Message ID | 1445506922-6005-4-git-send-email-eric.auger@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Thursday 22 October 2015 11:41:59 Eric Auger wrote: > This patch adds the reset function registration/unregistration. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> Looks good, except one thing: > @@ -70,6 +69,8 @@ int vfio_platform_calxedaxgmac_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev) > return -ENOMEM; > } > > + pr_info("VFIO reset of %s\n", vdev->name); > + > /* disable IRQ */ > writel(0, reg.ioaddr + XGMAC_DMA_INTR_ENA); > This probably slipped in from debugging, please remove it. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 10/22/2015 12:13 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thursday 22 October 2015 11:41:59 Eric Auger wrote: >> This patch adds the reset function registration/unregistration. >> >> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> > > Looks good, except one thing: >> @@ -70,6 +69,8 @@ int vfio_platform_calxedaxgmac_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev) >> return -ENOMEM; >> } >> >> + pr_info("VFIO reset of %s\n", vdev->name); >> + >> /* disable IRQ */ >> writel(0, reg.ioaddr + XGMAC_DMA_INTR_ENA); >> > > This probably slipped in from debugging, please remove it. Well actually this is not an oversight but some unappropriate tracing attempt I am afraid. I wanted to add a trace useful for the end-user to make sure the VFIO reset function was called. Do you forbid that or do recommend to use another tracing mechanism/level? In the past I tried dynamic tracing but with module loading mechanism I found it not that handy. Eric > > Arnd > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Thursday 22 October 2015 13:54:42 Eric Auger wrote: > On 10/22/2015 12:13 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Thursday 22 October 2015 11:41:59 Eric Auger wrote: > >> This patch adds the reset function registration/unregistration. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> > > > > Looks good, except one thing: > >> @@ -70,6 +69,8 @@ int vfio_platform_calxedaxgmac_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev) > >> return -ENOMEM; > >> } > >> > >> + pr_info("VFIO reset of %s\n", vdev->name); > >> + > >> /* disable IRQ */ > >> writel(0, reg.ioaddr + XGMAC_DMA_INTR_ENA); > >> > > > > This probably slipped in from debugging, please remove it. > Well actually this is not an oversight but some unappropriate tracing > attempt I am afraid. I wanted to add a trace useful for the end-user to > make sure the VFIO reset function was called. Do you forbid that or do > recommend to use another tracing mechanism/level? In the past I tried > dynamic tracing but with module loading mechanism I found it not that handy. If you think it's useful to have in the long run, it should be a separate patch with a description what it's good for, rather than a side-effect of an unrelated patch. It just looked to me like it's something you do while debugging the reset code, rather than while using it. Implementation-wise, you should use dev_info() instead of pr_info() where possible, and it probably makes sense to put this into the vfio_platform driver before calling the reset function, for consistency between the drivers. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 10/22/2015 02:09 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thursday 22 October 2015 13:54:42 Eric Auger wrote: >> On 10/22/2015 12:13 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >>> On Thursday 22 October 2015 11:41:59 Eric Auger wrote: >>>> This patch adds the reset function registration/unregistration. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> >>> >>> Looks good, except one thing: >>>> @@ -70,6 +69,8 @@ int vfio_platform_calxedaxgmac_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev) >>>> return -ENOMEM; >>>> } >>>> >>>> + pr_info("VFIO reset of %s\n", vdev->name); >>>> + >>>> /* disable IRQ */ >>>> writel(0, reg.ioaddr + XGMAC_DMA_INTR_ENA); >>>> >>> >>> This probably slipped in from debugging, please remove it. >> Well actually this is not an oversight but some unappropriate tracing >> attempt I am afraid. I wanted to add a trace useful for the end-user to >> make sure the VFIO reset function was called. Do you forbid that or do >> recommend to use another tracing mechanism/level? In the past I tried >> dynamic tracing but with module loading mechanism I found it not that handy. > > If you think it's useful to have in the long run, it should be a separate > patch with a description what it's good for, rather than a side-effect of > an unrelated patch. It just looked to me like it's something you do > while debugging the reset code, rather than while using it. > > Implementation-wise, you should use dev_info() instead of pr_info() where > possible, and it probably makes sense to put this into the vfio_platform > driver before calling the reset function, for consistency between the > drivers. OK thanks Best Regards Eric > > Arnd > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/platform/reset/vfio_platform_calxedaxgmac.c b/drivers/vfio/platform/reset/vfio_platform_calxedaxgmac.c index 619dc7d..8b2cccc 100644 --- a/drivers/vfio/platform/reset/vfio_platform_calxedaxgmac.c +++ b/drivers/vfio/platform/reset/vfio_platform_calxedaxgmac.c @@ -25,13 +25,12 @@ #include <linux/io.h> #include "vfio_platform_private.h" +#include "vfio_platform_reset_private.h" #define DRIVER_VERSION "0.1" #define DRIVER_AUTHOR "Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org>" #define DRIVER_DESC "Reset support for Calxeda xgmac vfio platform device" -#define CALXEDAXGMAC_COMPAT "calxeda,hb-xgmac" - /* XGMAC Register definitions */ #define XGMAC_CONTROL 0x00000000 /* MAC Configuration */ @@ -70,6 +69,8 @@ int vfio_platform_calxedaxgmac_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev) return -ENOMEM; } + pr_info("VFIO reset of %s\n", vdev->name); + /* disable IRQ */ writel(0, reg.ioaddr + XGMAC_DMA_INTR_ENA); @@ -78,7 +79,9 @@ int vfio_platform_calxedaxgmac_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev) return 0; } -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_platform_calxedaxgmac_reset); + +module_vfio_reset_handler("calxeda,hb-xgmac", + vfio_platform_calxedaxgmac_reset); MODULE_VERSION(DRIVER_VERSION); MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
This patch adds the reset function registration/unregistration. Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> --- v1 -> v2: - uses the module_vfio_reset_handler macro - add pr_info on vfio reset - do not export vfio_platform_calxedaxgmac_reset symbol anymore --- drivers/vfio/platform/reset/vfio_platform_calxedaxgmac.c | 9 ++++++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)