Message ID | 56F1C2D3.3050904@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> writes: > On 21/03/2016 18:39, Kevin Wolf wrote: >> > When I wrote my review, I forgot that I expect x-blockdev-del to accept >> > only backends created with blockdev-add. With that, my question is >> > indeed moot. >> > >> > However, I've now tested my expectation, and it turned out to be wrong. >> > I'm inclined to call that a bug. >> >> Yes. > > Like this? > > diff --git a/blockdev.c b/blockdev.c > index 3eb05d1..0bc7ea2 100644 > --- a/blockdev.c > +++ b/blockdev.c > @@ -4023,6 +4023,11 @@ void qmp_x_blockdev_del(bool has_id, const char *id, > error_setg(errp, "Cannot find block backend %s", id); > return; > } > + if (blk_legacy_dinfo(blk)) { > + error_setg(errp, "Deleting block backend added with drive-add" > + " is not supported"); > + return; > + } > if (blk_get_refcnt(blk) > 1) { > error_setg(errp, "Block backend %s is in use", id); > return; Matches hmp_drive_del(). Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
diff --git a/blockdev.c b/blockdev.c index 3eb05d1..0bc7ea2 100644 --- a/blockdev.c +++ b/blockdev.c @@ -4023,6 +4023,11 @@ void qmp_x_blockdev_del(bool has_id, const char *id, error_setg(errp, "Cannot find block backend %s", id); return; } + if (blk_legacy_dinfo(blk)) { + error_setg(errp, "Deleting block backend added with drive-add" + " is not supported"); + return; + } if (blk_get_refcnt(blk) > 1) { error_setg(errp, "Block backend %s is in use", id); return;