Message ID | 1448567789-2470-1-git-send-email-jslaby@suse.cz (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Changes Requested |
Delegated to: | Herbert Xu |
Headers | show |
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 08:56:29PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote: > > diff --git a/drivers/char/hw_random/core.c b/drivers/char/hw_random/core.c > index a064237ff362..f003df162e09 100644 > --- a/drivers/char/hw_random/core.c > +++ b/drivers/char/hw_random/core.c > @@ -238,7 +238,10 @@ static ssize_t rng_dev_read(struct file *filp, char __user *buf, > goto out; > } > > - mutex_lock(&reading_mutex); > + if (mutex_lock_interruptible(&reading_mutex)) { > + err = -EINTR; Shouldn't this be ERESTARTSYS? Thanks,
On 11/27/2015, 02:06 PM, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 08:56:29PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote: >> >> diff --git a/drivers/char/hw_random/core.c b/drivers/char/hw_random/core.c >> index a064237ff362..f003df162e09 100644 >> --- a/drivers/char/hw_random/core.c >> +++ b/drivers/char/hw_random/core.c >> @@ -238,7 +238,10 @@ static ssize_t rng_dev_read(struct file *filp, char __user *buf, >> goto out; >> } >> >> - mutex_lock(&reading_mutex); >> + if (mutex_lock_interruptible(&reading_mutex)) { >> + err = -EINTR; > > Shouldn't this be ERESTARTSYS? Yes, it actually can, given the retval is returned only if no data were read yet. thanks,
diff --git a/drivers/char/hw_random/core.c b/drivers/char/hw_random/core.c index a064237ff362..f003df162e09 100644 --- a/drivers/char/hw_random/core.c +++ b/drivers/char/hw_random/core.c @@ -238,7 +238,10 @@ static ssize_t rng_dev_read(struct file *filp, char __user *buf, goto out; } - mutex_lock(&reading_mutex); + if (mutex_lock_interruptible(&reading_mutex)) { + err = -EINTR; + goto out_put; + } if (!data_avail) { bytes_read = rng_get_data(rng, rng_buffer, rng_buffer_size(), @@ -288,6 +291,7 @@ out: out_unlock_reading: mutex_unlock(&reading_mutex); +out_put: put_rng(rng); goto out; }
hwrng kthread can be waiting via hwrng_fillfn for some data from a rng like virtio-rng: hwrng D ffff880093e17798 0 382 2 0x00000000 ... Call Trace: [<ffffffff817339c6>] wait_for_completion_killable+0x96/0x210 [<ffffffffa00aa1b7>] virtio_read+0x57/0xf0 [virtio_rng] [<ffffffff814f4a35>] hwrng_fillfn+0x75/0x130 [<ffffffff810aa243>] kthread+0xf3/0x110 And when some user program tries to read the /dev node in this state, we get: rngd D ffff880093e17798 0 762 1 0x00000004 ... Call Trace: [<ffffffff817351ac>] mutex_lock_nested+0x15c/0x3e0 [<ffffffff814f478e>] rng_dev_read+0x6e/0x240 [<ffffffff81231958>] __vfs_read+0x28/0xe0 [<ffffffff81232393>] vfs_read+0x83/0x130 And this is indeed unkillable. So use mutex_lock_interruptible instead of mutex_lock in rng_dev_read and exit immediatelly when interrupted. And possibly return already read data, if any (as POSIX allows). Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Cc: <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org> --- drivers/char/hw_random/core.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)