| Message ID | 1456735610-22012-4-git-send-email-fu.wei@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
Hi Wim, Guenter: Great thanks for reviewing and applying this patchset :-) Now I can see almost all the patches of this patchset have been merged into the master branch of mainline kernel. But only this one is still out of any branch or repo. It seems that it's applied on linux-watchdog for a while, then disappeared. So any thing I can do for this patch? Do I need to resubmit it? Maybe I miss it in some repo? Could you help me ? Great thanks ! :-) On 29 February 2016 at 16:46, <fu.wei@linaro.org> wrote: > From: Fu Wei <fu.wei@linaro.org> > > This can be a example of adding SBSA Generic Watchdog device node > into some dts files for the Soc which contains SBSA Generic Watchdog. > > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> > Signed-off-by: Fu Wei <fu.wei@linaro.org> > Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> > --- > arch/arm64/boot/dts/amd/amd-seattle-soc.dtsi | 8 ++++++++ > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amd/amd-seattle-soc.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amd/amd-seattle-soc.dtsi > index 2874d92..0a8ca1d 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amd/amd-seattle-soc.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amd/amd-seattle-soc.dtsi > @@ -84,6 +84,14 @@ > clock-names = "uartclk", "apb_pclk"; > }; > > + watchdog0: watchdog@e0bb0000 { > + compatible = "arm,sbsa-gwdt"; > + reg = <0x0 0xe0bc0000 0 0x1000>, > + <0x0 0xe0bb0000 0 0x1000>; > + interrupts = <0 337 4>; > + timeout-sec = <15>; > + }; > + > spi0: ssp@e1020000 { > status = "disabled"; > compatible = "arm,pl022", "arm,primecell"; > -- > 2.5.0 >
On 03/28/2016 06:12 AM, Fu Wei wrote: > Hi Wim, Guenter: > > Great thanks for reviewing and applying this patchset :-) > Now I can see almost all the patches of this patchset have been merged > into the master branch of mainline kernel. > But only this one is still out of any branch or repo. It seems that > it's applied on linux-watchdog for a while, then disappeared. > > > So any thing I can do for this patch? Do I need to resubmit it? > Maybe I miss it in some repo? Could you help me ? > Great thanks ! :-) > If I recall correctly, it was supposed to go in through some other tree (arm-soc ?) Guenter > On 29 February 2016 at 16:46, <fu.wei@linaro.org> wrote: >> From: Fu Wei <fu.wei@linaro.org> >> >> This can be a example of adding SBSA Generic Watchdog device node >> into some dts files for the Soc which contains SBSA Generic Watchdog. >> >> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> >> Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> >> Signed-off-by: Fu Wei <fu.wei@linaro.org> >> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> >> --- >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amd/amd-seattle-soc.dtsi | 8 ++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amd/amd-seattle-soc.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amd/amd-seattle-soc.dtsi >> index 2874d92..0a8ca1d 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amd/amd-seattle-soc.dtsi >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amd/amd-seattle-soc.dtsi >> @@ -84,6 +84,14 @@ >> clock-names = "uartclk", "apb_pclk"; >> }; >> >> + watchdog0: watchdog@e0bb0000 { >> + compatible = "arm,sbsa-gwdt"; >> + reg = <0x0 0xe0bc0000 0 0x1000>, >> + <0x0 0xe0bb0000 0 0x1000>; >> + interrupts = <0 337 4>; >> + timeout-sec = <15>; >> + }; >> + >> spi0: ssp@e1020000 { >> status = "disabled"; >> compatible = "arm,pl022", "arm,primecell"; >> -- >> 2.5.0 >> > > >
On 28/03/2016:06:46:20 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 03/28/2016 06:12 AM, Fu Wei wrote: > >Hi Wim, Guenter: > > > >Great thanks for reviewing and applying this patchset :-) > >Now I can see almost all the patches of this patchset have been merged > >into the master branch of mainline kernel. > >But only this one is still out of any branch or repo. It seems that > >it's applied on linux-watchdog for a while, then disappeared. > > > > > >So any thing I can do for this patch? Do I need to resubmit it? > >Maybe I miss it in some repo? Could you help me ? > >Great thanks ! :-) > > > > If I recall correctly, it was supposed to go in through some other tree (arm-soc ?) Yes, it should have gone through arm-soc tree. But, it seems it got missed. The other dt patch for foundation-v8 is there in v4.6 pull request [https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/3/20/244]. ~Pratyush
Hi Pratyush, Guenter, On 28 March 2016 at 22:11, Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com> wrote: > On 28/03/2016:06:46:20 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote: >> On 03/28/2016 06:12 AM, Fu Wei wrote: >> >Hi Wim, Guenter: >> > >> >Great thanks for reviewing and applying this patchset :-) >> >Now I can see almost all the patches of this patchset have been merged >> >into the master branch of mainline kernel. >> >But only this one is still out of any branch or repo. It seems that >> >it's applied on linux-watchdog for a while, then disappeared. >> > >> > >> >So any thing I can do for this patch? Do I need to resubmit it? >> >Maybe I miss it in some repo? Could you help me ? >> >Great thanks ! :-) >> > >> >> If I recall correctly, it was supposed to go in through some other tree (arm-soc ?) > > Yes, it should have gone through arm-soc tree. But, it seems it got missed. The > other dt patch for foundation-v8 is there in v4.6 pull request > [https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/3/20/244]. Yes, I thought it should be in arm-soc, but I have checked several branches in arm-soc repo, I can't find this patch. So can someone help to apply it. I have applied it on the master branch of latest mainline kernel locally, I don't see any conflict. Great thanks :-) > > ~Pratyush
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amd/amd-seattle-soc.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amd/amd-seattle-soc.dtsi index 2874d92..0a8ca1d 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amd/amd-seattle-soc.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amd/amd-seattle-soc.dtsi @@ -84,6 +84,14 @@ clock-names = "uartclk", "apb_pclk"; }; + watchdog0: watchdog@e0bb0000 { + compatible = "arm,sbsa-gwdt"; + reg = <0x0 0xe0bc0000 0 0x1000>, + <0x0 0xe0bb0000 0 0x1000>; + interrupts = <0 337 4>; + timeout-sec = <15>; + }; + spi0: ssp@e1020000 { status = "disabled"; compatible = "arm,pl022", "arm,primecell";