| Message ID | 1436430137-24205-5-git-send-email-eric.auger@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
Hi Eric, On 09/07/15 09:22, Eric Auger wrote: > This patch adds compilation and link against irqchip. > > On ARM, irqchip routing is not really useful since there is > a single irqchip. However main motivation behind using irqchip > code is to enable MSI routing code. With the support of in-kernel > GICv3 ITS emulation, it now seems to be a MUST HAVE requirement. > .... > diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c > index 3630971..6c6c25e 100644 > --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c > +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c > @@ -2215,44 +2215,65 @@ out_free_irq: > return ret; > } > > -int kvm_irq_map_gsi(struct kvm *kvm, > - struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *entries, > - int gsi) > +int vgic_irqfd_set_irq(struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *e, > + struct kvm *kvm, int irq_source_id, > + int level, bool line_status) > { > - return 0; > -} > - > -int kvm_irq_map_chip_pin(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned irqchip, unsigned pin) > -{ > - return pin; > -} > - > -int kvm_set_irq(struct kvm *kvm, int irq_source_id, > - u32 irq, int level, bool line_status) > -{ > - unsigned int spi = irq + VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS; > + unsigned int spi_id = e->irqchip.pin + VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS; > > - trace_kvm_set_irq(irq, level, irq_source_id); > + trace_kvm_set_irq(spi_id, level, irq_source_id); > > BUG_ON(!vgic_initialized(kvm)); > > - return kvm_vgic_inject_irq(kvm, 0, spi, level); > + if (spi_id > min(kvm->arch.vgic.nr_irqs, 1020)) > + return -EINVAL; > + return kvm_vgic_inject_irq(kvm, 0, spi_id, level); > +} > + > +/** > + * Populates a kvm routing entry from a user routing entry > + * @e: kvm internal formatted entry > + * @ue: user api formatted entry > + * return 0 on success, -EINVAL on errors. > + */ > +int kvm_set_routing_entry(struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *e, > + const struct kvm_irq_routing_entry *ue) > +{ > + int r = -EINVAL; > + > + switch (ue->type) { > + case KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_IRQCHIP: > + e->set = vgic_irqfd_set_irq; > + e->irqchip.irqchip = ue->u.irqchip.irqchip; > + e->irqchip.pin = ue->u.irqchip.pin; > + if ((e->irqchip.pin >= KVM_IRQCHIP_NUM_PINS) || > + (e->irqchip.irqchip >= KVM_NR_IRQCHIPS)) > + goto out; > + break; > + default: > + goto out; > + } > + r = 0; > +out: > + return r; > } > > -/* MSI not implemented yet */ > int kvm_set_msi(struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *e, > struct kvm *kvm, int irq_source_id, > int level, bool line_status) > { > - return 0; > -} > + struct kvm_msi msi; > + > + msi.address_lo = e->msi.address_lo; > + msi.address_hi = e->msi.address_hi; > + msi.data = e->msi.data; > + if (e->type == KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_EXTENDED_MSI) { > + msi.devid = e->devid; > + msi.flags = KVM_MSI_VALID_DEVID; > + } Can't we make the assignment unconditional? The GICv2m MSI code does not care about the devid and the ITS code requires it. This simplifies quite something in the following patches. (This refers to the idea of not using the extended type in the kernel). > > -#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_MSI > -int kvm_send_userspace_msi(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_msi *msi) > -{ > if (kvm->arch.vgic.vm_ops.inject_msi) > - return kvm->arch.vgic.vm_ops.inject_msi(kvm, msi); > + return kvm->arch.vgic.vm_ops.inject_msi(kvm, &msi); > else > return -ENODEV; > } > -#endif > diff --git a/virt/kvm/irqchip.c b/virt/kvm/irqchip.c > index e678f8a..f26cadd 100644 > --- a/virt/kvm/irqchip.c > +++ b/virt/kvm/irqchip.c > @@ -29,7 +29,9 @@ > #include <linux/srcu.h> > #include <linux/export.h> > #include <trace/events/kvm.h> > +#if !defined(CONFIG_ARM) && !defined(CONFIG_ARM64) > #include "irq.h" > +#endif To what irq.h is that referring to? And why is ARM not allowed to include that? Cheers, Andre. > > struct kvm_irq_routing_table { > int chip[KVM_NR_IRQCHIPS][KVM_IRQCHIP_NUM_PINS]; > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hi Andre, On 07/11/2015 01:15 AM, Andre Przywara wrote: > Hi Eric, > > On 09/07/15 09:22, Eric Auger wrote: >> This patch adds compilation and link against irqchip. >> >> On ARM, irqchip routing is not really useful since there is >> a single irqchip. However main motivation behind using irqchip >> code is to enable MSI routing code. With the support of in-kernel >> GICv3 ITS emulation, it now seems to be a MUST HAVE requirement. >> > > .... > >> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c >> index 3630971..6c6c25e 100644 >> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c >> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c >> @@ -2215,44 +2215,65 @@ out_free_irq: >> return ret; >> } >> >> -int kvm_irq_map_gsi(struct kvm *kvm, >> - struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *entries, >> - int gsi) >> +int vgic_irqfd_set_irq(struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *e, >> + struct kvm *kvm, int irq_source_id, >> + int level, bool line_status) >> { >> - return 0; >> -} >> - >> -int kvm_irq_map_chip_pin(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned irqchip, unsigned pin) >> -{ >> - return pin; >> -} >> - >> -int kvm_set_irq(struct kvm *kvm, int irq_source_id, >> - u32 irq, int level, bool line_status) >> -{ >> - unsigned int spi = irq + VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS; >> + unsigned int spi_id = e->irqchip.pin + VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS; >> >> - trace_kvm_set_irq(irq, level, irq_source_id); >> + trace_kvm_set_irq(spi_id, level, irq_source_id); >> >> BUG_ON(!vgic_initialized(kvm)); >> >> - return kvm_vgic_inject_irq(kvm, 0, spi, level); >> + if (spi_id > min(kvm->arch.vgic.nr_irqs, 1020)) >> + return -EINVAL; >> + return kvm_vgic_inject_irq(kvm, 0, spi_id, level); >> +} >> + >> +/** >> + * Populates a kvm routing entry from a user routing entry >> + * @e: kvm internal formatted entry >> + * @ue: user api formatted entry >> + * return 0 on success, -EINVAL on errors. >> + */ >> +int kvm_set_routing_entry(struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *e, >> + const struct kvm_irq_routing_entry *ue) >> +{ >> + int r = -EINVAL; >> + >> + switch (ue->type) { >> + case KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_IRQCHIP: >> + e->set = vgic_irqfd_set_irq; >> + e->irqchip.irqchip = ue->u.irqchip.irqchip; >> + e->irqchip.pin = ue->u.irqchip.pin; >> + if ((e->irqchip.pin >= KVM_IRQCHIP_NUM_PINS) || >> + (e->irqchip.irqchip >= KVM_NR_IRQCHIPS)) >> + goto out; >> + break; >> + default: >> + goto out; >> + } >> + r = 0; >> +out: >> + return r; >> } >> >> -/* MSI not implemented yet */ >> int kvm_set_msi(struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *e, >> struct kvm *kvm, int irq_source_id, >> int level, bool line_status) >> { >> - return 0; >> -} >> + struct kvm_msi msi; >> + >> + msi.address_lo = e->msi.address_lo; >> + msi.address_hi = e->msi.address_hi; >> + msi.data = e->msi.data; >> + if (e->type == KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_EXTENDED_MSI) { >> + msi.devid = e->devid; >> + msi.flags = KVM_MSI_VALID_DEVID; >> + } > > Can't we make the assignment unconditional? > The GICv2m MSI code does not care about the devid and the ITS code > requires it. > This simplifies quite something in the following patches. > (This refers to the idea of not using the extended type in the kernel). How are we going to make sure the userspace provided a valid devid then? - we have this info at user struct level: kvm_irq_routing_msi - we wouldn't propagate the info at kernel struct level: kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry - the only place where we could check the devid availability against the need is at kvm_set_routing_entry I think (routing adaptation on ARM). What is going to happen if devid == 0 since unset? > >> >> -#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_MSI >> -int kvm_send_userspace_msi(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_msi *msi) >> -{ >> if (kvm->arch.vgic.vm_ops.inject_msi) >> - return kvm->arch.vgic.vm_ops.inject_msi(kvm, msi); >> + return kvm->arch.vgic.vm_ops.inject_msi(kvm, &msi); >> else >> return -ENODEV; >> } >> -#endif >> diff --git a/virt/kvm/irqchip.c b/virt/kvm/irqchip.c >> index e678f8a..f26cadd 100644 >> --- a/virt/kvm/irqchip.c >> +++ b/virt/kvm/irqchip.c >> @@ -29,7 +29,9 @@ >> #include <linux/srcu.h> >> #include <linux/export.h> >> #include <trace/events/kvm.h> >> +#if !defined(CONFIG_ARM) && !defined(CONFIG_ARM64) >> #include "irq.h" >> +#endif > > To what irq.h is that referring to? And why is ARM not allowed to > include that? this refers to arch/x86/kvm/irq.h, arch/powerpc/kvm/irq.h, ... This typically declares things we have in include/kvm/arm_vgic.h like irqchip_in_kernel So currently I don't see things we should put in that header. Cheers Eric > Cheers, > Andre. > >> >> struct kvm_irq_routing_table { >> int chip[KVM_NR_IRQCHIPS][KVM_IRQCHIP_NUM_PINS]; >> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hello! > >> + struct kvm_msi msi; > >> + > >> + msi.address_lo = e->msi.address_lo; > >> + msi.address_hi = e->msi.address_hi; > >> + msi.data = e->msi.data; > >> + if (e->type == KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_EXTENDED_MSI) { > >> + msi.devid = e->devid; > >> + msi.flags = KVM_MSI_VALID_DEVID; > >> + } > > > > Can't we make the assignment unconditional? > > The GICv2m MSI code does not care about the devid and the ITS code > > requires it. > > This simplifies quite something in the following patches. > > (This refers to the idea of not using the extended type in the kernel). > > How are we going to make sure the userspace provided a valid devid then? > - we have this info at user struct level: kvm_irq_routing_msi > - we wouldn't propagate the info at kernel struct level: > kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry > - the only place where we could check the devid availability against the > need is at kvm_set_routing_entry I think (routing adaptation on ARM). > > What is going to happen if devid == 0 since unset? > > + if (msi->flags & KVM_MSI_VALID_DEVID) { > > + route.devid = msi->devid; > > + route.type = KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_EXTENDED_MSI; > > + } else if (!msi->flags) > > + return -EINVAL; > > I think we get away without using the extended type on the kernel side. > Within the kernel we don't have an ABI that we have to stick to forever, > so we can simplify things by re-using the existing type (no need to > check for both MSI types later). > So we always set the device ID, the only code that looks at it later is > the ITS emulation anyway, any other code path simply ignores that. Sorry for delayed reply, i'm a bit busy so cannot check all the emails in time... This is one more reason for using KVM_MSI_VALID_DEVID flag with KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_MSI. In this case you don't have to bother about those conditions and just copy devid + flags pair between route and MSI structures. Kind regards, Pavel Fedin Expert Engineer Samsung Electronics Research center Russia -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt index 3d920cd..9276dac 100644 --- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt +++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt @@ -1421,13 +1421,16 @@ KVM_ASSIGN_DEV_IRQ. Partial deassignment of host or guest IRQ is allowed. 4.52 KVM_SET_GSI_ROUTING Capability: KVM_CAP_IRQ_ROUTING -Architectures: x86 s390 +Architectures: x86 s390 arm arm64 Type: vm ioctl Parameters: struct kvm_irq_routing (in) Returns: 0 on success, -1 on error Sets the GSI routing table entries, overwriting any previously set entries. +On arm/arm64, GSI routing has the following limitation: +- GSI routing does not apply to KVM_IRQ_LINE but only to KVM_IRQFD. + struct kvm_irq_routing { __u32 nr; __u32 flags; @@ -2335,9 +2338,10 @@ Note that closing the resamplefd is not sufficient to disable the irqfd. The KVM_IRQFD_FLAG_RESAMPLE is only necessary on assignment and need not be specified with KVM_IRQFD_FLAG_DEASSIGN. -On ARM/ARM64, the gsi field in the kvm_irqfd struct specifies the Shared -Peripheral Interrupt (SPI) index, such that the GIC interrupt ID is -given by gsi + 32. +On arm/arm64, gsi routing being supported, the following can happen: +- in case no routing entry is associated to this gsi, injection fails +- in case the gsi is associated to an irqchip routing entry, + irqchip.pin + 32 corresponds to the injected SPI ID. 4.76 KVM_PPC_ALLOCATE_HTAB diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h index e896d2c..9871441 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h @@ -42,6 +42,8 @@ #define KVM_VCPU_MAX_FEATURES 2 +#define KVM_IRQCHIP_NUM_PINS 988 /* 1020 -32 is the number of SPI */ + #include <kvm/arm_vgic.h> u32 *kvm_vcpu_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u8 reg_num, u32 mode); diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig index bfb915d..151e710 100644 --- a/arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig @@ -31,6 +31,8 @@ config KVM select KVM_VFIO select HAVE_KVM_EVENTFD select HAVE_KVM_IRQFD + select HAVE_KVM_IRQCHIP + select HAVE_KVM_IRQ_ROUTING depends on ARM_VIRT_EXT && ARM_LPAE && ARM_ARCH_TIMER ---help--- Support hosting virtualized guest machines. diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/Makefile b/arch/arm/kvm/Makefile index c5eef02c..1a8f48a 100644 --- a/arch/arm/kvm/Makefile +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/Makefile @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ AFLAGS_init.o := -Wa,-march=armv7-a$(plus_virt) AFLAGS_interrupts.o := -Wa,-march=armv7-a$(plus_virt) KVM := ../../../virt/kvm -kvm-arm-y = $(KVM)/kvm_main.o $(KVM)/coalesced_mmio.o $(KVM)/eventfd.o $(KVM)/vfio.o +kvm-arm-y = $(KVM)/kvm_main.o $(KVM)/coalesced_mmio.o $(KVM)/eventfd.o $(KVM)/vfio.o $(KVM)/irqchip.o obj-y += kvm-arm.o init.o interrupts.o obj-y += arm.o handle_exit.o guest.o mmu.o emulate.o reset.o diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h index 2709db2..f6201eb 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ #include <kvm/arm_arch_timer.h> #define KVM_VCPU_MAX_FEATURES 3 +#define KVM_IRQCHIP_NUM_PINS 988 /* 1020 -32 is the number of SPI */ int __attribute_const__ kvm_target_cpu(void); int kvm_reset_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig index ff9722f..1a9900d 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig @@ -32,6 +32,8 @@ config KVM select HAVE_KVM_EVENTFD select HAVE_KVM_IRQFD select HAVE_KVM_MSI + select HAVE_KVM_IRQCHIP + select HAVE_KVM_IRQ_ROUTING ---help--- Support hosting virtualized guest machines. diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile b/arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile index 9803307..90a08457 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ ARM=../../../arch/arm/kvm obj-$(CONFIG_KVM_ARM_HOST) += kvm.o -kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_ARM_HOST) += $(KVM)/kvm_main.o $(KVM)/coalesced_mmio.o $(KVM)/eventfd.o $(KVM)/vfio.o +kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_ARM_HOST) += $(KVM)/kvm_main.o $(KVM)/coalesced_mmio.o $(KVM)/eventfd.o $(KVM)/vfio.o $(KVM)/irqchip.o kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_ARM_HOST) += $(ARM)/arm.o $(ARM)/mmu.o $(ARM)/mmio.o kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_ARM_HOST) += $(ARM)/psci.o $(ARM)/perf.o diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h index 8f1be6a..10dc596 100644 --- a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h +++ b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h @@ -366,13 +366,4 @@ static inline int vgic_v3_probe(struct device_node *vgic_node, } #endif -#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_MSI -int kvm_send_userspace_msi(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_msi *msi); -#else -static inline int kvm_send_userspace_msi(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_msi *msi) -{ - return -ENODEV; -} -#endif - #endif diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c index 3630971..6c6c25e 100644 --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c @@ -2215,44 +2215,65 @@ out_free_irq: return ret; } -int kvm_irq_map_gsi(struct kvm *kvm, - struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *entries, - int gsi) +int vgic_irqfd_set_irq(struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *e, + struct kvm *kvm, int irq_source_id, + int level, bool line_status) { - return 0; -} - -int kvm_irq_map_chip_pin(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned irqchip, unsigned pin) -{ - return pin; -} - -int kvm_set_irq(struct kvm *kvm, int irq_source_id, - u32 irq, int level, bool line_status) -{ - unsigned int spi = irq + VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS; + unsigned int spi_id = e->irqchip.pin + VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS; - trace_kvm_set_irq(irq, level, irq_source_id); + trace_kvm_set_irq(spi_id, level, irq_source_id); BUG_ON(!vgic_initialized(kvm)); - return kvm_vgic_inject_irq(kvm, 0, spi, level); + if (spi_id > min(kvm->arch.vgic.nr_irqs, 1020)) + return -EINVAL; + return kvm_vgic_inject_irq(kvm, 0, spi_id, level); +} + +/** + * Populates a kvm routing entry from a user routing entry + * @e: kvm internal formatted entry + * @ue: user api formatted entry + * return 0 on success, -EINVAL on errors. + */ +int kvm_set_routing_entry(struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *e, + const struct kvm_irq_routing_entry *ue) +{ + int r = -EINVAL; + + switch (ue->type) { + case KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_IRQCHIP: + e->set = vgic_irqfd_set_irq; + e->irqchip.irqchip = ue->u.irqchip.irqchip; + e->irqchip.pin = ue->u.irqchip.pin; + if ((e->irqchip.pin >= KVM_IRQCHIP_NUM_PINS) || + (e->irqchip.irqchip >= KVM_NR_IRQCHIPS)) + goto out; + break; + default: + goto out; + } + r = 0; +out: + return r; } -/* MSI not implemented yet */ int kvm_set_msi(struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *e, struct kvm *kvm, int irq_source_id, int level, bool line_status) { - return 0; -} + struct kvm_msi msi; + + msi.address_lo = e->msi.address_lo; + msi.address_hi = e->msi.address_hi; + msi.data = e->msi.data; + if (e->type == KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_EXTENDED_MSI) { + msi.devid = e->devid; + msi.flags = KVM_MSI_VALID_DEVID; + } -#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_MSI -int kvm_send_userspace_msi(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_msi *msi) -{ if (kvm->arch.vgic.vm_ops.inject_msi) - return kvm->arch.vgic.vm_ops.inject_msi(kvm, msi); + return kvm->arch.vgic.vm_ops.inject_msi(kvm, &msi); else return -ENODEV; } -#endif diff --git a/virt/kvm/irqchip.c b/virt/kvm/irqchip.c index e678f8a..f26cadd 100644 --- a/virt/kvm/irqchip.c +++ b/virt/kvm/irqchip.c @@ -29,7 +29,9 @@ #include <linux/srcu.h> #include <linux/export.h> #include <trace/events/kvm.h> +#if !defined(CONFIG_ARM) && !defined(CONFIG_ARM64) #include "irq.h" +#endif struct kvm_irq_routing_table { int chip[KVM_NR_IRQCHIPS][KVM_IRQCHIP_NUM_PINS];
This patch adds compilation and link against irqchip. On ARM, irqchip routing is not really useful since there is a single irqchip. However main motivation behind using irqchip code is to enable MSI routing code. With the support of in-kernel GICv3 ITS emulation, it now seems to be a MUST HAVE requirement. Functions previously implemented in vgic.c and substitute to more complex irqchip implementation are removed: - kvm_send_userspace_msi - kvm_irq_map_chip_pin - kvm_set_irq - kvm_irq_map_gsi. They implemented a kernel default identity GSI routing. This is now replaced by user-side provided routing. Routing standard hooks are now implemented in vgic: - kvm_set_routing_entry - kvm_set_irq - kvm_set_msi Both HAVE_KVM_IRQCHIP and HAVE_KVM_IRQ_ROUTING are defined. KVM_CAP_IRQ_ROUTING is advertised and KVM_SET_GSI_ROUTING is allowed. MSI routing is not yet allowed. Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> --- v1 -> v2: - fix bug reported by Andre related to msi.flags and msi.devid setting in kvm_send_userspace_msi - avoid injecting reserved IRQ numbers in vgic_irqfd_set_irq RFC -> PATCH - reword api.txt: x move MSI routing comments in a subsequent patch, x clearly state GSI routing does not apply to KVM_IRQ_LINE --- Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt | 12 ++++--- arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 ++ arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig | 2 ++ arch/arm/kvm/Makefile | 2 +- arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 + arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig | 2 ++ arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile | 2 +- include/kvm/arm_vgic.h | 9 ----- virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- virt/kvm/irqchip.c | 2 ++ 10 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)