| Message ID | 1436333790-18219-4-git-send-email-javier@osg.samsung.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On 08.07.2015 14:36, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > The dtc compiler combines all the defined nodes that have the same path > so a device node definition can be in one file and later be extended in > another one. > > That's the case of the Exynos5420 pinctrl device nodes that are defined > in the exynos5420.dtsi file and extended in exynos5420-pinctrl.dtsi. > > But since the exynos5420.dtsi file includes the exynos5420-pinctrl.dtsi > before the pinctrl device nodes are actually defined, the definition of > the pinctrl device nodes happens in exynos5420-pinctrl.dtsi and are > extended in exynos5420.dtsi. > > That is the opposite of the original intention so even when there is no > difference in practice, the exynos5420-pinctrl.dtsi include should be > moved at the end of the exynos5420.dtsi file after the pinctrl device > nodes have been already defined. > > This will also allow to later change the exynos5420-pinctrl.dtsi file > to use labels instead of full paths to extend the pinctrl nodes. Since > keeping the include at the top, would cause a dtc build error due the > pinctrl labels not being defined yet. > > Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> > --- > > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> Best regards, Krzysztof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi index 534f27ceb10b..df9aee92ecf4 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi @@ -15,7 +15,6 @@ #include <dt-bindings/clock/exynos5420.h> #include "exynos5.dtsi" -#include "exynos5420-pinctrl.dtsi" #include <dt-bindings/clock/exynos-audss-clk.h> @@ -1166,3 +1165,5 @@ clocks = <&clock CLK_UART3>, <&clock CLK_SCLK_UART3>; clock-names = "uart", "clk_uart_baud0"; }; + +#include "exynos5420-pinctrl.dtsi"
The dtc compiler combines all the defined nodes that have the same path so a device node definition can be in one file and later be extended in another one. That's the case of the Exynos5420 pinctrl device nodes that are defined in the exynos5420.dtsi file and extended in exynos5420-pinctrl.dtsi. But since the exynos5420.dtsi file includes the exynos5420-pinctrl.dtsi before the pinctrl device nodes are actually defined, the definition of the pinctrl device nodes happens in exynos5420-pinctrl.dtsi and are extended in exynos5420.dtsi. That is the opposite of the original intention so even when there is no difference in practice, the exynos5420-pinctrl.dtsi include should be moved at the end of the exynos5420.dtsi file after the pinctrl device nodes have been already defined. This will also allow to later change the exynos5420-pinctrl.dtsi file to use labels instead of full paths to extend the pinctrl nodes. Since keeping the include at the top, would cause a dtc build error due the pinctrl labels not being defined yet. Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> --- arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)