Message ID | 1426083169-8698-8-git-send-email-tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Not Applicable, archived |
Headers | show |
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 9:12 AM, Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org> wrote: > Architectures which want to take advantage of ECAM generic goodness This is not necessarily an architecture decision. It is likely per host. > should select CONFIG_PCI_ECAM_GENERIC. Otherwise, like x86 32bits machines, > are obligated to provide own low-level ECAM calls. > > Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org> > --- [...] > diff --git a/drivers/pci/ecam.c b/drivers/pci/ecam.c > index c588234..796b6e7 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/ecam.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/ecam.c > @@ -23,6 +23,119 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(pci_mmcfg_lock); > > LIST_HEAD(pci_mmcfg_list); > > +#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_PCI_ECAM > +static char __iomem *pci_dev_base(unsigned int seg, unsigned int bus, > + unsigned int devfn) > +{ > + struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg = pci_mmconfig_lookup(seg, bus); > + > + if (cfg && cfg->virt) > + return cfg->virt + (PCI_MMCFG_BUS_OFFSET(bus) | (devfn << 12)); > + return NULL; > +} > + > +int pci_mmcfg_read(unsigned int seg, unsigned int bus, > + unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 *value) > +{ > + char __iomem *addr; > + > + /* Why do we have this when nobody checks it. How about a BUG()!? -AK */ > + if (unlikely((bus > 255) || (devfn > 255) || (reg > 4095))) { > +err: *value = -1; > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + > + rcu_read_lock(); What is the purpose of the rcu lock other than the old implementation had it? > + addr = pci_dev_base(seg, bus, devfn); The .map_bus op provides the same function if you restructure to use the generic accessors. > + if (!addr) { > + rcu_read_unlock(); > + goto err; > + } > + > + *value = pci_mmio_read(len, addr + reg); > + rcu_read_unlock(); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +int pci_mmcfg_write(unsigned int seg, unsigned int bus, > + unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 value) > +{ > + char __iomem *addr; > + > + /* Why do we have this when nobody checks it. How about a BUG()!? -AK */ > + if (unlikely((bus > 255) || (devfn > 255) || (reg > 4095))) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + rcu_read_lock(); > + addr = pci_dev_base(seg, bus, devfn); > + if (!addr) { > + rcu_read_unlock(); > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + > + pci_mmio_write(len, addr + reg, value); > + rcu_read_unlock(); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static void __iomem *mcfg_ioremap(struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg) > +{ > + void __iomem *addr; > + u64 start, size; > + int num_buses; > + > + start = cfg->address + PCI_MMCFG_BUS_OFFSET(cfg->start_bus); > + num_buses = cfg->end_bus - cfg->start_bus + 1; > + size = PCI_MMCFG_BUS_OFFSET(num_buses); > + addr = ioremap_nocache(start, size); > + if (addr) > + addr -= PCI_MMCFG_BUS_OFFSET(cfg->start_bus); > + return addr; > +} > + > +int __init pci_mmcfg_arch_init(void) Where would this be called for the case of the generic host and using DT? Rob -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org> wrote: > diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/Makefile b/arch/x86/pci/Makefile > index 5c6fc35..35c765b 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/pci/Makefile > +++ b/arch/x86/pci/Makefile > @@ -1,7 +1,10 @@ > obj-y := i386.o init.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_BIOS) += pcbios.o > -obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_MMCONFIG) += mmconfig_$(BITS).o direct.o mmconfig-shared.o > +obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_MMCONFIG) += direct.o mmconfig-shared.o > +ifeq ($(BITS),32) > +obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_MMCONFIG) += mmconfig_32.o > +endif > obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_DIRECT) += direct.o > obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_OLPC) += olpc.o > obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_XEN) += xen.o This would be better written as: mmconfig-y := direct.o mmconfig-shared.o mmconfig-$(CONFIG_X86_32) += mmconfig_32.o obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_MMCONFIG) += $(mmconfig-y) -- Brian Gerst -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 11.03.2015 16:37, Rob Herring wrote: > On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 9:12 AM, Tomasz Nowicki > <tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org> wrote: >> Architectures which want to take advantage of ECAM generic goodness > > This is not necessarily an architecture decision. It is likely per host. Right, good point. > >> should select CONFIG_PCI_ECAM_GENERIC. Otherwise, like x86 32bits machines, >> are obligated to provide own low-level ECAM calls. >> >> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org> >> --- > > [...] > >> diff --git a/drivers/pci/ecam.c b/drivers/pci/ecam.c >> index c588234..796b6e7 100644 >> --- a/drivers/pci/ecam.c >> +++ b/drivers/pci/ecam.c >> @@ -23,6 +23,119 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(pci_mmcfg_lock); >> >> LIST_HEAD(pci_mmcfg_list); >> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_PCI_ECAM >> +static char __iomem *pci_dev_base(unsigned int seg, unsigned int bus, >> + unsigned int devfn) >> +{ >> + struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg = pci_mmconfig_lookup(seg, bus); >> + >> + if (cfg && cfg->virt) >> + return cfg->virt + (PCI_MMCFG_BUS_OFFSET(bus) | (devfn << 12)); >> + return NULL; >> +} >> + >> +int pci_mmcfg_read(unsigned int seg, unsigned int bus, >> + unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 *value) >> +{ >> + char __iomem *addr; >> + >> + /* Why do we have this when nobody checks it. How about a BUG()!? -AK */ >> + if (unlikely((bus > 255) || (devfn > 255) || (reg > 4095))) { >> +err: *value = -1; >> + return -EINVAL; >> + } >> + >> + rcu_read_lock(); > > What is the purpose of the rcu lock other than the old implementation had it? Read/write calls consist on lookup RCU list (with MMCONFIG regions) and then corresponding operation. It is possible to hotplug another pci root bridge which leads to RCU list modification. > >> + addr = pci_dev_base(seg, bus, devfn); > > The .map_bus op provides the same function if you restructure to use > the generic accessors. As you noticed, pci_mmcfg_{read,write} and pci_generic_config_{read,write} prototypes are different. int pci_mmcfg_read(unsigned int seg, unsigned int bus, unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 *value); vs int pci_generic_config_read(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, int where, int size, u32 *val); This is because pci_mmcfg_{read,write} can be used before pci root bridge initialization (while we have no struct pci_bus *bus) inside of ACPICA code (osl.c --> acpi_os_read_pci_configuration()) For that reason, I decide to create ECAM related new accessors which do not depend on host bridge presence. In other words, pci_generic_config_{read,write} can be built on pci_mmcfg_{read,write} but not the other way around. In the light of above, I could not used .map_bus. I might not see a nicer way to solve that so any opinion/suggestion very appreciated :) > >> + if (!addr) { >> + rcu_read_unlock(); >> + goto err; >> + } >> + >> + *value = pci_mmio_read(len, addr + reg); >> + rcu_read_unlock(); >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +int pci_mmcfg_write(unsigned int seg, unsigned int bus, >> + unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 value) >> +{ >> + char __iomem *addr; >> + >> + /* Why do we have this when nobody checks it. How about a BUG()!? -AK */ >> + if (unlikely((bus > 255) || (devfn > 255) || (reg > 4095))) >> + return -EINVAL; >> + >> + rcu_read_lock(); >> + addr = pci_dev_base(seg, bus, devfn); >> + if (!addr) { >> + rcu_read_unlock(); >> + return -EINVAL; >> + } >> + >> + pci_mmio_write(len, addr + reg, value); >> + rcu_read_unlock(); >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +static void __iomem *mcfg_ioremap(struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg) >> +{ >> + void __iomem *addr; >> + u64 start, size; >> + int num_buses; >> + >> + start = cfg->address + PCI_MMCFG_BUS_OFFSET(cfg->start_bus); >> + num_buses = cfg->end_bus - cfg->start_bus + 1; >> + size = PCI_MMCFG_BUS_OFFSET(num_buses); >> + addr = ioremap_nocache(start, size); >> + if (addr) >> + addr -= PCI_MMCFG_BUS_OFFSET(cfg->start_bus); >> + return addr; >> +} >> + >> +int __init pci_mmcfg_arch_init(void) > > Where would this be called for the case of the generic host and using DT? > I focused on sharing the code in ACPI context and did not consider DT. I think we can improve that code as next steps. Tomasz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 11.03.2015 17:30, Brian Gerst wrote: > On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Tomasz Nowicki > <tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org> wrote: > >> diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/Makefile b/arch/x86/pci/Makefile >> index 5c6fc35..35c765b 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/pci/Makefile >> +++ b/arch/x86/pci/Makefile >> @@ -1,7 +1,10 @@ >> obj-y := i386.o init.o >> >> obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_BIOS) += pcbios.o >> -obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_MMCONFIG) += mmconfig_$(BITS).o direct.o mmconfig-shared.o >> +obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_MMCONFIG) += direct.o mmconfig-shared.o >> +ifeq ($(BITS),32) >> +obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_MMCONFIG) += mmconfig_32.o >> +endif >> obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_DIRECT) += direct.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_OLPC) += olpc.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_XEN) += xen.o > > This would be better written as: > > mmconfig-y := direct.o mmconfig-shared.o > mmconfig-$(CONFIG_X86_32) += mmconfig_32.o > obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_MMCONFIG) += $(mmconfig-y) Nice! Will update my patch. Tomasz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig index aa451bf..3bf1aa5 100644 --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig @@ -142,6 +142,7 @@ config X86 select X86_FEATURE_NAMES if PROC_FS select SRCU select HAVE_PCI_ECAM + select GENERIC_PCI_ECAM if X86_64 config INSTRUCTION_DECODER def_bool y diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/Makefile b/arch/x86/pci/Makefile index 5c6fc35..35c765b 100644 --- a/arch/x86/pci/Makefile +++ b/arch/x86/pci/Makefile @@ -1,7 +1,10 @@ obj-y := i386.o init.o obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_BIOS) += pcbios.o -obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_MMCONFIG) += mmconfig_$(BITS).o direct.o mmconfig-shared.o +obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_MMCONFIG) += direct.o mmconfig-shared.o +ifeq ($(BITS),32) +obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_MMCONFIG) += mmconfig_32.o +endif obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_DIRECT) += direct.o obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_OLPC) += olpc.o obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_XEN) += xen.o diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/mmconfig_64.c b/arch/x86/pci/mmconfig_64.c deleted file mode 100644 index fd857ea..0000000 --- a/arch/x86/pci/mmconfig_64.c +++ /dev/null @@ -1,127 +0,0 @@ -/* - * mmconfig.c - Low-level direct PCI config space access via MMCONFIG - * - * This is an 64bit optimized version that always keeps the full mmconfig - * space mapped. This allows lockless config space operation. - */ - -#include <linux/pci.h> -#include <linux/init.h> -#include <linux/acpi.h> -#include <linux/bitmap.h> -#include <linux/rcupdate.h> -#include <linux/ecam.h> -#include <asm/e820.h> -#include <asm/pci_x86.h> - -#define PREFIX "PCI: " - -static char __iomem *pci_dev_base(unsigned int seg, unsigned int bus, unsigned int devfn) -{ - struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg = pci_mmconfig_lookup(seg, bus); - - if (cfg && cfg->virt) - return cfg->virt + (PCI_MMCFG_BUS_OFFSET(bus) | (devfn << 12)); - return NULL; -} - -int pci_mmcfg_read(unsigned int seg, unsigned int bus, - unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 *value) -{ - char __iomem *addr; - - /* Why do we have this when nobody checks it. How about a BUG()!? -AK */ - if (unlikely((bus > 255) || (devfn > 255) || (reg > 4095))) { -err: *value = -1; - return -EINVAL; - } - - rcu_read_lock(); - addr = pci_dev_base(seg, bus, devfn); - if (!addr) { - rcu_read_unlock(); - goto err; - } - - *value = pci_mmio_read(len, addr + reg); - rcu_read_unlock(); - - return 0; -} - -int pci_mmcfg_write(unsigned int seg, unsigned int bus, - unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 value) -{ - char __iomem *addr; - - /* Why do we have this when nobody checks it. How about a BUG()!? -AK */ - if (unlikely((bus > 255) || (devfn > 255) || (reg > 4095))) - return -EINVAL; - - rcu_read_lock(); - addr = pci_dev_base(seg, bus, devfn); - if (!addr) { - rcu_read_unlock(); - return -EINVAL; - } - - pci_mmio_write(len, addr + reg, value); - rcu_read_unlock(); - - return 0; -} - -static void __iomem *mcfg_ioremap(struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg) -{ - void __iomem *addr; - u64 start, size; - int num_buses; - - start = cfg->address + PCI_MMCFG_BUS_OFFSET(cfg->start_bus); - num_buses = cfg->end_bus - cfg->start_bus + 1; - size = PCI_MMCFG_BUS_OFFSET(num_buses); - addr = ioremap_nocache(start, size); - if (addr) - addr -= PCI_MMCFG_BUS_OFFSET(cfg->start_bus); - return addr; -} - -int __init pci_mmcfg_arch_init(void) -{ - struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg; - - list_for_each_entry(cfg, &pci_mmcfg_list, list) - if (pci_mmcfg_arch_map(cfg)) { - pci_mmcfg_arch_free(); - return 0; - } - - return 1; -} - -void __init pci_mmcfg_arch_free(void) -{ - struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg; - - list_for_each_entry(cfg, &pci_mmcfg_list, list) - pci_mmcfg_arch_unmap(cfg); -} - -int pci_mmcfg_arch_map(struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg) -{ - cfg->virt = mcfg_ioremap(cfg); - if (!cfg->virt) { - pr_err(PREFIX "can't map MMCONFIG at %pR\n", &cfg->res); - return -ENOMEM; - } - - return 0; -} - -void pci_mmcfg_arch_unmap(struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg) -{ - if (cfg && cfg->virt) { - iounmap(cfg->virt + PCI_MMCFG_BUS_OFFSET(cfg->start_bus)); - cfg->virt = NULL; - } -} diff --git a/drivers/pci/Kconfig b/drivers/pci/Kconfig index 90a5fb9..fae4aa7 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/pci/Kconfig @@ -29,6 +29,9 @@ config PCI_ECAM config HAVE_PCI_ECAM bool +config GENERIC_PCI_ECAM + bool + config PCI_DEBUG bool "PCI Debugging" depends on PCI && DEBUG_KERNEL diff --git a/drivers/pci/ecam.c b/drivers/pci/ecam.c index c588234..796b6e7 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/ecam.c +++ b/drivers/pci/ecam.c @@ -23,6 +23,119 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(pci_mmcfg_lock); LIST_HEAD(pci_mmcfg_list); +#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_PCI_ECAM +static char __iomem *pci_dev_base(unsigned int seg, unsigned int bus, + unsigned int devfn) +{ + struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg = pci_mmconfig_lookup(seg, bus); + + if (cfg && cfg->virt) + return cfg->virt + (PCI_MMCFG_BUS_OFFSET(bus) | (devfn << 12)); + return NULL; +} + +int pci_mmcfg_read(unsigned int seg, unsigned int bus, + unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 *value) +{ + char __iomem *addr; + + /* Why do we have this when nobody checks it. How about a BUG()!? -AK */ + if (unlikely((bus > 255) || (devfn > 255) || (reg > 4095))) { +err: *value = -1; + return -EINVAL; + } + + rcu_read_lock(); + addr = pci_dev_base(seg, bus, devfn); + if (!addr) { + rcu_read_unlock(); + goto err; + } + + *value = pci_mmio_read(len, addr + reg); + rcu_read_unlock(); + + return 0; +} + +int pci_mmcfg_write(unsigned int seg, unsigned int bus, + unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 value) +{ + char __iomem *addr; + + /* Why do we have this when nobody checks it. How about a BUG()!? -AK */ + if (unlikely((bus > 255) || (devfn > 255) || (reg > 4095))) + return -EINVAL; + + rcu_read_lock(); + addr = pci_dev_base(seg, bus, devfn); + if (!addr) { + rcu_read_unlock(); + return -EINVAL; + } + + pci_mmio_write(len, addr + reg, value); + rcu_read_unlock(); + + return 0; +} + +static void __iomem *mcfg_ioremap(struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg) +{ + void __iomem *addr; + u64 start, size; + int num_buses; + + start = cfg->address + PCI_MMCFG_BUS_OFFSET(cfg->start_bus); + num_buses = cfg->end_bus - cfg->start_bus + 1; + size = PCI_MMCFG_BUS_OFFSET(num_buses); + addr = ioremap_nocache(start, size); + if (addr) + addr -= PCI_MMCFG_BUS_OFFSET(cfg->start_bus); + return addr; +} + +int __init pci_mmcfg_arch_init(void) +{ + struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg; + + list_for_each_entry(cfg, &pci_mmcfg_list, list) + if (pci_mmcfg_arch_map(cfg)) { + pci_mmcfg_arch_free(); + return 0; + } + + return 1; +} + +void __init pci_mmcfg_arch_free(void) +{ + struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg; + + list_for_each_entry(cfg, &pci_mmcfg_list, list) + pci_mmcfg_arch_unmap(cfg); +} + +int pci_mmcfg_arch_map(struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg) +{ + cfg->virt = mcfg_ioremap(cfg); + if (!cfg->virt) { + pr_err(PREFIX "can't map MMCONFIG at %pR\n", &cfg->res); + return -ENOMEM; + } + + return 0; +} + +void pci_mmcfg_arch_unmap(struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg) +{ + if (cfg && cfg->virt) { + iounmap(cfg->virt + PCI_MMCFG_BUS_OFFSET(cfg->start_bus)); + cfg->virt = NULL; + } +} +#endif + static u32 pci_mmconfig_generic_read(int len, void __iomem *addr) {
Architectures which want to take advantage of ECAM generic goodness should select CONFIG_PCI_ECAM_GENERIC. Otherwise, like x86 32bits machines, are obligated to provide own low-level ECAM calls. Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org> --- arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 + arch/x86/pci/Makefile | 5 +- arch/x86/pci/mmconfig_64.c | 127 --------------------------------------------- drivers/pci/Kconfig | 3 ++ drivers/pci/ecam.c | 113 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 5 files changed, 121 insertions(+), 128 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 arch/x86/pci/mmconfig_64.c