diff mbox

[RFC] Fix _FIT vs. NFIT processing breakage

Message ID 20151118175359.GA2209@ljk840.redhat.com (mailing list archive)
State RFC, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Linda Knippers Nov. 18, 2015, 5:54 p.m. UTC
Since commit 209851649dc4f7900a6bfe1de5e2640ab2c7d931, we no longer
see NVDIMM devices on our systems.  The NFIT/_FIT processing at
initialization gets a table from _FIT but doesn't like it.

When support for _FIT was added, the code presumed that the data
returned by the _FIT method is identical to the NFIT table, which
starts with an acpi_table_header.  However, the _FIT is defined
to return a data in the format of a series of NFIT type structure
entries and as a method, has an acpi_object header rather tahn
an acpi_table_header.

To address the differences, explicitly save the acpi_table_header
from the NFIT, since it is accessible through /sys, and change
the nfit pointer in the acpi_desc structure to point to the
table entries rather than the headers.

This is an RFC patch for several reasons.
1) I've only tested the boot path, not the code path gets
gets a _FIT later.
2) There is some debug information that we probably don't
want to keep in there.
3) I'm not even sure we should be checking _FIT at boot time
4) While this fixes my platform, it probably breaks the tests
that were used to test the original commit.

If we need to have a long discussion about whether our firmware
is correct, then perhaps we can remove the _FIT code from acpi_nfit_add()
while we sort it out.

Reported-by: Jeff Moyer (jmoyer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Linda Knippers <linda.knippers@hp.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/nfit.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 drivers/acpi/nfit.h |  3 ++-
 2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

Comments

Verma, Vishal L Nov. 18, 2015, 9:07 p.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, 2015-11-18 at 12:54 -0500, Linda Knippers wrote:
> Since commit 209851649dc4f7900a6bfe1de5e2640ab2c7d931, we no longer

> see NVDIMM devices on our systems.  The NFIT/_FIT processing at

> initialization gets a table from _FIT but doesn't like it.

> 

> When support for _FIT was added, the code presumed that the data

> returned by the _FIT method is identical to the NFIT table, which

> starts with an acpi_table_header.  However, the _FIT is defined

> to return a data in the format of a series of NFIT type structure

> entries and as a method, has an acpi_object header rather tahn

> an acpi_table_header.


Hm, I couldn't find any reference to this in the spec - that NFIT will
have the acpi_table_header but _FIT will have a different header - but
I'm no ACPI expert - is this usual convention? Any pointers where I
could look at?

> 

> To address the differences, explicitly save the acpi_table_header

> from the NFIT, since it is accessible through /sys, and change

> the nfit pointer in the acpi_desc structure to point to the

> table entries rather than the headers.

> 

> This is an RFC patch for several reasons.

> 1) I've only tested the boot path, not the code path gets

> gets a _FIT later.

> 2) There is some debug information that we probably don't

> want to keep in there.

> 3) I'm not even sure we should be checking _FIT at boot time


I think there is good reason to. If the driver is reloaded after a
hotplug event but prior to a full system reboot, if we don't check _FIT,
we will get the stale NFIT.

> 4) While this fixes my platform, it probably breaks the tests

> that were used to test the original commit.

> 

> If we need to have a long discussion about whether our firmware

> is correct, then perhaps we can remove the _FIT code from

> acpi_nfit_add()

> while we sort it out.

> 

> Reported-by: Jeff Moyer (jmoyer@redhat.com>

> Signed-off-by: Linda Knippers <linda.knippers@hp.com>

> ---

>  drivers/acpi/nfit.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---

> ---------

>  drivers/acpi/nfit.h |  3 ++-

>  2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

> 

> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/nfit.c b/drivers/acpi/nfit.c

> index f7dab53..ad95113 100644

> --- a/drivers/acpi/nfit.c

> +++ b/drivers/acpi/nfit.c

> @@ -655,7 +655,7 @@ static ssize_t revision_show(struct device *dev,

>  	struct nvdimm_bus_descriptor *nd_desc =

> to_nd_desc(nvdimm_bus);

>  	struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc = to_acpi_desc(nd_desc);

>  

> -	return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", acpi_desc->nfit-

> >header.revision);

> +	return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", acpi_desc->acpi_header.revision);

>  }

>  static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(revision);

>  

> @@ -1652,7 +1652,6 @@ int acpi_nfit_init(struct acpi_nfit_desc

> *acpi_desc, acpi_size sz)

>  

>  	data = (u8 *) acpi_desc->nfit;

>  	end = data + sz;

> -	data += sizeof(struct acpi_table_nfit);

>  	while (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(data))

>  		data = add_table(acpi_desc, &prev, data, end);

>  

> @@ -1748,13 +1747,34 @@ static int acpi_nfit_add(struct acpi_device

> *adev)

>  		return PTR_ERR(acpi_desc);

>  	}

>  

> -	acpi_desc->nfit = (struct acpi_table_nfit *) tbl;

> +	/*

> +	 * Save the acpi header for later and then skip it, make

> +	 * nfit point to the first nfit table header.

> +	 */

> +	acpi_desc->acpi_header = *tbl;

> +	acpi_desc->nfit = (void *) tbl + sizeof(struct

> acpi_table_nfit);

> +	sz -= sizeof(struct acpi_table_nfit);

>  

>  	/* Evaluate _FIT and override with that if present */

>  	status = acpi_evaluate_object(adev->handle, "_FIT", NULL,

> &buf);

>  	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status) && buf.length > 0) {

> -		acpi_desc->nfit = (struct acpi_table_nfit

> *)buf.pointer;

> -		sz = buf.length;

> +		union acpi_object *obj;

> +

> +		dev_dbg(dev, "%s _FIT ptr %p, length: %d\n",

> +			__func__, buf.pointer, (int)buf.length);

> +		print_hex_dump_debug("_FIT: ", DUMP_PREFIX_OFFSET,

> 16, 1,

> +			buf.pointer, buf.length, true);

> +

> +		/*

> +		 * Adjust for the acpi_object header of the _FIT

> +		 */

> +		obj = buf.pointer;

> +		if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER) {

> +			acpi_desc->nfit = (struct acpi_nfit_header

> *)obj->buffer.pointer;

> +			sz = obj->buffer.length;

> +		} else

> +			dev_dbg(dev, "%s invalid type %d, ignoring

> _FIT\n",

> +				__func__, (int) obj->type);

>  	}

>  

>  	rc = acpi_nfit_init(acpi_desc, sz);

> @@ -1777,8 +1796,9 @@ static void acpi_nfit_notify(struct acpi_device

> *adev, u32 event)

>  {

>  	struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc = dev_get_drvdata(&adev-

> >dev);

>  	struct acpi_buffer buf = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL };

> -	struct acpi_table_nfit *nfit_saved;

> +	struct acpi_nfit_header *nfit_saved;

>  	struct device *dev = &adev->dev;

> +	union acpi_object *obj;

>  	acpi_status status;

>  	int ret;

>  

> @@ -1807,13 +1827,24 @@ static void acpi_nfit_notify(struct

> acpi_device *adev, u32 event)

>  		goto out_unlock;

>  	}

>  

> +	dev_dbg(dev, "%s _FIT ptr %p, length: %d\n",

> +		__func__, buf.pointer, (int)buf.length);

> +	print_hex_dump_debug("_FIT: ", DUMP_PREFIX_OFFSET, 16, 1,

> +		buf.pointer, buf.length, true);

> +

>  	nfit_saved = acpi_desc->nfit;

> -	acpi_desc->nfit = (struct acpi_table_nfit *)buf.pointer;

> -	ret = acpi_nfit_init(acpi_desc, buf.length);

> -	if (!ret) {

> -		/* Merge failed, restore old nfit, and exit */

> -		acpi_desc->nfit = nfit_saved;

> -		dev_err(dev, "failed to merge updated NFIT\n");

> +	obj = buf.pointer;

> +	if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER) {

> +		acpi_desc->nfit = (struct acpi_nfit_header *)obj-

> >buffer.pointer;

> +		ret = acpi_nfit_init(acpi_desc, obj->buffer.length);

> +		if (!ret) {

> +			/* Merge failed, restore old nfit, and exit

> */

> +			acpi_desc->nfit = nfit_saved;

> +			dev_err(dev, "failed to merge updated

> NFIT\n");

> +		}

> +	} else {

> +		/* Bad _FIT, restore old nfit */

> +		dev_err(dev, "Invalid _FIT\n");

>  	}

>  	kfree(buf.pointer);

>  

> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/nfit.h b/drivers/acpi/nfit.h

> index 2ea5c07..3d549a3 100644

> --- a/drivers/acpi/nfit.h

> +++ b/drivers/acpi/nfit.h

> @@ -96,7 +96,8 @@ struct nfit_mem {

>  

>  struct acpi_nfit_desc {

>  	struct nvdimm_bus_descriptor nd_desc;

> -	struct acpi_table_nfit *nfit;

> +	struct acpi_table_header acpi_header;

> +	struct acpi_nfit_header *nfit;

>  	struct mutex spa_map_mutex;

>  	struct mutex init_mutex;

>  	struct list_head spa_maps;
Linda Knippers Nov. 18, 2015, 9:28 p.m. UTC | #2
On 11/18/2015 4:07 PM, Verma, Vishal L wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-11-18 at 12:54 -0500, Linda Knippers wrote:
>> Since commit 209851649dc4f7900a6bfe1de5e2640ab2c7d931, we no longer
>> see NVDIMM devices on our systems.  The NFIT/_FIT processing at
>> initialization gets a table from _FIT but doesn't like it.
>>
>> When support for _FIT was added, the code presumed that the data
>> returned by the _FIT method is identical to the NFIT table, which
>> starts with an acpi_table_header.  However, the _FIT is defined
>> to return a data in the format of a series of NFIT type structure
>> entries and as a method, has an acpi_object header rather tahn
>> an acpi_table_header.
>
> Hm, I couldn't find any reference to this in the spec - that NFIT will
> have the acpi_table_header but _FIT will have a different header - but
> I'm no ACPI expert - is this usual convention? Any pointers where I
> could look at?

I'm no ACPI expert either so maybe Toshi or someone else will help me
here but according to the FW developer, the convention is that there is
no ACPI table header because you already know what the table is.

Also, if you look at the NFIT definition (table 5-126) , the definition
explicitly includes the APCI table header but the _FIT definition does not.
It just says it's a series of NFIT Types structure entries.

-- ljk

>
>>
>> To address the differences, explicitly save the acpi_table_header
>> from the NFIT, since it is accessible through /sys, and change
>> the nfit pointer in the acpi_desc structure to point to the
>> table entries rather than the headers.
>>
>> This is an RFC patch for several reasons.
>> 1) I've only tested the boot path, not the code path gets
>> gets a _FIT later.
>> 2) There is some debug information that we probably don't
>> want to keep in there.
>> 3) I'm not even sure we should be checking _FIT at boot time
>
> I think there is good reason to. If the driver is reloaded after a
> hotplug event but prior to a full system reboot, if we don't check _FIT,
> we will get the stale NFIT.
>
>> 4) While this fixes my platform, it probably breaks the tests
>> that were used to test the original commit.
>>
>> If we need to have a long discussion about whether our firmware
>> is correct, then perhaps we can remove the _FIT code from
>> acpi_nfit_add()
>> while we sort it out.
>>
>> Reported-by: Jeff Moyer (jmoyer@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Linda Knippers <linda.knippers@hp.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/acpi/nfit.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>> ---------
>>   drivers/acpi/nfit.h |  3 ++-
>>   2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/nfit.c b/drivers/acpi/nfit.c
>> index f7dab53..ad95113 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/nfit.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/nfit.c
>> @@ -655,7 +655,7 @@ static ssize_t revision_show(struct device *dev,
>>   	struct nvdimm_bus_descriptor *nd_desc =
>> to_nd_desc(nvdimm_bus);
>>   	struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc = to_acpi_desc(nd_desc);
>>
>> -	return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", acpi_desc->nfit-
>>> header.revision);
>> +	return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", acpi_desc->acpi_header.revision);
>>   }
>>   static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(revision);
>>
>> @@ -1652,7 +1652,6 @@ int acpi_nfit_init(struct acpi_nfit_desc
>> *acpi_desc, acpi_size sz)
>>
>>   	data = (u8 *) acpi_desc->nfit;
>>   	end = data + sz;
>> -	data += sizeof(struct acpi_table_nfit);
>>   	while (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(data))
>>   		data = add_table(acpi_desc, &prev, data, end);
>>
>> @@ -1748,13 +1747,34 @@ static int acpi_nfit_add(struct acpi_device
>> *adev)
>>   		return PTR_ERR(acpi_desc);
>>   	}
>>
>> -	acpi_desc->nfit = (struct acpi_table_nfit *) tbl;
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Save the acpi header for later and then skip it, make
>> +	 * nfit point to the first nfit table header.
>> +	 */
>> +	acpi_desc->acpi_header = *tbl;
>> +	acpi_desc->nfit = (void *) tbl + sizeof(struct
>> acpi_table_nfit);
>> +	sz -= sizeof(struct acpi_table_nfit);
>>
>>   	/* Evaluate _FIT and override with that if present */
>>   	status = acpi_evaluate_object(adev->handle, "_FIT", NULL,
>> &buf);
>>   	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status) && buf.length > 0) {
>> -		acpi_desc->nfit = (struct acpi_table_nfit
>> *)buf.pointer;
>> -		sz = buf.length;
>> +		union acpi_object *obj;
>> +
>> +		dev_dbg(dev, "%s _FIT ptr %p, length: %d\n",
>> +			__func__, buf.pointer, (int)buf.length);
>> +		print_hex_dump_debug("_FIT: ", DUMP_PREFIX_OFFSET,
>> 16, 1,
>> +			buf.pointer, buf.length, true);
>> +
>> +		/*
>> +		 * Adjust for the acpi_object header of the _FIT
>> +		 */
>> +		obj = buf.pointer;
>> +		if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER) {
>> +			acpi_desc->nfit = (struct acpi_nfit_header
>> *)obj->buffer.pointer;
>> +			sz = obj->buffer.length;
>> +		} else
>> +			dev_dbg(dev, "%s invalid type %d, ignoring
>> _FIT\n",
>> +				__func__, (int) obj->type);
>>   	}
>>
>>   	rc = acpi_nfit_init(acpi_desc, sz);
>> @@ -1777,8 +1796,9 @@ static void acpi_nfit_notify(struct acpi_device
>> *adev, u32 event)
>>   {
>>   	struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc = dev_get_drvdata(&adev-
>>> dev);
>>   	struct acpi_buffer buf = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL };
>> -	struct acpi_table_nfit *nfit_saved;
>> +	struct acpi_nfit_header *nfit_saved;
>>   	struct device *dev = &adev->dev;
>> +	union acpi_object *obj;
>>   	acpi_status status;
>>   	int ret;
>>
>> @@ -1807,13 +1827,24 @@ static void acpi_nfit_notify(struct
>> acpi_device *adev, u32 event)
>>   		goto out_unlock;
>>   	}
>>
>> +	dev_dbg(dev, "%s _FIT ptr %p, length: %d\n",
>> +		__func__, buf.pointer, (int)buf.length);
>> +	print_hex_dump_debug("_FIT: ", DUMP_PREFIX_OFFSET, 16, 1,
>> +		buf.pointer, buf.length, true);
>> +
>>   	nfit_saved = acpi_desc->nfit;
>> -	acpi_desc->nfit = (struct acpi_table_nfit *)buf.pointer;
>> -	ret = acpi_nfit_init(acpi_desc, buf.length);
>> -	if (!ret) {
>> -		/* Merge failed, restore old nfit, and exit */
>> -		acpi_desc->nfit = nfit_saved;
>> -		dev_err(dev, "failed to merge updated NFIT\n");
>> +	obj = buf.pointer;
>> +	if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER) {
>> +		acpi_desc->nfit = (struct acpi_nfit_header *)obj-
>>> buffer.pointer;
>> +		ret = acpi_nfit_init(acpi_desc, obj->buffer.length);
>> +		if (!ret) {
>> +			/* Merge failed, restore old nfit, and exit
>> */
>> +			acpi_desc->nfit = nfit_saved;
>> +			dev_err(dev, "failed to merge updated
>> NFIT\n");
>> +		}
>> +	} else {
>> +		/* Bad _FIT, restore old nfit */
>> +		dev_err(dev, "Invalid _FIT\n");
>>   	}
>>   	kfree(buf.pointer);
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/nfit.h b/drivers/acpi/nfit.h
>> index 2ea5c07..3d549a3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/nfit.h
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/nfit.h
>> @@ -96,7 +96,8 @@ struct nfit_mem {
>>
>>   struct acpi_nfit_desc {
>>   	struct nvdimm_bus_descriptor nd_desc;
>> -	struct acpi_table_nfit *nfit;
>> +	struct acpi_table_header acpi_header;
>> +	struct acpi_nfit_header *nfit;
>>   	struct mutex spa_map_mutex;
>>   	struct mutex init_mutex;
>>   	struct list_head spa_maps;N?????r??y???b?X???v?^?)?{.n?+????{?i?b?{ay????,j??f???h???z??w??????j:+v???w?j?m????????zZ+??????j"??!tml=

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Kani, Toshi Nov. 18, 2015, 10:22 p.m. UTC | #3
On Wed, 2015-11-18 at 16:28 -0500, Linda Knippers wrote:
> On 11/18/2015 4:07 PM, Verma, Vishal L wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-11-18 at 12:54 -0500, Linda Knippers wrote:
> > > Since commit 209851649dc4f7900a6bfe1de5e2640ab2c7d931, we no longer
> > > see NVDIMM devices on our systems.  The NFIT/_FIT processing at
> > > initialization gets a table from _FIT but doesn't like it.
> > > 
> > > When support for _FIT was added, the code presumed that the data
> > > returned by the _FIT method is identical to the NFIT table, which
> > > starts with an acpi_table_header.  However, the _FIT is defined
> > > to return a data in the format of a series of NFIT type structure
> > > entries and as a method, has an acpi_object header rather tahn
> > > an acpi_table_header.
> > 
> > Hm, I couldn't find any reference to this in the spec - that NFIT will
> > have the acpi_table_header but _FIT will have a different header - but
> > I'm no ACPI expert - is this usual convention? Any pointers where I
> > could look at?
> 
> I'm no ACPI expert either so maybe Toshi or someone else will help me
> here but according to the FW developer, the convention is that there is
> no ACPI table header because you already know what the table is.

map_mat_entry() handles _MAT for processor objects, which expects no MADT header
table.

Thanks,
-Toshi 

> Also, if you look at the NFIT definition (table 5-126) , the definition
> explicitly includes the APCI table header but the _FIT definition does not.
> It just says it's a series of NFIT Types structure entries.
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Verma, Vishal L Nov. 18, 2015, 11:43 p.m. UTC | #4
On Wed, 2015-11-18 at 15:22 -0700, Toshi Kani wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-11-18 at 16:28 -0500, Linda Knippers wrote:

> > On 11/18/2015 4:07 PM, Verma, Vishal L wrote:

> > > On Wed, 2015-11-18 at 12:54 -0500, Linda Knippers wrote:

> > > > Since commit 209851649dc4f7900a6bfe1de5e2640ab2c7d931, we no

> > > > longer

> > > > see NVDIMM devices on our systems.  The NFIT/_FIT processing at

> > > > initialization gets a table from _FIT but doesn't like it.

> > > > 

> > > > When support for _FIT was added, the code presumed that the data

> > > > returned by the _FIT method is identical to the NFIT table,

> > > > which

> > > > starts with an acpi_table_header.  However, the _FIT is defined

> > > > to return a data in the format of a series of NFIT type

> > > > structure

> > > > entries and as a method, has an acpi_object header rather tahn

> > > > an acpi_table_header.

> > > 

> > > Hm, I couldn't find any reference to this in the spec - that NFIT

> > > will

> > > have the acpi_table_header but _FIT will have a different header -

> > > but

> > > I'm no ACPI expert - is this usual convention? Any pointers where

> > > I

> > > could look at?

> > 

> > I'm no ACPI expert either so maybe Toshi or someone else will help

> > me

> > here but according to the FW developer, the convention is that there

> > is

> > no ACPI table header because you already know what the table is.

> 

> map_mat_entry() handles _MAT for processor objects, which expects no

> MADT header

> table.


Ok, thanks for the clarifications. I'm fine with the fix. Could you
resend an updated patch without the extra debug. We'd also have to
update the unit test framework - in tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c, in
nfit_test0_setup, based on whether it is being called with the hotplug
flag or not, decide which header to include.

Thanks,
	-Vishal

> 

> Thanks,

> -Toshi 

> 

> > Also, if you look at the NFIT definition (table 5-126) , the

> > definition

> > explicitly includes the APCI table header but the _FIT definition

> > does not.

> > It just says it's a series of NFIT Types structure entries.

> > 

>
Linda Knippers Nov. 19, 2015, 4:25 p.m. UTC | #5
On 11/18/2015 6:43 PM, Verma, Vishal L wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-11-18 at 15:22 -0700, Toshi Kani wrote:
>> On Wed, 2015-11-18 at 16:28 -0500, Linda Knippers wrote:
>>> On 11/18/2015 4:07 PM, Verma, Vishal L wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 2015-11-18 at 12:54 -0500, Linda Knippers wrote:
>>>>> Since commit 209851649dc4f7900a6bfe1de5e2640ab2c7d931, we no
>>>>> longer
>>>>> see NVDIMM devices on our systems.  The NFIT/_FIT processing at
>>>>> initialization gets a table from _FIT but doesn't like it.
>>>>>
>>>>> When support for _FIT was added, the code presumed that the data
>>>>> returned by the _FIT method is identical to the NFIT table,
>>>>> which
>>>>> starts with an acpi_table_header.  However, the _FIT is defined
>>>>> to return a data in the format of a series of NFIT type
>>>>> structure
>>>>> entries and as a method, has an acpi_object header rather tahn
>>>>> an acpi_table_header.
>>>>
>>>> Hm, I couldn't find any reference to this in the spec - that NFIT
>>>> will
>>>> have the acpi_table_header but _FIT will have a different header -
>>>> but
>>>> I'm no ACPI expert - is this usual convention? Any pointers where
>>>> I
>>>> could look at?
>>>
>>> I'm no ACPI expert either so maybe Toshi or someone else will help
>>> me
>>> here but according to the FW developer, the convention is that there
>>> is
>>> no ACPI table header because you already know what the table is.
>>
>> map_mat_entry() handles _MAT for processor objects, which expects no
>> MADT header
>> table.
>
> Ok, thanks for the clarifications. I'm fine with the fix. Could you
> resend an updated patch without the extra debug.

Yes, I will do that.  I've only tested the boot path of the patch though.
Is there an easy way for me to trigger the notification so I can test the other
code path?

- ljk

> We'd also have to
> update the unit test framework - in tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c, in
> nfit_test0_setup, based on whether it is being called with the hotplug
> flag or not, decide which header to include.
>
> Thanks,
> 	-Vishal
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Toshi
>>
>>> Also, if you look at the NFIT definition (table 5-126) , the
>>> definition
>>> explicitly includes the APCI table header but the _FIT definition
>>> does not.
>>> It just says it's a series of NFIT Types structure entries.
>>>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Verma, Vishal L Nov. 19, 2015, 7:07 p.m. UTC | #6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--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Linda Knippers Nov. 19, 2015, 8:16 p.m. UTC | #7
On 11/19/2015 2:07 PM, Verma, Vishal L wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 11:25 -0500, Linda Knippers wrote:
>
> <>
>> Yes, I will do that.  I've only tested the boot path of the patch though.
>> Is there an easy way for me to trigger the notification so I can test the
>> other code path?
>>
>
> Hm, I don't believe there is an easy way yet. I believe KVM enabling for
> NVDIMMS using the NFIT is under way, and once they are ready we might have a
> way to test that path, but for now I just tested acpi_nfit_init onward using
> the test framework in tools/testing/nvdimm.

After looking around for some generic way to get an ACPI device
notify function called and failing miserably, I ended up just hacking the
nfit.c revision_show() function to call the notify function any time I look
at the /sys/.../nfit/revision file.

It's complaining that the new nfit deletes entries so I'm looking into that.

-- ljk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/nfit.c b/drivers/acpi/nfit.c
index f7dab53..ad95113 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/nfit.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/nfit.c
@@ -655,7 +655,7 @@  static ssize_t revision_show(struct device *dev,
 	struct nvdimm_bus_descriptor *nd_desc = to_nd_desc(nvdimm_bus);
 	struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc = to_acpi_desc(nd_desc);
 
-	return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", acpi_desc->nfit->header.revision);
+	return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", acpi_desc->acpi_header.revision);
 }
 static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(revision);
 
@@ -1652,7 +1652,6 @@  int acpi_nfit_init(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc, acpi_size sz)
 
 	data = (u8 *) acpi_desc->nfit;
 	end = data + sz;
-	data += sizeof(struct acpi_table_nfit);
 	while (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(data))
 		data = add_table(acpi_desc, &prev, data, end);
 
@@ -1748,13 +1747,34 @@  static int acpi_nfit_add(struct acpi_device *adev)
 		return PTR_ERR(acpi_desc);
 	}
 
-	acpi_desc->nfit = (struct acpi_table_nfit *) tbl;
+	/*
+	 * Save the acpi header for later and then skip it, make
+	 * nfit point to the first nfit table header.
+	 */
+	acpi_desc->acpi_header = *tbl;
+	acpi_desc->nfit = (void *) tbl + sizeof(struct acpi_table_nfit);
+	sz -= sizeof(struct acpi_table_nfit);
 
 	/* Evaluate _FIT and override with that if present */
 	status = acpi_evaluate_object(adev->handle, "_FIT", NULL, &buf);
 	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status) && buf.length > 0) {
-		acpi_desc->nfit = (struct acpi_table_nfit *)buf.pointer;
-		sz = buf.length;
+		union acpi_object *obj;
+
+		dev_dbg(dev, "%s _FIT ptr %p, length: %d\n",
+			__func__, buf.pointer, (int)buf.length);
+		print_hex_dump_debug("_FIT: ", DUMP_PREFIX_OFFSET, 16, 1,
+			buf.pointer, buf.length, true);
+
+		/*
+		 * Adjust for the acpi_object header of the _FIT
+		 */
+		obj = buf.pointer;
+		if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER) {
+			acpi_desc->nfit = (struct acpi_nfit_header *)obj->buffer.pointer;
+			sz = obj->buffer.length;
+		} else
+			dev_dbg(dev, "%s invalid type %d, ignoring _FIT\n",
+				__func__, (int) obj->type);
 	}
 
 	rc = acpi_nfit_init(acpi_desc, sz);
@@ -1777,8 +1796,9 @@  static void acpi_nfit_notify(struct acpi_device *adev, u32 event)
 {
 	struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc = dev_get_drvdata(&adev->dev);
 	struct acpi_buffer buf = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL };
-	struct acpi_table_nfit *nfit_saved;
+	struct acpi_nfit_header *nfit_saved;
 	struct device *dev = &adev->dev;
+	union acpi_object *obj;
 	acpi_status status;
 	int ret;
 
@@ -1807,13 +1827,24 @@  static void acpi_nfit_notify(struct acpi_device *adev, u32 event)
 		goto out_unlock;
 	}
 
+	dev_dbg(dev, "%s _FIT ptr %p, length: %d\n",
+		__func__, buf.pointer, (int)buf.length);
+	print_hex_dump_debug("_FIT: ", DUMP_PREFIX_OFFSET, 16, 1,
+		buf.pointer, buf.length, true);
+
 	nfit_saved = acpi_desc->nfit;
-	acpi_desc->nfit = (struct acpi_table_nfit *)buf.pointer;
-	ret = acpi_nfit_init(acpi_desc, buf.length);
-	if (!ret) {
-		/* Merge failed, restore old nfit, and exit */
-		acpi_desc->nfit = nfit_saved;
-		dev_err(dev, "failed to merge updated NFIT\n");
+	obj = buf.pointer;
+	if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER) {
+		acpi_desc->nfit = (struct acpi_nfit_header *)obj->buffer.pointer;
+		ret = acpi_nfit_init(acpi_desc, obj->buffer.length);
+		if (!ret) {
+			/* Merge failed, restore old nfit, and exit */
+			acpi_desc->nfit = nfit_saved;
+			dev_err(dev, "failed to merge updated NFIT\n");
+		}
+	} else {
+		/* Bad _FIT, restore old nfit */
+		dev_err(dev, "Invalid _FIT\n");
 	}
 	kfree(buf.pointer);
 
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/nfit.h b/drivers/acpi/nfit.h
index 2ea5c07..3d549a3 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/nfit.h
+++ b/drivers/acpi/nfit.h
@@ -96,7 +96,8 @@  struct nfit_mem {
 
 struct acpi_nfit_desc {
 	struct nvdimm_bus_descriptor nd_desc;
-	struct acpi_table_nfit *nfit;
+	struct acpi_table_header acpi_header;
+	struct acpi_nfit_header *nfit;
 	struct mutex spa_map_mutex;
 	struct mutex init_mutex;
 	struct list_head spa_maps;