| Message ID | 1433391238-19471-12-git-send-email-jiang.liu@linux.intel.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Not Applicable, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 12:13:21PM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote: > Use irq_desc_get_xxx() to avoid redundant lookup of irq_desc while we > already have a pointer to corresponding irq_desc. > > Do the same thing to avoid pattern "irq_get_chip_data(data->irq)". And I am missing the context, it is a bad practice to send some part of the series without giving context. Is this dependent on something else...?
On 2015/6/8 19:16, Vinod Koul wrote: > On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 12:13:21PM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote: >> Use irq_desc_get_xxx() to avoid redundant lookup of irq_desc while we >> already have a pointer to corresponding irq_desc. >> >> Do the same thing to avoid pattern "irq_get_chip_data(data->irq)". > > And I am missing the context, it is a bad practice to send some part of the > series without giving context. Is this dependent on something else...? This patch set touches too many files, so I didn't send the cover letter to all maintainers. The whole patch set is to simplify core irq interfaces by killing the 'irq' parameter. Please refer to lkml.org/lkml/2015/6/4/113 And it may depends on preceding patches in tip/x86/apic branch, so it would be safer to handle the patch set altogether. Thanks! Gerry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/dma/ipu/ipu_irq.c b/drivers/dma/ipu/ipu_irq.c index 2e284a4438bc..0e12af37fe2f 100644 --- a/drivers/dma/ipu/ipu_irq.c +++ b/drivers/dma/ipu/ipu_irq.c @@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ int ipu_irq_unmap(unsigned int source) /* Chained IRQ handler for IPU error interrupt */ static void ipu_irq_err(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc) { - struct ipu *ipu = irq_get_handler_data(irq); + struct ipu *ipu = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc); u32 status; int i, line; diff --git a/drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/ipu-common.c b/drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/ipu-common.c index 67bab5c36056..7022825b7a2c 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/ipu-common.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/ipu-common.c @@ -915,8 +915,8 @@ static void ipu_irq_handle(struct ipu_soc *ipu, const int *regs, int num_regs) static void ipu_irq_handler(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc) { struct ipu_soc *ipu = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc); + struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc); const int int_reg[] = { 0, 1, 2, 3, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14}; - struct irq_chip *chip = irq_get_chip(irq); chained_irq_enter(chip, desc); @@ -928,8 +928,8 @@ static void ipu_irq_handler(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc) static void ipu_err_irq_handler(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc) { struct ipu_soc *ipu = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc); + struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc); const int int_reg[] = { 4, 5, 8, 9}; - struct irq_chip *chip = irq_get_chip(irq); chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
Use irq_desc_get_xxx() to avoid redundant lookup of irq_desc while we already have a pointer to corresponding irq_desc. Do the same thing to avoid pattern "irq_get_chip_data(data->irq)". Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> --- drivers/dma/ipu/ipu_irq.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/ipu-common.c | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)