| Message ID | 1435592237-17924-8-git-send-email-eric.auger@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
Hello! > -----Original Message----- > From: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Eric Auger > Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 6:37 PM > To: eric.auger@st.com; eric.auger@linaro.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; > marc.zyngier@arm.com; christoffer.dall@linaro.org; andre.przywara@arm.com; > kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu; kvm@vger.kernel.org > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; patches@linaro.org; p.fedin@samsung.com; pbonzini@redhat.com > Subject: [PATCH 7/7] KVM: arm: implement kvm_set_msi by gsi direct mapping > > If the ITS modality is not available, let's simply support MSI > injection by transforming the MSI.data into an SPI ID. > > This becomes possible to use KVM_SIGNAL_MSI ioctl for arm too. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> > --- > arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig | 1 + > virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c | 5 +++++ > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig > index 151e710..0f58baf 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig > @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ config KVM > select KVM_VFIO > select HAVE_KVM_EVENTFD > select HAVE_KVM_IRQFD > + select HAVE_KVM_MSI > select HAVE_KVM_IRQCHIP > select HAVE_KVM_IRQ_ROUTING > depends on ARM_VIRT_EXT && ARM_LPAE && ARM_ARCH_TIMER > diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c > index 0b4c48c..b3c10dc 100644 > --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c > +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c > @@ -2314,6 +2314,11 @@ int kvm_set_msi(struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *e, > return kvm->arch.vgic.vm_ops.inject_msi(kvm, &msi); > else > return -ENODEV; > + case KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_MSI: > + if (kvm->arch.vgic.vm_ops.inject_msi) > + return -EINVAL; > + else > + return kvm_vgic_inject_irq(kvm, 0, e->msi.data, level); Given API change i suggest (using KVM_MSI_VALID_DEVID flag), we could get rid of all these if()'s here. Just forward all parameters to vGIC implementation code and let it do its checks. > default: > return -EINVAL; > } > -- > 1.9.1 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Kind regards, Pavel Fedin Expert Engineer Samsung Electronics Research center Russia -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hi Pavel, On 07/02/2015 09:53 AM, Pavel Fedin wrote: > Hello! > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Eric Auger >> Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 6:37 PM >> To: eric.auger@st.com; eric.auger@linaro.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; >> marc.zyngier@arm.com; christoffer.dall@linaro.org; andre.przywara@arm.com; >> kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu; kvm@vger.kernel.org >> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; patches@linaro.org; p.fedin@samsung.com; pbonzini@redhat.com >> Subject: [PATCH 7/7] KVM: arm: implement kvm_set_msi by gsi direct mapping >> >> If the ITS modality is not available, let's simply support MSI >> injection by transforming the MSI.data into an SPI ID. >> >> This becomes possible to use KVM_SIGNAL_MSI ioctl for arm too. >> >> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> >> --- >> arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig | 1 + >> virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c | 5 +++++ >> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig >> index 151e710..0f58baf 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig >> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig >> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ config KVM >> select KVM_VFIO >> select HAVE_KVM_EVENTFD >> select HAVE_KVM_IRQFD >> + select HAVE_KVM_MSI >> select HAVE_KVM_IRQCHIP >> select HAVE_KVM_IRQ_ROUTING >> depends on ARM_VIRT_EXT && ARM_LPAE && ARM_ARCH_TIMER >> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c >> index 0b4c48c..b3c10dc 100644 >> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c >> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c >> @@ -2314,6 +2314,11 @@ int kvm_set_msi(struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *e, >> return kvm->arch.vgic.vm_ops.inject_msi(kvm, &msi); >> else >> return -ENODEV; >> + case KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_MSI: >> + if (kvm->arch.vgic.vm_ops.inject_msi) >> + return -EINVAL; >> + else >> + return kvm_vgic_inject_irq(kvm, 0, e->msi.data, level); > > Given API change i suggest (using KVM_MSI_VALID_DEVID flag), we could get rid of all these if()'s > here. Just forward all parameters to vGIC implementation code and let it do its checks. I don't understand this comment. Here this is the kernel struct that is used (struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry) and not the user one (kvm_irq_routing_entry). The kernel struct does not have the flag field. Another reason I think to keep using the type for homogeneity. To be noted that in the kernel struct, the devid is passed in kvm_extended_msi, as you suggested for the user-space struct. Thanks Eric > >> default: >> return -EINVAL; >> } >> -- >> 1.9.1 >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > Kind regards, > Pavel Fedin > Expert Engineer > Samsung Electronics Research center Russia > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hello! > > Given API change i suggest (using KVM_MSI_VALID_DEVID flag), we could get rid of all these if()'s > > here. Just forward all parameters to vGIC implementation code and let it do its checks. > I don't understand this comment. Here this is the kernel struct that is > used (struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry) and not the user one > (kvm_irq_routing_entry). The kernel struct does not have the flag field. Easy. ARM code can always use struct kvm_extended_msi, and flags can go to this structure. > Another reason I think to keep using the type for homogeneity. Homogeneity is perfect IMHO. If that would be simpler for you, i could post a patch for this which i made on top of your series. Sorry, i don't have time to respin the whole thing, busy with qemu GICv3 fight :) Kind regards, Pavel Fedin Expert Engineer Samsung Electronics Research center Russia -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hi Eric, On 29/06/15 16:37, Eric Auger wrote: > If the ITS modality is not available, let's simply support MSI > injection by transforming the MSI.data into an SPI ID. > > This becomes possible to use KVM_SIGNAL_MSI ioctl for arm too. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> > --- > arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig | 1 + > virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c | 5 +++++ > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig > index 151e710..0f58baf 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig > @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ config KVM > select KVM_VFIO > select HAVE_KVM_EVENTFD > select HAVE_KVM_IRQFD > + select HAVE_KVM_MSI > select HAVE_KVM_IRQCHIP > select HAVE_KVM_IRQ_ROUTING > depends on ARM_VIRT_EXT && ARM_LPAE && ARM_ARCH_TIMER > diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c > index 0b4c48c..b3c10dc 100644 > --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c > +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c > @@ -2314,6 +2314,11 @@ int kvm_set_msi(struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *e, > return kvm->arch.vgic.vm_ops.inject_msi(kvm, &msi); > else > return -ENODEV; > + case KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_MSI: > + if (kvm->arch.vgic.vm_ops.inject_msi) > + return -EINVAL; > + else > + return kvm_vgic_inject_irq(kvm, 0, e->msi.data, level); If you add: static int vgic_v2m_inject_msi(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_msi *msi) { return kvm_vgic_inject_irq(kvm, 0, msi->data, 1); } to vgic-v2-emul.c and wire it up accordingly, you can simplify the above kvm_set_msi, getting rid of all those extra case handling. This also helps merging KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_MSI and the extended case. I have hacked this up and it seems to work for me. Cheers, Andre. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hi Andre, On 07/02/2015 07:10 PM, Andre Przywara wrote: > Hi Eric, > > On 29/06/15 16:37, Eric Auger wrote: >> If the ITS modality is not available, let's simply support MSI >> injection by transforming the MSI.data into an SPI ID. >> >> This becomes possible to use KVM_SIGNAL_MSI ioctl for arm too. >> >> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> >> --- >> arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig | 1 + >> virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c | 5 +++++ >> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig >> index 151e710..0f58baf 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig >> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig >> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ config KVM >> select KVM_VFIO >> select HAVE_KVM_EVENTFD >> select HAVE_KVM_IRQFD >> + select HAVE_KVM_MSI >> select HAVE_KVM_IRQCHIP >> select HAVE_KVM_IRQ_ROUTING >> depends on ARM_VIRT_EXT && ARM_LPAE && ARM_ARCH_TIMER >> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c >> index 0b4c48c..b3c10dc 100644 >> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c >> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c >> @@ -2314,6 +2314,11 @@ int kvm_set_msi(struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *e, >> return kvm->arch.vgic.vm_ops.inject_msi(kvm, &msi); >> else >> return -ENODEV; >> + case KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_MSI: >> + if (kvm->arch.vgic.vm_ops.inject_msi) >> + return -EINVAL; >> + else >> + return kvm_vgic_inject_irq(kvm, 0, e->msi.data, level); > > If you add: > > static int vgic_v2m_inject_msi(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_msi *msi) > { > return kvm_vgic_inject_irq(kvm, 0, msi->data, 1); > } > > to vgic-v2-emul.c and wire it up accordingly, you can simplify the above > kvm_set_msi, getting rid of all those extra case handling. > This also helps merging KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_MSI and the extended case. > > I have hacked this up and it seems to work for me. OK thanks I will respin either today or on monday. Best Regards Eric > > Cheers, > Andre. > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig index 151e710..0f58baf 100644 --- a/arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ config KVM select KVM_VFIO select HAVE_KVM_EVENTFD select HAVE_KVM_IRQFD + select HAVE_KVM_MSI select HAVE_KVM_IRQCHIP select HAVE_KVM_IRQ_ROUTING depends on ARM_VIRT_EXT && ARM_LPAE && ARM_ARCH_TIMER diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c index 0b4c48c..b3c10dc 100644 --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c @@ -2314,6 +2314,11 @@ int kvm_set_msi(struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *e, return kvm->arch.vgic.vm_ops.inject_msi(kvm, &msi); else return -ENODEV; + case KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_MSI: + if (kvm->arch.vgic.vm_ops.inject_msi) + return -EINVAL; + else + return kvm_vgic_inject_irq(kvm, 0, e->msi.data, level); default: return -EINVAL; }
If the ITS modality is not available, let's simply support MSI injection by transforming the MSI.data into an SPI ID. This becomes possible to use KVM_SIGNAL_MSI ioctl for arm too. Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> --- arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig | 1 + virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c | 5 +++++ 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)