| Message ID | 1470480524-6851-6-git-send-email-ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Saturday 06 August 2016 04:18 PM, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote: > No need to check const slave num in runtime for every packet, > and ndev for slaves w/o ndev is anyway NULL. So remove redundant > check. > > Signed-off-by: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm@ti.com> Regards Mugunthan V N -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 08/06/2016 01:48 PM, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote: > No need to check const slave num in runtime for every packet, > and ndev for slaves w/o ndev is anyway NULL. So remove redundant > check. > > Signed-off-by: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org> > --- > drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c > index 70a9570..19aa4bb 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c > @@ -498,8 +498,7 @@ static const struct cpsw_stats cpsw_gstrings_stats[] = { > (func)(slave++, ##arg); \ > } while (0) > #define cpsw_get_slave_ndev(priv, __slave_no__) \ > - ((__slave_no__ < priv->data.slaves) ? \ > - priv->slaves[__slave_no__].ndev : NULL) > + priv->slaves[__slave_no__].ndev So after this change it will be #define cpsw_get_slave_ndev(priv, __slave_no__) priv->slaves[__slave_no__].ndev Can we just drop cpsw_get_slave_ndev() macro? > #define cpsw_get_slave_priv(priv, __slave_no__) \ > (((__slave_no__ < priv->data.slaves) && \ > (priv->slaves[__slave_no__].ndev)) ? \ >
On 09.08.16 14:34, Grygorii Strashko wrote: > On 08/06/2016 01:48 PM, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote: >> No need to check const slave num in runtime for every packet, >> and ndev for slaves w/o ndev is anyway NULL. So remove redundant >> check. >> >> Signed-off-by: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org> >> --- >> drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c | 3 +-- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c >> index 70a9570..19aa4bb 100644 >> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c >> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c >> @@ -498,8 +498,7 @@ static const struct cpsw_stats cpsw_gstrings_stats[] = { >> (func)(slave++, ##arg); \ >> } while (0) >> #define cpsw_get_slave_ndev(priv, __slave_no__) \ >> - ((__slave_no__ < priv->data.slaves) ? \ >> - priv->slaves[__slave_no__].ndev : NULL) >> + priv->slaves[__slave_no__].ndev > > So after this change it will be > #define cpsw_get_slave_ndev(priv, __slave_no__) priv->slaves[__slave_no__].ndev > > Can we just drop cpsw_get_slave_ndev() macro? Sure. Will drop it in v3. > >> #define cpsw_get_slave_priv(priv, __slave_no__) \ >> (((__slave_no__ < priv->data.slaves) && \ >> (priv->slaves[__slave_no__].ndev)) ? \ >> > >
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c index 70a9570..19aa4bb 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c @@ -498,8 +498,7 @@ static const struct cpsw_stats cpsw_gstrings_stats[] = { (func)(slave++, ##arg); \ } while (0) #define cpsw_get_slave_ndev(priv, __slave_no__) \ - ((__slave_no__ < priv->data.slaves) ? \ - priv->slaves[__slave_no__].ndev : NULL) + priv->slaves[__slave_no__].ndev #define cpsw_get_slave_priv(priv, __slave_no__) \ (((__slave_no__ < priv->data.slaves) && \ (priv->slaves[__slave_no__].ndev)) ? \
No need to check const slave num in runtime for every packet, and ndev for slaves w/o ndev is anyway NULL. So remove redundant check. Signed-off-by: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org> --- drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)