diff mbox

[v4,2/6] mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: add tuning-step seting support

Message ID 1438771122-8601-3-git-send-email-haibo.chen@freescale.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Haibo Chen Aug. 5, 2015, 10:38 a.m. UTC
tuning-step is the delay cell steps in tuning procedure. The default value
of tuning-step is 1. Some boards or cards need another value to pass the
tuning procedure. For example, imx7d-sdb board need the tuning-step value
as 2, otherwise it can't pass the tuning procedure.

So this patch add the tuning-step setting in driver, so that user can set
the tuning-step value in dts.

Signed-off-by: Haibo Chen <haibo.chen@freescale.com>
---
 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c          | 9 +++++++++
 include/linux/platform_data/mmc-esdhc-imx.h | 1 +
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)

Comments

Dong Aisheng Aug. 7, 2015, 7:40 a.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 06:38:38PM +0800, Haibo Chen wrote:
> tuning-step is the delay cell steps in tuning procedure. The default value
> of tuning-step is 1. Some boards or cards need another value to pass the
> tuning procedure. For example, imx7d-sdb board need the tuning-step value
> as 2, otherwise it can't pass the tuning procedure.
> 
> So this patch add the tuning-step setting in driver, so that user can set
> the tuning-step value in dts.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Haibo Chen <haibo.chen@freescale.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c          | 9 +++++++++
>  include/linux/platform_data/mmc-esdhc-imx.h | 1 +
>  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> index 48f009c..803d24f 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> @@ -75,6 +75,7 @@
>  #define ESDHC_STD_TUNING_EN		(1 << 24)
>  /* NOTE: the minimum valid tuning start tap for mx6sl is 1 */
>  #define ESDHC_TUNING_START_TAP		0x1
> +#define ESDHC_TUNING_STEP_SHIFT		16
>  
>  /* pinctrl state */
>  #define ESDHC_PINCTRL_STATE_100MHZ	"state_100mhz"
> @@ -474,6 +475,7 @@ static void esdhc_writew_le(struct sdhci_host *host, u16 val, int reg)
>  		} else if (imx_data->socdata->flags & ESDHC_FLAG_STD_TUNING) {
>  			u32 v = readl(host->ioaddr + SDHCI_ACMD12_ERR);
>  			u32 m = readl(host->ioaddr + ESDHC_MIX_CTRL);
> +			u32 tuning_ctrl;
>  			if (val & SDHCI_CTRL_TUNED_CLK) {
>  				v |= ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_SMPCLK_SEL;
>  			} else {
> @@ -484,6 +486,11 @@ static void esdhc_writew_le(struct sdhci_host *host, u16 val, int reg)
>  			if (val & SDHCI_CTRL_EXEC_TUNING) {
>  				v |= ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_EXE_TUNE;
>  				m |= ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_FBCLK_SEL;
> +				tuning_ctrl = readl(host->ioaddr + ESDHC_TUNING_CTRL);
> +				tuning_ctrl |= ESDHC_STD_TUNING_EN | ESDHC_TUNING_START_TAP;
> +				if (imx_data->boarddata.tuning_step)
> +					tuning_ctrl |= imx_data->boarddata.tuning_step << ESDHC_TUNING_STEP_SHIFT;
> +					writel(tuning_ctrl, host->ioaddr + ESDHC_TUNING_CTRL);

Is there a code indent issue here?
Otherwise, the patch looks good to me.

Regards
Dong Aisheng

>  			} else {
>  				v &= ~ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_EXE_TUNE;
>  			}
> @@ -964,6 +971,8 @@ sdhci_esdhc_imx_probe_dt(struct platform_device *pdev,
>  	if (gpio_is_valid(boarddata->wp_gpio))
>  		boarddata->wp_type = ESDHC_WP_GPIO;
>  
> +	of_property_read_u32(np, "fsl,tuning-step", &boarddata->tuning_step);
> +
>  	if (of_find_property(np, "no-1-8-v", NULL))
>  		boarddata->support_vsel = false;
>  	else
> diff --git a/include/linux/platform_data/mmc-esdhc-imx.h b/include/linux/platform_data/mmc-esdhc-imx.h
> index e1571ef..95ccab3 100644
> --- a/include/linux/platform_data/mmc-esdhc-imx.h
> +++ b/include/linux/platform_data/mmc-esdhc-imx.h
> @@ -45,5 +45,6 @@ struct esdhc_platform_data {
>  	int max_bus_width;
>  	bool support_vsel;
>  	unsigned int delay_line;
> +	unsigned int tuning_step;       /* The delay cell steps in tuning procedure */
>  };
>  #endif /* __ASM_ARCH_IMX_ESDHC_H */
> -- 
> 1.9.1
>
Haibo Chen Aug. 7, 2015, 10:04 a.m. UTC | #2
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dong Aisheng [mailto:aisheng.dong@freescale.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 07, 2015 3:40 PM
> To: Chen Haibo-B51421
> Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org; pawel.moll@arm.com; mark.rutland@arm.com;
> ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk; galak@codeaurora.org; shawnguo@kernel.org;
> kernel@pengutronix.de; linux@arm.linux.org.uk; ulf.hansson@linaro.org;
> johan.derycke@barco.com; mkl@pengutronix.de; Estevam Fabio-R49496; Dong
> Aisheng-B29396; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: add tuning-step seting
> support
> 
> On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 06:38:38PM +0800, Haibo Chen wrote:
> > tuning-step is the delay cell steps in tuning procedure. The default
> > value of tuning-step is 1. Some boards or cards need another value to
> > pass the tuning procedure. For example, imx7d-sdb board need the
> > tuning-step value as 2, otherwise it can't pass the tuning procedure.
> >
> > So this patch add the tuning-step setting in driver, so that user can
> > set the tuning-step value in dts.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Haibo Chen <haibo.chen@freescale.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c          | 9 +++++++++
> >  include/linux/platform_data/mmc-esdhc-imx.h | 1 +
> >  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> > b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> > index 48f009c..803d24f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> > @@ -75,6 +75,7 @@
> >  #define ESDHC_STD_TUNING_EN		(1 << 24)
> >  /* NOTE: the minimum valid tuning start tap for mx6sl is 1 */
> >  #define ESDHC_TUNING_START_TAP		0x1
> > +#define ESDHC_TUNING_STEP_SHIFT		16
> >
> >  /* pinctrl state */
> >  #define ESDHC_PINCTRL_STATE_100MHZ	"state_100mhz"
> > @@ -474,6 +475,7 @@ static void esdhc_writew_le(struct sdhci_host *host,
> u16 val, int reg)
> >  		} else if (imx_data->socdata->flags & ESDHC_FLAG_STD_TUNING)
> {
> >  			u32 v = readl(host->ioaddr + SDHCI_ACMD12_ERR);
> >  			u32 m = readl(host->ioaddr + ESDHC_MIX_CTRL);
> > +			u32 tuning_ctrl;
> >  			if (val & SDHCI_CTRL_TUNED_CLK) {
> >  				v |= ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_SMPCLK_SEL;
> >  			} else {
> > @@ -484,6 +486,11 @@ static void esdhc_writew_le(struct sdhci_host
> *host, u16 val, int reg)
> >  			if (val & SDHCI_CTRL_EXEC_TUNING) {
> >  				v |= ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_EXE_TUNE;
> >  				m |= ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_FBCLK_SEL;
> > +				tuning_ctrl = readl(host->ioaddr +
> ESDHC_TUNING_CTRL);
> > +				tuning_ctrl |= ESDHC_STD_TUNING_EN |
> ESDHC_TUNING_START_TAP;
> > +				if (imx_data->boarddata.tuning_step)
> > +					tuning_ctrl |= imx_data-
> >boarddata.tuning_step << ESDHC_TUNING_STEP_SHIFT;
> > +					writel(tuning_ctrl, host->ioaddr +
> ESDHC_TUNING_CTRL);
> 
> Is there a code indent issue here?
> Otherwise, the patch looks good to me.
> 
> Regards
> Dong Aisheng

[haibo] I check this, the code indent is okay.

> 
> >  			} else {
> >  				v &= ~ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_EXE_TUNE;
> >  			}
> > @@ -964,6 +971,8 @@ sdhci_esdhc_imx_probe_dt(struct platform_device
> *pdev,
> >  	if (gpio_is_valid(boarddata->wp_gpio))
> >  		boarddata->wp_type = ESDHC_WP_GPIO;
> >
> > +	of_property_read_u32(np, "fsl,tuning-step",
> > +&boarddata->tuning_step);
> > +
> >  	if (of_find_property(np, "no-1-8-v", NULL))
> >  		boarddata->support_vsel = false;
> >  	else
> > diff --git a/include/linux/platform_data/mmc-esdhc-imx.h
> > b/include/linux/platform_data/mmc-esdhc-imx.h
> > index e1571ef..95ccab3 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/platform_data/mmc-esdhc-imx.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/platform_data/mmc-esdhc-imx.h
> > @@ -45,5 +45,6 @@ struct esdhc_platform_data {
> >  	int max_bus_width;
> >  	bool support_vsel;
> >  	unsigned int delay_line;
> > +	unsigned int tuning_step;       /* The delay cell steps in tuning
> procedure */
> >  };
> >  #endif /* __ASM_ARCH_IMX_ESDHC_H */
> > --
> > 1.9.1
> >
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
index 48f009c..803d24f 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
@@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ 
 #define ESDHC_STD_TUNING_EN		(1 << 24)
 /* NOTE: the minimum valid tuning start tap for mx6sl is 1 */
 #define ESDHC_TUNING_START_TAP		0x1
+#define ESDHC_TUNING_STEP_SHIFT		16
 
 /* pinctrl state */
 #define ESDHC_PINCTRL_STATE_100MHZ	"state_100mhz"
@@ -474,6 +475,7 @@  static void esdhc_writew_le(struct sdhci_host *host, u16 val, int reg)
 		} else if (imx_data->socdata->flags & ESDHC_FLAG_STD_TUNING) {
 			u32 v = readl(host->ioaddr + SDHCI_ACMD12_ERR);
 			u32 m = readl(host->ioaddr + ESDHC_MIX_CTRL);
+			u32 tuning_ctrl;
 			if (val & SDHCI_CTRL_TUNED_CLK) {
 				v |= ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_SMPCLK_SEL;
 			} else {
@@ -484,6 +486,11 @@  static void esdhc_writew_le(struct sdhci_host *host, u16 val, int reg)
 			if (val & SDHCI_CTRL_EXEC_TUNING) {
 				v |= ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_EXE_TUNE;
 				m |= ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_FBCLK_SEL;
+				tuning_ctrl = readl(host->ioaddr + ESDHC_TUNING_CTRL);
+				tuning_ctrl |= ESDHC_STD_TUNING_EN | ESDHC_TUNING_START_TAP;
+				if (imx_data->boarddata.tuning_step)
+					tuning_ctrl |= imx_data->boarddata.tuning_step << ESDHC_TUNING_STEP_SHIFT;
+					writel(tuning_ctrl, host->ioaddr + ESDHC_TUNING_CTRL);
 			} else {
 				v &= ~ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_EXE_TUNE;
 			}
@@ -964,6 +971,8 @@  sdhci_esdhc_imx_probe_dt(struct platform_device *pdev,
 	if (gpio_is_valid(boarddata->wp_gpio))
 		boarddata->wp_type = ESDHC_WP_GPIO;
 
+	of_property_read_u32(np, "fsl,tuning-step", &boarddata->tuning_step);
+
 	if (of_find_property(np, "no-1-8-v", NULL))
 		boarddata->support_vsel = false;
 	else
diff --git a/include/linux/platform_data/mmc-esdhc-imx.h b/include/linux/platform_data/mmc-esdhc-imx.h
index e1571ef..95ccab3 100644
--- a/include/linux/platform_data/mmc-esdhc-imx.h
+++ b/include/linux/platform_data/mmc-esdhc-imx.h
@@ -45,5 +45,6 @@  struct esdhc_platform_data {
 	int max_bus_width;
 	bool support_vsel;
 	unsigned int delay_line;
+	unsigned int tuning_step;       /* The delay cell steps in tuning procedure */
 };
 #endif /* __ASM_ARCH_IMX_ESDHC_H */