Message ID | 3302342.cNyRUGN06P@wuerfel (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Thu, 9 Apr 2015, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > This is a fix^3 for the mempool poisoning patch, which introduces > a compile-time error on some ARM randconfig builds: > > mm/mempool.c: In function 'check_element': > mm/mempool.c:65:16: error: implicit declaration of function 'kmap_atomic' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > void *addr = kmap_atomic((struct page *)element); > > The problem is clearly the missing declaration, and including > linux/highmem.h fixes it. > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > Fixes: a3db5a8463b0db ("mm, mempool: poison elements backed by page allocator fix fix") Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Thanks! Can you confirm that this is because CONFIG_BLOCK is disabled and not something else?
On Thursday 09 April 2015 12:31:05 David Rientjes wrote: > On Thu, 9 Apr 2015, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > This is a fix^3 for the mempool poisoning patch, which introduces > > a compile-time error on some ARM randconfig builds: > > > > mm/mempool.c: In function 'check_element': > > mm/mempool.c:65:16: error: implicit declaration of function 'kmap_atomic' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > > void *addr = kmap_atomic((struct page *)element); > > > > The problem is clearly the missing declaration, and including > > linux/highmem.h fixes it. > > > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > > Fixes: a3db5a8463b0db ("mm, mempool: poison elements backed by page allocator fix fix") > > Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> > > Thanks! Can you confirm that this is because CONFIG_BLOCK is disabled and > not something else? Unfortunately I've lost the information which build was responsible for this error (normally I keep it, but my script failed here because the same config introduced two new regressions). CONFIG_BLOCK sounds plausible here. If necessary, I can repeat the last few hundred builds without this patch to find out what it was. Arnd
On Thu, 9 Apr 2015, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > This is a fix^3 for the mempool poisoning patch, which introduces > > > a compile-time error on some ARM randconfig builds: > > > > > > mm/mempool.c: In function 'check_element': > > > mm/mempool.c:65:16: error: implicit declaration of function 'kmap_atomic' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > > > void *addr = kmap_atomic((struct page *)element); > > > > > > The problem is clearly the missing declaration, and including > > > linux/highmem.h fixes it. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > > > Fixes: a3db5a8463b0db ("mm, mempool: poison elements backed by page allocator fix fix") > > > > Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> > > > > Thanks! Can you confirm that this is because CONFIG_BLOCK is disabled and > > not something else? > > Unfortunately I've lost the information which build was responsible > for this error (normally I keep it, but my script failed here because the > same config introduced two new regressions). CONFIG_BLOCK sounds plausible > here. > > If necessary, I can repeat the last few hundred builds without this > patch to find out what it was. > Ok, thanks. The only reason I ask is because if this is CONFIG_BLOCK then it shouldn't be arm specific and nothing else has reported it. I'll do a randconfig loop with my arm cross-compiler and see if I can find any other issues.
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 4:12 PM, David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> wrote: > On Thu, 9 Apr 2015, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > >> > > This is a fix^3 for the mempool poisoning patch, which introduces >> > > a compile-time error on some ARM randconfig builds: >> > > >> > > mm/mempool.c: In function 'check_element': >> > > mm/mempool.c:65:16: error: implicit declaration of function 'kmap_atomic' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] >> > > void *addr = kmap_atomic((struct page *)element); >> > > >> > > The problem is clearly the missing declaration, and including >> > > linux/highmem.h fixes it. >> > > >> > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> >> > > Fixes: a3db5a8463b0db ("mm, mempool: poison elements backed by page allocator fix fix") >> > >> > Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> >> > >> > Thanks! Can you confirm that this is because CONFIG_BLOCK is disabled and >> > not something else? >> >> Unfortunately I've lost the information which build was responsible >> for this error (normally I keep it, but my script failed here because the >> same config introduced two new regressions). CONFIG_BLOCK sounds plausible >> here. >> >> If necessary, I can repeat the last few hundred builds without this >> patch to find out what it was. >> > > Ok, thanks. The only reason I ask is because if this is CONFIG_BLOCK then > it shouldn't be arm specific and nothing else has reported it. The random configuration file included in http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=142851035816974&w=2 doesn't have CONFIG_BLOCK set. That build failure was on an x86_32 system.
diff --git a/mm/mempool.c b/mm/mempool.c index 05ad55e61264..5e7c4a871391 100644 --- a/mm/mempool.c +++ b/mm/mempool.c @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ #include <linux/mm.h> #include <linux/slab.h> #include <linux/kasan.h> +#include <linux/highmem.h> #include <linux/kmemleak.h> #include <linux/export.h> #include <linux/mempool.h>
This is a fix^3 for the mempool poisoning patch, which introduces a compile-time error on some ARM randconfig builds: mm/mempool.c: In function 'check_element': mm/mempool.c:65:16: error: implicit declaration of function 'kmap_atomic' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] void *addr = kmap_atomic((struct page *)element); The problem is clearly the missing declaration, and including linux/highmem.h fixes it. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Fixes: a3db5a8463b0db ("mm, mempool: poison elements backed by page allocator fix fix")