Message ID | 1461402396-11776-5-git-send-email-zhaoshenglong@huawei.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 05:06:35PM +0800, Shannon Zhao wrote: > From: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org> > > Move acpi_build_srat_memory to common place so that it could be reused > by ARM. > > Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> > Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org> > --- > hw/acpi/aml-build.c | 12 ++++++++++++ > hw/i386/acpi-build.c | 20 -------------------- > include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h | 10 ++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/hw/acpi/aml-build.c b/hw/acpi/aml-build.c > index ab89ca6..d167003 100644 > --- a/hw/acpi/aml-build.c > +++ b/hw/acpi/aml-build.c > @@ -1563,3 +1563,15 @@ build_rsdt(GArray *table_data, GArray *linker, GArray *table_offsets, > build_header(linker, table_data, > (void *)rsdt, "RSDT", rsdt_len, 1, oem_id, oem_table_id); > } > + > +void acpi_build_srat_memory(AcpiSratMemoryAffinity *numamem, uint64_t base, > + uint64_t len, int node, MemoryAffinityFlags flags) It looks like functions like these in hw/acpi/aml-build.c usually start with 'build_' not 'acpi_' > +{ > + numamem->type = ACPI_SRAT_MEMORY; > + numamem->length = sizeof(*numamem); > + memset(numamem->proximity, 0, 4); This memset thing is still weird... > + numamem->proximity[0] = node; > + numamem->flags = cpu_to_le32(flags); > + numamem->base_addr = cpu_to_le64(base); > + numamem->range_length = cpu_to_le64(len); > +} > diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c > index 9ae4c0d..cd93825 100644 > --- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c > +++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c > @@ -2427,26 +2427,6 @@ build_tpm2(GArray *table_data, GArray *linker) > (void *)tpm2_ptr, "TPM2", sizeof(*tpm2_ptr), 4, NULL, NULL); > } > > -typedef enum { > - MEM_AFFINITY_NOFLAGS = 0, > - MEM_AFFINITY_ENABLED = (1 << 0), > - MEM_AFFINITY_HOTPLUGGABLE = (1 << 1), > - MEM_AFFINITY_NON_VOLATILE = (1 << 2), > -} MemoryAffinityFlags; > - > -static void > -acpi_build_srat_memory(AcpiSratMemoryAffinity *numamem, uint64_t base, > - uint64_t len, int node, MemoryAffinityFlags flags) > -{ > - numamem->type = ACPI_SRAT_MEMORY; > - numamem->length = sizeof(*numamem); > - memset(numamem->proximity, 0, 4); > - numamem->proximity[0] = node; > - numamem->flags = cpu_to_le32(flags); > - numamem->base_addr = cpu_to_le64(base); > - numamem->range_length = cpu_to_le64(len); > -} > - > static void > build_srat(GArray *table_data, GArray *linker, MachineState *machine) > { > diff --git a/include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h b/include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h > index 2c994b3..d8f9fca 100644 > --- a/include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h > +++ b/include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h > @@ -198,6 +198,13 @@ typedef enum { > AML_PULL_NONE = 3, > } AmlPinConfig; > > +typedef enum { > + MEM_AFFINITY_NOFLAGS = 0, > + MEM_AFFINITY_ENABLED = (1 << 0), > + MEM_AFFINITY_HOTPLUGGABLE = (1 << 1), > + MEM_AFFINITY_NON_VOLATILE = (1 << 2), > +} MemoryAffinityFlags; > + > typedef > struct AcpiBuildTables { > GArray *table_data; > @@ -372,4 +379,7 @@ int > build_append_named_dword(GArray *array, const char *name_format, ...) > GCC_FMT_ATTR(2, 3); > > +void acpi_build_srat_memory(AcpiSratMemoryAffinity *numamem, uint64_t base, > + uint64_t len, int node, MemoryAffinityFlags flags); > + > #endif > -- > 2.0.4 > > > Otherwise looks good to me. drew
On 2016/4/25 1:00, Andrew Jones wrote: > On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 05:06:35PM +0800, Shannon Zhao wrote: >> > From: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org> >> > >> > Move acpi_build_srat_memory to common place so that it could be reused >> > by ARM. >> > >> > Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> >> > Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> >> > Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org> >> > --- >> > hw/acpi/aml-build.c | 12 ++++++++++++ >> > hw/i386/acpi-build.c | 20 -------------------- >> > include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h | 10 ++++++++++ >> > 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) >> > >> > diff --git a/hw/acpi/aml-build.c b/hw/acpi/aml-build.c >> > index ab89ca6..d167003 100644 >> > --- a/hw/acpi/aml-build.c >> > +++ b/hw/acpi/aml-build.c >> > @@ -1563,3 +1563,15 @@ build_rsdt(GArray *table_data, GArray *linker, GArray *table_offsets, >> > build_header(linker, table_data, >> > (void *)rsdt, "RSDT", rsdt_len, 1, oem_id, oem_table_id); >> > } >> > + >> > +void acpi_build_srat_memory(AcpiSratMemoryAffinity *numamem, uint64_t base, >> > + uint64_t len, int node, MemoryAffinityFlags flags) > It looks like functions like these in hw/acpi/aml-build.c usually start > with 'build_' not 'acpi_' > Ok, I will rename it to build_acpi_srat_memory. >> > +{ >> > + numamem->type = ACPI_SRAT_MEMORY; >> > + numamem->length = sizeof(*numamem); >> > + memset(numamem->proximity, 0, 4); > This memset thing is still weird... > I will add a patch before this one to fix the definition of proximity and use uint32_t as you said before. Thanks,
diff --git a/hw/acpi/aml-build.c b/hw/acpi/aml-build.c index ab89ca6..d167003 100644 --- a/hw/acpi/aml-build.c +++ b/hw/acpi/aml-build.c @@ -1563,3 +1563,15 @@ build_rsdt(GArray *table_data, GArray *linker, GArray *table_offsets, build_header(linker, table_data, (void *)rsdt, "RSDT", rsdt_len, 1, oem_id, oem_table_id); } + +void acpi_build_srat_memory(AcpiSratMemoryAffinity *numamem, uint64_t base, + uint64_t len, int node, MemoryAffinityFlags flags) +{ + numamem->type = ACPI_SRAT_MEMORY; + numamem->length = sizeof(*numamem); + memset(numamem->proximity, 0, 4); + numamem->proximity[0] = node; + numamem->flags = cpu_to_le32(flags); + numamem->base_addr = cpu_to_le64(base); + numamem->range_length = cpu_to_le64(len); +} diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c index 9ae4c0d..cd93825 100644 --- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c +++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c @@ -2427,26 +2427,6 @@ build_tpm2(GArray *table_data, GArray *linker) (void *)tpm2_ptr, "TPM2", sizeof(*tpm2_ptr), 4, NULL, NULL); } -typedef enum { - MEM_AFFINITY_NOFLAGS = 0, - MEM_AFFINITY_ENABLED = (1 << 0), - MEM_AFFINITY_HOTPLUGGABLE = (1 << 1), - MEM_AFFINITY_NON_VOLATILE = (1 << 2), -} MemoryAffinityFlags; - -static void -acpi_build_srat_memory(AcpiSratMemoryAffinity *numamem, uint64_t base, - uint64_t len, int node, MemoryAffinityFlags flags) -{ - numamem->type = ACPI_SRAT_MEMORY; - numamem->length = sizeof(*numamem); - memset(numamem->proximity, 0, 4); - numamem->proximity[0] = node; - numamem->flags = cpu_to_le32(flags); - numamem->base_addr = cpu_to_le64(base); - numamem->range_length = cpu_to_le64(len); -} - static void build_srat(GArray *table_data, GArray *linker, MachineState *machine) { diff --git a/include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h b/include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h index 2c994b3..d8f9fca 100644 --- a/include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h +++ b/include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h @@ -198,6 +198,13 @@ typedef enum { AML_PULL_NONE = 3, } AmlPinConfig; +typedef enum { + MEM_AFFINITY_NOFLAGS = 0, + MEM_AFFINITY_ENABLED = (1 << 0), + MEM_AFFINITY_HOTPLUGGABLE = (1 << 1), + MEM_AFFINITY_NON_VOLATILE = (1 << 2), +} MemoryAffinityFlags; + typedef struct AcpiBuildTables { GArray *table_data; @@ -372,4 +379,7 @@ int build_append_named_dword(GArray *array, const char *name_format, ...) GCC_FMT_ATTR(2, 3); +void acpi_build_srat_memory(AcpiSratMemoryAffinity *numamem, uint64_t base, + uint64_t len, int node, MemoryAffinityFlags flags); + #endif