diff mbox

[1/8] serial: sh-sci: Use correct device for DMA mapping with IOMMU

Message ID 1432145174-11534-2-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Delegated to: Geert Uytterhoeven
Headers show

Commit Message

Geert Uytterhoeven May 20, 2015, 6:06 p.m. UTC
To function correctly in the presence of an IOMMU, the DMA buffers must
be managed using the DMA channel's device instead of the platform
device's device.

Make sure to free the DMA memory before releasing the channel, and avoid
freeing it twice (when DMA initialization succeeded before, but failed
partially on next open).

Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
---
 drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c | 17 +++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Comments

Laurent Pinchart May 23, 2015, 7:01 p.m. UTC | #1
Hi Geert,

Thank you for the patch.

On Wednesday 20 May 2015 20:06:07 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> To function correctly in the presence of an IOMMU, the DMA buffers must
> be managed using the DMA channel's device instead of the platform
> device's device.
> 
> Make sure to free the DMA memory before releasing the channel, and avoid
> freeing it twice (when DMA initialization succeeded before, but failed
> partially on next open).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
> ---
>  drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c | 17 +++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c b/drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c
> index 583aa563d4038f8b..8756d186e86891ac 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c
> @@ -1372,10 +1372,13 @@ static void sci_rx_dma_release(struct sci_port *s,
> bool enable_pio)
> 
>  	s->chan_rx = NULL;
>  	s->cookie_rx[0] = s->cookie_rx[1] = -EINVAL;
> +	if (sg_dma_address(&s->sg_rx[0])) {

0 is a valid DMA address. You should use dma_mapping_error() to test for 
invalid addresses. I'm afraid we don't have any API to set a DMA address to an 
invalid value, but we can probably use DMA_ERROR_CODE for now even if it's 
limited to ARM.

> +		dma_free_coherent(chan->device->dev, s->buf_len_rx * 2,
> +				  sg_virt(&s->sg_rx[0]),
> +				  sg_dma_address(&s->sg_rx[0]));
> +		sg_dma_address(&s->sg_rx[0]) = 0;
> +	}
>  	dma_release_channel(chan);
> -	if (sg_dma_address(&s->sg_rx[0]))
> -		dma_free_coherent(port->dev, s->buf_len_rx * 2,
> -				  sg_virt(&s->sg_rx[0]), sg_dma_address(&s->sg_rx[0]));
>  	if (enable_pio)
>  		sci_start_rx(port);
>  }
> @@ -1706,7 +1709,8 @@ static void sci_request_dma(struct uart_port *port)
>  		sg_set_page(&s->sg_tx, virt_to_page(port->state->xmit.buf),
>  			    UART_XMIT_SIZE,
>  			    (uintptr_t)port->state->xmit.buf & ~PAGE_MASK);
> -		nent = dma_map_sg(port->dev, &s->sg_tx, 1, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> +		nent = dma_map_sg(chan->device->dev, &s->sg_tx, 1,
> +				  DMA_TO_DEVICE);
>  		if (!nent)
>  			sci_tx_dma_release(s, false);
>  		else
> @@ -1735,8 +1739,9 @@ static void sci_request_dma(struct uart_port *port)
>  		s->chan_rx = chan;
> 
>  		s->buf_len_rx = 2 * max(16, (int)port->fifosize);
> -		buf[0] = dma_alloc_coherent(port->dev, s->buf_len_rx * 2,
> -					    &dma[0], GFP_KERNEL);
> +		buf[0] = dma_alloc_coherent(chan->device->dev,
> +					    s->buf_len_rx * 2, &dma[0],
> +					    GFP_KERNEL);

I might be mistaken but I think this will break with the shdma-mux 
infrastructure, as the IOMMUs will be associated with the physical DMA 
controller and not the mux device. Maybe this just calls for getting rid of 
shdma-mux. I'm knowingly forgetting about the other option that would require 
fixing the problem in the DMA mapping implementation :-)

Those issues aren't introduced by this patch, so you can add my

Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>

here and fix them later.

> 
>  		if (!buf[0]) {
>  			dev_warn(port->dev,
Geert Uytterhoeven July 15, 2015, 11:37 a.m. UTC | #2
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 9:01 PM, Laurent Pinchart
<laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 May 2015 20:06:07 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> To function correctly in the presence of an IOMMU, the DMA buffers must
>> be managed using the DMA channel's device instead of the platform
>> device's device.
>>
>> Make sure to free the DMA memory before releasing the channel, and avoid
>> freeing it twice (when DMA initialization succeeded before, but failed
>> partially on next open).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
>> ---
>>  drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c | 17 +++++++++++------
>>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c b/drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c
>> index 583aa563d4038f8b..8756d186e86891ac 100644
>> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c
>> @@ -1372,10 +1372,13 @@ static void sci_rx_dma_release(struct sci_port *s,
>> bool enable_pio)
>>
>>       s->chan_rx = NULL;
>>       s->cookie_rx[0] = s->cookie_rx[1] = -EINVAL;
>> +     if (sg_dma_address(&s->sg_rx[0])) {
>
> 0 is a valid DMA address. You should use dma_mapping_error() to test for

0 is not a valid DMA addresss on sh...

> invalid addresses. I'm afraid we don't have any API to set a DMA address to an
> invalid value, but we can probably use DMA_ERROR_CODE for now even if it's
> limited to ARM.

There's no DMA_ERROR_CODE on sh.

Furthermore, while dma_mapping_error() on ARM checks for DMA_ERROR_CODE
(~0), sh checks for zero...

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sh" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Laurent Pinchart July 15, 2015, 8:30 p.m. UTC | #3
Hi Geert,

On Wednesday 15 July 2015 13:37:36 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 9:01 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Wednesday 20 May 2015 20:06:07 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> To function correctly in the presence of an IOMMU, the DMA buffers must
> >> be managed using the DMA channel's device instead of the platform
> >> device's device.
> >> 
> >> Make sure to free the DMA memory before releasing the channel, and avoid
> >> freeing it twice (when DMA initialization succeeded before, but failed
> >> partially on next open).
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
> >> ---
> >> 
> >>  drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c | 17 +++++++++++------
> >>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c b/drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c
> >> index 583aa563d4038f8b..8756d186e86891ac 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c
> >> @@ -1372,10 +1372,13 @@ static void sci_rx_dma_release(struct sci_port
> >> *s, bool enable_pio)
> >> 
> >>       s->chan_rx = NULL;
> >>       s->cookie_rx[0] = s->cookie_rx[1] = -EINVAL;
> >> 
> >> +     if (sg_dma_address(&s->sg_rx[0])) {
> > 
> > 0 is a valid DMA address. You should use dma_mapping_error() to test for
> 
> 0 is not a valid DMA addresss on sh...

It is on ARM though.

> > invalid addresses. I'm afraid we don't have any API to set a DMA address
> > to an invalid value, but we can probably use DMA_ERROR_CODE for now even
> > if it's limited to ARM.
> 
> There's no DMA_ERROR_CODE on sh.
> 
> Furthermore, while dma_mapping_error() on ARM checks for DMA_ERROR_CODE
> (~0), sh checks for zero...

That's why drivers are supposed to use dma_mapping_error(). The problem is the 
lack of an API to set a DMA address to an invalid value in an architecture-
independent way.
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c b/drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c
index 583aa563d4038f8b..8756d186e86891ac 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c
@@ -1372,10 +1372,13 @@  static void sci_rx_dma_release(struct sci_port *s, bool enable_pio)
 
 	s->chan_rx = NULL;
 	s->cookie_rx[0] = s->cookie_rx[1] = -EINVAL;
+	if (sg_dma_address(&s->sg_rx[0])) {
+		dma_free_coherent(chan->device->dev, s->buf_len_rx * 2,
+				  sg_virt(&s->sg_rx[0]),
+				  sg_dma_address(&s->sg_rx[0]));
+		sg_dma_address(&s->sg_rx[0]) = 0;
+	}
 	dma_release_channel(chan);
-	if (sg_dma_address(&s->sg_rx[0]))
-		dma_free_coherent(port->dev, s->buf_len_rx * 2,
-				  sg_virt(&s->sg_rx[0]), sg_dma_address(&s->sg_rx[0]));
 	if (enable_pio)
 		sci_start_rx(port);
 }
@@ -1706,7 +1709,8 @@  static void sci_request_dma(struct uart_port *port)
 		sg_set_page(&s->sg_tx, virt_to_page(port->state->xmit.buf),
 			    UART_XMIT_SIZE,
 			    (uintptr_t)port->state->xmit.buf & ~PAGE_MASK);
-		nent = dma_map_sg(port->dev, &s->sg_tx, 1, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
+		nent = dma_map_sg(chan->device->dev, &s->sg_tx, 1,
+				  DMA_TO_DEVICE);
 		if (!nent)
 			sci_tx_dma_release(s, false);
 		else
@@ -1735,8 +1739,9 @@  static void sci_request_dma(struct uart_port *port)
 		s->chan_rx = chan;
 
 		s->buf_len_rx = 2 * max(16, (int)port->fifosize);
-		buf[0] = dma_alloc_coherent(port->dev, s->buf_len_rx * 2,
-					    &dma[0], GFP_KERNEL);
+		buf[0] = dma_alloc_coherent(chan->device->dev,
+					    s->buf_len_rx * 2, &dma[0],
+					    GFP_KERNEL);
 
 		if (!buf[0]) {
 			dev_warn(port->dev,