| Message ID | 1437114567-17629-3-git-send-email-javier@osg.samsung.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
Hello. On 7/17/2015 9:29 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > The ePAR standard says that: "the name of a node should be somewhat ePAPR. > generic, reflecting the function of the device and not its precise > programming model." > So, change the max77686 binding document example to use a generic > node name instead of using the chip's name. > Suggested-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com> > Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> MBR, Sergei -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hello Sergei, On 07/17/2015 11:11 AM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Hello. > > On 7/17/2015 9:29 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > >> The ePAR standard says that: "the name of a node should be somewhat > > ePAPR. > Thanks for pointing it out. I guess that Lee can fix the typo when applying? >> generic, reflecting the function of the device and not its precise >> programming model." > >> So, change the max77686 binding document example to use a generic >> node name instead of using the chip's name. > >> Suggested-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com> >> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> > > MBR, Sergei > Best regards,
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/max77686.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/max77686.txt index 8221102d3fc2..d2ed3c20a5c3 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/max77686.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/max77686.txt @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ to get matched with their hardware counterparts as follow: Example: - max77686@09 { + max77686: pmic@09 { compatible = "maxim,max77686"; interrupt-parent = <&wakeup_eint>; interrupts = <26 0>;
The ePAR standard says that: "the name of a node should be somewhat generic, reflecting the function of the device and not its precise programming model." So, change the max77686 binding document example to use a generic node name instead of using the chip's name. Suggested-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> --- Changes in v2: None Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/max77686.txt | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)