| Message ID | 1456389222-12738-2-git-send-email-pankaj.dubey@samsung.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 02:03:37PM +0530, Pankaj Dubey wrote: > This patch adds exynos-srom binding information for SROM Controller > driver on Exynos SoCs. > > CC: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> > CC: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> > CC: Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk> > CC: devicetree@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com> > Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> > Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org> > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/exynos-srom.txt | 12 ++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/exynos-srom.txt > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/exynos-srom.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/exynos-srom.txt > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..33886d5 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/exynos-srom.txt > @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ > +SAMSUNG Exynos SoCs SROM Controller driver. > + > +Required properties: > +- compatible : Should contain "samsung,exynos-srom". There should be SoC specific compatible strings in addition to this. > + > +- reg: offset and length of the register set > + > +Example: > + sromc@12570000 { This should be memory-controller@... > + compatible = "samsung,exynos-srom"; > + reg = <0x12570000 0x10>; The next patch changes the size to 0x14? BTW, you could just combine both patches. I guess you didn't to maintain authorship? Rob -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hi, On Wednesday 02 March 2016 11:23 PM, Rob Herring wrote: > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 02:03:37PM +0530, Pankaj Dubey wrote: >> This patch adds exynos-srom binding information for SROM Controller >> driver on Exynos SoCs. >> >> CC: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> >> CC: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> >> CC: Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk> >> CC: devicetree@vger.kernel.org >> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com> >> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> >> Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org> >> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> >> --- >> .../devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/exynos-srom.txt | 12 ++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/exynos-srom.txt >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/exynos-srom.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/exynos-srom.txt >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000..33886d5 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/exynos-srom.txt >> @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ >> +SAMSUNG Exynos SoCs SROM Controller driver. >> + >> +Required properties: >> +- compatible : Should contain "samsung,exynos-srom". > > There should be SoC specific compatible strings in addition to this. > I do not understood need to additional need to SoC specific compatible, as of now all SoCs having SROM can work with exynos specific common compatible. Will you see any issues in this? >> + >> +- reg: offset and length of the register set >> + >> +Example: >> + sromc@12570000 { > > This should be memory-controller@... > >> + compatible = "samsung,exynos-srom"; >> + reg = <0x12570000 0x10>; > > The next patch changes the size to 0x14? > > BTW, you could just combine both patches. I guess you didn't to maintain > authorship? OK. Will squash both of these patches, unless Pavel do not any objections. Thanks, Pankaj Dubey > > Rob > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hi On Wednesday 02 March 2016 11:23 PM, Rob Herring wrote: > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 02:03:37PM +0530, Pankaj Dubey wrote: >> This patch adds exynos-srom binding information for SROM Controller >> driver on Exynos SoCs. >> >> CC: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> >> CC: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> >> CC: Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk> >> CC: devicetree@vger.kernel.org >> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com> >> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> >> Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org> >> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> >> --- >> .../devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/exynos-srom.txt | 12 ++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/exynos-srom.txt >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/exynos-srom.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/exynos-srom.txt >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000..33886d5 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/exynos-srom.txt >> @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ >> +SAMSUNG Exynos SoCs SROM Controller driver. >> + >> +Required properties: >> +- compatible : Should contain "samsung,exynos-srom". > > There should be SoC specific compatible strings in addition to this. > I do not understood need of additional SoC specific compatible here. As of now all SoCs having SROM can work with exynos specific common compatible. Do you see any issues if we do not have SoC specific compatible here. >> + >> +- reg: offset and length of the register set >> + >> +Example: >> + sromc@12570000 { > > This should be memory-controller@... > >> + compatible = "samsung,exynos-srom"; >> + reg = <0x12570000 0x10>; > > The next patch changes the size to 0x14? > > BTW, you could just combine both patches. I guess you didn't to maintain > authorship? > OK. Will squash both of these patches, unless Pavel do not have any objections to this. Thanks, Pankaj Dubey > Rob > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hello! >> BTW, you could just combine both patches. I guess you didn't to >> maintain authorship? >OK. Will squash both of these patches, unless Pavel do not any objections. I don't. Kind regards. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Saturday 05 March 2016 11:48 AM, pankaj.dubey wrote: > Hi > > On Wednesday 02 March 2016 11:23 PM, Rob Herring wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 02:03:37PM +0530, Pankaj Dubey wrote: >>> This patch adds exynos-srom binding information for SROM Controller >>> driver on Exynos SoCs. >>> >>> CC: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> >>> CC: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> >>> CC: Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk> >>> CC: devicetree@vger.kernel.org >>> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com> >>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> >>> Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org> >>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> >>> --- >>> .../devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/exynos-srom.txt | 12 ++++++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) >>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/exynos-srom.txt >>> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/exynos-srom.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/exynos-srom.txt >>> new file mode 100644 >>> index 0000000..33886d5 >>> --- /dev/null >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/exynos-srom.txt >>> @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ >>> +SAMSUNG Exynos SoCs SROM Controller driver. >>> + >>> +Required properties: >>> +- compatible : Should contain "samsung,exynos-srom". >> >> There should be SoC specific compatible strings in addition to this. >> > > I do not understood need of additional SoC specific compatible here. As > of now all SoCs having SROM can work with exynos specific common > compatible. Do you see any issues if we do not have SoC specific > compatible here. > Gentle ping. Thanks, Pankaj Dubey -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 05.03.2016 13:42, pankaj.dubey wrote: > Hi, > > On Wednesday 02 March 2016 11:23 PM, Rob Herring wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 02:03:37PM +0530, Pankaj Dubey wrote: >>> This patch adds exynos-srom binding information for SROM Controller >>> driver on Exynos SoCs. >>> >>> CC: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> >>> CC: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> >>> CC: Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk> >>> CC: devicetree@vger.kernel.org >>> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com> >>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> >>> Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org> >>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> >>> --- >>> .../devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/exynos-srom.txt | 12 ++++++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) >>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/exynos-srom.txt >>> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/exynos-srom.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/exynos-srom.txt >>> new file mode 100644 >>> index 0000000..33886d5 >>> --- /dev/null >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/exynos-srom.txt >>> @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ >>> +SAMSUNG Exynos SoCs SROM Controller driver. >>> + >>> +Required properties: >>> +- compatible : Should contain "samsung,exynos-srom". >> >> There should be SoC specific compatible strings in addition to this. >> > > I do not understood need to additional need to SoC specific compatible, > as of now all SoCs having SROM can work with exynos specific common > compatible. Will you see any issues in this? Dear Rob, Pankaj, I would like to proceed with this patchset. I guess your comment here was about to change the compatible from generic exynos-like to a model specific. How about this: - compatible : Should contain "samsung,exynos4210-srom". Is this okay? (the oldest chip mentioning SROM controller as separate block is Exynos4210) Best regards, Krzysztof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/exynos-srom.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/exynos-srom.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..33886d5 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/exynos-srom.txt @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ +SAMSUNG Exynos SoCs SROM Controller driver. + +Required properties: +- compatible : Should contain "samsung,exynos-srom". + +- reg: offset and length of the register set + +Example: + sromc@12570000 { + compatible = "samsung,exynos-srom"; + reg = <0x12570000 0x10>; + };