| Message ID | 1464096493-13378-1-git-send-email-k.kozlowski@samsung.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
Hello Krzysztof, are you sure that these are the only differences. Because AFAIK there are quite a few more: - DMA submission of commands - blend mode / rounding - solid fill - YCrCb support - and probably more One would need to add least split the command list parser into a v3 and v41 version to accomodate for the differences. In fact userspace/libdrm would need to know which hw type it currently uses, but you currently always return 4.1 in the corresponding ioctl. Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > The non-DRM s5p-g2d driver supports two versions of G2D: v3.0 on > S5Pv210 and v4.x on Exynos 4x12 (or newer). The driver for 3.0 device > version is doing two things differently: > 1. Before starting the render process, it invalidates caches (pattern, > source buffer and mask buffer). Cache control is not present on v4.x > device. > 2. Scalling is done through StretchEn command (in BITBLT_COMMAND_REG > register) instead of SRC_SCALE_CTRL_REG as in v4.x. However the > exynos_drm_g2d driver does not implement the scalling so this > difference can be eliminated. Huh? Where did you get this from? Scaling works with the DRM driver. With best wishes, Tobias > After adding support for v3.0 to exynos_drm_g2d driver, the old driver > can be removed. > > Cc: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com> > Cc: Kamil Debski <k.debski@samsung.com> > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_g2d.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_g2d.h | 7 +++++++ > 2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_g2d.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_g2d.c > index 493552368295..44d8b28e9d98 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_g2d.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_g2d.c > @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ > #include <linux/dma-mapping.h> > #include <linux/dma-attrs.h> > #include <linux/of.h> > +#include <linux/of_device.h> > > #include <drm/drmP.h> > #include <drm/exynos_drm.h> > @@ -38,6 +39,7 @@ > #define G2D_SOFT_RESET 0x0000 > #define G2D_INTEN 0x0004 > #define G2D_INTC_PEND 0x000C > +#define G2D_CACHECTL 0x0018 /* S5PV210 specific */ > #define G2D_DMA_SFR_BASE_ADDR 0x0080 > #define G2D_DMA_COMMAND 0x0084 > #define G2D_DMA_STATUS 0x008C > @@ -78,6 +80,11 @@ > #define G2D_INTP_GCMD_FIN (1 << 1) > #define G2D_INTP_SCMD_FIN (1 << 0) > > +/* G2D_CACHECTL, S5PV210 specific */ > +#define G2D_CACHECTL_PATCACHE (BIT(2)) > +#define G2D_CACHECTL_SRCBUFFER (BIT(1)) > +#define G2D_CACHECTL_MASKBUFFER (BIT(0)) > + > /* G2D_DMA_COMMAND */ > #define G2D_DMA_HALT (1 << 2) > #define G2D_DMA_CONTINUE (1 << 1) > @@ -245,6 +252,7 @@ struct g2d_data { > > unsigned long current_pool; > unsigned long max_pool; > + enum exynos_drm_g2d_type type; > }; > > static int g2d_init_cmdlist(struct g2d_data *g2d) > @@ -1125,6 +1133,13 @@ int exynos_g2d_set_cmdlist_ioctl(struct drm_device *drm_dev, void *data, > cmdlist->data[cmdlist->last++] = G2D_SRC_BASE_ADDR; > cmdlist->data[cmdlist->last++] = 0; > > + if (g2d->type == EXYNOS_DRM_G2D_TYPE_3X) { > + cmdlist->data[cmdlist->last++] = G2D_CACHECTL; > + cmdlist->data[cmdlist->last++] = G2D_CACHECTL_PATCACHE | > + G2D_CACHECTL_SRCBUFFER | > + G2D_CACHECTL_MASKBUFFER; > + } > + > /* > * 'LIST_HOLD' command should be set to the DMA_HOLD_CMD_REG > * and GCF bit should be set to INTEN register if user wants > @@ -1369,10 +1384,20 @@ static int g2d_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > struct exynos_drm_subdrv *subdrv; > int ret; > > + /* Sanity check, we can be instatiated only from DT */ > + if (!dev->of_node) > + return -EINVAL; > + > g2d = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*g2d), GFP_KERNEL); > if (!g2d) > return -ENOMEM; > > + g2d->type = (enum exynos_drm_g2d_type)of_device_get_match_data(dev); > + if (g2d->type == EXYNOS_DRM_G2D_TYPE_UNKNOWN) { > + dev_err(dev, "failed to get type of device\n"); > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + > g2d->runqueue_slab = kmem_cache_create("g2d_runqueue_slab", > sizeof(struct g2d_runqueue_node), 0, 0, NULL); > if (!g2d->runqueue_slab) > @@ -1535,8 +1560,16 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops g2d_pm_ops = { > }; > > static const struct of_device_id exynos_g2d_match[] = { > - { .compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-g2d" }, > - { .compatible = "samsung,exynos4212-g2d" }, > + { > + .compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-g2d", > + .data = (void *)EXYNOS_DRM_G2D_TYPE_4X, > + }, { > + .compatible = "samsung,exynos4212-g2d", > + .data = (void *)EXYNOS_DRM_G2D_TYPE_4X, > + }, { > + .compatible = "samsung,s5pv210-g2d", > + .data = (void *)EXYNOS_DRM_G2D_TYPE_3X, > + }, > {}, > }; > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, exynos_g2d_match); > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_g2d.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_g2d.h > index 1a9c7ca8c15b..84ec8aff6f0a 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_g2d.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_g2d.h > @@ -7,6 +7,13 @@ > * published by the Free Software Foundationr > */ > > +enum exynos_drm_g2d_type { > + EXYNOS_DRM_G2D_TYPE_UNKNOWN, > + > + EXYNOS_DRM_G2D_TYPE_3X, > + EXYNOS_DRM_G2D_TYPE_4X, > +}; > + > #ifdef CONFIG_DRM_EXYNOS_G2D > extern int exynos_g2d_get_ver_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, > struct drm_file *file_priv); > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 05/24/2016 03:49 PM, Tobias Jakobi wrote: > Hello Krzysztof, > > are you sure that these are the only differences. Because AFAIK there > are quite a few more: > - DMA submission of commands > - blend mode / rounding > - solid fill > - YCrCb support > - and probably more > > One would need to add least split the command list parser into a v3 and > v41 version to accomodate for the differences. In fact userspace/libdrm > would need to know which hw type it currently uses, but you currently > always return 4.1 in the corresponding ioctl. Eh, so probably my patch does not cover fully the support for v3 G2D. I looked mostly at the differences between v3 and v4 in the s5p-g2d driver itself. However you are right that this might be not sufficient because exynos-g2d moved forward and is different than s5p-g2d. > Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> The non-DRM s5p-g2d driver supports two versions of G2D: v3.0 on >> S5Pv210 and v4.x on Exynos 4x12 (or newer). The driver for 3.0 device >> version is doing two things differently: >> 1. Before starting the render process, it invalidates caches (pattern, >> source buffer and mask buffer). Cache control is not present on v4.x >> device. >> 2. Scalling is done through StretchEn command (in BITBLT_COMMAND_REG >> register) instead of SRC_SCALE_CTRL_REG as in v4.x. However the >> exynos_drm_g2d driver does not implement the scalling so this >> difference can be eliminated. > Huh? Where did you get this from? Scaling works with the DRM driver. I was looking for the usage of scaling reg (as there is no scaling command). How the scaling is implemented then? Thanks for feedback! Best regards, Krzysztof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hello Krzysztof, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 05/24/2016 03:49 PM, Tobias Jakobi wrote: >> Hello Krzysztof, >> >> are you sure that these are the only differences. Because AFAIK there >> are quite a few more: >> - DMA submission of commands >> - blend mode / rounding >> - solid fill >> - YCrCb support >> - and probably more >> >> One would need to add least split the command list parser into a v3 and >> v41 version to accomodate for the differences. In fact userspace/libdrm >> would need to know which hw type it currently uses, but you currently >> always return 4.1 in the corresponding ioctl. > > Eh, so probably my patch does not cover fully the support for v3 G2D. I > looked mostly at the differences between v3 and v4 in the s5p-g2d driver > itself. However you are right that this might be not sufficient because > exynos-g2d moved forward and is different than s5p-g2d. > >> Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> The non-DRM s5p-g2d driver supports two versions of G2D: v3.0 on >>> S5Pv210 and v4.x on Exynos 4x12 (or newer). The driver for 3.0 device >>> version is doing two things differently: >>> 1. Before starting the render process, it invalidates caches (pattern, >>> source buffer and mask buffer). Cache control is not present on v4.x >>> device. >>> 2. Scalling is done through StretchEn command (in BITBLT_COMMAND_REG >>> register) instead of SRC_SCALE_CTRL_REG as in v4.x. However the >>> exynos_drm_g2d driver does not implement the scalling so this >>> difference can be eliminated. >> Huh? Where did you get this from? Scaling works with the DRM driver. > > I was looking for the usage of scaling reg (as there is no scaling > command). How the scaling is implemented then? Like you said above the drivers work completly different. The DRM one receives a command list that is constructed by userspace (libdrm mostly), copies it to a contiguous buffer and passes the memory address of that buffer to the engine which then works on it. Of course everything is slightly more complex. You don't see any reference to scaling in the driver because the scaling regs don't need any kind of specific validation. If you want to know how the command list is constructed, the best way is to look into libdrm. The Exynos specific tests actually cover scaling. With best wishes, Tobias > Thanks for feedback! > > Best regards, > Krzysztof > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 05/24/2016 06:05 PM, Tobias Jakobi wrote: > Hello Krzysztof, > > > Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 05/24/2016 03:49 PM, Tobias Jakobi wrote: >>> Hello Krzysztof, >>> >>> are you sure that these are the only differences. Because AFAIK there >>> are quite a few more: >>> - DMA submission of commands >>> - blend mode / rounding >>> - solid fill >>> - YCrCb support >>> - and probably more >>> >>> One would need to add least split the command list parser into a v3 and >>> v41 version to accomodate for the differences. In fact userspace/libdrm >>> would need to know which hw type it currently uses, but you currently >>> always return 4.1 in the corresponding ioctl. >> >> Eh, so probably my patch does not cover fully the support for v3 G2D. I >> looked mostly at the differences between v3 and v4 in the s5p-g2d driver >> itself. However you are right that this might be not sufficient because >> exynos-g2d moved forward and is different than s5p-g2d. >> >>> Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>>> The non-DRM s5p-g2d driver supports two versions of G2D: v3.0 on >>>> S5Pv210 and v4.x on Exynos 4x12 (or newer). The driver for 3.0 device >>>> version is doing two things differently: >>>> 1. Before starting the render process, it invalidates caches (pattern, >>>> source buffer and mask buffer). Cache control is not present on v4.x >>>> device. >>>> 2. Scalling is done through StretchEn command (in BITBLT_COMMAND_REG >>>> register) instead of SRC_SCALE_CTRL_REG as in v4.x. However the >>>> exynos_drm_g2d driver does not implement the scalling so this >>>> difference can be eliminated. >>> Huh? Where did you get this from? Scaling works with the DRM driver. >> >> I was looking for the usage of scaling reg (as there is no scaling >> command). How the scaling is implemented then? > Like you said above the drivers work completly different. The DRM one > receives a command list that is constructed by userspace (libdrm > mostly), copies it to a contiguous buffer and passes the memory address > of that buffer to the engine which then works on it. Of course > everything is slightly more complex. > > You don't see any reference to scaling in the driver because the scaling > regs don't need any kind of specific validation. > > If you want to know how the command list is constructed, the best way is > to look into libdrm. The Exynos specific tests actually cover scaling. Thanks for explanations. The patch is insufficient then and it requires much more effort. Please drop the series as of now. Best regards, Krzysztof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hey Krzysztof, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 05/24/2016 06:05 PM, Tobias Jakobi wrote: >> Hello Krzysztof, >> >> >> Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> On 05/24/2016 03:49 PM, Tobias Jakobi wrote: >>>> Hello Krzysztof, >>>> >>>> are you sure that these are the only differences. Because AFAIK there >>>> are quite a few more: >>>> - DMA submission of commands >>>> - blend mode / rounding >>>> - solid fill >>>> - YCrCb support >>>> - and probably more >>>> >>>> One would need to add least split the command list parser into a v3 and >>>> v41 version to accomodate for the differences. In fact userspace/libdrm >>>> would need to know which hw type it currently uses, but you currently >>>> always return 4.1 in the corresponding ioctl. >>> >>> Eh, so probably my patch does not cover fully the support for v3 G2D. I >>> looked mostly at the differences between v3 and v4 in the s5p-g2d driver >>> itself. However you are right that this might be not sufficient because >>> exynos-g2d moved forward and is different than s5p-g2d. >>> >>>> Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>>>> The non-DRM s5p-g2d driver supports two versions of G2D: v3.0 on >>>>> S5Pv210 and v4.x on Exynos 4x12 (or newer). The driver for 3.0 device >>>>> version is doing two things differently: >>>>> 1. Before starting the render process, it invalidates caches (pattern, >>>>> source buffer and mask buffer). Cache control is not present on v4.x >>>>> device. >>>>> 2. Scalling is done through StretchEn command (in BITBLT_COMMAND_REG >>>>> register) instead of SRC_SCALE_CTRL_REG as in v4.x. However the >>>>> exynos_drm_g2d driver does not implement the scalling so this >>>>> difference can be eliminated. >>>> Huh? Where did you get this from? Scaling works with the DRM driver. >>> >>> I was looking for the usage of scaling reg (as there is no scaling >>> command). How the scaling is implemented then? >> Like you said above the drivers work completly different. The DRM one >> receives a command list that is constructed by userspace (libdrm >> mostly), copies it to a contiguous buffer and passes the memory address >> of that buffer to the engine which then works on it. Of course >> everything is slightly more complex. >> >> You don't see any reference to scaling in the driver because the scaling >> regs don't need any kind of specific validation. >> >> If you want to know how the command list is constructed, the best way is >> to look into libdrm. The Exynos specific tests actually cover scaling. > > Thanks for explanations. The patch is insufficient then and it requires > much more effort. Please drop the series as of now. If you intend to add support for v3 hardware we might want to join forces. I have an (ongoing) rewrite of the driver to enable additional functionality and to make it more suitable to provide EXA for a X11 DDX. However this breaks the existing API and rewrites quite a bit of the driver Here's what's there so far. https://github.com/tobiasjakobi/linux-odroid-public/compare/e35ca9aca1214c5e104e6906c1d9affeb80fe5df...3d1ddb86db73b0d664f3e339709e8e8dacdc8e91 And here's the DDX: https://github.com/tobiasjakobi/xf86-video-armsoc/commits/g2d With best wishes, Tobias > > Best regards, > Krzysztof > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_g2d.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_g2d.c index 493552368295..44d8b28e9d98 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_g2d.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_g2d.c @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ #include <linux/dma-mapping.h> #include <linux/dma-attrs.h> #include <linux/of.h> +#include <linux/of_device.h> #include <drm/drmP.h> #include <drm/exynos_drm.h> @@ -38,6 +39,7 @@ #define G2D_SOFT_RESET 0x0000 #define G2D_INTEN 0x0004 #define G2D_INTC_PEND 0x000C +#define G2D_CACHECTL 0x0018 /* S5PV210 specific */ #define G2D_DMA_SFR_BASE_ADDR 0x0080 #define G2D_DMA_COMMAND 0x0084 #define G2D_DMA_STATUS 0x008C @@ -78,6 +80,11 @@ #define G2D_INTP_GCMD_FIN (1 << 1) #define G2D_INTP_SCMD_FIN (1 << 0) +/* G2D_CACHECTL, S5PV210 specific */ +#define G2D_CACHECTL_PATCACHE (BIT(2)) +#define G2D_CACHECTL_SRCBUFFER (BIT(1)) +#define G2D_CACHECTL_MASKBUFFER (BIT(0)) + /* G2D_DMA_COMMAND */ #define G2D_DMA_HALT (1 << 2) #define G2D_DMA_CONTINUE (1 << 1) @@ -245,6 +252,7 @@ struct g2d_data { unsigned long current_pool; unsigned long max_pool; + enum exynos_drm_g2d_type type; }; static int g2d_init_cmdlist(struct g2d_data *g2d) @@ -1125,6 +1133,13 @@ int exynos_g2d_set_cmdlist_ioctl(struct drm_device *drm_dev, void *data, cmdlist->data[cmdlist->last++] = G2D_SRC_BASE_ADDR; cmdlist->data[cmdlist->last++] = 0; + if (g2d->type == EXYNOS_DRM_G2D_TYPE_3X) { + cmdlist->data[cmdlist->last++] = G2D_CACHECTL; + cmdlist->data[cmdlist->last++] = G2D_CACHECTL_PATCACHE | + G2D_CACHECTL_SRCBUFFER | + G2D_CACHECTL_MASKBUFFER; + } + /* * 'LIST_HOLD' command should be set to the DMA_HOLD_CMD_REG * and GCF bit should be set to INTEN register if user wants @@ -1369,10 +1384,20 @@ static int g2d_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) struct exynos_drm_subdrv *subdrv; int ret; + /* Sanity check, we can be instatiated only from DT */ + if (!dev->of_node) + return -EINVAL; + g2d = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*g2d), GFP_KERNEL); if (!g2d) return -ENOMEM; + g2d->type = (enum exynos_drm_g2d_type)of_device_get_match_data(dev); + if (g2d->type == EXYNOS_DRM_G2D_TYPE_UNKNOWN) { + dev_err(dev, "failed to get type of device\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } + g2d->runqueue_slab = kmem_cache_create("g2d_runqueue_slab", sizeof(struct g2d_runqueue_node), 0, 0, NULL); if (!g2d->runqueue_slab) @@ -1535,8 +1560,16 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops g2d_pm_ops = { }; static const struct of_device_id exynos_g2d_match[] = { - { .compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-g2d" }, - { .compatible = "samsung,exynos4212-g2d" }, + { + .compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-g2d", + .data = (void *)EXYNOS_DRM_G2D_TYPE_4X, + }, { + .compatible = "samsung,exynos4212-g2d", + .data = (void *)EXYNOS_DRM_G2D_TYPE_4X, + }, { + .compatible = "samsung,s5pv210-g2d", + .data = (void *)EXYNOS_DRM_G2D_TYPE_3X, + }, {}, }; MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, exynos_g2d_match); diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_g2d.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_g2d.h index 1a9c7ca8c15b..84ec8aff6f0a 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_g2d.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_g2d.h @@ -7,6 +7,13 @@ * published by the Free Software Foundationr */ +enum exynos_drm_g2d_type { + EXYNOS_DRM_G2D_TYPE_UNKNOWN, + + EXYNOS_DRM_G2D_TYPE_3X, + EXYNOS_DRM_G2D_TYPE_4X, +}; + #ifdef CONFIG_DRM_EXYNOS_G2D extern int exynos_g2d_get_ver_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file_priv);
The non-DRM s5p-g2d driver supports two versions of G2D: v3.0 on S5Pv210 and v4.x on Exynos 4x12 (or newer). The driver for 3.0 device version is doing two things differently: 1. Before starting the render process, it invalidates caches (pattern, source buffer and mask buffer). Cache control is not present on v4.x device. 2. Scalling is done through StretchEn command (in BITBLT_COMMAND_REG register) instead of SRC_SCALE_CTRL_REG as in v4.x. However the exynos_drm_g2d driver does not implement the scalling so this difference can be eliminated. After adding support for v3.0 to exynos_drm_g2d driver, the old driver can be removed. Cc: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com> Cc: Kamil Debski <k.debski@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_g2d.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_g2d.h | 7 +++++++ 2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)