get_seqno(ring, false)); > + seq_printf(m, "\taction = %d\n", ring->hangcheck.action); > + seq_printf(m, "\tscore = %d\n", ring->hangcheck.score); > + seq_printf(m, "\tACTHD = 0x%08llx [current 0x%08llx]\n", > + (long long)ring->hangcheck.acthd, > + (long long)intel_ring_get_active_head(ring)); > + seq_printf(m, "\tmax ACTHD = 0x%08llx\n", > + (long long)ring->hangcheck.max_acthd); > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > + > static int ironlake_drpc_info(struct seq_file *m) > { > struct drm_info_node *node = m->private; > @@ -4407,6 +4442,7 @@ static const struct drm_info_list i915_debugfs_list[] = { > {"i915_gem_hws_vebox", i915_hws_info, 0, (void *)VECS}, > {"i915_gem_batch_pool", i915_gem_batch_pool_info, 0}, > {"i915_frequency_info", i915_frequency_info, 0}, > + {"i915_hangcheck_info", i915_hangcheck_info, 0}, > {"i915_drpc_info", i915_drpc_info, 0}, > {"i915_emon_status", i915_emon_status, 0}, > {"i915_ring_freq_table", i915_ring_freq_table, 0}, > -- > 1.9.1 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Tested-By: PRC QA PRTS (Patch Regression Test System Contact: shuang.he@intel.com)
Task id: 5634
-------------------------------------Summary-------------------------------------
Platform Delta drm-intel-nightly Series Applied
PNV -1 353/353 352/353
ILK 353/353 353/353
SNB +1 399/422 400/422
IVB +1 486/487 487/487
BYT 296/296 296/296
HSW +1-2 507/508 506/508
BDW 399/402 399/402
-------------------------------------Detailed-------------------------------------
Platform Test drm-intel-nightly Series Applied
*PNV igt_gen3_render_linear_blits PASS(3, M7M23) CRASH(1, M23)
SNB igt_kms_flip_nonexisting-fb NSPT(1, M35)PASS(5, M35M22) PASS(1, M22)
IVB igt_gem_pwrite_pread_snooped-pwrite-blt-cpu_mmap-performance DMESG_WARN(2, M21)PASS(1, M4) PASS(1, M21)
*HSW igt_gem_storedw_batches_loop_normal PASS(2, M19M20) DMESG_WARN(1, M20)
HSW igt_gem_storedw_loop_blt DMESG_WARN(2, M19M20)PASS(4, M20M40) PASS(1, M20)
*HSW igt_pm_rpm_debugfs-read PASS(2, M19M20) DMESG_WARN(1, M20)
Note: You need to pay more attention to line start with '*'
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 03:19:16PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 02:44:08PM +0200, Mika Kuoppala wrote: > > From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> > > > > For example, > > > > /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/i915_hangcheck_info: > > > > Hangcheck active, fires in 15887800ms > > render ring: > > seqno = -4059 [current -583] > > action = 2 > > score = 0 > > ACTHD = 1ee8 [current 21f980] > > max ACTHD = 0 > > > > v2: Include expiration ETA. Can anyone spot a problem? > > v3: Convert for workqueued hangcheck (Mika) > > > > Tested-By: PRC QA PRTS (Patch Regression Test System Contact: shuang.he@intel.com) (v2) > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> (v2) > > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> (v2) > > Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c > > index 2ad4c48..1502c96 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c > > @@ -1219,6 +1219,41 @@ out: > > return ret; > > } > > > > +static int i915_hangcheck_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused) > > +{ > > + struct drm_info_node *node = m->private; > > + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(node->minor->dev); > > + struct intel_engine_cs *ring; > > + int i; > > + > > + if (!i915.enable_hangcheck) { > > + seq_printf(m, "Hangcheck disabled\n"); > > + return 0; > > + } > > + > > + if (delayed_work_pending(&dev_priv->gpu_error.hangcheck_work)) { > > + seq_printf(m, "Hangcheck active, fires in %dms\n", > > + jiffies_to_msecs(dev_priv->gpu_error.hangcheck_work.timer.expires - > > + jiffies)); > > + } else > > + seq_printf(m, "Hangcheck inactive\n"); > > + > > + for_each_ring(ring, dev_priv, i) { > > + seq_printf(m, "%s:\n", ring->name); > > + seq_printf(m, "\tseqno = %d [current %d]\n", > > %u ? %x. Then it will be more consistent with how we print it else. (No one has ever accused me of being consistent!) -Chris
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c index 2ad4c48..1502c96 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c @@ -1219,6 +1219,41 @@ out: return ret; } +static int i915_hangcheck_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused) +{ + struct drm_info_node *node = m->private; + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(node->minor->dev); + struct intel_engine_cs *ring; + int i; + + if (!i915.enable_hangcheck) { + seq_printf(m, "Hangcheck disabled\n"); + return 0; + } + + if (delayed_work_pending(&dev_priv->gpu_error.hangcheck_work)) { + seq_printf(m, "Hangcheck active, fires in %dms\n", + jiffies_to_msecs(dev_priv->gpu_error.hangcheck_work.timer.expires - + jiffies)); + } else + seq_printf(m, "Hangcheck inactive\n"); + + for_each_ring(ring, dev_priv, i) { + seq_printf(m, "%s:\n", ring->name); + seq_printf(m, "\tseqno = %d [current %d]\n", + ring->hangcheck.seqno, ring->get_seqno(ring, false)); + seq_printf(m, "\taction = %d\n", ring->hangcheck.action); + seq_printf(m, "\tscore = %d\n", ring->hangcheck.score); + seq_printf(m, "\tACTHD = 0x%08llx [current 0x%08llx]\n", + (long long)ring->hangcheck.acthd, + (long long)intel_ring_get_active_head(ring)); + seq_printf(m, "\tmax ACTHD = 0x%08llx\n", + (long long)ring->hangcheck.max_acthd); + } + + return 0; +} + static int ironlake_drpc_info(struct seq_file *m) { struct drm_info_node *node = m->private; @@ -4407,6 +4442,7 @@ static const struct drm_info_list i915_debugfs_list[] = { {"i915_gem_hws_vebox", i915_hws_info, 0, (void *)VECS}, {"i915_gem_batch_pool", i915_gem_batch_pool_info, 0}, {"i915_frequency_info", i915_frequency_info, 0}, + {"i915_hangcheck_info", i915_hangcheck_info, 0}, {"i915_drpc_info", i915_drpc_info, 0}, {"i915_emon_status", i915_emon_status, 0}, {"i915_ring_freq_table", i915_ring_freq_table, 0},