diff mbox

[6/6] kvm tools: Protect IOPORT tree by rwsem

Message ID 1306419950-19064-6-git-send-email-levinsasha928@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Sasha Levin May 26, 2011, 2:25 p.m. UTC
Makes ioport thread-safe.

Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>
---
 tools/kvm/ioport.c |    7 +++++++
 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

Comments

Pekka Enberg May 26, 2011, 4:01 p.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, 26 May 2011, Sasha Levin wrote:
> Makes ioport thread-safe.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>
> ---
> tools/kvm/ioport.c |    7 +++++++
> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/kvm/ioport.c b/tools/kvm/ioport.c
> index 1f13960..db9ff0f 100644
> --- a/tools/kvm/ioport.c
> +++ b/tools/kvm/ioport.c
> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
> #include "kvm/kvm.h"
> #include "kvm/util.h"
> #include "kvm/rbtree-interval.h"
> +#include "kvm/rwsem.h"
>
> #include <linux/kvm.h>	/* for KVM_EXIT_* */
> #include <linux/types.h>
> @@ -22,6 +23,7 @@ struct ioport_entry {
>
> static struct rb_root ioport_tree = RB_ROOT;
> bool ioport_debug;
> +static DECLARE_RWSEM(ioport_tree_sem);

Why do we need a new lock here? Can't we reuse the new ioport_mutex?

 			Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Sasha Levin May 26, 2011, 4:19 p.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 19:01 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Thu, 26 May 2011, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > Makes ioport thread-safe.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > tools/kvm/ioport.c |    7 +++++++
> > 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/kvm/ioport.c b/tools/kvm/ioport.c
> > index 1f13960..db9ff0f 100644
> > --- a/tools/kvm/ioport.c
> > +++ b/tools/kvm/ioport.c
> > @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
> > #include "kvm/kvm.h"
> > #include "kvm/util.h"
> > #include "kvm/rbtree-interval.h"
> > +#include "kvm/rwsem.h"
> >
> > #include <linux/kvm.h>	/* for KVM_EXIT_* */
> > #include <linux/types.h>
> > @@ -22,6 +23,7 @@ struct ioport_entry {
> >
> > static struct rb_root ioport_tree = RB_ROOT;
> > bool ioport_debug;
> > +static DECLARE_RWSEM(ioport_tree_sem);
> 
> Why do we need a new lock here? Can't we reuse the new ioport_mutex?

ioport_mutex is used for allocations of ioports to devices, this lock is
intended to protect the ioport tree from being read while new devices
are added.
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/tools/kvm/ioport.c b/tools/kvm/ioport.c
index 1f13960..db9ff0f 100644
--- a/tools/kvm/ioport.c
+++ b/tools/kvm/ioport.c
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ 
 #include "kvm/kvm.h"
 #include "kvm/util.h"
 #include "kvm/rbtree-interval.h"
+#include "kvm/rwsem.h"
 
 #include <linux/kvm.h>	/* for KVM_EXIT_* */
 #include <linux/types.h>
@@ -22,6 +23,7 @@  struct ioport_entry {
 
 static struct rb_root ioport_tree = RB_ROOT;
 bool ioport_debug;
+static DECLARE_RWSEM(ioport_tree_sem);
 
 static struct ioport_entry *ioport_search(struct rb_root *root, u64 addr)
 {
@@ -71,6 +73,7 @@  void ioport__register(u16 port, struct ioport_operations *ops, int count)
 {
 	struct ioport_entry *entry;
 
+	down_write(&ioport_tree_sem);
 	entry = ioport_search(&ioport_tree, port);
 	if (entry) {
 		pr_warning("ioport re-registered: %x", port);
@@ -87,6 +90,8 @@  void ioport__register(u16 port, struct ioport_operations *ops, int count)
 	};
 
 	ioport_insert(&ioport_tree, entry);
+
+	up_write(&ioport_tree_sem);
 }
 
 static const char *to_direction(int direction)
@@ -108,7 +113,9 @@  bool kvm__emulate_io(struct kvm *kvm, u16 port, void *data, int direction, int s
 	bool ret;
 	struct ioport_entry *entry;
 
+	down_read(&ioport_tree_sem);
 	entry = ioport_search(&ioport_tree, port);
+	up_read(&ioport_tree_sem);
 	if (!entry)
 		goto error;