| Message ID | 20160608010429.19618-5-stefan@agner.ch (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Tue, 07 Jun 2016, Stefan Agner wrote: > Only register power off if the PMIC is defined as system power > controller (see Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/ > power-controller.txt). > > Reviewed-by: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com> > Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch> These should be chronological. > --- > drivers/mfd/rn5t618.c | 10 +++++++--- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/rn5t618.c b/drivers/mfd/rn5t618.c > index 7607ced..d9b4d40 100644 > --- a/drivers/mfd/rn5t618.c > +++ b/drivers/mfd/rn5t618.c > @@ -103,9 +103,13 @@ static int rn5t618_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c, > return ret; > } > > - if (!pm_power_off) { > - rn5t618_pm_power_off = priv; > - pm_power_off = rn5t618_power_off; > + if (of_device_is_system_power_controller(i2c->dev.of_node)) { > + if (!pm_power_off) { > + rn5t618_pm_power_off = priv; > + pm_power_off = rn5t618_power_off; > + } else { > + dev_err(&i2c->dev, "Failed to set poweroff capability, already defined\n"); This is not an error. Please use dev_warn() instead. Also, is this message actually accurate? Your commit message would indicate that it's not. > + } > } > > return 0;
On 2016-06-16 07:59, Lee Jones wrote: > On Tue, 07 Jun 2016, Stefan Agner wrote: > >> Only register power off if the PMIC is defined as system power >> controller (see Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/ >> power-controller.txt). >> >> Reviewed-by: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com> >> Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch> > > These should be chronological. > Has been discussed already here: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-May/345835.html It's an artifact of my development process, I keep the commits in my local branches without signed off lines and add them before sending out patches. So whenever I prepare a new revision, collected acks, sobs are chronological, but end up before my sob. But since you are the second maintainer which has objection to that style I probably should change that... >> --- >> drivers/mfd/rn5t618.c | 10 +++++++--- >> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/rn5t618.c b/drivers/mfd/rn5t618.c >> index 7607ced..d9b4d40 100644 >> --- a/drivers/mfd/rn5t618.c >> +++ b/drivers/mfd/rn5t618.c >> @@ -103,9 +103,13 @@ static int rn5t618_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c, >> return ret; >> } >> >> - if (!pm_power_off) { >> - rn5t618_pm_power_off = priv; >> - pm_power_off = rn5t618_power_off; >> + if (of_device_is_system_power_controller(i2c->dev.of_node)) { >> + if (!pm_power_off) { >> + rn5t618_pm_power_off = priv; >> + pm_power_off = rn5t618_power_off; >> + } else { >> + dev_err(&i2c->dev, "Failed to set poweroff capability, already defined\n"); > > This is not an error. Please use dev_warn() instead. > Hm, I agree... FWIW, I copied the code (and that message) from here, where dev_err is probably also not appropriate: drivers/regulator/act8865-regulator.c > Also, is this message actually accurate? Your commit message would > indicate that it's not. Hm, maybe we should bail out with an error in that case since DT explicitly asks to be power controller... Is that what you mean? -- Stefan > >> + } >> } >> >> return 0;
On Sat, 18 Jun 2016, Stefan Agner wrote: > On 2016-06-16 07:59, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Tue, 07 Jun 2016, Stefan Agner wrote: > > > >> Only register power off if the PMIC is defined as system power > >> controller (see Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/ > >> power-controller.txt). > >> > >> Reviewed-by: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com> > >> Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch> > > > > These should be chronological. > > > > Has been discussed already here: > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-May/345835.html > > It's an artifact of my development process, I keep the commits in my > local branches without signed off lines and add them before sending out > patches. So whenever I prepare a new revision, collected acks, sobs are > chronological, but end up before my sob. > > But since you are the second maintainer which has objection to that > style I probably should change that... It would make your life easier in the long run. :) > >> --- > >> drivers/mfd/rn5t618.c | 10 +++++++--- > >> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/rn5t618.c b/drivers/mfd/rn5t618.c > >> index 7607ced..d9b4d40 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/mfd/rn5t618.c > >> +++ b/drivers/mfd/rn5t618.c > >> @@ -103,9 +103,13 @@ static int rn5t618_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c, > >> return ret; > >> } > >> > >> - if (!pm_power_off) { > >> - rn5t618_pm_power_off = priv; > >> - pm_power_off = rn5t618_power_off; > >> + if (of_device_is_system_power_controller(i2c->dev.of_node)) { > >> + if (!pm_power_off) { > >> + rn5t618_pm_power_off = priv; > >> + pm_power_off = rn5t618_power_off; > >> + } else { > >> + dev_err(&i2c->dev, "Failed to set poweroff capability, already defined\n"); > > > > This is not an error. Please use dev_warn() instead. > > > > Hm, I agree... FWIW, I copied the code (and that message) from here, > where dev_err is probably also not appropriate: > drivers/regulator/act8865-regulator.c Mark (Regulator maintainer) also accepts patches. > > Also, is this message actually accurate? Your commit message would > > indicate that it's not. > > Hm, maybe we should bail out with an error in that case since DT > explicitly asks to be power controller... Is that what you mean? I think I misunderstood the message. To fix this I would reword it. "Poweroff call-back already defined"
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/rn5t618.c b/drivers/mfd/rn5t618.c index 7607ced..d9b4d40 100644 --- a/drivers/mfd/rn5t618.c +++ b/drivers/mfd/rn5t618.c @@ -103,9 +103,13 @@ static int rn5t618_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c, return ret; } - if (!pm_power_off) { - rn5t618_pm_power_off = priv; - pm_power_off = rn5t618_power_off; + if (of_device_is_system_power_controller(i2c->dev.of_node)) { + if (!pm_power_off) { + rn5t618_pm_power_off = priv; + pm_power_off = rn5t618_power_off; + } else { + dev_err(&i2c->dev, "Failed to set poweroff capability, already defined\n"); + } } return 0;