diff mbox

[v4,5/7] KVM: arm/arm64: build a default routing table

Message ID 1459759657-7402-6-git-send-email-eric.auger@linaro.org (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Eric Auger April 4, 2016, 8:47 a.m. UTC
Implement a default routing table made of flat irqchip routing
entries (gsi = irqchip.pin) covering the VGIC SPI indexes.
This routing table is overwritten by the first user-space call
to KVM_SET_GSI_ROUTING ioctl.

Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org>

---
---
 virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic_init.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)

Comments

Christoffer Dall April 14, 2016, 12:05 p.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 10:47:35AM +0200, Eric Auger wrote:
> Implement a default routing table made of flat irqchip routing
> entries (gsi = irqchip.pin) covering the VGIC SPI indexes.
> This routing table is overwritten by the first user-space call
> to KVM_SET_GSI_ROUTING ioctl.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org>
> 

so before applying this patch, but after applying the previous patch,
will our current GICv2m-based MSI injection work?

If not, is there a better split of these patches (e.g. squash this one
into the previous one)?

> ---
> ---
>  virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic_init.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic_init.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic_init.c
> index e4459e3..041443b 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic_init.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic_init.c
> @@ -261,6 +261,10 @@ int vgic_init(struct kvm *kvm)
>  	kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm)
>  		kvm_vgic_vcpu_init(vcpu);
>  
> +	ret = kvm_setup_default_irq_routing(kvm);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto out;
> +
>  	dist->initialized = true;
>  out:
>  	return ret;
> @@ -454,3 +458,23 @@ out_free_irq:
>  			kvm_get_running_vcpus());
>  	return ret;
>  }
> +
> +int kvm_setup_default_irq_routing(struct kvm *kvm)
> +{
> +	struct kvm_irq_routing_entry *entries;
> +	struct vgic_dist *dist = &kvm->arch.vgic;
> +	u32 nr = dist->nr_spis;
> +	int i, ret;
> +
> +	entries = kcalloc(nr, sizeof(struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry),
> +			  GFP_KERNEL);

I think you need to check if the allocation succeeded here or not...

> +	for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) {
> +		entries[i].gsi = i;
> +		entries[i].type = KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_IRQCHIP;
> +		entries[i].u.irqchip.irqchip = 0;
> +		entries[i].u.irqchip.pin = i;
> +	}
> +	ret = kvm_set_irq_routing(kvm, entries, nr, 0);
> +	kfree(entries);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Eric Auger April 21, 2016, 2:51 p.m. UTC | #2
On 04/14/2016 02:05 PM, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 10:47:35AM +0200, Eric Auger wrote:
>> Implement a default routing table made of flat irqchip routing
>> entries (gsi = irqchip.pin) covering the VGIC SPI indexes.
>> This routing table is overwritten by the first user-space call
>> to KVM_SET_GSI_ROUTING ioctl.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org>
>>
> 
> so before applying this patch, but after applying the previous patch,
> will our current GICv2m-based MSI injection work?

If you don't apply that patch and kernel does not build a default table,
userspace is obliged to do the job. if it doesn't the irqfd-> virtual
gsi forwarding will fail. So effectively it makes sense to squash both
patches.

> 
> If not, is there a better split of these patches (e.g. squash this one
> into the previous one)?
> 
>> ---
>> ---
>>  virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic_init.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic_init.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic_init.c
>> index e4459e3..041443b 100644
>> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic_init.c
>> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic_init.c
>> @@ -261,6 +261,10 @@ int vgic_init(struct kvm *kvm)
>>  	kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm)
>>  		kvm_vgic_vcpu_init(vcpu);
>>  
>> +	ret = kvm_setup_default_irq_routing(kvm);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		goto out;
>> +
>>  	dist->initialized = true;
>>  out:
>>  	return ret;
>> @@ -454,3 +458,23 @@ out_free_irq:
>>  			kvm_get_running_vcpus());
>>  	return ret;
>>  }
>> +
>> +int kvm_setup_default_irq_routing(struct kvm *kvm)
>> +{
>> +	struct kvm_irq_routing_entry *entries;
>> +	struct vgic_dist *dist = &kvm->arch.vgic;
>> +	u32 nr = dist->nr_spis;
>> +	int i, ret;
>> +
>> +	entries = kcalloc(nr, sizeof(struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry),
>> +			  GFP_KERNEL);
> 
> I think you need to check if the allocation succeeded here or not...
sure

thanks

Eric
> 
>> +	for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) {
>> +		entries[i].gsi = i;
>> +		entries[i].type = KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_IRQCHIP;
>> +		entries[i].u.irqchip.irqchip = 0;
>> +		entries[i].u.irqchip.pin = i;
>> +	}
>> +	ret = kvm_set_irq_routing(kvm, entries, nr, 0);
>> +	kfree(entries);
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
>> -- 
>> 1.9.1
>>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic_init.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic_init.c
index e4459e3..041443b 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic_init.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic_init.c
@@ -261,6 +261,10 @@  int vgic_init(struct kvm *kvm)
 	kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm)
 		kvm_vgic_vcpu_init(vcpu);
 
+	ret = kvm_setup_default_irq_routing(kvm);
+	if (ret)
+		goto out;
+
 	dist->initialized = true;
 out:
 	return ret;
@@ -454,3 +458,23 @@  out_free_irq:
 			kvm_get_running_vcpus());
 	return ret;
 }
+
+int kvm_setup_default_irq_routing(struct kvm *kvm)
+{
+	struct kvm_irq_routing_entry *entries;
+	struct vgic_dist *dist = &kvm->arch.vgic;
+	u32 nr = dist->nr_spis;
+	int i, ret;
+
+	entries = kcalloc(nr, sizeof(struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry),
+			  GFP_KERNEL);
+	for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) {
+		entries[i].gsi = i;
+		entries[i].type = KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_IRQCHIP;
+		entries[i].u.irqchip.irqchip = 0;
+		entries[i].u.irqchip.pin = i;
+	}
+	ret = kvm_set_irq_routing(kvm, entries, nr, 0);
+	kfree(entries);
+	return ret;
+}