| Message ID | CALtMJEBdXLef8AJ1-8Txmg2iS413bVV7cpQSb+nL5M7jN_QYzw@mail.gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
Hi Andreas, On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 10:31:04PM +0100, Andreas Fenkart wrote: > Hi Vishal, > > I remember there was a problem with IRQ, but can't remember on top of > my head. Meanwhile this might be some pointer: > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/sta_ioctl.c > b/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/sta_ioctl.c > index a6c8a4f..67587c2 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/sta_ioctl.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/sta_ioctl.c > @@ -517,6 +517,17 @@ int mwifiex_enable_hs(struct mwifiex_adapter *adapter) > adapter->hs_enabling = true; > mwifiex_cancel_all_pending_cmd(adapter); > > + /* if the MMC host is already in suspend it will not detect SDIO irq > + * and we might run into response timeout. By claiming the MMC host we > + * wake it up, which is sufficient to detect a pending IRQ > + */ > + { > + struct sdio_mmc_card *card = adapter->card; > + sdio_claim_host(card->func); > + printk("+++ poll mmc host for IRQ +++\n"); > + sdio_release_host(card->func); > + } > + > if (mwifiex_set_hs_params(mwifiex_get_priv(adapter, > MWIFIEX_BSS_ROLE_STA), > HostCmd_ACT_GEN_SET, MWIFIEX_SYNC_CMD, I tried this code change but that did not help. I saw that the code change is in a function called mwifiex_enable_hs(), which only gets invoked by mwifiex_sdio_suspend(); which is why I think it is not having any effect. Because when I run the command to scan the channel list (i.e. iw dev wlan0 scan), the system is not in suspend state. And I noticed (by adding prints in omap_hsmmc.c for suspend and resume callbacks) that during the "scan" command, the suspend routine gets invoked for HSMMC but it never gets resumed (may be due to the missed wakeup IRQ) from mwifiex and the command times out. Thanks for your help. Vishal > > 2016-02-18 19:27 GMT+01:00 Vishal Thanki <vishalthanki@gmail.com>: > > Hi, > > > > On a custom built am335x based board, I am facing an issue mwifiex wifi > > module which is connected to host via SDIO interface. I am using kernel > > version 4.4. > > > > The problem is related to the wifi "ext_scan" command getting timed out > > over SDIO. This was working with old kernel (v4.0), but does not work on > > kernel v4.4. I found the following commit is responsible for this > > behavior. > > > > ================================= > > 5b83b2234be6733cfe22036c38031b2c890b3db8 > > > > mmc: omap_hsmmc: Change wake-up interrupt to use generic wakeirq > > > > We can now use generic wakeirq handling and remove the custom handling > > for the wake-up interrupts. > > ================================= > > > > There is no wifi issue if I revert the above mentioned commit on kernel > > v4.4. > > > > I see that before this commit, the wakeup IRQ handler was registered > > within the omap_hsmmc.c itself with additional IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW flag. > > But with the introduction to dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq(), the > > generic wakeup IRQ handler is registered which does not take the > > IRQF_TRIGGER flag. I am not sure if that is the issue, but I added that > > IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW flag in dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq() while > > registering a threaded IRQ handler, I could see the problem disappears. > > However, this change is causing the infinite interrupts because the of > > level triggered interrupt is not handled in generic wakeup IRQ handling > > code (as it was done specially in omap_hsmmc.c code earlier). > > > > I am not much familiar with MMC/SDIO driver and I am not sure how to fix > > this behavior. So any guidance would be really helpful. > > > > Thanks, > > Vishal -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hi, On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 7:41 PM, Vishal Thanki <vishalthanki@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 10:31:04PM +0100, Andreas Fenkart wrote: >> Hi Vishal, >> >> I remember there was a problem with IRQ, but can't remember on top of >> my head. Meanwhile this might be some pointer: >> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/sta_ioctl.c >> b/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/sta_ioctl.c >> index a6c8a4f..67587c2 100644 >> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/sta_ioctl.c >> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/sta_ioctl.c >> @@ -517,6 +517,17 @@ int mwifiex_enable_hs(struct mwifiex_adapter *adapter) >> adapter->hs_enabling = true; >> mwifiex_cancel_all_pending_cmd(adapter); >> >> + /* if the MMC host is already in suspend it will not detect SDIO irq >> + * and we might run into response timeout. By claiming the MMC host we >> + * wake it up, which is sufficient to detect a pending IRQ >> + */ >> + { >> + struct sdio_mmc_card *card = adapter->card; >> + sdio_claim_host(card->func); >> + printk("+++ poll mmc host for IRQ +++\n"); >> + sdio_release_host(card->func); >> + } >> + >> if (mwifiex_set_hs_params(mwifiex_get_priv(adapter, >> MWIFIEX_BSS_ROLE_STA), >> HostCmd_ACT_GEN_SET, MWIFIEX_SYNC_CMD, > > I tried this code change but that did not help. I saw that the code > change is in a function called mwifiex_enable_hs(), which only gets > invoked by mwifiex_sdio_suspend(); which is why I think it is not having > any effect. Because when I run the command to scan the channel list > (i.e. iw dev wlan0 scan), the system is not in suspend state. And I > noticed (by adding prints in omap_hsmmc.c for suspend and resume > callbacks) that during the "scan" command, the suspend routine gets invoked > for HSMMC but it never gets resumed (may be due to the missed wakeup > IRQ) from mwifiex and the command times out. > Is there any other suggestion for mwifiex that I should try out? Or is there any way in omap_hsmmc to specify the wakeup interrupt type (IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW) while using generic wakeup IRQ mechanism. I could not find it, but I may be missing something. Thanks, Vishal > Thanks for your help. > > Vishal > > >> >> 2016-02-18 19:27 GMT+01:00 Vishal Thanki <vishalthanki@gmail.com>: >> > Hi, >> > >> > On a custom built am335x based board, I am facing an issue mwifiex wifi >> > module which is connected to host via SDIO interface. I am using kernel >> > version 4.4. >> > >> > The problem is related to the wifi "ext_scan" command getting timed out >> > over SDIO. This was working with old kernel (v4.0), but does not work on >> > kernel v4.4. I found the following commit is responsible for this >> > behavior. >> > >> > ================================= >> > 5b83b2234be6733cfe22036c38031b2c890b3db8 >> > >> > mmc: omap_hsmmc: Change wake-up interrupt to use generic wakeirq >> > >> > We can now use generic wakeirq handling and remove the custom handling >> > for the wake-up interrupts. >> > ================================= >> > >> > There is no wifi issue if I revert the above mentioned commit on kernel >> > v4.4. >> > >> > I see that before this commit, the wakeup IRQ handler was registered >> > within the omap_hsmmc.c itself with additional IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW flag. >> > But with the introduction to dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq(), the >> > generic wakeup IRQ handler is registered which does not take the >> > IRQF_TRIGGER flag. I am not sure if that is the issue, but I added that >> > IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW flag in dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq() while >> > registering a threaded IRQ handler, I could see the problem disappears. >> > However, this change is causing the infinite interrupts because the of >> > level triggered interrupt is not handled in generic wakeup IRQ handling >> > code (as it was done specially in omap_hsmmc.c code earlier). >> > >> > I am not much familiar with MMC/SDIO driver and I am not sure how to fix >> > this behavior. So any guidance would be really helpful. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Vishal -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 02/24/2016 11:32 PM, Vishal Thanki wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 7:41 PM, Vishal Thanki <vishalthanki@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi Andreas, >> >> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 10:31:04PM +0100, Andreas Fenkart wrote: >>> Hi Vishal, >>> >>> I remember there was a problem with IRQ, but can't remember on top of >>> my head. Meanwhile this might be some pointer: >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/sta_ioctl.c >>> b/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/sta_ioctl.c >>> index a6c8a4f..67587c2 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/sta_ioctl.c >>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/sta_ioctl.c >>> @@ -517,6 +517,17 @@ int mwifiex_enable_hs(struct mwifiex_adapter *adapter) >>> adapter->hs_enabling = true; >>> mwifiex_cancel_all_pending_cmd(adapter); >>> >>> + /* if the MMC host is already in suspend it will not detect SDIO irq >>> + * and we might run into response timeout. By claiming the MMC host we >>> + * wake it up, which is sufficient to detect a pending IRQ >>> + */ >>> + { >>> + struct sdio_mmc_card *card = adapter->card; >>> + sdio_claim_host(card->func); >>> + printk("+++ poll mmc host for IRQ +++\n"); >>> + sdio_release_host(card->func); >>> + } >>> + >>> if (mwifiex_set_hs_params(mwifiex_get_priv(adapter, >>> MWIFIEX_BSS_ROLE_STA), >>> HostCmd_ACT_GEN_SET, MWIFIEX_SYNC_CMD, >> >> I tried this code change but that did not help. I saw that the code >> change is in a function called mwifiex_enable_hs(), which only gets >> invoked by mwifiex_sdio_suspend(); which is why I think it is not having >> any effect. Because when I run the command to scan the channel list >> (i.e. iw dev wlan0 scan), the system is not in suspend state. And I >> noticed (by adding prints in omap_hsmmc.c for suspend and resume >> callbacks) that during the "scan" command, the suspend routine gets invoked >> for HSMMC but it never gets resumed (may be due to the missed wakeup >> IRQ) from mwifiex and the command times out. Suspend or Runtime suspend? >> > > Is there any other suggestion for mwifiex that I should try out? Or > is there any way in omap_hsmmc to specify the wakeup interrupt > type (IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW) while using generic wakeup IRQ > mechanism. I could not find it, but I may be missing something. How your irqs defined in DT? Could you provide mmc+wifi nodes? >>> >>> 2016-02-18 19:27 GMT+01:00 Vishal Thanki <vishalthanki@gmail.com>: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> On a custom built am335x based board, I am facing an issue mwifiex wifi >>>> module which is connected to host via SDIO interface. I am using kernel >>>> version 4.4. >>>> >>>> The problem is related to the wifi "ext_scan" command getting timed out >>>> over SDIO. This was working with old kernel (v4.0), but does not work on >>>> kernel v4.4. I found the following commit is responsible for this >>>> behavior. >>>> >>>> ================================= >>>> 5b83b2234be6733cfe22036c38031b2c890b3db8 >>>> >>>> mmc: omap_hsmmc: Change wake-up interrupt to use generic wakeirq >>>> >>>> We can now use generic wakeirq handling and remove the custom handling >>>> for the wake-up interrupts. >>>> ================================= >>>> >>>> There is no wifi issue if I revert the above mentioned commit on kernel >>>> v4.4. >>>> >>>> I see that before this commit, the wakeup IRQ handler was registered >>>> within the omap_hsmmc.c itself with additional IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW flag. >>>> But with the introduction to dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq(), the >>>> generic wakeup IRQ handler is registered which does not take the >>>> IRQF_TRIGGER flag. I am not sure if that is the issue, but I added that >>>> IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW flag in dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq() while >>>> registering a threaded IRQ handler, I could see the problem disappears. >>>> However, this change is causing the infinite interrupts because the of >>>> level triggered interrupt is not handled in generic wakeup IRQ handling >>>> code (as it was done specially in omap_hsmmc.c code earlier). >>>> >>>> I am not much familiar with MMC/SDIO driver and I am not sure how to fix >>>> this behavior. So any guidance would be really helpful. >>>>
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 12:46:40PM +0200, Grygorii Strashko wrote: > On 02/24/2016 11:32 PM, Vishal Thanki wrote: > >Hi, > > > >On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 7:41 PM, Vishal Thanki <vishalthanki@gmail.com> wrote: > >>Hi Andreas, > >> > >>On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 10:31:04PM +0100, Andreas Fenkart wrote: > >>>Hi Vishal, > >>> > >>>I remember there was a problem with IRQ, but can't remember on top of > >>>my head. Meanwhile this might be some pointer: > >>> > >>>diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/sta_ioctl.c > >>>b/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/sta_ioctl.c > >>>index a6c8a4f..67587c2 100644 > >>>--- a/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/sta_ioctl.c > >>>+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/sta_ioctl.c > >>>@@ -517,6 +517,17 @@ int mwifiex_enable_hs(struct mwifiex_adapter *adapter) > >>> adapter->hs_enabling = true; > >>> mwifiex_cancel_all_pending_cmd(adapter); > >>> > >>>+ /* if the MMC host is already in suspend it will not detect SDIO irq > >>>+ * and we might run into response timeout. By claiming the MMC host we > >>>+ * wake it up, which is sufficient to detect a pending IRQ > >>>+ */ > >>>+ { > >>>+ struct sdio_mmc_card *card = adapter->card; > >>>+ sdio_claim_host(card->func); > >>>+ printk("+++ poll mmc host for IRQ +++\n"); > >>>+ sdio_release_host(card->func); > >>>+ } > >>>+ > >>> if (mwifiex_set_hs_params(mwifiex_get_priv(adapter, > >>> MWIFIEX_BSS_ROLE_STA), > >>> HostCmd_ACT_GEN_SET, MWIFIEX_SYNC_CMD, > >> > >>I tried this code change but that did not help. I saw that the code > >>change is in a function called mwifiex_enable_hs(), which only gets > >>invoked by mwifiex_sdio_suspend(); which is why I think it is not having > >>any effect. Because when I run the command to scan the channel list > >>(i.e. iw dev wlan0 scan), the system is not in suspend state. And I > >>noticed (by adding prints in omap_hsmmc.c for suspend and resume > >>callbacks) that during the "scan" command, the suspend routine gets invoked > >>for HSMMC but it never gets resumed (may be due to the missed wakeup > >>IRQ) from mwifiex and the command times out. > > Suspend or Runtime suspend? The it is the runtime suspend routine for omap_hsmmc.c mmc1_pins: pinmux_mmc1_pins { pinctrl-single,pins = < 0x0fc 0x38 /* MMC0_DAT0 */ 0x0f8 0x38 /* MMC0_DAT1 */ 0x0f4 0x38 /* MMC0_DAT2 */ 0x0f0 0x38 /* MMC0_DAT3 */ 0x100 0x38 /* MMC0_CLK */ 0x104 0x38 /* MMC0_CMD */ 0x88 0x07 /* GPMC_CSN3 -> GPIO2_0 */ >; }; mmc1_sleep_pins: pinmux_mmc1_sleep_pins { pinctrl-single,pins = < 0x0fc 0x3f /* MMC0_DAT0 */ 0x0f8 0x3f /* MMC0_DAT1 */ 0x0f4 0x3f /* MMC0_DAT2 */ 0x0f0 0x3f /* MMC0_DAT3 */ 0x100 0x3f /* MMC0_CLK */ 0x104 0x3f /* MMC0_CMD */ 0x88 0x17 /* GPMC_CSN3 -> GPIO2_0 PULL UP */ >; }; mmc1_cirq_pin: pinmux_cirq_pin { pinctrl-single,pins = < 0x0f8 0x3f /* MMC0_DAT1 as GPIO2_28 */ >; }; wlan0_pwrseq: pwrseq { compatible = "mmc-pwrseq-simple"; reset-gpios = <&gpio2 0 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>; clocks = <&clk_32768_ck>; clock-names = "ext_clock"; }; &mmc1 { status = "okay"; pinctrl-names = "default", "idle", "sleep"; pinctrl-0 = <&mmc1_pins>; pinctrl-1 = <&mmc1_cirq_pin>; pinctrl-2 = <&mmc1_sleep_pins>; interrupts-extended = <&intc 64 &gpio2 28 0>; ti,non-removable; bus-width = <4>; vmmc-supply = <&ldo2_reg>; vmmc_aux-supply = <&vmmc>; keep-power-in-suspend; enable-sdio-wakeup; mmc-pwrseq = <&wlan0_pwrseq>; }; > > >> > > > >Is there any other suggestion for mwifiex that I should try out? Or > >is there any way in omap_hsmmc to specify the wakeup interrupt > >type (IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW) while using generic wakeup IRQ > >mechanism. I could not find it, but I may be missing something. > > How your irqs defined in DT? Could you provide mmc+wifi nodes? > > > >>> > >>>2016-02-18 19:27 GMT+01:00 Vishal Thanki <vishalthanki@gmail.com>: > >>>>Hi, > >>>> > >>>>On a custom built am335x based board, I am facing an issue mwifiex wifi > >>>>module which is connected to host via SDIO interface. I am using kernel > >>>>version 4.4. > >>>> > >>>>The problem is related to the wifi "ext_scan" command getting timed out > >>>>over SDIO. This was working with old kernel (v4.0), but does not work on > >>>>kernel v4.4. I found the following commit is responsible for this > >>>>behavior. > >>>> > >>>>================================= > >>>>5b83b2234be6733cfe22036c38031b2c890b3db8 > >>>> > >>>>mmc: omap_hsmmc: Change wake-up interrupt to use generic wakeirq > >>>> > >>>>We can now use generic wakeirq handling and remove the custom handling > >>>>for the wake-up interrupts. > >>>>================================= > >>>> > >>>>There is no wifi issue if I revert the above mentioned commit on kernel > >>>>v4.4. > >>>> > >>>>I see that before this commit, the wakeup IRQ handler was registered > >>>>within the omap_hsmmc.c itself with additional IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW flag. > >>>>But with the introduction to dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq(), the > >>>>generic wakeup IRQ handler is registered which does not take the > >>>>IRQF_TRIGGER flag. I am not sure if that is the issue, but I added that > >>>>IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW flag in dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq() while > >>>>registering a threaded IRQ handler, I could see the problem disappears. > >>>>However, this change is causing the infinite interrupts because the of > >>>>level triggered interrupt is not handled in generic wakeup IRQ handling > >>>>code (as it was done specially in omap_hsmmc.c code earlier). > >>>> > >>>>I am not much familiar with MMC/SDIO driver and I am not sure how to fix > >>>>this behavior. So any guidance would be really helpful. > >>>> > > > > -- > regards, > -grygorii -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 02/25/2016 01:18 PM, Vishal Thanki wrote: [...] >> >> Suspend or Runtime suspend? > > The it is the runtime suspend routine for omap_hsmmc.c > > mmc1_pins: pinmux_mmc1_pins { > pinctrl-single,pins = < > 0x0fc 0x38 /* MMC0_DAT0 */ > 0x0f8 0x38 /* MMC0_DAT1 */ > 0x0f4 0x38 /* MMC0_DAT2 */ > 0x0f0 0x38 /* MMC0_DAT3 */ > 0x100 0x38 /* MMC0_CLK */ > 0x104 0x38 /* MMC0_CMD */ > 0x88 0x07 /* GPMC_CSN3 -> GPIO2_0 */ > >; > }; > > mmc1_sleep_pins: pinmux_mmc1_sleep_pins { > pinctrl-single,pins = < > 0x0fc 0x3f /* MMC0_DAT0 */ > 0x0f8 0x3f /* MMC0_DAT1 */ > 0x0f4 0x3f /* MMC0_DAT2 */ > 0x0f0 0x3f /* MMC0_DAT3 */ > 0x100 0x3f /* MMC0_CLK */ > 0x104 0x3f /* MMC0_CMD */ > 0x88 0x17 /* GPMC_CSN3 -> GPIO2_0 PULL UP */ > >; > }; > > mmc1_cirq_pin: pinmux_cirq_pin { > pinctrl-single,pins = < > 0x0f8 0x3f /* MMC0_DAT1 as GPIO2_28 */ > >; > }; > > wlan0_pwrseq: pwrseq { > compatible = "mmc-pwrseq-simple"; > reset-gpios = <&gpio2 0 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>; > clocks = <&clk_32768_ck>; > clock-names = "ext_clock"; > }; > > &mmc1 { > status = "okay"; > pinctrl-names = "default", "idle", "sleep"; > pinctrl-0 = <&mmc1_pins>; > pinctrl-1 = <&mmc1_cirq_pin>; > pinctrl-2 = <&mmc1_sleep_pins>; > interrupts-extended = <&intc 64 &gpio2 28 0>; ^^ you can define IRQ type here &gpio2 28 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW > ti,non-removable; > bus-width = <4>; > vmmc-supply = <&ldo2_reg>; > vmmc_aux-supply = <&vmmc>; > keep-power-in-suspend; > enable-sdio-wakeup; > mmc-pwrseq = <&wlan0_pwrseq>; > }; > > >> >>>> >>> >>> Is there any other suggestion for mwifiex that I should try out? Or >>> is there any way in omap_hsmmc to specify the wakeup interrupt >>> type (IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW) while using generic wakeup IRQ >>> mechanism. I could not find it, but I may be missing something. >> >> How your irqs defined in DT? Could you provide mmc+wifi nodes? > > > >> >> [..]
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 12:47 PM, Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> wrote: > On 02/25/2016 01:18 PM, Vishal Thanki wrote: > > [...] > > >>> >>> Suspend or Runtime suspend? >> >> >> The it is the runtime suspend routine for omap_hsmmc.c >> >> mmc1_pins: pinmux_mmc1_pins { >> pinctrl-single,pins = < >> 0x0fc 0x38 /* MMC0_DAT0 */ >> 0x0f8 0x38 /* MMC0_DAT1 */ >> 0x0f4 0x38 /* MMC0_DAT2 */ >> 0x0f0 0x38 /* MMC0_DAT3 */ >> 0x100 0x38 /* MMC0_CLK */ >> 0x104 0x38 /* MMC0_CMD */ >> 0x88 0x07 /* GPMC_CSN3 -> GPIO2_0 */ >> >; >> }; >> >> mmc1_sleep_pins: pinmux_mmc1_sleep_pins { >> pinctrl-single,pins = < >> 0x0fc 0x3f /* MMC0_DAT0 */ >> 0x0f8 0x3f /* MMC0_DAT1 */ >> 0x0f4 0x3f /* MMC0_DAT2 */ >> 0x0f0 0x3f /* MMC0_DAT3 */ >> 0x100 0x3f /* MMC0_CLK */ >> 0x104 0x3f /* MMC0_CMD */ >> 0x88 0x17 /* GPMC_CSN3 -> GPIO2_0 PULL UP */ >> >; >> }; >> >> mmc1_cirq_pin: pinmux_cirq_pin { >> pinctrl-single,pins = < >> 0x0f8 0x3f /* MMC0_DAT1 as GPIO2_28 */ >> >; >> }; >> >> wlan0_pwrseq: pwrseq { >> compatible = "mmc-pwrseq-simple"; >> reset-gpios = <&gpio2 0 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>; >> clocks = <&clk_32768_ck>; >> clock-names = "ext_clock"; >> }; >> >> &mmc1 { >> status = "okay"; >> pinctrl-names = "default", "idle", "sleep"; >> pinctrl-0 = <&mmc1_pins>; >> pinctrl-1 = <&mmc1_cirq_pin>; >> pinctrl-2 = <&mmc1_sleep_pins>; >> interrupts-extended = <&intc 64 &gpio2 28 0>; > > > ^^ you can define IRQ type here > > &gpio2 28 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW > Thank you very much Grygorii for pointing it out. With that change, I am not seeing any problem now. Thanks, Vishal >> ti,non-removable; >> bus-width = <4>; >> vmmc-supply = <&ldo2_reg>; >> vmmc_aux-supply = <&vmmc>; >> keep-power-in-suspend; >> enable-sdio-wakeup; >> mmc-pwrseq = <&wlan0_pwrseq>; >> }; >> >> >>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> Is there any other suggestion for mwifiex that I should try out? Or >>>> is there any way in omap_hsmmc to specify the wakeup interrupt >>>> type (IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW) while using generic wakeup IRQ >>>> mechanism. I could not find it, but I may be missing something. >>> >>> >>> How your irqs defined in DT? Could you provide mmc+wifi nodes? >> >> >> >> >>> >>> > > [..] > > -- > regards, > -grygorii -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/sta_ioctl.c b/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/sta_ioctl.c index a6c8a4f..67587c2 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/sta_ioctl.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/sta_ioctl.c @@ -517,6 +517,17 @@ int mwifiex_enable_hs(struct mwifiex_adapter *adapter) adapter->hs_enabling = true; mwifiex_cancel_all_pending_cmd(adapter); + /* if the MMC host is already in suspend it will not detect SDIO irq + * and we might run into response timeout. By claiming the MMC host we + * wake it up, which is sufficient to detect a pending IRQ + */ + { + struct sdio_mmc_card *card = adapter->card; + sdio_claim_host(card->func); + printk("+++ poll mmc host for IRQ +++\n"); + sdio_release_host(card->func); + } + if (mwifiex_set_hs_params(mwifiex_get_priv(adapter, MWIFIEX_BSS_ROLE_STA), HostCmd_ACT_GEN_SET, MWIFIEX_SYNC_CMD,