| Message ID | 1467462728-14495-1-git-send-email-fdmanana@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 01:32:08PM +0100, fdmanana@kernel.org wrote: > From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> > > Test that an incremental send operation works after doing radical changes > in the directory hierarchy that involve switching the inode that directory > entries point to. > > This test exercises scenarios used to fail in btrfs and are fixed by the > following patches for the linux kernel: > > "Btrfs: send, fix failure to move directories with the same name around" > "Btrfs: incremental send, fix invalid paths for rename operations" > > Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> > --- > tests/btrfs/124 | 261 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > tests/btrfs/124.out | 2 + > tests/btrfs/group | 1 + > 3 files changed, 264 insertions(+) > create mode 100755 tests/btrfs/124 > create mode 100644 tests/btrfs/124.out > > diff --git a/tests/btrfs/124 b/tests/btrfs/124 > new file mode 100755 > index 0000000..38635a3 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/tests/btrfs/124 > @@ -0,0 +1,261 @@ > +#! /bin/bash > +# FS QA Test No. btrfs/124 > +# > +# Test that an incremental send operation works after doing radical changes > +# in the directory hierarchy that involve switching the inode that directory > +# entries point to. > +# > +#----------------------------------------------------------------------- > +# Copyright (C) 2016 SUSE Linux Products GmbH. All Rights Reserved. > +# Author: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> > +# > +# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or > +# modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as > +# published by the Free Software Foundation. > +# > +# This program is distributed in the hope that it would be useful, > +# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of > +# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the > +# GNU General Public License for more details. > +# > +# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License > +# along with this program; if not, write the Free Software Foundation, > +# Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA > +#----------------------------------------------------------------------- > +# > + > +seq=`basename $0` > +seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq > +echo "QA output created by $seq" > + > +tmp=/tmp/$$ > +status=1 # failure is the default! > +trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15 > + > +_cleanup() > +{ cd / to make it consistent with other _cleanup :) > + rm -fr $send_files_dir > + rm -f $tmp.* > +} > + > +# get standard environment, filters and checks > +. ./common/rc > +. ./common/filter > + > +# real QA test starts here > +_supported_fs btrfs > +_supported_os Linux > +_require_scratch > +_require_fssum > + > +send_files_dir=$TEST_DIR/btrfs-test-$seq These three tests all take use of $TEST_DIR, but don't _require_test, I think we need it in these tests. > + > +rm -f $seqres.full > +rm -fr $send_files_dir > +mkdir $send_files_dir > + > +_scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 > +_scratch_mount > + > +# case 1 > +mkdir -p $SCRATCH_MNT/case_1/d/p1 > +mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/case_1/p1 > + > +# case 2 > +mkdir -p $SCRATCH_MNT/case_2/a > +mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/case_2/d > +mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/case_2/e > +mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/case_2/f > +mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/case_2/ance > +mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/case_2/d/ance > +mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/case_2/a/c > +mv $SCRATCH_MNT/case_2/e $SCRATCH_MNT/case_2/d/ance > +mv $SCRATCH_MNT/case_2/f $SCRATCH_MNT/case_2/d/ance > +mv $SCRATCH_MNT/case_2/ance $SCRATCH_MNT/case_2/d/ance > + > +# case 3 > +mkdir -p $SCRATCH_MNT/case_3/d > +mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/case_3/a > +mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/case_3/waiting_dir > +mkdir -p $SCRATCH_MNT/case_3/pre/ance > +mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/case_3/d/ance > +mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/case_3/a/c > +mv $SCRATCH_MNT/case_3/waiting_dir $SCRATCH_MNT/case_3/d/ance > + > +# case 4 > +mkdir -p $SCRATCH_MNT/case_4/tmp > +mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/case_4/below_ance > +mkdir -p $SCRATCH_MNT/case_4/pre/wait_dir > +mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/case_4/desc > +mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/case_4/ance > +mv $SCRATCH_MNT/case_4/below_ance $SCRATCH_MNT/case_4/ance > +mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/case_4/other_dir > + > +# Filesystem looks like: > +# > +# . (ino 256) > +# |--- case_1/ (ino 257) > +# | |---- d/ (ino 258) > +# | | |--- p1/ (ino 259) > +# | | > +# | |---- p1/ (ino 260) > +# | > +# |--- case_2/ (ino 261) > +# | |---- a/ (ino 262) > +# | | |---- c/ (ino 268) > +# | | > +# | |---- d/ (ino 263) > +# | |---- ance/ (ino 267) > +# | |---- e/ (ino 264) > +# | |---- f/ (ino 265) > +# | |---- ance/ (ino 266) > +# | > +# |--- case_3/ (ino 269) > +# | |---- a/ (ino 271) > +# | | |---- c/ (ino 276) > +# | | > +# | |---- d/ (ino 270) > +# | | |---- ance/ (ino 275) > +# | | |---- waiting_dir/ (ino 272) > +# | | > +# | |---- pre/ (ino 273) > +# | |---- ance/ (ino 274) > +# | > +# |--- case_4/ (ino 277) > +# |---- tmp/ (ino 278) > +# |---- pre/ (ino 280) > +# | |---- wait_dir/ (ino 281) > +# | > +# |---- desc/ (ino 282) > +# |---- ance/ (ino 283) > +# | |---- below_ance/ (ino 279) > +# | > +# |---- other_dir/ (ino 284) > +# > +_run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 Please avoid using _run_btrfs_util_prog and run_check, as Dave explained before (and I summarized them in this email http://www.spinics.net/lists/fstests/msg03311.html :-) So just dump the output and do necessary filters to match golden image. I think this also makes it easier to know what's failing, the diff output shows it directly, there's no need to check $seqres.full again. And this test failed due to memory allocation, is this expected? At subvol /mnt/testarea/scratch/mysnap2 ERROR: send ioctl failed with -12: Cannot allocate memory failed: '/usr/bin/btrfs send -p /mnt/testarea/scratch/mysnap1 /mnt/testarea/scratch/mysnap2 -f /mnt/testarea/test/btrfs-test-127/2.snap' I'm using btrfs-progs v4.6 Otherwise these three tests look good to me. Thanks, Eryu -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 4:58 AM, Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com> wrote: > On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 01:32:08PM +0100, fdmanana@kernel.org wrote: >> From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> >> >> Test that an incremental send operation works after doing radical changes >> in the directory hierarchy that involve switching the inode that directory >> entries point to. >> >> This test exercises scenarios used to fail in btrfs and are fixed by the >> following patches for the linux kernel: >> >> "Btrfs: send, fix failure to move directories with the same name around" >> "Btrfs: incremental send, fix invalid paths for rename operations" >> >> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> >> --- >> tests/btrfs/124 | 261 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> tests/btrfs/124.out | 2 + >> tests/btrfs/group | 1 + >> 3 files changed, 264 insertions(+) >> create mode 100755 tests/btrfs/124 >> create mode 100644 tests/btrfs/124.out >> >> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/124 b/tests/btrfs/124 >> new file mode 100755 >> index 0000000..38635a3 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/tests/btrfs/124 >> @@ -0,0 +1,261 @@ >> +#! /bin/bash >> +# FS QA Test No. btrfs/124 >> +# >> +# Test that an incremental send operation works after doing radical changes >> +# in the directory hierarchy that involve switching the inode that directory >> +# entries point to. >> +# >> +#----------------------------------------------------------------------- >> +# Copyright (C) 2016 SUSE Linux Products GmbH. All Rights Reserved. >> +# Author: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> >> +# >> +# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or >> +# modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as >> +# published by the Free Software Foundation. >> +# >> +# This program is distributed in the hope that it would be useful, >> +# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of >> +# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the >> +# GNU General Public License for more details. >> +# >> +# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License >> +# along with this program; if not, write the Free Software Foundation, >> +# Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA >> +#----------------------------------------------------------------------- >> +# >> + >> +seq=`basename $0` >> +seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq >> +echo "QA output created by $seq" >> + >> +tmp=/tmp/$$ >> +status=1 # failure is the default! >> +trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15 >> + >> +_cleanup() >> +{ > cd / > to make it consistent with other _cleanup :) > >> + rm -fr $send_files_dir >> + rm -f $tmp.* >> +} >> + >> +# get standard environment, filters and checks >> +. ./common/rc >> +. ./common/filter >> + >> +# real QA test starts here >> +_supported_fs btrfs >> +_supported_os Linux >> +_require_scratch >> +_require_fssum >> + >> +send_files_dir=$TEST_DIR/btrfs-test-$seq > > These three tests all take use of $TEST_DIR, but don't _require_test, I > think we need it in these tests. > >> + >> +rm -f $seqres.full >> +rm -fr $send_files_dir >> +mkdir $send_files_dir >> + >> +_scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 >> +_scratch_mount >> + >> +# case 1 >> +mkdir -p $SCRATCH_MNT/case_1/d/p1 >> +mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/case_1/p1 >> + >> +# case 2 >> +mkdir -p $SCRATCH_MNT/case_2/a >> +mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/case_2/d >> +mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/case_2/e >> +mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/case_2/f >> +mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/case_2/ance >> +mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/case_2/d/ance >> +mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/case_2/a/c >> +mv $SCRATCH_MNT/case_2/e $SCRATCH_MNT/case_2/d/ance >> +mv $SCRATCH_MNT/case_2/f $SCRATCH_MNT/case_2/d/ance >> +mv $SCRATCH_MNT/case_2/ance $SCRATCH_MNT/case_2/d/ance >> + >> +# case 3 >> +mkdir -p $SCRATCH_MNT/case_3/d >> +mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/case_3/a >> +mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/case_3/waiting_dir >> +mkdir -p $SCRATCH_MNT/case_3/pre/ance >> +mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/case_3/d/ance >> +mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/case_3/a/c >> +mv $SCRATCH_MNT/case_3/waiting_dir $SCRATCH_MNT/case_3/d/ance >> + >> +# case 4 >> +mkdir -p $SCRATCH_MNT/case_4/tmp >> +mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/case_4/below_ance >> +mkdir -p $SCRATCH_MNT/case_4/pre/wait_dir >> +mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/case_4/desc >> +mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/case_4/ance >> +mv $SCRATCH_MNT/case_4/below_ance $SCRATCH_MNT/case_4/ance >> +mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/case_4/other_dir >> + >> +# Filesystem looks like: >> +# >> +# . (ino 256) >> +# |--- case_1/ (ino 257) >> +# | |---- d/ (ino 258) >> +# | | |--- p1/ (ino 259) >> +# | | >> +# | |---- p1/ (ino 260) >> +# | >> +# |--- case_2/ (ino 261) >> +# | |---- a/ (ino 262) >> +# | | |---- c/ (ino 268) >> +# | | >> +# | |---- d/ (ino 263) >> +# | |---- ance/ (ino 267) >> +# | |---- e/ (ino 264) >> +# | |---- f/ (ino 265) >> +# | |---- ance/ (ino 266) >> +# | >> +# |--- case_3/ (ino 269) >> +# | |---- a/ (ino 271) >> +# | | |---- c/ (ino 276) >> +# | | >> +# | |---- d/ (ino 270) >> +# | | |---- ance/ (ino 275) >> +# | | |---- waiting_dir/ (ino 272) >> +# | | >> +# | |---- pre/ (ino 273) >> +# | |---- ance/ (ino 274) >> +# | >> +# |--- case_4/ (ino 277) >> +# |---- tmp/ (ino 278) >> +# |---- pre/ (ino 280) >> +# | |---- wait_dir/ (ino 281) >> +# | >> +# |---- desc/ (ino 282) >> +# |---- ance/ (ino 283) >> +# | |---- below_ance/ (ino 279) >> +# | >> +# |---- other_dir/ (ino 284) >> +# >> +_run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 > > Please avoid using _run_btrfs_util_prog and run_check, as Dave explained > before (and I summarized them in this email > http://www.spinics.net/lists/fstests/msg03311.html :-) Yeah, I know that. But for snapshot creation we always do it like that or, like in some older tests something like: $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvolume snapshot $1 $SNAPNAME > /dev/null || _fail "snapshot create failed" That's because the output of the snapshot command in the tools has changed many times in the past (and sometimes radically). > > So just dump the output and do necessary filters to match golden image. > I think this also makes it easier to know what's failing, the diff > output shows it directly, there's no need to check $seqres.full again. > > And this test failed due to memory allocation, is this expected? Yes. Infinite path build loops keep allocating memory in each iteration, that's why you get enomem. > > At subvol /mnt/testarea/scratch/mysnap2 > ERROR: send ioctl failed with -12: Cannot allocate memory > failed: '/usr/bin/btrfs send -p /mnt/testarea/scratch/mysnap1 /mnt/testarea/scratch/mysnap2 -f /mnt/testarea/test/btrfs-test-127/2.snap' > > I'm using btrfs-progs v4.6 Doesn't matter, it's exclusively a kernel side issue. > > Otherwise these three tests look good to me. thanks > > Thanks, > Eryu -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/tests/btrfs/124 b/tests/btrfs/124 new file mode 100755 index 0000000..38635a3 --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/btrfs/124 @@ -0,0 +1,261 @@ +#! /bin/bash +# FS QA Test No. btrfs/124 +# +# Test that an incremental send operation works after doing radical changes +# in the directory hierarchy that involve switching the inode that directory +# entries point to. +# +#----------------------------------------------------------------------- +# Copyright (C) 2016 SUSE Linux Products GmbH. All Rights Reserved. +# Author: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> +# +# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or +# modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as +# published by the Free Software Foundation. +# +# This program is distributed in the hope that it would be useful, +# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of +# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the +# GNU General Public License for more details. +# +# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License +# along with this program; if not, write the Free Software Foundation, +# Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA +#----------------------------------------------------------------------- +# + +seq=`basename $0` +seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq +echo "QA output created by $seq" + +tmp=/tmp/$$ +status=1 # failure is the default! +trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15 + +_cleanup() +{ + rm -fr $send_files_dir + rm -f $tmp.* +} + +# get standard environment, filters and checks +. ./common/rc +. ./common/filter + +# real QA test starts here +_supported_fs btrfs +_supported_os Linux +_require_scratch +_require_fssum + +send_files_dir=$TEST_DIR/btrfs-test-$seq + +rm -f $seqres.full +rm -fr $send_files_dir +mkdir $send_files_dir + +_scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 +_scratch_mount + +# case 1 +mkdir -p $SCRATCH_MNT/case_1/d/p1 +mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/case_1/p1 + +# case 2 +mkdir -p $SCRATCH_MNT/case_2/a +mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/case_2/d +mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/case_2/e +mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/case_2/f +mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/case_2/ance +mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/case_2/d/ance +mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/case_2/a/c +mv $SCRATCH_MNT/case_2/e $SCRATCH_MNT/case_2/d/ance +mv $SCRATCH_MNT/case_2/f $SCRATCH_MNT/case_2/d/ance +mv $SCRATCH_MNT/case_2/ance $SCRATCH_MNT/case_2/d/ance + +# case 3 +mkdir -p $SCRATCH_MNT/case_3/d +mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/case_3/a +mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/case_3/waiting_dir +mkdir -p $SCRATCH_MNT/case_3/pre/ance +mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/case_3/d/ance +mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/case_3/a/c +mv $SCRATCH_MNT/case_3/waiting_dir $SCRATCH_MNT/case_3/d/ance + +# case 4 +mkdir -p $SCRATCH_MNT/case_4/tmp +mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/case_4/below_ance +mkdir -p $SCRATCH_MNT/case_4/pre/wait_dir +mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/case_4/desc +mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/case_4/ance +mv $SCRATCH_MNT/case_4/below_ance $SCRATCH_MNT/case_4/ance +mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/case_4/other_dir + +# Filesystem looks like: +# +# . (ino 256) +# |--- case_1/ (ino 257) +# | |---- d/ (ino 258) +# | | |--- p1/ (ino 259) +# | | +# | |---- p1/ (ino 260) +# | +# |--- case_2/ (ino 261) +# | |---- a/ (ino 262) +# | | |---- c/ (ino 268) +# | | +# | |---- d/ (ino 263) +# | |---- ance/ (ino 267) +# | |---- e/ (ino 264) +# | |---- f/ (ino 265) +# | |---- ance/ (ino 266) +# | +# |--- case_3/ (ino 269) +# | |---- a/ (ino 271) +# | | |---- c/ (ino 276) +# | | +# | |---- d/ (ino 270) +# | | |---- ance/ (ino 275) +# | | |---- waiting_dir/ (ino 272) +# | | +# | |---- pre/ (ino 273) +# | |---- ance/ (ino 274) +# | +# |--- case_4/ (ino 277) +# |---- tmp/ (ino 278) +# |---- pre/ (ino 280) +# | |---- wait_dir/ (ino 281) +# | +# |---- desc/ (ino 282) +# |---- ance/ (ino 283) +# | |---- below_ance/ (ino 279) +# | +# |---- other_dir/ (ino 284) +# +_run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 + +# case 1 +# +# The directory named "d" (inode 257) has in both snapshots an entry with the +# name "p1" but it refers to different inodes in both snapshots (inode 258 in +# the parent snapshot and inode 259 in the send snapshot). When attempting to +# move inode 258, the operation is delayed because its new parent, inode 259, +# was not yet moved/renamed (as the stream is currently processing inode 258). +# Later on when processing inode 259, btrfs' send also ended up delaying the +# move/rename operation for this inode, so that it would happen after inode 258 +# was processed, creating a circular dependency that resulted in the send stream +# terminating without issuing a rename operations for the inodes 258 and 259. +# +mv $SCRATCH_MNT/case_1/d/p1 $SCRATCH_MNT/case_1/p1 +mv $SCRATCH_MNT/case_1/p1 $SCRATCH_MNT/case_1/d + +# case 2 +# +# When the inode 265 is processed, the path for inode 267 is computed, which at +# that time corresponds to "case_2/d/ance", and it was stored in the name cache +# (to avoid recomputing it again later when needed). +# Later on when processing inode 266, btrfs' send end up orphanizing (renaming +# to a name matching the pattern o<ino>-<gen>-<seq>) inode 267 because it has +# the same name as inode 266 and at that time it's a child of the new parent +# directory (inode 263) for inode 266. After the orphanization and while still +# processing inode 266, a rename operation for inode 266 was generated. However +# the source path for that rename operation was incorrect because it ended up +# using the old, pre-orphanization, name of inode 267. +# +mv $SCRATCH_MNT/case_2/a/c $SCRATCH_MNT/case_2 +mv $SCRATCH_MNT/case_2/d/ance $SCRATCH_MNT/case_2/c +mv $SCRATCH_MNT/case_2/c/ance/ance $SCRATCH_MNT/case_2/d +mv $SCRATCH_MNT/case_2/c/ance/f $SCRATCH_MNT/case_2 +mv $SCRATCH_MNT/case_2/c/ance/e $SCRATCH_MNT/case_2/f + +# case 3 +# +# This is similar to cases 1 and 2, but adding more complexity just to exercise +# btrfs' incremental send correctness. +# +mv $SCRATCH_MNT/case_3/d/ance $SCRATCH_MNT/case_3/a +mv $SCRATCH_MNT/case_3/a/c $SCRATCH_MNT/case_3 +mv $SCRATCH_MNT/case_3/a/ance/waiting_dir $SCRATCH_MNT/case_3/c +mv $SCRATCH_MNT/case_3/pre/ance $SCRATCH_MNT/case_3/d +mv $SCRATCH_MNT/case_3/pre $SCRATCH_MNT/case_3/c/waiting_dir + +# case 4 +# +# When attempting to rename inode 283, the incremental send stream included an +# invalid destination path for the rename command. This was due to a missing +# path loop detection in the send code that made the rename of inode 283 happen +# without waiting for the rename of inode 284 to happen first (since it's an +# ancestor in the send snapshot that is beyond the current progress and it was +# also renamed/moved). +# +mv $SCRATCH_MNT/case_4/other_dir $SCRATCH_MNT/case_4/tmp +mv $SCRATCH_MNT/case_4/ance/below_ance $SCRATCH_MNT/case_4/tmp/other_dir +mv $SCRATCH_MNT/case_4/pre/wait_dir $SCRATCH_MNT/case_4/tmp/other_dir +mv $SCRATCH_MNT/case_4/pre $SCRATCH_MNT/case_4/tmp/other_dir/below_ance +mv $SCRATCH_MNT/case_4/desc $SCRATCH_MNT/case_4/tmp/other_dir/wait_dir +mv $SCRATCH_MNT/case_4/ance $SCRATCH_MNT/case_4/tmp/other_dir/wait_dir/desc + +# Filesystem now looks like: +# +# . (ino 256) +# |--- case_1/ (ino 257) +# | |--- d/ (ino 258) +# | |--- p1/ (ino 260) +# | |--- p1/ (ino 259) +# | +# |--- case_2/ (ino 261) +# | |---- a/ (ino 262) +# | |---- c/ (ino 268) +# | | |---- ance/ (ino 267) +# | | +# | |---- d/ (ino 263) +# | | |---- ance/ (ino 266) +# | | +# | |---- f/ (ino 265) +# | |---- e/ (ino 264) +# | +# |--- case_3/ (ino 269) +# | |---- a/ (ino 271) +# | | |---- ance/ (ino 275) +# | | +# | |---- c/ (ino 276) +# | | |---- waiting_dir/ (ino 272) +# | | |---- pre/ (ino 273) +# | | +# | |---- d/ (ino 270) +# | |---- ance/ (ino 274) +# | +# |--- case_4/ (ino 277) +# |---- tmp/ (ino 278) +# |---- other_dir/ (ino 284) +# |---- below_ance/ (ino 279) +# | |---- pre/ (ino 280) +# | +# |---- wait_dir/ (ino 281) +# |---- desc/ (ino 282) +# |---- ance/ (ino 283) +# +_run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2 + +run_check $FSSUM_PROG -A -f -w $send_files_dir/1.fssum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 +run_check $FSSUM_PROG -A -f -w $send_files_dir/2.fssum \ + -x $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2/mysnap1 $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2 + +_run_btrfs_util_prog send $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 -f $send_files_dir/1.snap +_run_btrfs_util_prog send -p $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2 \ + -f $send_files_dir/2.snap + +# Now recreate the filesystem by receiving both send streams and verify we get +# the same content that the original filesystem had. +_scratch_unmount +_scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 +_scratch_mount + +_run_btrfs_util_prog receive $SCRATCH_MNT -f $send_files_dir/1.snap +run_check $FSSUM_PROG -r $send_files_dir/1.fssum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 +_run_btrfs_util_prog receive $SCRATCH_MNT -f $send_files_dir/2.snap +run_check $FSSUM_PROG -r $send_files_dir/2.fssum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2 + +echo "Silence is golden" +status=0 +exit diff --git a/tests/btrfs/124.out b/tests/btrfs/124.out new file mode 100644 index 0000000..d7339e6 --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/btrfs/124.out @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ +QA output created by 124 +Silence is golden diff --git a/tests/btrfs/group b/tests/btrfs/group index 5a26ed7..19f4688 100644 --- a/tests/btrfs/group +++ b/tests/btrfs/group @@ -126,3 +126,4 @@ 121 auto quick snapshot qgroup 122 auto quick snapshot qgroup 123 auto quick qgroup +124 auto quick send