Message ID | 1423588576-11339-14-git-send-email-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Tested-By: PRC QA PRTS (Patch Regression Test System Contact: shuang.he@intel.com)
Task id: 5750
-------------------------------------Summary-------------------------------------
Platform Delta drm-intel-nightly Series Applied
PNV +5-4 275/283 276/283
ILK 310/315 310/315
SNB +3-1 320/346 322/346
IVB -1 380/384 379/384
BYT 296/296 296/296
HSW +3-1 422/428 424/428
BDW 318/333 318/333
-------------------------------------Detailed-------------------------------------
Platform Test drm-intel-nightly Series Applied
*PNV igt_gem_fence_thrash_bo-write-verify-none PASS(3, M7) FAIL(1, M7)
*PNV igt_gem_fence_thrash_bo-write-verify-x PASS(3, M7) FAIL(1, M7)
*PNV igt_gem_fence_thrash_bo-write-verify-y PASS(4, M7) FAIL(1, M7)
PNV igt_gem_userptr_blits_create-destroy-sync NRUN(1, M7)PASS(6, M7) PASS(1, M7)
PNV igt_gen3_render_linear_blits FAIL(2, M7)PASS(2, M7) PASS(1, M7)
PNV igt_gen3_render_mixed_blits FAIL(2, M7)PASS(2, M7) PASS(1, M7)
PNV igt_gen3_render_tiledx_blits FAIL(2, M7)TIMEOUT(1, M7)PASS(4, M7) PASS(1, M7)
PNV igt_gen3_render_tiledy_blits FAIL(3, M7)PASS(2, M7) PASS(1, M7)
*PNV igt_gem_tiled_pread_pwrite PASS(4, M7) FAIL(1, M7)
*SNB igt_kms_flip_bo-too-big BLACKLIST(1, M35) PASS(1, M35)
*SNB igt_kms_flip_bo-too-big-interruptible BLACKLIST(1, M35) PASS(1, M35)
*SNB igt_kms_flip_event_leak NSPT(5, M35) PASS(1, M35)
*SNB igt_kms_flip_tiling_flip-changes-tiling PASS(2, M35) FAIL(1, M35)
IVB igt_gem_storedw_batches_loop_normal DMESG_WARN(1, M4)PASS(4, M4) DMESG_WARN(1, M4)
*HSW igt_gem_pwrite_pread_snooped-pwrite-blt-cpu_mmap-performance PASS(3, M40) DMESG_WARN(1, M40)
*HSW igt_kms_flip_bo-too-big BLACKLIST(1, M40) PASS(1, M40)
*HSW igt_kms_flip_bo-too-big-interruptible BLACKLIST(1, M40) PASS(1, M40)
HSW igt_kms_flip_plain-flip-fb-recreate-interruptible TIMEOUT(5, M40)PASS(3, M40) PASS(1, M40)
Note: You need to pay more attention to line start with '*'
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 06:46:39PM -0800, shuang.he@intel.com wrote: > Tested-By: PRC QA PRTS (Patch Regression Test System Contact: shuang.he@intel.com) > Task id: 5750 > -------------------------------------Summary------------------------------------- > Platform Delta drm-intel-nightly Series Applied > PNV +5-4 275/283 276/283 > ILK 310/315 310/315 > SNB +3-1 320/346 322/346 > IVB -1 380/384 379/384 > BYT 296/296 296/296 > HSW +3-1 422/428 424/428 > BDW 318/333 318/333 > -------------------------------------Detailed------------------------------------- > Platform Test drm-intel-nightly Series Applied > *PNV igt_gem_fence_thrash_bo-write-verify-none PASS(3, M7) FAIL(1, M7) > *PNV igt_gem_fence_thrash_bo-write-verify-x PASS(3, M7) FAIL(1, M7) > *PNV igt_gem_fence_thrash_bo-write-verify-y PASS(4, M7) FAIL(1, M7) > PNV igt_gem_userptr_blits_create-destroy-sync NRUN(1, M7)PASS(6, M7) PASS(1, M7) > PNV igt_gen3_render_linear_blits FAIL(2, M7)PASS(2, M7) PASS(1, M7) > PNV igt_gen3_render_mixed_blits FAIL(2, M7)PASS(2, M7) PASS(1, M7) > PNV igt_gen3_render_tiledx_blits FAIL(2, M7)TIMEOUT(1, M7)PASS(4, M7) PASS(1, M7) > PNV igt_gen3_render_tiledy_blits FAIL(3, M7)PASS(2, M7) PASS(1, M7) > *PNV igt_gem_tiled_pread_pwrite PASS(4, M7) FAIL(1, M7) > *SNB igt_kms_flip_bo-too-big BLACKLIST(1, M35) PASS(1, M35) > *SNB igt_kms_flip_bo-too-big-interruptible BLACKLIST(1, M35) PASS(1, M35) > *SNB igt_kms_flip_event_leak NSPT(5, M35) PASS(1, M35) > *SNB igt_kms_flip_tiling_flip-changes-tiling PASS(2, M35) FAIL(1, M35) > IVB igt_gem_storedw_batches_loop_normal DMESG_WARN(1, M4)PASS(4, M4) DMESG_WARN(1, M4) > *HSW igt_gem_pwrite_pread_snooped-pwrite-blt-cpu_mmap-performance PASS(3, M40) DMESG_WARN(1, M40) > *HSW igt_kms_flip_bo-too-big BLACKLIST(1, M40) PASS(1, M40) > *HSW igt_kms_flip_bo-too-big-interruptible BLACKLIST(1, M40) PASS(1, M40) Why does PRTS report BLACKLIST -> PASS changes in the public test results? Can you please fix that of if it's more involved create a JIRA for it? Thanks, Daniel > HSW igt_kms_flip_plain-flip-fb-recreate-interruptible TIMEOUT(5, M40)PASS(3, M40) PASS(1, M40) > Note: You need to pay more attention to line start with '*' > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 05:16:16PM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> > > Let the DRM core know we can handle it. > > v2: Change to boolean true. (Daniel Vetter) > > Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> All merged except for the drm core patch - I'll do some testcases for that one first. -Daniel > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > index e5e9221..0f2a6c7 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > @@ -13172,6 +13172,8 @@ void intel_modeset_init(struct drm_device *dev) > dev->mode_config.preferred_depth = 24; > dev->mode_config.prefer_shadow = 1; > > + dev->mode_config.allow_fb_modifiers = true; > + > dev->mode_config.funcs = &intel_mode_funcs; > > intel_init_quirks(dev); > -- > 2.2.2 >
On 02/11/2015 07:58 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 05:16:16PM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: >> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> >> >> Let the DRM core know we can handle it. >> >> v2: Change to boolean true. (Daniel Vetter) >> >> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> > > All merged except for the drm core patch - I'll do some testcases for that > one first. I wanted to ask how it will compile then but saw it is already in nightly. Regards, Tvrtko
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 09:57:09AM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > > On 02/11/2015 07:58 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > >On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 05:16:16PM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > >>From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> > >> > >>Let the DRM core know we can handle it. > >> > >>v2: Change to boolean true. (Daniel Vetter) > >> > >>Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> > >>Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> > > > >All merged except for the drm core patch - I'll do some testcases for that > >one first. > > I wanted to ask how it will compile then but saw it is already in nightly. I've meant "drm: Also check unused fields for addfb2" since the basic modifier patch landed already. I wasn't really clear. -Daniel
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c index e5e9221..0f2a6c7 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c @@ -13172,6 +13172,8 @@ void intel_modeset_init(struct drm_device *dev) dev->mode_config.preferred_depth = 24; dev->mode_config.prefer_shadow = 1; + dev->mode_config.allow_fb_modifiers = true; + dev->mode_config.funcs = &intel_mode_funcs; intel_init_quirks(dev);