| Message ID | 1306108649-28644-1-git-send-email-bhalevy@panasas.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On 05/23/2011 02:57 AM, Benny Halevy wrote: > With the objects layout security model we have object capabilities > that are associated with the layout ad we anticipate that the server > will issue a cb_layoutrecall for any setattr that changes security > related attributes (user/group/mode/acl) or truncates the file. > Therefore, the client returns the layout in advance to avoid the > extra layout recall. > This looks like the wrong text. It belongs to that other patch. The title and actual patch do match Boaz > [get rid of ds_[rw]size] > Signed-off-by: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com> > --- > include/linux/nfs_fs_sb.h | 1 + > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/nfs_fs_sb.h b/include/linux/nfs_fs_sb.h > index 87694ca..66e031f 100644 > --- a/include/linux/nfs_fs_sb.h > +++ b/include/linux/nfs_fs_sb.h > @@ -143,6 +143,7 @@ struct nfs_server { > filesystem */ > struct pnfs_layoutdriver_type *pnfs_curr_ld; /* Active layout driver */ > struct rpc_wait_queue roc_rpcwaitq; > + void *pnfs_ld_data; /* Per-mount data */ > > /* the following fields are protected by nfs_client->cl_lock */ > struct rb_root state_owners; -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 2011-05-23 07:38, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > On 05/23/2011 02:57 AM, Benny Halevy wrote: >> With the objects layout security model we have object capabilities >> that are associated with the layout ad we anticipate that the server >> will issue a cb_layoutrecall for any setattr that changes security >> related attributes (user/group/mode/acl) or truncates the file. >> Therefore, the client returns the layout in advance to avoid the >> extra layout recall. >> > > This looks like the wrong text. It belongs to that other patch. Hmm, looks like a pilot error... thanks! Benny > > The title and actual patch do match > > Boaz >> [get rid of ds_[rw]size] >> Signed-off-by: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com> >> --- >> include/linux/nfs_fs_sb.h | 1 + >> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/include/linux/nfs_fs_sb.h b/include/linux/nfs_fs_sb.h >> index 87694ca..66e031f 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/nfs_fs_sb.h >> +++ b/include/linux/nfs_fs_sb.h >> @@ -143,6 +143,7 @@ struct nfs_server { >> filesystem */ >> struct pnfs_layoutdriver_type *pnfs_curr_ld; /* Active layout driver */ >> struct rpc_wait_queue roc_rpcwaitq; >> + void *pnfs_ld_data; /* Per-mount data */ >> >> /* the following fields are protected by nfs_client->cl_lock */ >> struct rb_root state_owners; > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/include/linux/nfs_fs_sb.h b/include/linux/nfs_fs_sb.h index 87694ca..66e031f 100644 --- a/include/linux/nfs_fs_sb.h +++ b/include/linux/nfs_fs_sb.h @@ -143,6 +143,7 @@ struct nfs_server { filesystem */ struct pnfs_layoutdriver_type *pnfs_curr_ld; /* Active layout driver */ struct rpc_wait_queue roc_rpcwaitq; + void *pnfs_ld_data; /* Per-mount data */ /* the following fields are protected by nfs_client->cl_lock */ struct rb_root state_owners;
With the objects layout security model we have object capabilities that are associated with the layout ad we anticipate that the server will issue a cb_layoutrecall for any setattr that changes security related attributes (user/group/mode/acl) or truncates the file. Therefore, the client returns the layout in advance to avoid the extra layout recall. [get rid of ds_[rw]size] Signed-off-by: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com> --- include/linux/nfs_fs_sb.h | 1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)