| Message ID | 1448430667-4213-1-git-send-email-drinkcat@chromium.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Wed, 25 Nov 2015, Nicolas Boichat wrote: > cros_ec_cmd_xfer_spi and cros_ec_pkt_xfer_spi generally work like > this: > - Pull CS down (active), wait a bit, then send a command > - Wait for response (multiple requests) > - Wait a while, pull CS up (inactive) > > These operations, individually, lock the SPI bus, but there is > nothing preventing the SPI framework from interleaving messages > intended for other devices as the bus is unlocked in between. > > This is a problem as the EC expects CS to be held low for the > whole duration. > > Solution: Lock the SPI bus during the whole transaction, to make > sure that no other messages can be interleaved. > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org> > --- > > v2: Move bus_unlock earlier in the functions. > v3: Remove comments. > > Applies on top on linux-next/master (20151124) > > drivers/mfd/cros_ec_spi.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++------------ > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_spi.c b/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_spi.c > index 6a0f6ec..d6af52d 100644 > --- a/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_spi.c > +++ b/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_spi.c > @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ static int terminate_request(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev) > trans.delay_usecs = ec_spi->end_of_msg_delay; > spi_message_add_tail(&trans, &msg); > > - ret = spi_sync(ec_spi->spi, &msg); > + ret = spi_sync_locked(ec_spi->spi, &msg); > > /* Reset end-of-response timer */ > ec_spi->last_transfer_ns = ktime_get_ns(); > @@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ static int receive_n_bytes(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev, u8 *buf, int n) > > spi_message_init(&msg); > spi_message_add_tail(&trans, &msg); > - ret = spi_sync(ec_spi->spi, &msg); > + ret = spi_sync_locked(ec_spi->spi, &msg); > if (ret < 0) > dev_err(ec_dev->dev, "spi transfer failed: %d\n", ret); > > @@ -391,10 +391,10 @@ static int cros_ec_pkt_xfer_spi(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev, > } > > rx_buf = kzalloc(len, GFP_KERNEL); > - if (!rx_buf) { > - ret = -ENOMEM; > - goto exit; > - } > + if (!rx_buf) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + spi_bus_lock(ec_spi->spi->master); > > /* > * Leave a gap between CS assertion and clocking of data to allow the > @@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ static int cros_ec_pkt_xfer_spi(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev, > trans.len = len; > trans.cs_change = 1; > spi_message_add_tail(&trans, &msg); > - ret = spi_sync(ec_spi->spi, &msg); > + ret = spi_sync_locked(ec_spi->spi, &msg); > > /* Get the response */ > if (!ret) { > @@ -440,6 +440,9 @@ static int cros_ec_pkt_xfer_spi(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev, > } > > final_ret = terminate_request(ec_dev); > + > + spi_bus_unlock(ec_spi->spi->master); > + > if (!ret) > ret = final_ret; > if (ret < 0) > @@ -520,10 +523,10 @@ static int cros_ec_cmd_xfer_spi(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev, > } > > rx_buf = kzalloc(len, GFP_KERNEL); > - if (!rx_buf) { > - ret = -ENOMEM; > - goto exit; > - } > + if (!rx_buf) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + spi_bus_lock(ec_spi->spi->master); > > /* Transmit phase - send our message */ > debug_packet(ec_dev->dev, "out", ec_dev->dout, len); > @@ -534,7 +537,7 @@ static int cros_ec_cmd_xfer_spi(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev, > trans.cs_change = 1; > spi_message_init(&msg); > spi_message_add_tail(&trans, &msg); > - ret = spi_sync(ec_spi->spi, &msg); > + ret = spi_sync_locked(ec_spi->spi, &msg); > > /* Get the response */ > if (!ret) { > @@ -560,6 +563,9 @@ static int cros_ec_cmd_xfer_spi(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev, > } > > final_ret = terminate_request(ec_dev); > + > + spi_bus_unlock(ec_spi->spi->master); > + > if (!ret) > ret = final_ret; > if (ret < 0)
Reviewed-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 12:12 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote: > On Wed, 25 Nov 2015, Nicolas Boichat wrote: > >> cros_ec_cmd_xfer_spi and cros_ec_pkt_xfer_spi generally work like >> this: >> - Pull CS down (active), wait a bit, then send a command >> - Wait for response (multiple requests) >> - Wait a while, pull CS up (inactive) >> >> These operations, individually, lock the SPI bus, but there is >> nothing preventing the SPI framework from interleaving messages >> intended for other devices as the bus is unlocked in between. >> >> This is a problem as the EC expects CS to be held low for the >> whole duration. >> >> Solution: Lock the SPI bus during the whole transaction, to make >> sure that no other messages can be interleaved. >> >> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org> >> --- >> >> v2: Move bus_unlock earlier in the functions. >> v3: Remove comments. >> >> Applies on top on linux-next/master (20151124) >> >> drivers/mfd/cros_ec_spi.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++------------ >> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> > >> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_spi.c b/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_spi.c >> index 6a0f6ec..d6af52d 100644 >> --- a/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_spi.c >> +++ b/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_spi.c >> @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ static int terminate_request(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev) >> trans.delay_usecs = ec_spi->end_of_msg_delay; >> spi_message_add_tail(&trans, &msg); >> >> - ret = spi_sync(ec_spi->spi, &msg); >> + ret = spi_sync_locked(ec_spi->spi, &msg); >> >> /* Reset end-of-response timer */ >> ec_spi->last_transfer_ns = ktime_get_ns(); >> @@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ static int receive_n_bytes(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev, u8 *buf, int n) >> >> spi_message_init(&msg); >> spi_message_add_tail(&trans, &msg); >> - ret = spi_sync(ec_spi->spi, &msg); >> + ret = spi_sync_locked(ec_spi->spi, &msg); >> if (ret < 0) >> dev_err(ec_dev->dev, "spi transfer failed: %d\n", ret); >> >> @@ -391,10 +391,10 @@ static int cros_ec_pkt_xfer_spi(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev, >> } >> >> rx_buf = kzalloc(len, GFP_KERNEL); >> - if (!rx_buf) { >> - ret = -ENOMEM; >> - goto exit; >> - } >> + if (!rx_buf) >> + return -ENOMEM; >> + >> + spi_bus_lock(ec_spi->spi->master); >> >> /* >> * Leave a gap between CS assertion and clocking of data to allow the >> @@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ static int cros_ec_pkt_xfer_spi(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev, >> trans.len = len; >> trans.cs_change = 1; >> spi_message_add_tail(&trans, &msg); >> - ret = spi_sync(ec_spi->spi, &msg); >> + ret = spi_sync_locked(ec_spi->spi, &msg); >> >> /* Get the response */ >> if (!ret) { >> @@ -440,6 +440,9 @@ static int cros_ec_pkt_xfer_spi(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev, >> } >> >> final_ret = terminate_request(ec_dev); >> + >> + spi_bus_unlock(ec_spi->spi->master); >> + >> if (!ret) >> ret = final_ret; >> if (ret < 0) >> @@ -520,10 +523,10 @@ static int cros_ec_cmd_xfer_spi(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev, >> } >> >> rx_buf = kzalloc(len, GFP_KERNEL); >> - if (!rx_buf) { >> - ret = -ENOMEM; >> - goto exit; >> - } >> + if (!rx_buf) >> + return -ENOMEM; >> + >> + spi_bus_lock(ec_spi->spi->master); >> >> /* Transmit phase - send our message */ >> debug_packet(ec_dev->dev, "out", ec_dev->dout, len); >> @@ -534,7 +537,7 @@ static int cros_ec_cmd_xfer_spi(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev, >> trans.cs_change = 1; >> spi_message_init(&msg); >> spi_message_add_tail(&trans, &msg); >> - ret = spi_sync(ec_spi->spi, &msg); >> + ret = spi_sync_locked(ec_spi->spi, &msg); >> >> /* Get the response */ >> if (!ret) { >> @@ -560,6 +563,9 @@ static int cros_ec_cmd_xfer_spi(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev, >> } >> >> final_ret = terminate_request(ec_dev); >> + >> + spi_bus_unlock(ec_spi->spi->master); >> + >> if (!ret) >> ret = final_ret; >> if (ret < 0) > > -- > Lee Jones > Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead > Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs > Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Wed, 25 Nov 2015, Nicolas Boichat wrote: > cros_ec_cmd_xfer_spi and cros_ec_pkt_xfer_spi generally work like > this: > - Pull CS down (active), wait a bit, then send a command > - Wait for response (multiple requests) > - Wait a while, pull CS up (inactive) > > These operations, individually, lock the SPI bus, but there is > nothing preventing the SPI framework from interleaving messages > intended for other devices as the bus is unlocked in between. > > This is a problem as the EC expects CS to be held low for the > whole duration. > > Solution: Lock the SPI bus during the whole transaction, to make > sure that no other messages can be interleaved. > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org> > --- > > v2: Move bus_unlock earlier in the functions. > v3: Remove comments. > > Applies on top on linux-next/master (20151124) > > drivers/mfd/cros_ec_spi.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++------------ > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) Applied, thanks. > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_spi.c b/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_spi.c > index 6a0f6ec..d6af52d 100644 > --- a/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_spi.c > +++ b/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_spi.c > @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ static int terminate_request(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev) > trans.delay_usecs = ec_spi->end_of_msg_delay; > spi_message_add_tail(&trans, &msg); > > - ret = spi_sync(ec_spi->spi, &msg); > + ret = spi_sync_locked(ec_spi->spi, &msg); > > /* Reset end-of-response timer */ > ec_spi->last_transfer_ns = ktime_get_ns(); > @@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ static int receive_n_bytes(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev, u8 *buf, int n) > > spi_message_init(&msg); > spi_message_add_tail(&trans, &msg); > - ret = spi_sync(ec_spi->spi, &msg); > + ret = spi_sync_locked(ec_spi->spi, &msg); > if (ret < 0) > dev_err(ec_dev->dev, "spi transfer failed: %d\n", ret); > > @@ -391,10 +391,10 @@ static int cros_ec_pkt_xfer_spi(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev, > } > > rx_buf = kzalloc(len, GFP_KERNEL); > - if (!rx_buf) { > - ret = -ENOMEM; > - goto exit; > - } > + if (!rx_buf) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + spi_bus_lock(ec_spi->spi->master); > > /* > * Leave a gap between CS assertion and clocking of data to allow the > @@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ static int cros_ec_pkt_xfer_spi(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev, > trans.len = len; > trans.cs_change = 1; > spi_message_add_tail(&trans, &msg); > - ret = spi_sync(ec_spi->spi, &msg); > + ret = spi_sync_locked(ec_spi->spi, &msg); > > /* Get the response */ > if (!ret) { > @@ -440,6 +440,9 @@ static int cros_ec_pkt_xfer_spi(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev, > } > > final_ret = terminate_request(ec_dev); > + > + spi_bus_unlock(ec_spi->spi->master); > + > if (!ret) > ret = final_ret; > if (ret < 0) > @@ -520,10 +523,10 @@ static int cros_ec_cmd_xfer_spi(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev, > } > > rx_buf = kzalloc(len, GFP_KERNEL); > - if (!rx_buf) { > - ret = -ENOMEM; > - goto exit; > - } > + if (!rx_buf) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + spi_bus_lock(ec_spi->spi->master); > > /* Transmit phase - send our message */ > debug_packet(ec_dev->dev, "out", ec_dev->dout, len); > @@ -534,7 +537,7 @@ static int cros_ec_cmd_xfer_spi(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev, > trans.cs_change = 1; > spi_message_init(&msg); > spi_message_add_tail(&trans, &msg); > - ret = spi_sync(ec_spi->spi, &msg); > + ret = spi_sync_locked(ec_spi->spi, &msg); > > /* Get the response */ > if (!ret) { > @@ -560,6 +563,9 @@ static int cros_ec_cmd_xfer_spi(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev, > } > > final_ret = terminate_request(ec_dev); > + > + spi_bus_unlock(ec_spi->spi->master); > + > if (!ret) > ret = final_ret; > if (ret < 0)
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_spi.c b/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_spi.c index 6a0f6ec..d6af52d 100644 --- a/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_spi.c +++ b/drivers/mfd/cros_ec_spi.c @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ static int terminate_request(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev) trans.delay_usecs = ec_spi->end_of_msg_delay; spi_message_add_tail(&trans, &msg); - ret = spi_sync(ec_spi->spi, &msg); + ret = spi_sync_locked(ec_spi->spi, &msg); /* Reset end-of-response timer */ ec_spi->last_transfer_ns = ktime_get_ns(); @@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ static int receive_n_bytes(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev, u8 *buf, int n) spi_message_init(&msg); spi_message_add_tail(&trans, &msg); - ret = spi_sync(ec_spi->spi, &msg); + ret = spi_sync_locked(ec_spi->spi, &msg); if (ret < 0) dev_err(ec_dev->dev, "spi transfer failed: %d\n", ret); @@ -391,10 +391,10 @@ static int cros_ec_pkt_xfer_spi(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev, } rx_buf = kzalloc(len, GFP_KERNEL); - if (!rx_buf) { - ret = -ENOMEM; - goto exit; - } + if (!rx_buf) + return -ENOMEM; + + spi_bus_lock(ec_spi->spi->master); /* * Leave a gap between CS assertion and clocking of data to allow the @@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ static int cros_ec_pkt_xfer_spi(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev, trans.len = len; trans.cs_change = 1; spi_message_add_tail(&trans, &msg); - ret = spi_sync(ec_spi->spi, &msg); + ret = spi_sync_locked(ec_spi->spi, &msg); /* Get the response */ if (!ret) { @@ -440,6 +440,9 @@ static int cros_ec_pkt_xfer_spi(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev, } final_ret = terminate_request(ec_dev); + + spi_bus_unlock(ec_spi->spi->master); + if (!ret) ret = final_ret; if (ret < 0) @@ -520,10 +523,10 @@ static int cros_ec_cmd_xfer_spi(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev, } rx_buf = kzalloc(len, GFP_KERNEL); - if (!rx_buf) { - ret = -ENOMEM; - goto exit; - } + if (!rx_buf) + return -ENOMEM; + + spi_bus_lock(ec_spi->spi->master); /* Transmit phase - send our message */ debug_packet(ec_dev->dev, "out", ec_dev->dout, len); @@ -534,7 +537,7 @@ static int cros_ec_cmd_xfer_spi(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev, trans.cs_change = 1; spi_message_init(&msg); spi_message_add_tail(&trans, &msg); - ret = spi_sync(ec_spi->spi, &msg); + ret = spi_sync_locked(ec_spi->spi, &msg); /* Get the response */ if (!ret) { @@ -560,6 +563,9 @@ static int cros_ec_cmd_xfer_spi(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev, } final_ret = terminate_request(ec_dev); + + spi_bus_unlock(ec_spi->spi->master); + if (!ret) ret = final_ret; if (ret < 0)
cros_ec_cmd_xfer_spi and cros_ec_pkt_xfer_spi generally work like this: - Pull CS down (active), wait a bit, then send a command - Wait for response (multiple requests) - Wait a while, pull CS up (inactive) These operations, individually, lock the SPI bus, but there is nothing preventing the SPI framework from interleaving messages intended for other devices as the bus is unlocked in between. This is a problem as the EC expects CS to be held low for the whole duration. Solution: Lock the SPI bus during the whole transaction, to make sure that no other messages can be interleaved. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org> --- v2: Move bus_unlock earlier in the functions. v3: Remove comments. Applies on top on linux-next/master (20151124) drivers/mfd/cros_ec_spi.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)