| Message ID | 3280835.MNk2ItMooy@wuerfel (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Wed, 2016-05-18 at 09:54 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > The change from blkdev_dax_capable() to bdev_dax_capable() removed the > only user of the former, so we now get a build warning: > > fs/block_dev.c:1244:13: error: 'blkdev_dax_capable' defined but not used > [-Werror=unused-function] > static bool blkdev_dax_capable(struct block_device *bdev) > > This removes the now-unused function. > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > Fixes: a8078b1fc616 ("block: Update blkdev_dax_capable() for > consistency") : > It's not entirely from the patch description what the intention was here > in keeping two slightly different implementations of the same function > in one file, my best guess is that it was not intentional and we should > just remove this. Thanks for the build fix. Looks like there was a conflict between 8044aae6f374 and a8078b1fc616d, which resulted this build error. Both patches moved blkdev_dax_capable() from block/ioctl.c to fs/block_dev.c. Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hpe.com> Thanks, -Toshi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 09:54:08AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > The change from blkdev_dax_capable() to bdev_dax_capable() removed the only user > of the former, so we now get a build warning: > > fs/block_dev.c:1244:13: error: 'blkdev_dax_capable' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function] > static bool blkdev_dax_capable(struct block_device *bdev) > > This removes the now-unused function. > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > Fixes: a8078b1fc616 ("block: Update blkdev_dax_capable() for consistency") > --- > On Tuesday 10 May 2016 10:23:57 Toshi Kani wrote: > > @@ -1295,7 +1330,7 @@ static int __blkdev_get(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode, int for_part) > > > > if (!ret) { > > bd_set_size(bdev,(loff_t)get_capacity(disk)<<9); > > - if (!blkdev_dax_capable(bdev)) > > + if (!bdev_dax_capable(bdev)) > > bdev->bd_inode->i_flags &= ~S_DAX; > > > > It's not entirely from the patch description what the intention was here > in keeping two slightly different implementations of the same function > in one file, my best guess is that it was not intentional and we should > just remove this. > Good catch - like Toshi said, this was indeed a mis-merge. Stephen, for reference, I've added a branch with the expected conflict resolution at: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/nvdimm/nvdimm.git/ libnvdimm-for-4.7-merge Thanks, -Vishal -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hi,
[auto build test ERROR on next-20160517]
[cannot apply to v4.6-rc7 v4.6-rc6 v4.6-rc5 v4.6]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Arnd-Bergmann/remove-unused-blkdev_dax_capable-function/20160518-155729
config: m68k-allyesconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: m68k-linux-gcc (GCC) 4.9.0
reproduce:
wget https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make.cross ARCH=m68k
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
fs/block_dev.c: In function '__blkdev_get':
>> fs/block_dev.c:1242:5: error: implicit declaration of function 'blkdev_dax_capable' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
if (!blkdev_dax_capable(bdev))
^
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
vim +/blkdev_dax_capable +1242 fs/block_dev.c
d3374825 NeilBrown 2009-01-09 1236 goto restart;
d3374825 NeilBrown 2009-01-09 1237 }
1196f8b8 Tejun Heo 2011-04-21 1238 }
7e69723f Tejun Heo 2011-05-23 1239
5a023cdb Dan Williams 2015-11-30 1240 if (!ret) {
7e69723f Tejun Heo 2011-05-23 1241 bd_set_size(bdev,(loff_t)get_capacity(disk)<<9);
5a023cdb Dan Williams 2015-11-30 @1242 if (!blkdev_dax_capable(bdev))
5a023cdb Dan Williams 2015-11-30 1243 bdev->bd_inode->i_flags &= ~S_DAX;
5a023cdb Dan Williams 2015-11-30 1244 }
7e69723f Tejun Heo 2011-05-23 1245
:::::: The code at line 1242 was first introduced by commit
:::::: 5a023cdba50c5f5f2bc351783b3131699deb3937 block: enable dax for raw block devices
:::::: TO: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
:::::: CC: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
FYI, fs/block_dev.c has multiple updates since then including the code in question. I just built tot -next m64 kernel with the attached config file, and confirmed no compile error on the file. -Toshi On Fri, 2016-05-20 at 19:32 +0800, kbuild test robot wrote: > Hi, > > [auto build test ERROR on next-20160517] > [cannot apply to v4.6-rc7 v4.6-rc6 v4.6-rc5 v4.6] > [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to > help improve the system] > > url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Arnd-Bergmann/remove-unu > sed-blkdev_dax_capable-function/20160518-155729 > config: m68k-allyesconfig (attached as .config) > compiler: m68k-linux-gcc (GCC) 4.9.0 > reproduce: > wget https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.g > it/plain/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross > chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross > # save the attached .config to linux build tree > make.cross ARCH=m68k > > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): > > fs/block_dev.c: In function '__blkdev_get': > > > > > > > > fs/block_dev.c:1242:5: error: implicit declaration of function > > > 'blkdev_dax_capable' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > if (!blkdev_dax_capable(bdev)) > ^ > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors > > vim +/blkdev_dax_capable +1242 fs/block_dev.c > > d3374825 NeilBrown 2009-01-09 1236 > goto restart; > d3374825 NeilBrown 2009-01-09 1237 } > 1196f8b8 Tejun Heo 2011-04-21 1238 } > 7e69723f Tejun Heo 2011-05-23 1239 > 5a023cdb Dan Williams 2015-11-30 1240 if (!ret) > { > 7e69723f Tejun Heo 2011-05-23 1241 b > d_set_size(bdev,(loff_t)get_capacity(disk)<<9); > 5a023cdb Dan Williams 2015-11-30 @1242 i > f (!blkdev_dax_capable(bdev)) > 5a023cdb Dan Williams 2015-11-30 1243 > bdev->bd_inode->i_flags &= ~S_DAX; > 5a023cdb Dan Williams 2015-11-30 1244 } > 7e69723f Tejun Heo 2011-05-23 1245 > > :::::: The code at line 1242 was first introduced by commit > :::::: 5a023cdba50c5f5f2bc351783b3131699deb3937 block: enable dax for raw > block devices > > :::::: TO: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> > :::::: CC: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> > > --- > 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology > Center > https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel > Corporation
diff --git a/fs/block_dev.c b/fs/block_dev.c index 97f324642b5f..dad77225a721 100644 --- a/fs/block_dev.c +++ b/fs/block_dev.c @@ -1241,33 +1241,6 @@ void bd_set_size(struct block_device *bdev, loff_t size) } EXPORT_SYMBOL(bd_set_size); -static bool blkdev_dax_capable(struct block_device *bdev) -{ - struct gendisk *disk = bdev->bd_disk; - - if (!disk->fops->direct_access || !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FS_DAX)) - return false; - - /* - * If the partition is not aligned on a page boundary, we can't - * do dax I/O to it. - */ - if ((bdev->bd_part->start_sect % (PAGE_SIZE / 512)) - || (bdev->bd_part->nr_sects % (PAGE_SIZE / 512))) - return false; - - /* - * If the device has known bad blocks, force all I/O through the - * driver / page cache. - * - * TODO: support finer grained dax error handling - */ - if (disk->bb && disk->bb->count) - return false; - - return true; -} - static void __blkdev_put(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode, int for_part); /*