| Message ID | 87k2zha69p.fsf@free.fr (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 10:36:02PM +0100, Robert Jarzmik wrote: > Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> writes: > > >> I don't think an mdelay(256) is acceptable. > > > > That's very true that this driver would need some love, but > > valentine's day was last week. > > That doesn't cope with the 256ms mdelay. And a potential big mdelay > is not what I'd call a bug fix, see below. I really don't care about the delay itself, really. Just splitting the readsl into several chunks seems to slow the FIFO draining enough so that we don't even need to poll the RDDREQ bit. I was asked (rightfully) for a timeout, and since there's no particular indication in the datasheet on this, I came up with a totally random and made-up number. If you want to suggest any other random number, I'd be happy to use it. Plus, saying that this is strictly equivalent to mdelay(256) is just bad faith. It is a (very very very unlikely) worst case scenario. During my tests, I've never experienced even a single delay being used, let alone every single reads needing to poll the bit for 5ms, always succeeding at the last attempt. If we really care about this, we might as well start caring about other theoretically possible situations, such as the NAND chip being ripped off the board by an asteroid. > > I'm sorry, but this is a patch targeted for stable. This is a pure > > bugfix. I won't rewrite the whole driver solely to make the driver > > better, especially since that would make such a patch (or more likely > > a whole serie) unsuitable for stable. > > This is the rewrite I was asking for (not tested), consider it against your > "rewrite the whole driver" : > > Modified drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c > index e512902..6e569e9 100644 > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c > @@ -576,11 +576,20 @@ static void start_data_dma(struct pxa3xx_nand_info *info) > {} > #endif > > +static irqreturn_t pxa3xx_nand_irq_thread(int irq, void *data) > +{ > + struct pxa3xx_nand_info *info = data; > + > + handle_data_pio(info); > + return IRQ_HANDLED; > +} > + > static irqreturn_t pxa3xx_nand_irq(int irq, void *devid) > { > struct pxa3xx_nand_info *info = devid; > unsigned int status, is_completed = 0, is_ready = 0; > unsigned int ready, cmd_done; > + irqreturn_t ret = IRQ_HANDLED; > > if (info->cs == 0) { > ready = NDSR_FLASH_RDY; > @@ -622,7 +631,7 @@ static irqreturn_t pxa3xx_nand_irq(int irq, void *devid) > } else { > info->state = (status & NDSR_RDDREQ) ? > STATE_PIO_READING : STATE_PIO_WRITING; > - handle_data_pio(info); > + ret = IRQ_WAKE_THREAD; > } > } > if (status & cmd_done) { > @@ -663,7 +672,7 @@ static irqreturn_t pxa3xx_nand_irq(int irq, void *devid) > if (is_ready) > complete(&info->dev_ready); > NORMAL_IRQ_EXIT: > - return IRQ_HANDLED; > + return ret; > } > > static inline int is_buf_blank(uint8_t *buf, size_t len) > @@ -1688,7 +1697,8 @@ static int alloc_nand_resource(struct platform_device *pdev) > /* initialize all interrupts to be disabled */ > disable_int(info, NDSR_MASK); > > - ret = request_irq(irq, pxa3xx_nand_irq, 0, pdev->name, info); > + ret = request_threaded_irq(irq, pxa3xx_nand_irq, > + pxa3xx_nand_irq_thread, 0, pdev->name, info); > if (ret < 0) { > dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to request IRQ\n"); > goto fail_free_buf; While I agree that this change would be needed, it is still not stable material, so both patches will have to go through separate ways (and one will live without the other). Maxime
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 10:36:02PM +0100, Robert Jarzmik wrote: > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c > index e512902..6e569e9 100644 > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c > @@ -576,11 +576,20 @@ static void start_data_dma(struct pxa3xx_nand_info *info) > {} > #endif > > +static irqreturn_t pxa3xx_nand_irq_thread(int irq, void *data) > +{ > + struct pxa3xx_nand_info *info = data; > + > + handle_data_pio(info); > + return IRQ_HANDLED; > +} > + > static irqreturn_t pxa3xx_nand_irq(int irq, void *devid) > { > struct pxa3xx_nand_info *info = devid; > unsigned int status, is_completed = 0, is_ready = 0; > unsigned int ready, cmd_done; > + irqreturn_t ret = IRQ_HANDLED; > > if (info->cs == 0) { > ready = NDSR_FLASH_RDY; > @@ -622,7 +631,7 @@ static irqreturn_t pxa3xx_nand_irq(int irq, void *devid) > } else { > info->state = (status & NDSR_RDDREQ) ? > STATE_PIO_READING : STATE_PIO_WRITING; > - handle_data_pio(info); > + ret = IRQ_WAKE_THREAD; > } > } > if (status & cmd_done) { > @@ -663,7 +672,7 @@ static irqreturn_t pxa3xx_nand_irq(int irq, void *devid) > if (is_ready) > complete(&info->dev_ready); > NORMAL_IRQ_EXIT: > - return IRQ_HANDLED; > + return ret; > } > > static inline int is_buf_blank(uint8_t *buf, size_t len) > @@ -1688,7 +1697,8 @@ static int alloc_nand_resource(struct platform_device *pdev) > /* initialize all interrupts to be disabled */ > disable_int(info, NDSR_MASK); > > - ret = request_irq(irq, pxa3xx_nand_irq, 0, pdev->name, info); > + ret = request_threaded_irq(irq, pxa3xx_nand_irq, > + pxa3xx_nand_irq_thread, 0, pdev->name, info); > if (ret < 0) { > dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to request IRQ\n"); > goto fail_free_buf; I just gave this patch a try, and it blows up quite badly: http://code.bulix.org/p96krc-87889?raw It looks like there's more work here, most likely in the waitqueues wake up. Maxime
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> writes: > On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 10:36:02PM +0100, Robert Jarzmik wrote: >> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c >> index e512902..6e569e9 100644 >> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c >> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c >> @@ -576,11 +576,20 @@ static void start_data_dma(struct pxa3xx_nand_info *info) >> {} >> #endif >> >> +static irqreturn_t pxa3xx_nand_irq_thread(int irq, void *data) >> +{ >> + struct pxa3xx_nand_info *info = data; >> + >> + handle_data_pio(info); >> + return IRQ_HANDLED; >> +} >> + >> static irqreturn_t pxa3xx_nand_irq(int irq, void *devid) >> { >> struct pxa3xx_nand_info *info = devid; >> unsigned int status, is_completed = 0, is_ready = 0; >> unsigned int ready, cmd_done; >> + irqreturn_t ret = IRQ_HANDLED; >> >> if (info->cs == 0) { >> ready = NDSR_FLASH_RDY; >> @@ -622,7 +631,7 @@ static irqreturn_t pxa3xx_nand_irq(int irq, void *devid) >> } else { >> info->state = (status & NDSR_RDDREQ) ? >> STATE_PIO_READING : STATE_PIO_WRITING; >> - handle_data_pio(info); >> + ret = IRQ_WAKE_THREAD; >> } >> } >> if (status & cmd_done) { >> @@ -663,7 +672,7 @@ static irqreturn_t pxa3xx_nand_irq(int irq, void *devid) >> if (is_ready) >> complete(&info->dev_ready); >> NORMAL_IRQ_EXIT: >> - return IRQ_HANDLED; >> + return ret; >> } >> >> static inline int is_buf_blank(uint8_t *buf, size_t len) >> @@ -1688,7 +1697,8 @@ static int alloc_nand_resource(struct platform_device *pdev) >> /* initialize all interrupts to be disabled */ >> disable_int(info, NDSR_MASK); >> >> - ret = request_irq(irq, pxa3xx_nand_irq, 0, pdev->name, info); >> + ret = request_threaded_irq(irq, pxa3xx_nand_irq, >> + pxa3xx_nand_irq_thread, 0, pdev->name, info); >> if (ret < 0) { >> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to request IRQ\n"); >> goto fail_free_buf; > > I just gave this patch a try, and it blows up quite badly: > http://code.bulix.org/p96krc-87889?raw Confirmed. OTOH, replacing : >> + ret = IRQ_WAKE_THREAD; With: + ret = IRQ_WAKE_THREAD; + goto NORMAL_IRQ_EXIT; is fully working in my environment, now I got 10mn to test it. I also added for cosmetics in pxa3xx_nand_irq_thread() a : info->state = STATE_CMD_DONE; > It looks like there's more work here, most likely in the waitqueues > wake up. Not that much if I'm right, hein ? And it enables the msleep() instead of mdelay(). And the flow of the driver is not changed for pxa3xx, only for Armada (ie. non dma case) for which you need to introduce a delay anyway, and therefore change the flow. It will be Brian choice eventually, but if you say that you will submit that approach for next cycle, and yours for stable, and that for next you'll convert mdelay() to msleep(), I'll stop arguing. Cheers.
On 02/17/2015 02:07 PM, Robert Jarzmik wrote: > Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> writes: > >> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 10:36:02PM +0100, Robert Jarzmik wrote: >>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c >>> index e512902..6e569e9 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c >>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c >>> @@ -576,11 +576,20 @@ static void start_data_dma(struct pxa3xx_nand_info *info) >>> {} >>> #endif >>> >>> +static irqreturn_t pxa3xx_nand_irq_thread(int irq, void *data) >>> +{ >>> + struct pxa3xx_nand_info *info = data; >>> + >>> + handle_data_pio(info); >>> + return IRQ_HANDLED; >>> +} >>> + >>> static irqreturn_t pxa3xx_nand_irq(int irq, void *devid) >>> { >>> struct pxa3xx_nand_info *info = devid; >>> unsigned int status, is_completed = 0, is_ready = 0; >>> unsigned int ready, cmd_done; >>> + irqreturn_t ret = IRQ_HANDLED; >>> >>> if (info->cs == 0) { >>> ready = NDSR_FLASH_RDY; >>> @@ -622,7 +631,7 @@ static irqreturn_t pxa3xx_nand_irq(int irq, void *devid) >>> } else { >>> info->state = (status & NDSR_RDDREQ) ? >>> STATE_PIO_READING : STATE_PIO_WRITING; >>> - handle_data_pio(info); >>> + ret = IRQ_WAKE_THREAD; >>> } >>> } >>> if (status & cmd_done) { >>> @@ -663,7 +672,7 @@ static irqreturn_t pxa3xx_nand_irq(int irq, void *devid) >>> if (is_ready) >>> complete(&info->dev_ready); >>> NORMAL_IRQ_EXIT: >>> - return IRQ_HANDLED; >>> + return ret; >>> } >>> >>> static inline int is_buf_blank(uint8_t *buf, size_t len) >>> @@ -1688,7 +1697,8 @@ static int alloc_nand_resource(struct platform_device *pdev) >>> /* initialize all interrupts to be disabled */ >>> disable_int(info, NDSR_MASK); >>> >>> - ret = request_irq(irq, pxa3xx_nand_irq, 0, pdev->name, info); >>> + ret = request_threaded_irq(irq, pxa3xx_nand_irq, >>> + pxa3xx_nand_irq_thread, 0, pdev->name, info); >>> if (ret < 0) { >>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to request IRQ\n"); >>> goto fail_free_buf; >> >> I just gave this patch a try, and it blows up quite badly: >> http://code.bulix.org/p96krc-87889?raw > Confirmed. > OTOH, replacing : >>> + ret = IRQ_WAKE_THREAD; > With: > + ret = IRQ_WAKE_THREAD; > + goto NORMAL_IRQ_EXIT; > > is fully working in my environment, now I got 10mn to test it. > I also added for cosmetics in pxa3xx_nand_irq_thread() a : > info->state = STATE_CMD_DONE; > >> It looks like there's more work here, most likely in the waitqueues >> wake up. > Not that much if I'm right, hein ? > And it enables the msleep() instead of mdelay(). > > And the flow of the driver is not changed for pxa3xx, only for Armada (ie. non > dma case) for which you need to introduce a delay anyway, and therefore change > the flow. > > It will be Brian choice eventually, but if you say that you will submit that > approach for next cycle, and yours for stable, and that for next you'll convert > mdelay() to msleep(), I'll stop arguing. > How about you push a proper patchset with this alternative (and a nice cover letter explaining the need for a threaded irq) so we can discuss properly this new turn?
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 02:16:43PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > On 02/17/2015 02:07 PM, Robert Jarzmik wrote: > > It will be Brian choice eventually, but if you say that you will submit that > > approach for next cycle, and yours for stable, and that for next you'll convert > > mdelay() to msleep(), I'll stop arguing. > > How about you push a proper patchset with this alternative (and a nice > cover letter explaining the need for a threaded irq) so we can discuss > properly this new turn? I think both Maxime's change (polling a new HW bit) and Robert J's change (move to a threaded IRQ) are good. I'll take another look, but I expect I'll take Maxime's v4 for the 4.0 cycle, and Robert J's v2 for 4.1 (or will we just jump straight to 5.0? I never know). Will I see a patch to convert to msleep() and/or a jiffies timeout in the near future? Brian
Hi Brian, On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 07:45:48PM -0800, Brian Norris wrote: > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 02:16:43PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > > On 02/17/2015 02:07 PM, Robert Jarzmik wrote: > > > It will be Brian choice eventually, but if you say that you will submit that > > > approach for next cycle, and yours for stable, and that for next you'll convert > > > mdelay() to msleep(), I'll stop arguing. > > > > How about you push a proper patchset with this alternative (and a nice > > cover letter explaining the need for a threaded irq) so we can discuss > > properly this new turn? > > I think both Maxime's change (polling a new HW bit) and Robert J's > change (move to a threaded IRQ) are good. I'll take another look, but I > expect I'll take Maxime's v4 for the 4.0 cycle, and Robert J's v2 for > 4.1 (or will we just jump straight to 5.0? I never know). That's what I would expect too. > Will I see a patch to convert to msleep() and/or a jiffies timeout > in the near future? As soon as both patches are merged. Maxime
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c index e512902..6e569e9 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c @@ -576,11 +576,20 @@ static void start_data_dma(struct pxa3xx_nand_info *info) {} #endif +static irqreturn_t pxa3xx_nand_irq_thread(int irq, void *data) +{ + struct pxa3xx_nand_info *info = data; + + handle_data_pio(info); + return IRQ_HANDLED; +} + static irqreturn_t pxa3xx_nand_irq(int irq, void *devid) { struct pxa3xx_nand_info *info = devid; unsigned int status, is_completed = 0, is_ready = 0; unsigned int ready, cmd_done; + irqreturn_t ret = IRQ_HANDLED; if (info->cs == 0) { ready = NDSR_FLASH_RDY; @@ -622,7 +631,7 @@ static irqreturn_t pxa3xx_nand_irq(int irq, void *devid) } else { info->state = (status & NDSR_RDDREQ) ? STATE_PIO_READING : STATE_PIO_WRITING; - handle_data_pio(info); + ret = IRQ_WAKE_THREAD; } } if (status & cmd_done) { @@ -663,7 +672,7 @@ static irqreturn_t pxa3xx_nand_irq(int irq, void *devid) if (is_ready) complete(&info->dev_ready); NORMAL_IRQ_EXIT: - return IRQ_HANDLED; + return ret; } static inline int is_buf_blank(uint8_t *buf, size_t len) @@ -1688,7 +1697,8 @@ static int alloc_nand_resource(struct platform_device *pdev) /* initialize all interrupts to be disabled */ disable_int(info, NDSR_MASK); - ret = request_irq(irq, pxa3xx_nand_irq, 0, pdev->name, info); + ret = request_threaded_irq(irq, pxa3xx_nand_irq, + pxa3xx_nand_irq_thread, 0, pdev->name, info); if (ret < 0) { dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to request IRQ\n"); goto fail_free_buf;