Message ID | 1438164539-29256-10-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Not Applicable, archived |
Headers | show |
On 29/07/15 11:08, Hanjun Guo wrote: > From: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> > > This patch introduces pci_host_bridge_acpi_msi_domain(), which queries > a GIC MSI irq-domain token and use it to retrieve an irq_domain with > DOMAIN_BUS_PCI_MSI bus type, and bind it to PCI host-bridge. > > Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> > Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> > --- > drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/pci/probe.c | 3 +++ > include/linux/pci-acpi.h | 4 ++++ > 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c b/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c > index 314a625..5f11653 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c > @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ > > #include <linux/delay.h> > #include <linux/init.h> > +#include <linux/irqdomain.h> > #include <linux/pci.h> > #include <linux/pci_hotplug.h> > #include <linux/module.h> > @@ -16,6 +17,7 @@ > #include <linux/pci-acpi.h> > #include <linux/pm_runtime.h> > #include <linux/pm_qos.h> > +#include <acpi/acpi_gic.h> > #include "pci.h" > > /* > @@ -681,6 +683,22 @@ static bool pci_acpi_bus_match(struct device *dev) > return dev_is_pci(dev); > } > > +#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN > +struct irq_domain *pci_host_bridge_acpi_msi_domain(struct pci_bus *bus) > +{ > + struct irq_domain *d = NULL; > + void *token = acpi_gic_get_msi_token(&bus->dev); Do you see why I positively *hate* having hardware details in generic layers? They propagate everywhere... > + > + if (token) > + d = irq_find_matching_host(token, DOMAIN_BUS_PCI_MSI); > + > + if (!d) > + pr_debug("Fail to find domain for MSI\n"); > + > + return d; > +} > +#endif /*CONFIG_GENERIC_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN*/ > + > static struct acpi_bus_type acpi_pci_bus = { > .name = "PCI", > .match = pci_acpi_bus_match, > diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c > index a7afeac..8c1204c 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c > @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ > #include <linux/module.h> > #include <linux/cpumask.h> > #include <linux/pci-aspm.h> > +#include <linux/pci-acpi.h> > #include <asm-generic/pci-bridge.h> > #include "pci.h" > > @@ -670,6 +671,8 @@ static struct irq_domain *pci_host_bridge_msi_domain(struct pci_bus *bus) > * should be called from here. > */ > d = pci_host_bridge_of_msi_domain(bus); > + if (!d) > + d = pci_host_bridge_acpi_msi_domain(bus); > > return d; > } > diff --git a/include/linux/pci-acpi.h b/include/linux/pci-acpi.h > index a965efa..766d045 100644 > --- a/include/linux/pci-acpi.h > +++ b/include/linux/pci-acpi.h > @@ -77,6 +77,8 @@ static inline void acpiphp_remove_slots(struct pci_bus *bus) { } > static inline void acpiphp_check_host_bridge(struct acpi_device *adev) { } > #endif > > +struct irq_domain *pci_host_bridge_acpi_msi_domain(struct pci_bus *bus); > + > extern const u8 pci_acpi_dsm_uuid[]; > #define DEVICE_LABEL_DSM 0x07 > #define RESET_DELAY_DSM 0x08 > @@ -85,6 +87,8 @@ extern const u8 pci_acpi_dsm_uuid[]; > #else /* CONFIG_ACPI */ > static inline void acpi_pci_add_bus(struct pci_bus *bus) { } > static inline void acpi_pci_remove_bus(struct pci_bus *bus) { } > +static inline struct irq_domain * > +pci_host_bridge_acpi_msi_domain(struct pci_bus *bus) { return NULL; } > #endif /* CONFIG_ACPI */ > > #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_APEI > Once you solve the HW abstraction issue, this will be OK. Thanks, M.
On 08/04/2015 10:04 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On 29/07/15 11:08, Hanjun Guo wrote: >> From: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> >> >> This patch introduces pci_host_bridge_acpi_msi_domain(), which queries >> a GIC MSI irq-domain token and use it to retrieve an irq_domain with >> DOMAIN_BUS_PCI_MSI bus type, and bind it to PCI host-bridge. >> >> Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> >> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> >> --- >> drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ >> drivers/pci/probe.c | 3 +++ >> include/linux/pci-acpi.h | 4 ++++ >> 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c b/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c >> index 314a625..5f11653 100644 >> --- a/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c >> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c >> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ >> >> #include <linux/delay.h> >> #include <linux/init.h> >> +#include <linux/irqdomain.h> >> #include <linux/pci.h> >> #include <linux/pci_hotplug.h> >> #include <linux/module.h> >> @@ -16,6 +17,7 @@ >> #include <linux/pci-acpi.h> >> #include <linux/pm_runtime.h> >> #include <linux/pm_qos.h> >> +#include <acpi/acpi_gic.h> >> #include "pci.h" >> >> /* >> @@ -681,6 +683,22 @@ static bool pci_acpi_bus_match(struct device *dev) >> return dev_is_pci(dev); >> } >> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN >> +struct irq_domain *pci_host_bridge_acpi_msi_domain(struct pci_bus *bus) >> +{ >> + struct irq_domain *d = NULL; >> + void *token = acpi_gic_get_msi_token(&bus->dev); > > Do you see why I positively *hate* having hardware details in generic > layers? They propagate everywhere... > >> + >> + if (token) >> + d = irq_find_matching_host(token, DOMAIN_BUS_PCI_MSI); >> + >> + if (!d) >> + pr_debug("Fail to find domain for MSI\n"); >> + >> + return d; >> +} >> +#endif /*CONFIG_GENERIC_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN*/ >> + >> static struct acpi_bus_type acpi_pci_bus = { >> .name = "PCI", >> .match = pci_acpi_bus_match, >> diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c >> index a7afeac..8c1204c 100644 >> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c >> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c >> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ >> #include <linux/module.h> >> #include <linux/cpumask.h> >> #include <linux/pci-aspm.h> >> +#include <linux/pci-acpi.h> >> #include <asm-generic/pci-bridge.h> >> #include "pci.h" >> >> @@ -670,6 +671,8 @@ static struct irq_domain *pci_host_bridge_msi_domain(struct pci_bus *bus) >> * should be called from here. >> */ >> d = pci_host_bridge_of_msi_domain(bus); >> + if (!d) >> + d = pci_host_bridge_acpi_msi_domain(bus); >> >> return d; >> } >> diff --git a/include/linux/pci-acpi.h b/include/linux/pci-acpi.h >> index a965efa..766d045 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/pci-acpi.h >> +++ b/include/linux/pci-acpi.h >> @@ -77,6 +77,8 @@ static inline void acpiphp_remove_slots(struct pci_bus *bus) { } >> static inline void acpiphp_check_host_bridge(struct acpi_device *adev) { } >> #endif >> >> +struct irq_domain *pci_host_bridge_acpi_msi_domain(struct pci_bus *bus); >> + >> extern const u8 pci_acpi_dsm_uuid[]; >> #define DEVICE_LABEL_DSM 0x07 >> #define RESET_DELAY_DSM 0x08 >> @@ -85,6 +87,8 @@ extern const u8 pci_acpi_dsm_uuid[]; >> #else /* CONFIG_ACPI */ >> static inline void acpi_pci_add_bus(struct pci_bus *bus) { } >> static inline void acpi_pci_remove_bus(struct pci_bus *bus) { } >> +static inline struct irq_domain * >> +pci_host_bridge_acpi_msi_domain(struct pci_bus *bus) { return NULL; } >> #endif /* CONFIG_ACPI */ >> >> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_APEI >> > > Once you solve the HW abstraction issue, this will be OK. Sure, I will sync with Suravee to fix that. Thanks for you comments! Hanjun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 29.07.2015 12:08, Hanjun Guo wrote: > From: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> > > This patch introduces pci_host_bridge_acpi_msi_domain(), which queries > a GIC MSI irq-domain token and use it to retrieve an irq_domain with > DOMAIN_BUS_PCI_MSI bus type, and bind it to PCI host-bridge. > > Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> > Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> > --- > drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/pci/probe.c | 3 +++ > include/linux/pci-acpi.h | 4 ++++ > 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c b/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c > index 314a625..5f11653 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c > @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ > > #include <linux/delay.h> > #include <linux/init.h> > +#include <linux/irqdomain.h> > #include <linux/pci.h> > #include <linux/pci_hotplug.h> > #include <linux/module.h> > @@ -16,6 +17,7 @@ > #include <linux/pci-acpi.h> > #include <linux/pm_runtime.h> > #include <linux/pm_qos.h> > +#include <acpi/acpi_gic.h> > #include "pci.h" > > /* > @@ -681,6 +683,22 @@ static bool pci_acpi_bus_match(struct device *dev) > return dev_is_pci(dev); > } > > +#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN > +struct irq_domain *pci_host_bridge_acpi_msi_domain(struct pci_bus *bus) > +{ > + struct irq_domain *d = NULL; > + void *token = acpi_gic_get_msi_token(&bus->dev); > + > + if (token) > + d = irq_find_matching_host(token, DOMAIN_BUS_PCI_MSI); > + > + if (!d) > + pr_debug("Fail to find domain for MSI\n"); > + > + return d; > +} > +#endif /*CONFIG_GENERIC_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN*/ > + > static struct acpi_bus_type acpi_pci_bus = { > .name = "PCI", > .match = pci_acpi_bus_match, > diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c > index a7afeac..8c1204c 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c > @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ > #include <linux/module.h> > #include <linux/cpumask.h> > #include <linux/pci-aspm.h> > +#include <linux/pci-acpi.h> > #include <asm-generic/pci-bridge.h> > #include "pci.h" > > @@ -670,6 +671,8 @@ static struct irq_domain *pci_host_bridge_msi_domain(struct pci_bus *bus) > * should be called from here. > */ > d = pci_host_bridge_of_msi_domain(bus); > + if (!d) > + d = pci_host_bridge_acpi_msi_domain(bus); Please use acpi_disabled here. BTW. This is another place where we need to know our firmware - DT vs ACPI. I know we can use acpi_disabled but I think more about generic solution. Since we already have: struct fwnode_handle *fwnode; we can create macro which identify h/w description style, something like: #define FWNODE_TYPE(dev) dev_fwnode(dev)->type and then: switch (FWNODE_TYPE(&bus->dev)) { case FWNODE_OF: ... case FWNODE_ACPI: ... case FWNODE_XXX: ... } Root bus is special case since it has no frimware type but we could factor out pci_set_bus_of_node(). For platform devices we have all we need. Just thinking aloud, let me know your thoughts. Regards, Tomasz > > return d; > } > diff --git a/include/linux/pci-acpi.h b/include/linux/pci-acpi.h > index a965efa..766d045 100644 > --- a/include/linux/pci-acpi.h > +++ b/include/linux/pci-acpi.h > @@ -77,6 +77,8 @@ static inline void acpiphp_remove_slots(struct pci_bus *bus) { } > static inline void acpiphp_check_host_bridge(struct acpi_device *adev) { } > #endif > > +struct irq_domain *pci_host_bridge_acpi_msi_domain(struct pci_bus *bus); > + > extern const u8 pci_acpi_dsm_uuid[]; > #define DEVICE_LABEL_DSM 0x07 > #define RESET_DELAY_DSM 0x08 > @@ -85,6 +87,8 @@ extern const u8 pci_acpi_dsm_uuid[]; > #else /* CONFIG_ACPI */ > static inline void acpi_pci_add_bus(struct pci_bus *bus) { } > static inline void acpi_pci_remove_bus(struct pci_bus *bus) { } > +static inline struct irq_domain * > +pci_host_bridge_acpi_msi_domain(struct pci_bus *bus) { return NULL; } > #endif /* CONFIG_ACPI */ > > #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_APEI > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 12:03:24PM +0200, Tomasz Nowicki wrote: > >@@ -670,6 +671,8 @@ static struct irq_domain *pci_host_bridge_msi_domain(struct pci_bus *bus) > > * should be called from here. > > */ > > d = pci_host_bridge_of_msi_domain(bus); > >+ if (!d) > >+ d = pci_host_bridge_acpi_msi_domain(bus); > > Please use acpi_disabled here. > BTW. This is another place where we need to know our firmware - DT vs ACPI. > I know we can use acpi_disabled but I think more about generic solution. > Since we already have: > struct fwnode_handle *fwnode; > we can create macro which identify h/w description style, something like: > #define FWNODE_TYPE(dev) dev_fwnode(dev)->type > and then: > switch (FWNODE_TYPE(&bus->dev)) { > case FWNODE_OF: > ... > case FWNODE_ACPI: > ... > case FWNODE_XXX: > ... > } > Root bus is special case since it has no frimware type but we could factor > out pci_set_bus_of_node(). For platform devices we have all we need. Just > thinking aloud, let me know your thoughts. Not knowing the particular detail here but can we not go a step further than that and have a fwnode_disabled() for this which does appropriate things for both ACPI and DT?
On 07/08/15 11:03, Tomasz Nowicki wrote: > On 29.07.2015 12:08, Hanjun Guo wrote: >> From: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> >> >> This patch introduces pci_host_bridge_acpi_msi_domain(), which queries >> a GIC MSI irq-domain token and use it to retrieve an irq_domain with >> DOMAIN_BUS_PCI_MSI bus type, and bind it to PCI host-bridge. >> >> Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> >> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> >> --- >> drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ >> drivers/pci/probe.c | 3 +++ >> include/linux/pci-acpi.h | 4 ++++ >> 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c b/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c >> index 314a625..5f11653 100644 >> --- a/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c >> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c >> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ >> >> #include <linux/delay.h> >> #include <linux/init.h> >> +#include <linux/irqdomain.h> >> #include <linux/pci.h> >> #include <linux/pci_hotplug.h> >> #include <linux/module.h> >> @@ -16,6 +17,7 @@ >> #include <linux/pci-acpi.h> >> #include <linux/pm_runtime.h> >> #include <linux/pm_qos.h> >> +#include <acpi/acpi_gic.h> >> #include "pci.h" >> >> /* >> @@ -681,6 +683,22 @@ static bool pci_acpi_bus_match(struct device *dev) >> return dev_is_pci(dev); >> } >> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN >> +struct irq_domain *pci_host_bridge_acpi_msi_domain(struct pci_bus *bus) >> +{ >> + struct irq_domain *d = NULL; >> + void *token = acpi_gic_get_msi_token(&bus->dev); >> + >> + if (token) >> + d = irq_find_matching_host(token, DOMAIN_BUS_PCI_MSI); >> + >> + if (!d) >> + pr_debug("Fail to find domain for MSI\n"); >> + >> + return d; >> +} >> +#endif /*CONFIG_GENERIC_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN*/ >> + >> static struct acpi_bus_type acpi_pci_bus = { >> .name = "PCI", >> .match = pci_acpi_bus_match, >> diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c >> index a7afeac..8c1204c 100644 >> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c >> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c >> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ >> #include <linux/module.h> >> #include <linux/cpumask.h> >> #include <linux/pci-aspm.h> >> +#include <linux/pci-acpi.h> >> #include <asm-generic/pci-bridge.h> >> #include "pci.h" >> >> @@ -670,6 +671,8 @@ static struct irq_domain *pci_host_bridge_msi_domain(struct pci_bus *bus) >> * should be called from here. >> */ >> d = pci_host_bridge_of_msi_domain(bus); >> + if (!d) >> + d = pci_host_bridge_acpi_msi_domain(bus); > > Please use acpi_disabled here. No, thanks. pci_host_bridge_acpi_msi_domain() can return NULL if ACPI is disabled, just like pci_host_bridge_of_msi_domain will return NULL if there is no domain to be found (or no OF support). Littering various firmware predicates all over the place hardly seem like a scalable solution, and I'd expect the ACPI backends to be self contained. > BTW. This is another place where we need to know our firmware - DT vs > ACPI. I know we can use acpi_disabled but I think more about generic > solution. Since we already have: > struct fwnode_handle *fwnode; > we can create macro which identify h/w description style, something like: > > #define FWNODE_TYPE(dev) dev_fwnode(dev)->type > > and then: > > switch (FWNODE_TYPE(&bus->dev)) { > case FWNODE_OF: > ... > case FWNODE_ACPI: > ... > case FWNODE_XXX: > ... > } > > Root bus is special case since it has no frimware type but we could > factor out pci_set_bus_of_node(). For platform devices we have all we > need. Just thinking aloud, let me know your thoughts. For that to work, we'd need to start converging device_node and fwnode_handle. Having both feels quite redundant at the moment. Thanks, M.
Hi Marc, On 8/4/15 21:04, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On 29/07/15 11:08, Hanjun Guo wrote: >> From: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> >> >> This patch introduces pci_host_bridge_acpi_msi_domain(), which queries >> a GIC MSI irq-domain token and use it to retrieve an irq_domain with >> DOMAIN_BUS_PCI_MSI bus type, and bind it to PCI host-bridge. >> >> Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> >> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> >> --- >> drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ >> drivers/pci/probe.c | 3 +++ >> include/linux/pci-acpi.h | 4 ++++ >> 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c b/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c >> index 314a625..5f11653 100644 >> --- a/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c >> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c >> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ >> >> #include <linux/delay.h> >> #include <linux/init.h> >> +#include <linux/irqdomain.h> >> #include <linux/pci.h> >> #include <linux/pci_hotplug.h> >> #include <linux/module.h> >> @@ -16,6 +17,7 @@ >> #include <linux/pci-acpi.h> >> #include <linux/pm_runtime.h> >> #include <linux/pm_qos.h> >> +#include <acpi/acpi_gic.h> >> #include "pci.h" >> >> /* >> @@ -681,6 +683,22 @@ static bool pci_acpi_bus_match(struct device *dev) >> return dev_is_pci(dev); >> } >> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN >> +struct irq_domain *pci_host_bridge_acpi_msi_domain(struct pci_bus *bus) >> +{ >> + struct irq_domain *d = NULL; >> + void *token = acpi_gic_get_msi_token(&bus->dev); > > Do you see why I positively *hate* having hardware details in generic > layers? They propagate everywhere... > >> + >> + if (token) >> + d = irq_find_matching_host(token, DOMAIN_BUS_PCI_MSI); >> + >> + if (!d) >> + pr_debug("Fail to find domain for MSI\n"); >> + >> + return d; >> +} >> +#endif /*CONFIG_GENERIC_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN*/ >> + >> static struct acpi_bus_type acpi_pci_bus = { >> .name = "PCI", >> .match = pci_acpi_bus_match, >> diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c >> index a7afeac..8c1204c 100644 >> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c >> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c >> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ >> #include <linux/module.h> >> #include <linux/cpumask.h> >> #include <linux/pci-aspm.h> >> +#include <linux/pci-acpi.h> >> #include <asm-generic/pci-bridge.h> >> #include "pci.h" >> >> @@ -670,6 +671,8 @@ static struct irq_domain *pci_host_bridge_msi_domain(struct pci_bus *bus) >> * should be called from here. >> */ >> d = pci_host_bridge_of_msi_domain(bus); >> + if (!d) >> + d = pci_host_bridge_acpi_msi_domain(bus); >> >> return d; >> } >> diff --git a/include/linux/pci-acpi.h b/include/linux/pci-acpi.h >> index a965efa..766d045 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/pci-acpi.h >> +++ b/include/linux/pci-acpi.h >> @@ -77,6 +77,8 @@ static inline void acpiphp_remove_slots(struct pci_bus *bus) { } >> static inline void acpiphp_check_host_bridge(struct acpi_device *adev) { } >> #endif >> >> +struct irq_domain *pci_host_bridge_acpi_msi_domain(struct pci_bus *bus); >> + >> extern const u8 pci_acpi_dsm_uuid[]; >> #define DEVICE_LABEL_DSM 0x07 >> #define RESET_DELAY_DSM 0x08 >> @@ -85,6 +87,8 @@ extern const u8 pci_acpi_dsm_uuid[]; >> #else /* CONFIG_ACPI */ >> static inline void acpi_pci_add_bus(struct pci_bus *bus) { } >> static inline void acpi_pci_remove_bus(struct pci_bus *bus) { } >> +static inline struct irq_domain * >> +pci_host_bridge_acpi_msi_domain(struct pci_bus *bus) { return NULL; } >> #endif /* CONFIG_ACPI */ >> >> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_APEI >> > > Once you solve the HW abstraction issue, this will be OK. > > Thanks, > > M. > Ok. Thanks, Suravee -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c b/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c index 314a625..5f11653 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ #include <linux/delay.h> #include <linux/init.h> +#include <linux/irqdomain.h> #include <linux/pci.h> #include <linux/pci_hotplug.h> #include <linux/module.h> @@ -16,6 +17,7 @@ #include <linux/pci-acpi.h> #include <linux/pm_runtime.h> #include <linux/pm_qos.h> +#include <acpi/acpi_gic.h> #include "pci.h" /* @@ -681,6 +683,22 @@ static bool pci_acpi_bus_match(struct device *dev) return dev_is_pci(dev); } +#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN +struct irq_domain *pci_host_bridge_acpi_msi_domain(struct pci_bus *bus) +{ + struct irq_domain *d = NULL; + void *token = acpi_gic_get_msi_token(&bus->dev); + + if (token) + d = irq_find_matching_host(token, DOMAIN_BUS_PCI_MSI); + + if (!d) + pr_debug("Fail to find domain for MSI\n"); + + return d; +} +#endif /*CONFIG_GENERIC_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN*/ + static struct acpi_bus_type acpi_pci_bus = { .name = "PCI", .match = pci_acpi_bus_match, diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c index a7afeac..8c1204c 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ #include <linux/module.h> #include <linux/cpumask.h> #include <linux/pci-aspm.h> +#include <linux/pci-acpi.h> #include <asm-generic/pci-bridge.h> #include "pci.h" @@ -670,6 +671,8 @@ static struct irq_domain *pci_host_bridge_msi_domain(struct pci_bus *bus) * should be called from here. */ d = pci_host_bridge_of_msi_domain(bus); + if (!d) + d = pci_host_bridge_acpi_msi_domain(bus); return d; } diff --git a/include/linux/pci-acpi.h b/include/linux/pci-acpi.h index a965efa..766d045 100644 --- a/include/linux/pci-acpi.h +++ b/include/linux/pci-acpi.h @@ -77,6 +77,8 @@ static inline void acpiphp_remove_slots(struct pci_bus *bus) { } static inline void acpiphp_check_host_bridge(struct acpi_device *adev) { } #endif +struct irq_domain *pci_host_bridge_acpi_msi_domain(struct pci_bus *bus); + extern const u8 pci_acpi_dsm_uuid[]; #define DEVICE_LABEL_DSM 0x07 #define RESET_DELAY_DSM 0x08 @@ -85,6 +87,8 @@ extern const u8 pci_acpi_dsm_uuid[]; #else /* CONFIG_ACPI */ static inline void acpi_pci_add_bus(struct pci_bus *bus) { } static inline void acpi_pci_remove_bus(struct pci_bus *bus) { } +static inline struct irq_domain * +pci_host_bridge_acpi_msi_domain(struct pci_bus *bus) { return NULL; } #endif /* CONFIG_ACPI */ #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_APEI