Message ID | 1463164937-91089-2-git-send-email-briannorris@chromium.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Hi, On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 11:42 AM, Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> wrote: > From: Xing Zheng <zhengxing@rock-chips.com> > > There was a typo, swapping 'c' <--> 'g'. > > Signed-off-by: Xing Zheng <zhengxing@rock-chips.com> > Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> > --- > drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3399.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3399.c b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3399.c > index 145756c4f3c8..9f86bfef70f7 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3399.c > +++ b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3399.c > @@ -832,9 +832,9 @@ static struct rockchip_clk_branch rk3399_clk_branches[] __initdata = { > RK3399_CLKGATE_CON(13), 1, GFLAGS), > > /* perihp */ > - GATE(0, "cpll_aclk_perihp_src", "gpll", CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED, > + GATE(0, "cpll_aclk_perihp_src", "cpll", CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED, > RK3399_CLKGATE_CON(5), 0, GFLAGS), > - GATE(0, "gpll_aclk_perihp_src", "cpll", CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED, > + GATE(0, "gpll_aclk_perihp_src", "gpll", CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED, > RK3399_CLKGATE_CON(5), 1, GFLAGS), > COMPOSITE(ACLK_PERIHP, "aclk_perihp", mux_aclk_perihp_p, CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED, > RK3399_CLKSEL_CON(14), 7, 1, MFLAGS, 0, 5, DFLAGS, Definitely there was a bug since this table itself was inconsistent. ...and I _think_ this fix is correct, but I'll note that the TRM has more inconsistency here. In the big clock table 'CRU Clock Architecture Diagram', I see: CLK 4 is CPLL CLK 5 is GPLL CLK 125 is aclk_perihp_cpll_src and has 4 (CPLL) as source, with g5[0] as the bit CLK 126 is aclk_perihp_gpll_src and has 5 (GPLL) as source, with g5[1] as the bit In the definition of CRU_CLKGATE_CON5: bit 0 shows aclk_perihp_gpll_src_en bit 1 shows aclk_perihp_cpll_src_en Thus the table shows CPLL as gate5[0] and GPLL as gate5[1]. The register definition shows the opposite. I'll tend to believe the table over the register definition, but I figured I'd bring it up anyway. Xing Zheng: can you confirm that the table is correct and ask documentation folks to fix the register definition for CRU_CLKGATE_CON5? Thanks! -Doug
Hi Doug, On 2016?05?14? 04:10, Doug Anderson wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 11:42 AM, Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> wrote: >> From: Xing Zheng <zhengxing@rock-chips.com> >> >> There was a typo, swapping 'c' <--> 'g'. >> >> Signed-off-by: Xing Zheng <zhengxing@rock-chips.com> >> Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> >> --- >> drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3399.c | 4 ++-- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3399.c b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3399.c >> index 145756c4f3c8..9f86bfef70f7 100644 >> --- a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3399.c >> +++ b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3399.c >> @@ -832,9 +832,9 @@ static struct rockchip_clk_branch rk3399_clk_branches[] __initdata = { >> RK3399_CLKGATE_CON(13), 1, GFLAGS), >> >> /* perihp */ >> - GATE(0, "cpll_aclk_perihp_src", "gpll", CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED, >> + GATE(0, "cpll_aclk_perihp_src", "cpll", CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED, >> RK3399_CLKGATE_CON(5), 0, GFLAGS), >> - GATE(0, "gpll_aclk_perihp_src", "cpll", CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED, >> + GATE(0, "gpll_aclk_perihp_src", "gpll", CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED, >> RK3399_CLKGATE_CON(5), 1, GFLAGS), >> COMPOSITE(ACLK_PERIHP, "aclk_perihp", mux_aclk_perihp_p, CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED, >> RK3399_CLKSEL_CON(14), 7, 1, MFLAGS, 0, 5, DFLAGS, > Definitely there was a bug since this table itself was inconsistent. > ...and I _think_ this fix is correct, but I'll note that the TRM has > more inconsistency here. > > In the big clock table 'CRU Clock Architecture Diagram', I see: > CLK 4 is CPLL > CLK 5 is GPLL > CLK 125 is aclk_perihp_cpll_src and has 4 (CPLL) as source, with > g5[0] as the bit > CLK 126 is aclk_perihp_gpll_src and has 5 (GPLL) as source, with > g5[1] as the bit > > In the definition of CRU_CLKGATE_CON5: > bit 0 shows aclk_perihp_gpll_src_en > bit 1 shows aclk_perihp_cpll_src_en > > > Thus the table shows CPLL as gate5[0] and GPLL as gate5[1]. The > register definition shows the opposite. I'll tend to believe the > table over the register definition, but I figured I'd bring it up > anyway. > > > Xing Zheng: can you confirm that the table is correct and ask > documentation folks to fix the register definition for > CRU_CLKGATE_CON5? Yes, previously, our IC & DOC partner confirmed that the definition of CRU_CLKGATE_CON5 should be: bit 0 shows aclk_perihp_cpll_src_en bit 1 shows aclk_perihp_gpll_src_en Sorry to the incorrect register definition, we will fix them and review the TRM again. Thanks.
Hi, On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 8:36 PM, Xing Zheng <zhengxing@rock-chips.com> wrote: > Hi Doug, > > > On 2016?05?14? 04:10, Doug Anderson wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 11:42 AM, Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> >> wrote: >>> >>> From: Xing Zheng <zhengxing@rock-chips.com> >>> >>> There was a typo, swapping 'c' <--> 'g'. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Xing Zheng <zhengxing@rock-chips.com> >>> Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> >>> --- >>> drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3399.c | 4 ++-- >>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3399.c >>> b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3399.c >>> index 145756c4f3c8..9f86bfef70f7 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3399.c >>> +++ b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3399.c >>> @@ -832,9 +832,9 @@ static struct rockchip_clk_branch >>> rk3399_clk_branches[] __initdata = { >>> RK3399_CLKGATE_CON(13), 1, GFLAGS), >>> >>> /* perihp */ >>> - GATE(0, "cpll_aclk_perihp_src", "gpll", CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED, >>> + GATE(0, "cpll_aclk_perihp_src", "cpll", CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED, >>> RK3399_CLKGATE_CON(5), 0, GFLAGS), >>> - GATE(0, "gpll_aclk_perihp_src", "cpll", CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED, >>> + GATE(0, "gpll_aclk_perihp_src", "gpll", CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED, >>> RK3399_CLKGATE_CON(5), 1, GFLAGS), >>> COMPOSITE(ACLK_PERIHP, "aclk_perihp", mux_aclk_perihp_p, >>> CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED, >>> RK3399_CLKSEL_CON(14), 7, 1, MFLAGS, 0, 5, >>> DFLAGS, >> >> Definitely there was a bug since this table itself was inconsistent. >> ...and I _think_ this fix is correct, but I'll note that the TRM has >> more inconsistency here. >> >> In the big clock table 'CRU Clock Architecture Diagram', I see: >> CLK 4 is CPLL >> CLK 5 is GPLL >> CLK 125 is aclk_perihp_cpll_src and has 4 (CPLL) as source, with >> g5[0] as the bit >> CLK 126 is aclk_perihp_gpll_src and has 5 (GPLL) as source, with >> g5[1] as the bit >> >> In the definition of CRU_CLKGATE_CON5: >> bit 0 shows aclk_perihp_gpll_src_en >> bit 1 shows aclk_perihp_cpll_src_en >> >> >> Thus the table shows CPLL as gate5[0] and GPLL as gate5[1]. The >> register definition shows the opposite. I'll tend to believe the >> table over the register definition, but I figured I'd bring it up >> anyway. >> >> >> Xing Zheng: can you confirm that the table is correct and ask >> documentation folks to fix the register definition for >> CRU_CLKGATE_CON5? > > Yes, previously, our IC & DOC partner confirmed that the definition of > CRU_CLKGATE_CON5 should be: > bit 0 shows aclk_perihp_cpll_src_en > bit 1 shows aclk_perihp_gpll_src_en > > Sorry to the incorrect register definition, we will fix them and review the > TRM again. Great! Since we now have extra confirmation that Brian's patch is indeed correct: Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Hi Doug, It is so sorry that our IC folks re-correct these bits, they need to be recovered like these: ---- In the definition of CRU_CLKGATE_CON5: bit 1 - shows aclk_perihp_cpll_src_en bit 0 - shows aclk_perihp_gpll_src_en ---- And the new TRM will be updated. FYI. Thanks. On 2016年05月16日 23:49, Doug Anderson wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 8:36 PM, Xing Zheng <zhengxing@rock-chips.com> wrote: >> Hi Doug, >> >> >> On 2016年05月14日 04:10, Doug Anderson wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 11:42 AM, Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> >>> wrote: >>>> From: Xing Zheng <zhengxing@rock-chips.com> >>>> >>>> There was a typo, swapping 'c' <--> 'g'. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Xing Zheng <zhengxing@rock-chips.com> >>>> Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> >>>> --- >>>> drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3399.c | 4 ++-- >>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3399.c >>>> b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3399.c >>>> index 145756c4f3c8..9f86bfef70f7 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3399.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3399.c >>>> @@ -832,9 +832,9 @@ static struct rockchip_clk_branch >>>> rk3399_clk_branches[] __initdata = { >>>> RK3399_CLKGATE_CON(13), 1, GFLAGS), >>>> >>>> /* perihp */ >>>> - GATE(0, "cpll_aclk_perihp_src", "gpll", CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED, >>>> + GATE(0, "cpll_aclk_perihp_src", "cpll", CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED, >>>> RK3399_CLKGATE_CON(5), 0, GFLAGS), >>>> - GATE(0, "gpll_aclk_perihp_src", "cpll", CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED, >>>> + GATE(0, "gpll_aclk_perihp_src", "gpll", CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED, >>>> RK3399_CLKGATE_CON(5), 1, GFLAGS), >>>> COMPOSITE(ACLK_PERIHP, "aclk_perihp", mux_aclk_perihp_p, >>>> CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED, >>>> RK3399_CLKSEL_CON(14), 7, 1, MFLAGS, 0, 5, >>>> DFLAGS, >>> Definitely there was a bug since this table itself was inconsistent. >>> ...and I _think_ this fix is correct, but I'll note that the TRM has >>> more inconsistency here. >>> >>> In the big clock table 'CRU Clock Architecture Diagram', I see: >>> CLK 4 is CPLL >>> CLK 5 is GPLL >>> CLK 125 is aclk_perihp_cpll_src and has 4 (CPLL) as source, with >>> g5[0] as the bit >>> CLK 126 is aclk_perihp_gpll_src and has 5 (GPLL) as source, with >>> g5[1] as the bit >>> >>> In the definition of CRU_CLKGATE_CON5: >>> bit 0 shows aclk_perihp_gpll_src_en >>> bit 1 shows aclk_perihp_cpll_src_en >>> >>> >>> Thus the table shows CPLL as gate5[0] and GPLL as gate5[1]. The >>> register definition shows the opposite. I'll tend to believe the >>> table over the register definition, but I figured I'd bring it up >>> anyway. >>> >>> >>> Xing Zheng: can you confirm that the table is correct and ask >>> documentation folks to fix the register definition for >>> CRU_CLKGATE_CON5? >> Yes, previously, our IC & DOC partner confirmed that the definition of >> CRU_CLKGATE_CON5 should be: >> bit 0 shows aclk_perihp_cpll_src_en >> bit 1 shows aclk_perihp_gpll_src_en >> >> Sorry to the incorrect register definition, we will fix them and review the >> TRM again. > Great! > > Since we now have extra confirmation that Brian's patch is indeed correct: > > Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> > > >
diff --git a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3399.c b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3399.c index 145756c4f3c8..9f86bfef70f7 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3399.c +++ b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3399.c @@ -832,9 +832,9 @@ static struct rockchip_clk_branch rk3399_clk_branches[] __initdata = { RK3399_CLKGATE_CON(13), 1, GFLAGS), /* perihp */ - GATE(0, "cpll_aclk_perihp_src", "gpll", CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED, + GATE(0, "cpll_aclk_perihp_src", "cpll", CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED, RK3399_CLKGATE_CON(5), 0, GFLAGS), - GATE(0, "gpll_aclk_perihp_src", "cpll", CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED, + GATE(0, "gpll_aclk_perihp_src", "gpll", CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED, RK3399_CLKGATE_CON(5), 1, GFLAGS), COMPOSITE(ACLK_PERIHP, "aclk_perihp", mux_aclk_perihp_p, CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED, RK3399_CLKSEL_CON(14), 7, 1, MFLAGS, 0, 5, DFLAGS,