diff mbox

[v3,2/6] mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: add tuning-step seting support

Message ID 1438160637-28061-3-git-send-email-haibo.chen@freescale.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Haibo Chen July 29, 2015, 9:03 a.m. UTC
tuning-step is the delay cell steps in tuning procedure. The default value
of tuning-step is 1. For imx6 series usdhc, tuning procedure can be passed
when the tuning-step value is 1. But imx7d usdhc need the tuning-step value
as 2, otherwise it can't pass the tuning procedure.

So this patch add the tuning-step setting in driver, so that user can set
the tuning-step value in dts.

Signed-off-by: Haibo Chen <haibo.chen@freescale.com>
---
 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c          | 9 +++++++++
 include/linux/platform_data/mmc-esdhc-imx.h | 1 +
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)

Comments

Jan Lübbe July 30, 2015, 4:25 p.m. UTC | #1
On Mi, 2015-07-29 at 17:03 +0800, Haibo Chen wrote:
> tuning-step is the delay cell steps in tuning procedure. The default
> value of tuning-step is 1. For imx6 series usdhc, tuning procedure can
> be passed when the tuning-step value is 1. But imx7d usdhc need the
> tuning-step value as 2, otherwise it can't pass the tuning procedure.
> 
> So this patch add the tuning-step setting in driver, so that user can
> set the tuning-step value in dts.

From your description, the correct tuning-step value only depends on the
SoC. Why not derive it from the compatible string?

Regards,
Jan Lübbe
Dong Aisheng July 31, 2015, 4:41 a.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 06:25:06PM +0200, Jan Lübbe wrote:
> On Mi, 2015-07-29 at 17:03 +0800, Haibo Chen wrote:
> > tuning-step is the delay cell steps in tuning procedure. The default
> > value of tuning-step is 1. For imx6 series usdhc, tuning procedure can
> > be passed when the tuning-step value is 1. But imx7d usdhc need the
> > tuning-step value as 2, otherwise it can't pass the tuning procedure.
> > 
> > So this patch add the tuning-step setting in driver, so that user can
> > set the tuning-step value in dts.
> 
> From your description, the correct tuning-step value only depends on the
> SoC. Why not derive it from the compatible string?
> 

'tuning-step' actually depends on board and card.
The commit message should be reformed a bit.

Regards
Dong Aisheng

> Regards,
> Jan Lübbe
> -- 
> Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
> Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
> Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
>
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
index b441eed..158f93b 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
@@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ 
 #define ESDHC_STD_TUNING_EN		(1 << 24)
 /* NOTE: the minimum valid tuning start tap for mx6sl is 1 */
 #define ESDHC_TUNING_START_TAP		0x1
+#define ESDHC_TUNING_STEP_SHIFT		16
 
 /* pinctrl state */
 #define ESDHC_PINCTRL_STATE_100MHZ	"state_100mhz"
@@ -472,6 +473,7 @@  static void esdhc_writew_le(struct sdhci_host *host, u16 val, int reg)
 		} else if (imx_data->socdata->flags & ESDHC_FLAG_STD_TUNING) {
 			u32 v = readl(host->ioaddr + SDHCI_ACMD12_ERR);
 			u32 m = readl(host->ioaddr + ESDHC_MIX_CTRL);
+			u32 tuning_ctrl;
 			if (val & SDHCI_CTRL_TUNED_CLK) {
 				v |= ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_SMPCLK_SEL;
 			} else {
@@ -482,6 +484,11 @@  static void esdhc_writew_le(struct sdhci_host *host, u16 val, int reg)
 			if (val & SDHCI_CTRL_EXEC_TUNING) {
 				v |= ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_EXE_TUNE;
 				m |= ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_FBCLK_SEL;
+				tuning_ctrl = readl(host->ioaddr + ESDHC_TUNING_CTRL);
+				tuning_ctrl |= ESDHC_STD_TUNING_EN | ESDHC_TUNING_START_TAP;
+				if (imx_data->boarddata.tuning_step)
+					tuning_ctrl |= imx_data->boarddata.tuning_step << ESDHC_TUNING_STEP_SHIFT;
+					writel(tuning_ctrl, host->ioaddr + ESDHC_TUNING_CTRL);
 			} else {
 				v &= ~ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_EXE_TUNE;
 			}
@@ -949,6 +956,8 @@  sdhci_esdhc_imx_probe_dt(struct platform_device *pdev,
 	if (gpio_is_valid(boarddata->wp_gpio))
 		boarddata->wp_type = ESDHC_WP_GPIO;
 
+	of_property_read_u32(np, "fsl,tuning-step", &boarddata->tuning_step);
+
 	if (of_find_property(np, "no-1-8-v", NULL))
 		boarddata->support_vsel = false;
 	else
diff --git a/include/linux/platform_data/mmc-esdhc-imx.h b/include/linux/platform_data/mmc-esdhc-imx.h
index e1571ef..95ccab3 100644
--- a/include/linux/platform_data/mmc-esdhc-imx.h
+++ b/include/linux/platform_data/mmc-esdhc-imx.h
@@ -45,5 +45,6 @@  struct esdhc_platform_data {
 	int max_bus_width;
 	bool support_vsel;
 	unsigned int delay_line;
+	unsigned int tuning_step;       /* The delay cell steps in tuning procedure */
 };
 #endif /* __ASM_ARCH_IMX_ESDHC_H */