| Message ID | 1441448856-13478-26-git-send-email-agruenba@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 12:27:20PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > When applying the file masks to an acl, we need to ensure that no > process gets more permissions than allowed by its file mask. > > This may require inserting an owner@ deny ace to ensure this if the > owner mask contains fewer permissions than the group or other mask. For > example, when applying mode 0466 to the following acl: > > everyone@:rw::allow > > A deny ace needs to be inserted so that the owner won't get elevated > write access: > > owner@:w::deny > everyone@:rw::allow > > Likewise, we may need to insert group class deny aces if the group mask > contains fewer permissions than the other mask. For example, when > applying mode 0646 to the following acl: > > owner@:rw::allow > everyone@:rw::allow > > A deny ace needs to be inserted so that the owning group won't get > elevated write access: > > owner@:rw::allow > group@:w::deny > everyone@:rw::allow > > Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@kernel.org> > --- > fs/richacl_compat.c | 236 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 236 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/fs/richacl_compat.c b/fs/richacl_compat.c > index 30bdc95..412844c 100644 > --- a/fs/richacl_compat.c > +++ b/fs/richacl_compat.c > @@ -494,3 +494,239 @@ richacl_set_other_permissions(struct richacl_alloc *alloc) > richace_change_mask(alloc, &ace, other_mask); > return 0; > } > + > +/** > + * richacl_max_allowed - maximum permissions that anybody is allowed > + */ > +static unsigned int > +richacl_max_allowed(struct richacl *acl) > +{ > + struct richace *ace; > + unsigned int allowed = 0; > + > + richacl_for_each_entry_reverse(ace, acl) { > + if (richace_is_inherit_only(ace)) > + continue; > + if (richace_is_allow(ace)) > + allowed |= ace->e_mask; > + else if (richace_is_deny(ace)) { > + if (richace_is_everyone(ace)) > + allowed &= ~ace->e_mask; > + } > + } > + return allowed; > +} > + > +/** > + * richacl_isolate_owner_class - limit the owner class to the owner file mask > + * @alloc: acl and number of allocated entries > + * > + * POSIX requires that after a chmod, the owner class is granted no more > + * permissions than the owner file permission bits. For richacls, this > + * means that the owner class must not be granted any permissions that the > + * owner mask does not include. > + * > + * When we apply file masks to an acl which grant more permissions to the group > + * or other class than to the owner class, we may end up in a situation where > + * the owner is granted additional permissions from other aces. For example, > + * given this acl: > + * > + * everyone:rwx::allow > + * > + * when file masks corresponding to mode 0466 are applied, after > + * richacl_propagate_everyone() and __richacl_apply_masks(), we end up with: > + * > + * owner@:r::allow > + * everyone@:rw::allow Are you sure? I didn't think richacl_apply_masks actually creates an owner@ entry in this case. Which is OK, just delete the owner@ ace from here and the following example and it still makes sense, I think. (But: thanks in general for the examples in these comments, they're extremely helpful.) > + * > + * This acl still grants the owner rw access through the everyone@ allow ace. > + * To fix this, we must deny the owner w access: > + * > + * owner@:w::deny > + * owner@:r::allow > + * everyone@:rw::allow > + */ > +static int > +richacl_isolate_owner_class(struct richacl_alloc *alloc) > +{ > + struct richace *ace; > + unsigned int allowed = 0; > + > + allowed = richacl_max_allowed(alloc->acl); > + if (allowed & ~alloc->acl->a_owner_mask) { > + /* > + * Figure out if we can update an existig OWNER@ DENY entry. > + */ > + richacl_for_each_entry(ace, alloc->acl) { > + if (richace_is_inherit_only(ace)) > + continue; > + if (richace_is_deny(ace)) { > + if (richace_is_owner(ace)) > + break; > + } else if (richace_is_allow(ace)) { > + ace = alloc->acl->a_entries + > + alloc->acl->a_count; > + break; > + } > + } > + if (ace != alloc->acl->a_entries + alloc->acl->a_count) { > + if (richace_change_mask(alloc, &ace, ace->e_mask | > + (allowed & ~alloc->acl->a_owner_mask))) > + return -1; > + } else { > + /* Insert an owner@ deny entry at the front. */ > + ace = alloc->acl->a_entries; > + if (richacl_insert_entry(alloc, &ace)) > + return -1; > + ace->e_type = RICHACE_ACCESS_DENIED_ACE_TYPE; > + ace->e_flags = RICHACE_SPECIAL_WHO; > + ace->e_mask = allowed & ~alloc->acl->a_owner_mask; > + ace->e_id.special = RICHACE_OWNER_SPECIAL_ID; > + } > + } > + return 0; Makes sense, though personally I'd find it simpler to follow without the a_entries + a_count condition, maybe something like this (untested): richacl_for_each_entry(ace, alloc->acl) { if (richace_is_inherit_only(ace)) continue; if (richace_is_allow(ace)) break; if (richace_is_owner(ace)) goto found; } /* Insert an owner@ deny entry at the front. */ ace = alloc->acl->a_entries; if (richacl_insert_entry(alloc, &ace)) return -1; ace->e_type = RICHACE_ACCESS_DENIED_ACE_TYPE; ace->e_flags = RICHACE_SPECIAL_WHO; ace->e_mask = allowed & ~alloc->acl->a_owner_mask; ace->e_id.special = RICHACE_OWNER_SPECIAL_ID; return 0; found: if (richace_change_mask(alloc, &ace, ace->e_mask | (allowed & ~alloc->acl->a_owner_mask))) return -1; return 0; --b. > +} > + > +/** > + * __richacl_isolate_who - isolate entry from everyone@ allow entry > + * @alloc: acl and number of allocated entries > + * @who: identifier to isolate > + * @deny: permissions this identifier should not be allowed > + * > + * See richacl_isolate_group_class(). > + */ > +static int > +__richacl_isolate_who(struct richacl_alloc *alloc, struct richace *who, > + unsigned int deny) > +{ > + struct richacl *acl = alloc->acl; > + struct richace *ace; > + int n; > + /* > + * Compute the permissions already denied to @who. > + */ > + richacl_for_each_entry(ace, acl) { > + if (richace_is_inherit_only(ace)) > + continue; > + if (richace_is_same_identifier(ace, who) && > + richace_is_deny(ace)) > + deny &= ~ace->e_mask; > + } > + if (!deny) > + return 0; > + > + /* > + * Figure out if we can update an existig deny entry. Start from the > + * entry before the trailing everyone@ allow entry. We will not hit > + * everyone@ entries in the loop. > + */ > + for (n = acl->a_count - 2; n != -1; n--) { > + ace = acl->a_entries + n; > + if (richace_is_inherit_only(ace)) > + continue; > + if (richace_is_deny(ace)) { > + if (richace_is_same_identifier(ace, who)) > + break; > + } else if (richace_is_allow(ace) && > + (ace->e_mask & deny)) { > + n = -1; > + break; > + } > + } > + if (n != -1) { > + if (richace_change_mask(alloc, &ace, ace->e_mask | deny)) > + return -1; > + } else { > + /* > + * Insert a new entry before the trailing everyone@ deny entry. > + */ > + struct richace who_copy; > + > + richace_copy(&who_copy, who); > + ace = acl->a_entries + acl->a_count - 1; > + if (richacl_insert_entry(alloc, &ace)) > + return -1; > + richace_copy(ace, &who_copy); > + ace->e_type = RICHACE_ACCESS_DENIED_ACE_TYPE; > + ace->e_flags &= ~RICHACE_INHERITANCE_FLAGS; > + ace->e_mask = deny; > + } > + return 0; > +} > + > +/** > + * richacl_isolate_group_class - limit the group class to the group file mask > + * @alloc: acl and number of allocated entries > + * > + * POSIX requires that after a chmod, the group class is granted no more > + * permissions than the group file permission bits. For richacls, this > + * means that the group class must not be granted any permissions that the > + * group mask does not include. > + * > + * When we apply file masks to an acl which grant more permissions to the other > + * class than to the group class, we may end up in a situation where processes > + * in the group class are granted additional permission from other aces. For > + * example, given this acl: > + * > + * joe:rwx::allow > + * everyone:rwx::allow > + * > + * when file masks corresponding to mode 0646 are applied, after > + * richacl_propagate_everyone() and __richacl_apply_masks(), we end up with: > + * > + * joe:r::allow > + * owner@:rw::allow > + * group@:r::allow > + * everyone@:rw::allow > + * > + * This acl still grants joe and group@ rw access through the everyone@ allow > + * ace. To fix this, we must deny w access to group class aces before the > + * everyone@ allow ace at the end of the acl: > + * > + * joe:r::allow > + * owner@:rw::allow > + * group@:r::allow > + * joe:w::deny > + * group@:w::deny > + * everyone@:rw::allow > + */ > +static int > +richacl_isolate_group_class(struct richacl_alloc *alloc) > +{ > + struct richace who = { > + .e_flags = RICHACE_SPECIAL_WHO, > + .e_id.special = RICHACE_GROUP_SPECIAL_ID, > + }; > + struct richace *ace; > + unsigned int deny; > + > + if (!alloc->acl->a_count) > + return 0; > + ace = alloc->acl->a_entries + alloc->acl->a_count - 1; > + if (richace_is_inherit_only(ace) || !richace_is_everyone(ace)) > + return 0; > + deny = ace->e_mask & ~alloc->acl->a_group_mask; > + > + if (deny) { > + unsigned int n; > + > + if (__richacl_isolate_who(alloc, &who, deny)) > + return -1; > + /* > + * Start from the entry before the trailing everyone@ allow > + * entry. We will not hit everyone@ entries in the loop. > + */ > + for (n = alloc->acl->a_count - 2; n != -1; n--) { > + ace = alloc->acl->a_entries + n; > + > + if (richace_is_inherit_only(ace) || > + richace_is_owner(ace) || > + richace_is_group(ace) || > + richace_is_everyone(ace)) > + continue; > + if (__richacl_isolate_who(alloc, ace, deny)) > + return -1; > + } > + } > + return 0; > +} > -- > 2.4.3 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 12:27:20PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > When applying the file masks to an acl, we need to ensure that no > process gets more permissions than allowed by its file mask. > > This may require inserting an owner@ deny ace to ensure this if the > owner mask contains fewer permissions than the group or other mask. For > example, when applying mode 0466 to the following acl: > > everyone@:rw::allow > > A deny ace needs to be inserted so that the owner won't get elevated > write access: > > owner@:w::deny > everyone@:rw::allow > > Likewise, we may need to insert group class deny aces if the group mask > contains fewer permissions than the other mask. For example, when > applying mode 0646 to the following acl: > > owner@:rw::allow > everyone@:rw::allow > > A deny ace needs to be inserted so that the owning group won't get > elevated write access: > > owner@:rw::allow > group@:w::deny > everyone@:rw::allow > > Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@kernel.org> > --- > fs/richacl_compat.c | 236 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 236 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/fs/richacl_compat.c b/fs/richacl_compat.c > index 30bdc95..412844c 100644 > --- a/fs/richacl_compat.c > +++ b/fs/richacl_compat.c > @@ -494,3 +494,239 @@ richacl_set_other_permissions(struct richacl_alloc *alloc) > richace_change_mask(alloc, &ace, other_mask); > return 0; > } > + > +/** > + * richacl_max_allowed - maximum permissions that anybody is allowed > + */ > +static unsigned int > +richacl_max_allowed(struct richacl *acl) > +{ > + struct richace *ace; > + unsigned int allowed = 0; > + > + richacl_for_each_entry_reverse(ace, acl) { > + if (richace_is_inherit_only(ace)) > + continue; > + if (richace_is_allow(ace)) > + allowed |= ace->e_mask; > + else if (richace_is_deny(ace)) { > + if (richace_is_everyone(ace)) > + allowed &= ~ace->e_mask; > + } > + } > + return allowed; > +} > + > +/** > + * richacl_isolate_owner_class - limit the owner class to the owner file mask > + * @alloc: acl and number of allocated entries > + * > + * POSIX requires that after a chmod, the owner class is granted no more > + * permissions than the owner file permission bits. For richacls, this > + * means that the owner class must not be granted any permissions that the > + * owner mask does not include. > + * > + * When we apply file masks to an acl which grant more permissions to the group > + * or other class than to the owner class, we may end up in a situation where > + * the owner is granted additional permissions from other aces. For example, > + * given this acl: > + * > + * everyone:rwx::allow > + * > + * when file masks corresponding to mode 0466 are applied, after > + * richacl_propagate_everyone() and __richacl_apply_masks(), we end up with: > + * > + * owner@:r::allow > + * everyone@:rw::allow > + * > + * This acl still grants the owner rw access through the everyone@ allow ace. > + * To fix this, we must deny the owner w access: > + * > + * owner@:w::deny > + * owner@:r::allow > + * everyone@:rw::allow > + */ > +static int > +richacl_isolate_owner_class(struct richacl_alloc *alloc) > +{ > + struct richace *ace; > + unsigned int allowed = 0; > + > + allowed = richacl_max_allowed(alloc->acl); > + if (allowed & ~alloc->acl->a_owner_mask) { > + /* > + * Figure out if we can update an existig OWNER@ DENY entry. > + */ > + richacl_for_each_entry(ace, alloc->acl) { > + if (richace_is_inherit_only(ace)) > + continue; > + if (richace_is_deny(ace)) { > + if (richace_is_owner(ace)) > + break; > + } else if (richace_is_allow(ace)) { > + ace = alloc->acl->a_entries + > + alloc->acl->a_count; > + break; > + } > + } > + if (ace != alloc->acl->a_entries + alloc->acl->a_count) { > + if (richace_change_mask(alloc, &ace, ace->e_mask | > + (allowed & ~alloc->acl->a_owner_mask))) > + return -1; > + } else { > + /* Insert an owner@ deny entry at the front. */ > + ace = alloc->acl->a_entries; > + if (richacl_insert_entry(alloc, &ace)) > + return -1; > + ace->e_type = RICHACE_ACCESS_DENIED_ACE_TYPE; > + ace->e_flags = RICHACE_SPECIAL_WHO; > + ace->e_mask = allowed & ~alloc->acl->a_owner_mask; > + ace->e_id.special = RICHACE_OWNER_SPECIAL_ID; > + } > + } > + return 0; > +} > + > +/** > + * __richacl_isolate_who - isolate entry from everyone@ allow entry > + * @alloc: acl and number of allocated entries > + * @who: identifier to isolate > + * @deny: permissions this identifier should not be allowed > + * > + * See richacl_isolate_group_class(). > + */ > +static int > +__richacl_isolate_who(struct richacl_alloc *alloc, struct richace *who, > + unsigned int deny) > +{ > + struct richacl *acl = alloc->acl; > + struct richace *ace; > + int n; > + /* > + * Compute the permissions already denied to @who. I'm not sure, but may be worth commenting on the lack of everyone denies here as you do in a couple places below. > + */ > + richacl_for_each_entry(ace, acl) { > + if (richace_is_inherit_only(ace)) > + continue; > + if (richace_is_same_identifier(ace, who) && > + richace_is_deny(ace)) > + deny &= ~ace->e_mask; > + } > + if (!deny) > + return 0; > + > + /* > + * Figure out if we can update an existig deny entry. Start from the > + * entry before the trailing everyone@ allow entry. We will not hit > + * everyone@ entries in the loop. > + */ > + for (n = acl->a_count - 2; n != -1; n--) { > + ace = acl->a_entries + n; > + if (richace_is_inherit_only(ace)) > + continue; > + if (richace_is_deny(ace)) { > + if (richace_is_same_identifier(ace, who)) > + break; > + } else if (richace_is_allow(ace) && > + (ace->e_mask & deny)) { > + n = -1; > + break; > + } > + } > + if (n != -1) { > + if (richace_change_mask(alloc, &ace, ace->e_mask | deny)) > + return -1; > + } else { > + /* > + * Insert a new entry before the trailing everyone@ deny entry. > + */ > + struct richace who_copy; > + > + richace_copy(&who_copy, who); > + ace = acl->a_entries + acl->a_count - 1; > + if (richacl_insert_entry(alloc, &ace)) > + return -1; > + richace_copy(ace, &who_copy); > + ace->e_type = RICHACE_ACCESS_DENIED_ACE_TYPE; > + ace->e_flags &= ~RICHACE_INHERITANCE_FLAGS; > + ace->e_mask = deny; > + } As in the owner case, I think a goto would simplify the logic a little. > + return 0; > +} > + > +/** > + * richacl_isolate_group_class - limit the group class to the group file mask > + * @alloc: acl and number of allocated entries > + * > + * POSIX requires that after a chmod, the group class is granted no more > + * permissions than the group file permission bits. For richacls, this > + * means that the group class must not be granted any permissions that the > + * group mask does not include. > + * > + * When we apply file masks to an acl which grant more permissions to the other > + * class than to the group class, we may end up in a situation where processes > + * in the group class are granted additional permission from other aces. For > + * example, given this acl: > + * > + * joe:rwx::allow > + * everyone:rwx::allow > + * > + * when file masks corresponding to mode 0646 are applied, after > + * richacl_propagate_everyone() and __richacl_apply_masks(), we end up with: > + * > + * joe:r::allow > + * owner@:rw::allow > + * group@:r::allow > + * everyone@:rw::allow > + * > + * This acl still grants joe and group@ rw access through the everyone@ allow > + * ace. To fix this, we must deny w access to group class aces before the > + * everyone@ allow ace at the end of the acl: > + * > + * joe:r::allow > + * owner@:rw::allow > + * group@:r::allow > + * joe:w::deny > + * group@:w::deny > + * everyone@:rw::allow > + */ > +static int > +richacl_isolate_group_class(struct richacl_alloc *alloc) > +{ > + struct richace who = { > + .e_flags = RICHACE_SPECIAL_WHO, > + .e_id.special = RICHACE_GROUP_SPECIAL_ID, > + }; > + struct richace *ace; > + unsigned int deny; > + > + if (!alloc->acl->a_count) > + return 0; > + ace = alloc->acl->a_entries + alloc->acl->a_count - 1; > + if (richace_is_inherit_only(ace) || !richace_is_everyone(ace)) > + return 0; > + deny = ace->e_mask & ~alloc->acl->a_group_mask; > + > + if (deny) { > + unsigned int n; > + > + if (__richacl_isolate_who(alloc, &who, deny)) > + return -1; > + /* > + * Start from the entry before the trailing everyone@ allow > + * entry. We will not hit everyone@ entries in the loop. May as well skip the check below, in that case? --b. > + */ > + for (n = alloc->acl->a_count - 2; n != -1; n--) { > + ace = alloc->acl->a_entries + n; > + > + if (richace_is_inherit_only(ace) || > + richace_is_owner(ace) || > + richace_is_group(ace) || > + richace_is_everyone(ace)) > + continue; > + if (__richacl_isolate_who(alloc, ace, deny)) > + return -1; > + } > + } > + return 0; > +} > -- > 2.4.3 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Oh, and my only comments were nits, this looks good to me: Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> --b. On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 12:27:20PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > When applying the file masks to an acl, we need to ensure that no > process gets more permissions than allowed by its file mask. > > This may require inserting an owner@ deny ace to ensure this if the > owner mask contains fewer permissions than the group or other mask. For > example, when applying mode 0466 to the following acl: > > everyone@:rw::allow > > A deny ace needs to be inserted so that the owner won't get elevated > write access: > > owner@:w::deny > everyone@:rw::allow > > Likewise, we may need to insert group class deny aces if the group mask > contains fewer permissions than the other mask. For example, when > applying mode 0646 to the following acl: > > owner@:rw::allow > everyone@:rw::allow > > A deny ace needs to be inserted so that the owning group won't get > elevated write access: > > owner@:rw::allow > group@:w::deny > everyone@:rw::allow > > Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@kernel.org> > --- > fs/richacl_compat.c | 236 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 236 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/fs/richacl_compat.c b/fs/richacl_compat.c > index 30bdc95..412844c 100644 > --- a/fs/richacl_compat.c > +++ b/fs/richacl_compat.c > @@ -494,3 +494,239 @@ richacl_set_other_permissions(struct richacl_alloc *alloc) > richace_change_mask(alloc, &ace, other_mask); > return 0; > } > + > +/** > + * richacl_max_allowed - maximum permissions that anybody is allowed > + */ > +static unsigned int > +richacl_max_allowed(struct richacl *acl) > +{ > + struct richace *ace; > + unsigned int allowed = 0; > + > + richacl_for_each_entry_reverse(ace, acl) { > + if (richace_is_inherit_only(ace)) > + continue; > + if (richace_is_allow(ace)) > + allowed |= ace->e_mask; > + else if (richace_is_deny(ace)) { > + if (richace_is_everyone(ace)) > + allowed &= ~ace->e_mask; > + } > + } > + return allowed; > +} > + > +/** > + * richacl_isolate_owner_class - limit the owner class to the owner file mask > + * @alloc: acl and number of allocated entries > + * > + * POSIX requires that after a chmod, the owner class is granted no more > + * permissions than the owner file permission bits. For richacls, this > + * means that the owner class must not be granted any permissions that the > + * owner mask does not include. > + * > + * When we apply file masks to an acl which grant more permissions to the group > + * or other class than to the owner class, we may end up in a situation where > + * the owner is granted additional permissions from other aces. For example, > + * given this acl: > + * > + * everyone:rwx::allow > + * > + * when file masks corresponding to mode 0466 are applied, after > + * richacl_propagate_everyone() and __richacl_apply_masks(), we end up with: > + * > + * owner@:r::allow > + * everyone@:rw::allow > + * > + * This acl still grants the owner rw access through the everyone@ allow ace. > + * To fix this, we must deny the owner w access: > + * > + * owner@:w::deny > + * owner@:r::allow > + * everyone@:rw::allow > + */ > +static int > +richacl_isolate_owner_class(struct richacl_alloc *alloc) > +{ > + struct richace *ace; > + unsigned int allowed = 0; > + > + allowed = richacl_max_allowed(alloc->acl); > + if (allowed & ~alloc->acl->a_owner_mask) { > + /* > + * Figure out if we can update an existig OWNER@ DENY entry. > + */ > + richacl_for_each_entry(ace, alloc->acl) { > + if (richace_is_inherit_only(ace)) > + continue; > + if (richace_is_deny(ace)) { > + if (richace_is_owner(ace)) > + break; > + } else if (richace_is_allow(ace)) { > + ace = alloc->acl->a_entries + > + alloc->acl->a_count; > + break; > + } > + } > + if (ace != alloc->acl->a_entries + alloc->acl->a_count) { > + if (richace_change_mask(alloc, &ace, ace->e_mask | > + (allowed & ~alloc->acl->a_owner_mask))) > + return -1; > + } else { > + /* Insert an owner@ deny entry at the front. */ > + ace = alloc->acl->a_entries; > + if (richacl_insert_entry(alloc, &ace)) > + return -1; > + ace->e_type = RICHACE_ACCESS_DENIED_ACE_TYPE; > + ace->e_flags = RICHACE_SPECIAL_WHO; > + ace->e_mask = allowed & ~alloc->acl->a_owner_mask; > + ace->e_id.special = RICHACE_OWNER_SPECIAL_ID; > + } > + } > + return 0; > +} > + > +/** > + * __richacl_isolate_who - isolate entry from everyone@ allow entry > + * @alloc: acl and number of allocated entries > + * @who: identifier to isolate > + * @deny: permissions this identifier should not be allowed > + * > + * See richacl_isolate_group_class(). > + */ > +static int > +__richacl_isolate_who(struct richacl_alloc *alloc, struct richace *who, > + unsigned int deny) > +{ > + struct richacl *acl = alloc->acl; > + struct richace *ace; > + int n; > + /* > + * Compute the permissions already denied to @who. > + */ > + richacl_for_each_entry(ace, acl) { > + if (richace_is_inherit_only(ace)) > + continue; > + if (richace_is_same_identifier(ace, who) && > + richace_is_deny(ace)) > + deny &= ~ace->e_mask; > + } > + if (!deny) > + return 0; > + > + /* > + * Figure out if we can update an existig deny entry. Start from the > + * entry before the trailing everyone@ allow entry. We will not hit > + * everyone@ entries in the loop. > + */ > + for (n = acl->a_count - 2; n != -1; n--) { > + ace = acl->a_entries + n; > + if (richace_is_inherit_only(ace)) > + continue; > + if (richace_is_deny(ace)) { > + if (richace_is_same_identifier(ace, who)) > + break; > + } else if (richace_is_allow(ace) && > + (ace->e_mask & deny)) { > + n = -1; > + break; > + } > + } > + if (n != -1) { > + if (richace_change_mask(alloc, &ace, ace->e_mask | deny)) > + return -1; > + } else { > + /* > + * Insert a new entry before the trailing everyone@ deny entry. > + */ > + struct richace who_copy; > + > + richace_copy(&who_copy, who); > + ace = acl->a_entries + acl->a_count - 1; > + if (richacl_insert_entry(alloc, &ace)) > + return -1; > + richace_copy(ace, &who_copy); > + ace->e_type = RICHACE_ACCESS_DENIED_ACE_TYPE; > + ace->e_flags &= ~RICHACE_INHERITANCE_FLAGS; > + ace->e_mask = deny; > + } > + return 0; > +} > + > +/** > + * richacl_isolate_group_class - limit the group class to the group file mask > + * @alloc: acl and number of allocated entries > + * > + * POSIX requires that after a chmod, the group class is granted no more > + * permissions than the group file permission bits. For richacls, this > + * means that the group class must not be granted any permissions that the > + * group mask does not include. > + * > + * When we apply file masks to an acl which grant more permissions to the other > + * class than to the group class, we may end up in a situation where processes > + * in the group class are granted additional permission from other aces. For > + * example, given this acl: > + * > + * joe:rwx::allow > + * everyone:rwx::allow > + * > + * when file masks corresponding to mode 0646 are applied, after > + * richacl_propagate_everyone() and __richacl_apply_masks(), we end up with: > + * > + * joe:r::allow > + * owner@:rw::allow > + * group@:r::allow > + * everyone@:rw::allow > + * > + * This acl still grants joe and group@ rw access through the everyone@ allow > + * ace. To fix this, we must deny w access to group class aces before the > + * everyone@ allow ace at the end of the acl: > + * > + * joe:r::allow > + * owner@:rw::allow > + * group@:r::allow > + * joe:w::deny > + * group@:w::deny > + * everyone@:rw::allow > + */ > +static int > +richacl_isolate_group_class(struct richacl_alloc *alloc) > +{ > + struct richace who = { > + .e_flags = RICHACE_SPECIAL_WHO, > + .e_id.special = RICHACE_GROUP_SPECIAL_ID, > + }; > + struct richace *ace; > + unsigned int deny; > + > + if (!alloc->acl->a_count) > + return 0; > + ace = alloc->acl->a_entries + alloc->acl->a_count - 1; > + if (richace_is_inherit_only(ace) || !richace_is_everyone(ace)) > + return 0; > + deny = ace->e_mask & ~alloc->acl->a_group_mask; > + > + if (deny) { > + unsigned int n; > + > + if (__richacl_isolate_who(alloc, &who, deny)) > + return -1; > + /* > + * Start from the entry before the trailing everyone@ allow > + * entry. We will not hit everyone@ entries in the loop. > + */ > + for (n = alloc->acl->a_count - 2; n != -1; n--) { > + ace = alloc->acl->a_entries + n; > + > + if (richace_is_inherit_only(ace) || > + richace_is_owner(ace) || > + richace_is_group(ace) || > + richace_is_everyone(ace)) > + continue; > + if (__richacl_isolate_who(alloc, ace, deny)) > + return -1; > + } > + } > + return 0; > +} > -- > 2.4.3 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
2015-09-22 18:06 GMT+02:00 J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>: > On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 12:27:20PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: >> When applying the file masks to an acl, we need to ensure that no >> process gets more permissions than allowed by its file mask. >> >> This may require inserting an owner@ deny ace to ensure this if the >> owner mask contains fewer permissions than the group or other mask. For >> example, when applying mode 0466 to the following acl: >> >> everyone@:rw::allow >> >> A deny ace needs to be inserted so that the owner won't get elevated >> write access: >> >> owner@:w::deny >> everyone@:rw::allow >> >> Likewise, we may need to insert group class deny aces if the group mask >> contains fewer permissions than the other mask. For example, when >> applying mode 0646 to the following acl: >> >> owner@:rw::allow >> everyone@:rw::allow >> >> A deny ace needs to be inserted so that the owning group won't get >> elevated write access: >> >> owner@:rw::allow >> group@:w::deny >> everyone@:rw::allow >> >> Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@kernel.org> >> --- >> fs/richacl_compat.c | 236 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 236 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/fs/richacl_compat.c b/fs/richacl_compat.c >> index 30bdc95..412844c 100644 >> --- a/fs/richacl_compat.c >> +++ b/fs/richacl_compat.c >> @@ -494,3 +494,239 @@ richacl_set_other_permissions(struct richacl_alloc *alloc) >> richace_change_mask(alloc, &ace, other_mask); >> return 0; >> } >> + >> +/** >> + * richacl_max_allowed - maximum permissions that anybody is allowed >> + */ >> +static unsigned int >> +richacl_max_allowed(struct richacl *acl) >> +{ >> + struct richace *ace; >> + unsigned int allowed = 0; >> + >> + richacl_for_each_entry_reverse(ace, acl) { >> + if (richace_is_inherit_only(ace)) >> + continue; >> + if (richace_is_allow(ace)) >> + allowed |= ace->e_mask; >> + else if (richace_is_deny(ace)) { >> + if (richace_is_everyone(ace)) >> + allowed &= ~ace->e_mask; >> + } >> + } >> + return allowed; >> +} >> + >> +/** >> + * richacl_isolate_owner_class - limit the owner class to the owner file mask >> + * @alloc: acl and number of allocated entries >> + * >> + * POSIX requires that after a chmod, the owner class is granted no more >> + * permissions than the owner file permission bits. For richacls, this >> + * means that the owner class must not be granted any permissions that the >> + * owner mask does not include. >> + * >> + * When we apply file masks to an acl which grant more permissions to the group >> + * or other class than to the owner class, we may end up in a situation where >> + * the owner is granted additional permissions from other aces. For example, >> + * given this acl: >> + * >> + * everyone:rwx::allow >> + * >> + * when file masks corresponding to mode 0466 are applied, after >> + * richacl_propagate_everyone() and __richacl_apply_masks(), we end up with: >> + * >> + * owner@:r::allow >> + * everyone@:rw::allow > > Are you sure? I didn't think richacl_apply_masks actually creates an > owner@ entry in this case. Which is OK, just delete the owner@ ace from > here and the following example and it still makes sense, I think. Hmm, the example can be fixed by applying more 0406 here instead of 0466. > (But: thanks in general for the examples in these comments, they're > extremely helpful.) Yes, I think without them, the code cannot be reviewed properly. > I'd find it simpler to follow without the a_entries + a_count condition, > maybe something like this (untested): > > [...] Great, let me further simplify this to: static int richacl_isolate_owner_class(struct richacl_alloc *alloc) { struct richacl *acl = alloc->acl; unsigned int deny = richacl_max_allowed(acl) & ~acl->a_owner_mask; if (deny) { struct richace *ace; /* * Figure out if we can update an existig OWNER@ DENY entry. */ richacl_for_each_entry(ace, acl) { if (richace_is_inherit_only(ace)) continue; if (richace_is_allow(ace)) break; if (richace_is_owner(ace)) { return richace_change_mask(alloc, &ace, ace->e_mask | deny); } } /* Insert an owner@ deny entry at the front. */ ace = acl->a_entries; if (richacl_insert_entry(alloc, &ace)) return -1; ace->e_type = RICHACE_ACCESS_DENIED_ACE_TYPE; ace->e_flags = RICHACE_SPECIAL_WHO; ace->e_mask = deny; ace->e_id.special = RICHACE_OWNER_SPECIAL_ID; } return 0; } Thanks, Andreas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 03:11:45PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > 2015-09-22 18:06 GMT+02:00 J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>: > > On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 12:27:20PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > >> When applying the file masks to an acl, we need to ensure that no > >> process gets more permissions than allowed by its file mask. > >> > >> This may require inserting an owner@ deny ace to ensure this if the > >> owner mask contains fewer permissions than the group or other mask. For > >> example, when applying mode 0466 to the following acl: > >> > >> everyone@:rw::allow > >> > >> A deny ace needs to be inserted so that the owner won't get elevated > >> write access: > >> > >> owner@:w::deny > >> everyone@:rw::allow > >> > >> Likewise, we may need to insert group class deny aces if the group mask > >> contains fewer permissions than the other mask. For example, when > >> applying mode 0646 to the following acl: > >> > >> owner@:rw::allow > >> everyone@:rw::allow > >> > >> A deny ace needs to be inserted so that the owning group won't get > >> elevated write access: > >> > >> owner@:rw::allow > >> group@:w::deny > >> everyone@:rw::allow > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@kernel.org> > >> --- > >> fs/richacl_compat.c | 236 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> 1 file changed, 236 insertions(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/fs/richacl_compat.c b/fs/richacl_compat.c > >> index 30bdc95..412844c 100644 > >> --- a/fs/richacl_compat.c > >> +++ b/fs/richacl_compat.c > >> @@ -494,3 +494,239 @@ richacl_set_other_permissions(struct richacl_alloc *alloc) > >> richace_change_mask(alloc, &ace, other_mask); > >> return 0; > >> } > >> + > >> +/** > >> + * richacl_max_allowed - maximum permissions that anybody is allowed > >> + */ > >> +static unsigned int > >> +richacl_max_allowed(struct richacl *acl) > >> +{ > >> + struct richace *ace; > >> + unsigned int allowed = 0; > >> + > >> + richacl_for_each_entry_reverse(ace, acl) { > >> + if (richace_is_inherit_only(ace)) > >> + continue; > >> + if (richace_is_allow(ace)) > >> + allowed |= ace->e_mask; > >> + else if (richace_is_deny(ace)) { > >> + if (richace_is_everyone(ace)) > >> + allowed &= ~ace->e_mask; > >> + } > >> + } > >> + return allowed; > >> +} > >> + > >> +/** > >> + * richacl_isolate_owner_class - limit the owner class to the owner file mask > >> + * @alloc: acl and number of allocated entries > >> + * > >> + * POSIX requires that after a chmod, the owner class is granted no more > >> + * permissions than the owner file permission bits. For richacls, this > >> + * means that the owner class must not be granted any permissions that the > >> + * owner mask does not include. > >> + * > >> + * When we apply file masks to an acl which grant more permissions to the group > >> + * or other class than to the owner class, we may end up in a situation where > >> + * the owner is granted additional permissions from other aces. For example, > >> + * given this acl: > >> + * > >> + * everyone:rwx::allow > >> + * > >> + * when file masks corresponding to mode 0466 are applied, after > >> + * richacl_propagate_everyone() and __richacl_apply_masks(), we end up with: > >> + * > >> + * owner@:r::allow > >> + * everyone@:rw::allow > > > > Are you sure? I didn't think richacl_apply_masks actually creates an > > owner@ entry in this case. Which is OK, just delete the owner@ ace from > > here and the following example and it still makes sense, I think. > > Hmm, the example can be fixed by applying more 0406 here instead of 0466. > > > (But: thanks in general for the examples in these comments, they're > > extremely helpful.) > > Yes, I think without them, the code cannot be reviewed properly. > > > I'd find it simpler to follow without the a_entries + a_count condition, > > maybe something like this (untested): > > > > [...] > > Great, let me further simplify this to: Works for me! (And feel free to add a Reviewed-by:.) --b. > > static int > richacl_isolate_owner_class(struct richacl_alloc *alloc) > { > struct richacl *acl = alloc->acl; > unsigned int deny = richacl_max_allowed(acl) & ~acl->a_owner_mask; > > if (deny) { > struct richace *ace; > > /* > * Figure out if we can update an existig OWNER@ DENY entry. > */ > richacl_for_each_entry(ace, acl) { > if (richace_is_inherit_only(ace)) > continue; > if (richace_is_allow(ace)) > break; > if (richace_is_owner(ace)) { > return richace_change_mask(alloc, &ace, > ace->e_mask | deny); > } > } > > /* Insert an owner@ deny entry at the front. */ > ace = acl->a_entries; > if (richacl_insert_entry(alloc, &ace)) > return -1; > ace->e_type = RICHACE_ACCESS_DENIED_ACE_TYPE; > ace->e_flags = RICHACE_SPECIAL_WHO; > ace->e_mask = deny; > ace->e_id.special = RICHACE_OWNER_SPECIAL_ID; > } > return 0; > } > > Thanks, > Andreas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
2015-09-22 21:02 GMT+02:00 J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>: > On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 12:27:20PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: >> + * Compute the permissions already denied to @who. > > I'm not sure, but may be worth commenting on the lack of everyone denies > here as you do in a couple places below. Okay. > As in the owner case, I think a goto would simplify the logic a little. Yep, I'll clean that up. >> + /* >> + * Start from the entry before the trailing everyone@ allow >> + * entry. We will not hit everyone@ entries in the loop. > > May as well skip the check below, in that case? Indeed. You can almost tell from those few leftovers how the code has evolved over time :) Thanks, Andreas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/fs/richacl_compat.c b/fs/richacl_compat.c index 30bdc95..412844c 100644 --- a/fs/richacl_compat.c +++ b/fs/richacl_compat.c @@ -494,3 +494,239 @@ richacl_set_other_permissions(struct richacl_alloc *alloc) richace_change_mask(alloc, &ace, other_mask); return 0; } + +/** + * richacl_max_allowed - maximum permissions that anybody is allowed + */ +static unsigned int +richacl_max_allowed(struct richacl *acl) +{ + struct richace *ace; + unsigned int allowed = 0; + + richacl_for_each_entry_reverse(ace, acl) { + if (richace_is_inherit_only(ace)) + continue; + if (richace_is_allow(ace)) + allowed |= ace->e_mask; + else if (richace_is_deny(ace)) { + if (richace_is_everyone(ace)) + allowed &= ~ace->e_mask; + } + } + return allowed; +} + +/** + * richacl_isolate_owner_class - limit the owner class to the owner file mask + * @alloc: acl and number of allocated entries + * + * POSIX requires that after a chmod, the owner class is granted no more + * permissions than the owner file permission bits. For richacls, this + * means that the owner class must not be granted any permissions that the + * owner mask does not include. + * + * When we apply file masks to an acl which grant more permissions to the group + * or other class than to the owner class, we may end up in a situation where + * the owner is granted additional permissions from other aces. For example, + * given this acl: + * + * everyone:rwx::allow + * + * when file masks corresponding to mode 0466 are applied, after + * richacl_propagate_everyone() and __richacl_apply_masks(), we end up with: + * + * owner@:r::allow + * everyone@:rw::allow + * + * This acl still grants the owner rw access through the everyone@ allow ace. + * To fix this, we must deny the owner w access: + * + * owner@:w::deny + * owner@:r::allow + * everyone@:rw::allow + */ +static int +richacl_isolate_owner_class(struct richacl_alloc *alloc) +{ + struct richace *ace; + unsigned int allowed = 0; + + allowed = richacl_max_allowed(alloc->acl); + if (allowed & ~alloc->acl->a_owner_mask) { + /* + * Figure out if we can update an existig OWNER@ DENY entry. + */ + richacl_for_each_entry(ace, alloc->acl) { + if (richace_is_inherit_only(ace)) + continue; + if (richace_is_deny(ace)) { + if (richace_is_owner(ace)) + break; + } else if (richace_is_allow(ace)) { + ace = alloc->acl->a_entries + + alloc->acl->a_count; + break; + } + } + if (ace != alloc->acl->a_entries + alloc->acl->a_count) { + if (richace_change_mask(alloc, &ace, ace->e_mask | + (allowed & ~alloc->acl->a_owner_mask))) + return -1; + } else { + /* Insert an owner@ deny entry at the front. */ + ace = alloc->acl->a_entries; + if (richacl_insert_entry(alloc, &ace)) + return -1; + ace->e_type = RICHACE_ACCESS_DENIED_ACE_TYPE; + ace->e_flags = RICHACE_SPECIAL_WHO; + ace->e_mask = allowed & ~alloc->acl->a_owner_mask; + ace->e_id.special = RICHACE_OWNER_SPECIAL_ID; + } + } + return 0; +} + +/** + * __richacl_isolate_who - isolate entry from everyone@ allow entry + * @alloc: acl and number of allocated entries + * @who: identifier to isolate + * @deny: permissions this identifier should not be allowed + * + * See richacl_isolate_group_class(). + */ +static int +__richacl_isolate_who(struct richacl_alloc *alloc, struct richace *who, + unsigned int deny) +{ + struct richacl *acl = alloc->acl; + struct richace *ace; + int n; + /* + * Compute the permissions already denied to @who. + */ + richacl_for_each_entry(ace, acl) { + if (richace_is_inherit_only(ace)) + continue; + if (richace_is_same_identifier(ace, who) && + richace_is_deny(ace)) + deny &= ~ace->e_mask; + } + if (!deny) + return 0; + + /* + * Figure out if we can update an existig deny entry. Start from the + * entry before the trailing everyone@ allow entry. We will not hit + * everyone@ entries in the loop. + */ + for (n = acl->a_count - 2; n != -1; n--) { + ace = acl->a_entries + n; + if (richace_is_inherit_only(ace)) + continue; + if (richace_is_deny(ace)) { + if (richace_is_same_identifier(ace, who)) + break; + } else if (richace_is_allow(ace) && + (ace->e_mask & deny)) { + n = -1; + break; + } + } + if (n != -1) { + if (richace_change_mask(alloc, &ace, ace->e_mask | deny)) + return -1; + } else { + /* + * Insert a new entry before the trailing everyone@ deny entry. + */ + struct richace who_copy; + + richace_copy(&who_copy, who); + ace = acl->a_entries + acl->a_count - 1; + if (richacl_insert_entry(alloc, &ace)) + return -1; + richace_copy(ace, &who_copy); + ace->e_type = RICHACE_ACCESS_DENIED_ACE_TYPE; + ace->e_flags &= ~RICHACE_INHERITANCE_FLAGS; + ace->e_mask = deny; + } + return 0; +} + +/** + * richacl_isolate_group_class - limit the group class to the group file mask + * @alloc: acl and number of allocated entries + * + * POSIX requires that after a chmod, the group class is granted no more + * permissions than the group file permission bits. For richacls, this + * means that the group class must not be granted any permissions that the + * group mask does not include. + * + * When we apply file masks to an acl which grant more permissions to the other + * class than to the group class, we may end up in a situation where processes + * in the group class are granted additional permission from other aces. For + * example, given this acl: + * + * joe:rwx::allow + * everyone:rwx::allow + * + * when file masks corresponding to mode 0646 are applied, after + * richacl_propagate_everyone() and __richacl_apply_masks(), we end up with: + * + * joe:r::allow + * owner@:rw::allow + * group@:r::allow + * everyone@:rw::allow + * + * This acl still grants joe and group@ rw access through the everyone@ allow + * ace. To fix this, we must deny w access to group class aces before the + * everyone@ allow ace at the end of the acl: + * + * joe:r::allow + * owner@:rw::allow + * group@:r::allow + * joe:w::deny + * group@:w::deny + * everyone@:rw::allow + */ +static int +richacl_isolate_group_class(struct richacl_alloc *alloc) +{ + struct richace who = { + .e_flags = RICHACE_SPECIAL_WHO, + .e_id.special = RICHACE_GROUP_SPECIAL_ID, + }; + struct richace *ace; + unsigned int deny; + + if (!alloc->acl->a_count) + return 0; + ace = alloc->acl->a_entries + alloc->acl->a_count - 1; + if (richace_is_inherit_only(ace) || !richace_is_everyone(ace)) + return 0; + deny = ace->e_mask & ~alloc->acl->a_group_mask; + + if (deny) { + unsigned int n; + + if (__richacl_isolate_who(alloc, &who, deny)) + return -1; + /* + * Start from the entry before the trailing everyone@ allow + * entry. We will not hit everyone@ entries in the loop. + */ + for (n = alloc->acl->a_count - 2; n != -1; n--) { + ace = alloc->acl->a_entries + n; + + if (richace_is_inherit_only(ace) || + richace_is_owner(ace) || + richace_is_group(ace) || + richace_is_everyone(ace)) + continue; + if (__richacl_isolate_who(alloc, ace, deny)) + return -1; + } + } + return 0; +}
When applying the file masks to an acl, we need to ensure that no process gets more permissions than allowed by its file mask. This may require inserting an owner@ deny ace to ensure this if the owner mask contains fewer permissions than the group or other mask. For example, when applying mode 0466 to the following acl: everyone@:rw::allow A deny ace needs to be inserted so that the owner won't get elevated write access: owner@:w::deny everyone@:rw::allow Likewise, we may need to insert group class deny aces if the group mask contains fewer permissions than the other mask. For example, when applying mode 0646 to the following acl: owner@:rw::allow everyone@:rw::allow A deny ace needs to be inserted so that the owning group won't get elevated write access: owner@:rw::allow group@:w::deny everyone@:rw::allow Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@kernel.org> --- fs/richacl_compat.c | 236 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 236 insertions(+)