Message ID | 1435060743-5511-9-git-send-email-kishon@ti.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 17:28:53 +0530 Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com> wrote: > Add new device tree node for the control module register space where > PCIe registers are present. > > Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com> > --- > arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi | 5 +++++ > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi > index 260f300..3f434f7 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi > @@ -291,6 +291,11 @@ > reg = <0x4a002e00 0x7c>; > }; > > + dra7_ctrl_pcie: tisyscon@4a003c00 { > + compatible = "syscon"; > + reg = <0x4a003c00 0x48>; > + }; > + Why do you need to start from 0x4a003c00? CTRL_CORE_PCIESS1_PCS1 is at 0x4a003c24 > sdma: dma-controller@4a056000 { > compatible = "ti,omap4430-sdma"; > reg = <0x4a056000 0x1000>; > -- > 1.7.9.5 > cheers, -roger
On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 14:50:17 +0300 Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com> wrote: > On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 17:28:53 +0530 > Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com> wrote: > > > Add new device tree node for the control module register space where > > PCIe registers are present. > > > > Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com> > > --- > > arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi | 5 +++++ > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi > > index 260f300..3f434f7 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi > > @@ -291,6 +291,11 @@ > > reg = <0x4a002e00 0x7c>; > > }; > > > > + dra7_ctrl_pcie: tisyscon@4a003c00 { > > + compatible = "syscon"; > > + reg = <0x4a003c00 0x48>; > > + }; > > + > > Why do you need to start from 0x4a003c00? > CTRL_CORE_PCIESS1_PCS1 is at 0x4a003c24 Also, why can't this dra7_ctrl_pcie node be where scm_conf is. > > > sdma: dma-controller@4a056000 { > > compatible = "ti,omap4430-sdma"; > > reg = <0x4a056000 0x1000>; > > -- > > 1.7.9.5 > > > > cheers, > -roger > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com> [150624 04:58]: > On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 14:50:17 +0300 > Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 17:28:53 +0530 > > Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com> wrote: > > > > > Add new device tree node for the control module register space where > > > PCIe registers are present. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com> > > > --- > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi | 5 +++++ > > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi > > > index 260f300..3f434f7 100644 > > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi > > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi > > > @@ -291,6 +291,11 @@ > > > reg = <0x4a002e00 0x7c>; > > > }; > > > > > > + dra7_ctrl_pcie: tisyscon@4a003c00 { > > > + compatible = "syscon"; > > > + reg = <0x4a003c00 0x48>; > > > + }; > > > + > > > > Why do you need to start from 0x4a003c00? > > CTRL_CORE_PCIESS1_PCS1 is at 0x4a003c24 > > Also, why can't this dra7_ctrl_pcie node be where scm_conf is. Yes all the scm children should be under scm@2000 entry in the dra7.dtsi file. And BTW, there's nothing stopping a driver doing of_ioremap on a larger range and be a child under scm@2000 in the dra7.dtsi if that range is dedicated to a single driver. My take is we should only use regmap for the scm_conf area in general. Regards, Tony
On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 05:09:39 -0700 Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote: > * Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com> [150624 04:58]: > > On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 14:50:17 +0300 > > Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com> wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 17:28:53 +0530 > > > Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Add new device tree node for the control module register space where > > > > PCIe registers are present. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com> > > > > --- > > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi | 5 +++++ > > > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi > > > > index 260f300..3f434f7 100644 > > > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi > > > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi > > > > @@ -291,6 +291,11 @@ > > > > reg = <0x4a002e00 0x7c>; > > > > }; > > > > > > > > + dra7_ctrl_pcie: tisyscon@4a003c00 { > > > > + compatible = "syscon"; > > > > + reg = <0x4a003c00 0x48>; > > > > + }; > > > > + > > > > > > Why do you need to start from 0x4a003c00? > > > CTRL_CORE_PCIESS1_PCS1 is at 0x4a003c24 > > > > Also, why can't this dra7_ctrl_pcie node be where scm_conf is. > > Yes all the scm children should be under scm@2000 entry in the > dra7.dtsi file. > > And BTW, there's nothing stopping a driver doing of_ioremap > on a larger range and be a child under scm@2000 in the dra7.dtsi > if that range is dedicated to a single driver. Agreed. > > My take is we should only use regmap for the scm_conf area > in general. +1 should we get rid of dra7_ctrl_core and dra7_ctrl_general? or move them to scm node? cheers, -roger
* Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com> [150624 05:21]: > On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 05:09:39 -0700 > Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote: > > > > My take is we should only use regmap for the scm_conf area > > in general. > > +1 > > should we get rid of dra7_ctrl_core and dra7_ctrl_general? > or move them to scm node? Well at least move them. And if there are clear dedicated register ranges there claimed only by a single device driver, then those drivers should be just regular loadable driver modules doing of_ioremap on the range. And in that case they can be removed. We have examples of both in dra7.dtsi, pbias_regulator using the scm_conf via syscon, and then dra7_pmx_core ioremapping a dedicated register range. So unless there are other messy register ranges like the scm_conf area then there should not be need for other syscon areas. Regards, Tony
Hi, On Wednesday 24 June 2015 05:20 PM, Roger Quadros wrote: > On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 17:28:53 +0530 > Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com> wrote: > >> Add new device tree node for the control module register space where >> PCIe registers are present. >> >> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com> >> --- >> arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi | 5 +++++ >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi >> index 260f300..3f434f7 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi >> @@ -291,6 +291,11 @@ >> reg = <0x4a002e00 0x7c>; >> }; >> >> + dra7_ctrl_pcie: tisyscon@4a003c00 { >> + compatible = "syscon"; >> + reg = <0x4a003c00 0x48>; >> + }; >> + > > Why do you need to start from 0x4a003c00? > CTRL_CORE_PCIESS1_PCS1 is at 0x4a003c24 Actually wanted to have minimum number of syscon dt nodes. So thought even others can use dra7_ctrl_pcie phandle. But I looked only at dra7_ctrl_core and dra7_ctrl_general and not scm_conf :-( Thanks Kishon
Hi, On Wednesday 24 June 2015 05:26 PM, Roger Quadros wrote: > On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 14:50:17 +0300 > Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 17:28:53 +0530 >> Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com> wrote: >> >>> Add new device tree node for the control module register space where >>> PCIe registers are present. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com> >>> --- >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi | 5 +++++ >>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi >>> index 260f300..3f434f7 100644 >>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi >>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi >>> @@ -291,6 +291,11 @@ >>> reg = <0x4a002e00 0x7c>; >>> }; >>> >>> + dra7_ctrl_pcie: tisyscon@4a003c00 { >>> + compatible = "syscon"; >>> + reg = <0x4a003c00 0x48>; >>> + }; >>> + >> >> Why do you need to start from 0x4a003c00? >> CTRL_CORE_PCIESS1_PCS1 is at 0x4a003c24 > > Also, why can't this dra7_ctrl_pcie node be where scm_conf is. Yes. I think that's the right thing to do. I saw dra7_ctrl_core and dra7_ctrl_general and added it. Thanks Kishon
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi index 260f300..3f434f7 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi @@ -291,6 +291,11 @@ reg = <0x4a002e00 0x7c>; }; + dra7_ctrl_pcie: tisyscon@4a003c00 { + compatible = "syscon"; + reg = <0x4a003c00 0x48>; + }; + sdma: dma-controller@4a056000 { compatible = "ti,omap4430-sdma"; reg = <0x4a056000 0x1000>;
Add new device tree node for the control module register space where PCIe registers are present. Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com> --- arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)