Message ID | 1441314363-9836-1-git-send-email-anders.roxell@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Thu, 3 Sep 2015, Anders Roxell wrote: > The current spin_lock_irqsave() protects the enabling of the device > interrupt. In order to prevent recursion in the case of sleeping > spinlocks (e.g. with RT patch, stacktrace below), convert the spin lock > to a raw spin lock. No change for !RT kernels. > > [ 10.992238] kernel BUG at ../kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:998! > [ 10.992243] Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] PREEMPT SMP ARM > [ 10.992250] Modules linked in: > [ 10.992258] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.1.5-rt5 > [ 10.992263] Hardware name: SAMSUNG EXYNOS (Flattened Device Tree) > [ 10.992268] task: ed880000 ti: ed888000 task.ti: ed888000 > [ 10.992281] PC is at rt_spin_lock_slowlock+0xa4/0x2ec > [ 10.992288] LR is at rt_spin_lock_slowlock+0x54/0x2ec > [ 10.992296] pc : [<c099e1bc>] lr : [<c099e16c>] psr: 60000193 > [ 10.992296] sp : ed889a28 ip : ed880001 fp : 00000089 > [ 10.992300] r10: ed889a28 r9 : c0f55654 r8 : 00000060 > [ 10.992305] r7 : ed880000 r6 : 00000000 r5 : 00000001 r4 : ed9f7288 > [ 10.992310] r3 : ed880000 r2 : 00000000 r1 : ed880000 r0 : 00000000 > [ 10.992316] Flags: nZCv IRQs off FIQs on Mode SVC_32 ISA ARM > Segment kernel > ... > ... > [ 10.992662] [<c099e1bc>] (rt_spin_lock_slowlock) from [<c07bc794>] > (exynos5_i2c_irq+0x20/0x2b0) > [ 10.992678] [<c07bc794>] (exynos5_i2c_irq) from [<c028c8b4>] > (handle_irq_event_percpu+0x68/0x158) > [ 10.992690] [<c028c8b4>] (handle_irq_event_percpu) from [<c028ca0c>] > (handle_irq_event+0x68/0xa8) > [ 10.992702] [<c028ca0c>] (handle_irq_event) from [<c028f9c4>] > (handle_fasteoi_irq+0x11c/0x1d4) > [ 10.992713] [<c028f9c4>] (handle_fasteoi_irq) from [<c028c17c>] > (generic_handle_irq+0x20/0x30) > [ 10.992724] [<c028c17c>] (generic_handle_irq) from [<c028c290>] > (__handle_domain_irq+0x6c/0xe4) > [ 10.992734] [<c028c290>] (__handle_domain_irq) from [<c020a71c>] > (gic_handle_irq+0x2c/0x68) > [ 10.992744] [<c020a71c>] (gic_handle_irq) from [<c0214140>] > (__irq_svc+0x40/0x88) > [ 10.992749] Exception stack(0xed889b28 to 0xed889b70) What you completely fail to explain how this can happen at all. On RT the interrupt of that device is force threaded, but the handler is called in hard interrupt context, which is wrong to begin with. While the interrupt request in this driver is bogus: ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, i2c->irq, exynos5_i2c_irq, IRQF_NO_SUSPEND | IRQF_ONESHOT, dev_name(&pdev->dev), i2c); because it sets the ONESHOT flag for no reason, it does not set the NOTRHEAD flag which would prevent force threading. Hmm? tglx
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c index b29c750..b12e77e 100644 --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c @@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ struct exynos5_i2c { struct device *dev; int state; - spinlock_t lock; /* IRQ synchronization */ + raw_spinlock_t lock; /* IRQ synchronization */ /* * Since the TRANS_DONE bit is cleared on read, and we may read it @@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ static irqreturn_t exynos5_i2c_irq(int irqno, void *dev_id) i2c->state = -EINVAL; - spin_lock(&i2c->lock); + raw_spin_lock(&i2c->lock); int_status = readl(i2c->regs + HSI2C_INT_STATUS); writel(int_status, i2c->regs + HSI2C_INT_STATUS); @@ -521,7 +521,7 @@ static irqreturn_t exynos5_i2c_irq(int irqno, void *dev_id) complete(&i2c->msg_complete); } - spin_unlock(&i2c->lock); + raw_spin_unlock(&i2c->lock); return IRQ_HANDLED; } @@ -610,7 +610,7 @@ static void exynos5_i2c_message_start(struct exynos5_i2c *i2c, int stop) * Enable interrupts before starting the transfer so that we don't * miss any INT_I2C interrupts. */ - spin_lock_irqsave(&i2c->lock, flags); + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&i2c->lock, flags); writel(int_en, i2c->regs + HSI2C_INT_ENABLE); if (stop == 1) @@ -618,7 +618,7 @@ static void exynos5_i2c_message_start(struct exynos5_i2c *i2c, int stop) i2c_auto_conf |= i2c->msg->len; i2c_auto_conf |= HSI2C_MASTER_RUN; writel(i2c_auto_conf, i2c->regs + HSI2C_AUTO_CONF); - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&i2c->lock, flags); + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&i2c->lock, flags); } static int exynos5_i2c_xfer_msg(struct exynos5_i2c *i2c, @@ -763,7 +763,7 @@ static int exynos5_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) /* Clear pending interrupts from u-boot or misc causes */ exynos5_i2c_clr_pend_irq(i2c); - spin_lock_init(&i2c->lock); + raw_spin_lock_init(&i2c->lock); init_completion(&i2c->msg_complete); i2c->irq = ret = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
The current spin_lock_irqsave() protects the enabling of the device interrupt. In order to prevent recursion in the case of sleeping spinlocks (e.g. with RT patch, stacktrace below), convert the spin lock to a raw spin lock. No change for !RT kernels. [ 10.992238] kernel BUG at ../kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:998! [ 10.992243] Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] PREEMPT SMP ARM [ 10.992250] Modules linked in: [ 10.992258] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.1.5-rt5 [ 10.992263] Hardware name: SAMSUNG EXYNOS (Flattened Device Tree) [ 10.992268] task: ed880000 ti: ed888000 task.ti: ed888000 [ 10.992281] PC is at rt_spin_lock_slowlock+0xa4/0x2ec [ 10.992288] LR is at rt_spin_lock_slowlock+0x54/0x2ec [ 10.992296] pc : [<c099e1bc>] lr : [<c099e16c>] psr: 60000193 [ 10.992296] sp : ed889a28 ip : ed880001 fp : 00000089 [ 10.992300] r10: ed889a28 r9 : c0f55654 r8 : 00000060 [ 10.992305] r7 : ed880000 r6 : 00000000 r5 : 00000001 r4 : ed9f7288 [ 10.992310] r3 : ed880000 r2 : 00000000 r1 : ed880000 r0 : 00000000 [ 10.992316] Flags: nZCv IRQs off FIQs on Mode SVC_32 ISA ARM Segment kernel ... ... [ 10.992662] [<c099e1bc>] (rt_spin_lock_slowlock) from [<c07bc794>] (exynos5_i2c_irq+0x20/0x2b0) [ 10.992678] [<c07bc794>] (exynos5_i2c_irq) from [<c028c8b4>] (handle_irq_event_percpu+0x68/0x158) [ 10.992690] [<c028c8b4>] (handle_irq_event_percpu) from [<c028ca0c>] (handle_irq_event+0x68/0xa8) [ 10.992702] [<c028ca0c>] (handle_irq_event) from [<c028f9c4>] (handle_fasteoi_irq+0x11c/0x1d4) [ 10.992713] [<c028f9c4>] (handle_fasteoi_irq) from [<c028c17c>] (generic_handle_irq+0x20/0x30) [ 10.992724] [<c028c17c>] (generic_handle_irq) from [<c028c290>] (__handle_domain_irq+0x6c/0xe4) [ 10.992734] [<c028c290>] (__handle_domain_irq) from [<c020a71c>] (gic_handle_irq+0x2c/0x68) [ 10.992744] [<c020a71c>] (gic_handle_irq) from [<c0214140>] (__irq_svc+0x40/0x88) [ 10.992749] Exception stack(0xed889b28 to 0xed889b70) ... ... Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org> --- drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)