Message ID | 1429025727-15380-7-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 05:35:16PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > PIN_GLOBAL is set only when userspace asked for it, and that > is only the case for the gen6 PIPE_CONTROL workaround. We're not > allowed to just clear this. Nope. See only_mappable_for_reloc(). There is an issue here, but this is not it. -Chris
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c index 48ac5608481e..a7ed9f695586 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c @@ -600,7 +600,7 @@ i915_gem_execbuffer_reserve_vma(struct i915_vma *vma, only_mappable_for_reloc(entry->flags)) ret = i915_gem_object_pin(obj, vma->vm, entry->alignment, - flags & ~(PIN_GLOBAL | PIN_MAPPABLE)); + flags & ~PIN_MAPPABLE); if (ret) return ret;
PIN_GLOBAL is set only when userspace asked for it, and that is only the case for the gen6 PIPE_CONTROL workaround. We're not allowed to just clear this. The important part of the fallback is to drop the restriction to the mappable range. This issue has been introduced in commit edf4427b8055dc93eb5222d8174b07a75ba24fb5 Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Date: Wed Jan 14 11:20:56 2015 +0000 drm/i915: Fallback to using CPU relocations for large batch buffers Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)