diff mbox

[v6,3/8] arm, dts: add TC2 cpu capacity-dmips-mhz information

Message ID 1468932048-31635-4-git-send-email-juri.lelli@arm.com (mailing list archive)
State Not Applicable, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Juri Lelli July 19, 2016, 12:40 p.m. UTC
Add TC2 cpu capacity binding information.

Cc: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>
Cc: Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
---

Changes from v1:
  - capacity-scale removed

Changes from v4:
  - binding changed to capacity-dmips-mhz
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/vexpress-v2p-ca15_a7.dts | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

Comments

Sudeep Holla Aug. 10, 2016, 3:33 p.m. UTC | #1
Hi Juri,

On 19/07/16 13:40, Juri Lelli wrote:
> Add TC2 cpu capacity binding information.
>

If you repost it,

s/binding//

> Cc: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>
> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>

Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
(assuming you take it via some other tree, let us know if it's
  OK to merge the DTS separately and you want us to pick them)
Juri Lelli Aug. 10, 2016, 3:43 p.m. UTC | #2
Hi,

On 10/08/16 16:33, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> Hi Juri,
> 
> On 19/07/16 13:40, Juri Lelli wrote:
> >Add TC2 cpu capacity binding information.
> >
> 
> If you repost it,
> 
> s/binding//
> 

Yes, I think I'll need to repost, squashing the arm64 fix in the
appropriate patch. Thanks.

> >Cc: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>
> >Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>

Thanks!

> (assuming you take it via some other tree, let us know if it's
>  OK to merge the DTS separately and you want us to pick them)
> 

As per off-line discussion with Russell, binding doc and arm bits should
go via his patch system. While arm64 bits could go separately via aarch64.

Does this make sense?

Best,

- Juri
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Sudeep Holla Aug. 10, 2016, 3:52 p.m. UTC | #3
On 10/08/16 16:43, Juri Lelli wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10/08/16 16:33, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>> Hi Juri,
>>
>> On 19/07/16 13:40, Juri Lelli wrote:
>>> Add TC2 cpu capacity binding information.
>>>
>>
>> If you repost it,
>>
>> s/binding//
>>
>
> Yes, I think I'll need to repost, squashing the arm64 fix in the
> appropriate patch. Thanks.
>
>>> Cc: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>
>>> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
>>
>> Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
>
> Thanks!
>
>> (assuming you take it via some other tree, let us know if it's
>>  OK to merge the DTS separately and you want us to pick them)
>>
>
> As per off-line discussion with Russell, binding doc and arm bits should
> go via his patch system. While arm64 bits could go separately via aarch64.
>
> Does this make sense?

Yes, we can pick up the juno and tc2 dts changes and send it via
arm-soc. I have already acked them, so you can take it via other tree if
required.
Juri Lelli Aug. 10, 2016, 4:06 p.m. UTC | #4
On 10/08/16 16:52, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> 
> 
> On 10/08/16 16:43, Juri Lelli wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >On 10/08/16 16:33, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> >>Hi Juri,
> >>
> >>On 19/07/16 13:40, Juri Lelli wrote:
> >>>Add TC2 cpu capacity binding information.
> >>>
> >>
> >>If you repost it,
> >>
> >>s/binding//
> >>
> >
> >Yes, I think I'll need to repost, squashing the arm64 fix in the
> >appropriate patch. Thanks.
> >
> >>>Cc: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>
> >>>Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> >>
> >>Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> >
> >Thanks!
> >
> >>(assuming you take it via some other tree, let us know if it's
> >> OK to merge the DTS separately and you want us to pick them)
> >>
> >
> >As per off-line discussion with Russell, binding doc and arm bits should
> >go via his patch system. While arm64 bits could go separately via aarch64.
> >
> >Does this make sense?
> 
> Yes, we can pick up the juno and tc2 dts changes and send it via
> arm-soc.

If this works better for you it is fine by me! I'll only use Russell's
system for docs and arm parsing/sysfs implementation then.

Thanks,

- Juri
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/vexpress-v2p-ca15_a7.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/vexpress-v2p-ca15_a7.dts
index 0205c97efdef..45d08cc37b01 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/vexpress-v2p-ca15_a7.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/vexpress-v2p-ca15_a7.dts
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ 
 			reg = <0>;
 			cci-control-port = <&cci_control1>;
 			cpu-idle-states = <&CLUSTER_SLEEP_BIG>;
+			capacity-dmips-mhz = <1024>;
 		};
 
 		cpu1: cpu@1 {
@@ -47,6 +48,7 @@ 
 			reg = <1>;
 			cci-control-port = <&cci_control1>;
 			cpu-idle-states = <&CLUSTER_SLEEP_BIG>;
+			capacity-dmips-mhz = <1024>;
 		};
 
 		cpu2: cpu@2 {
@@ -55,6 +57,7 @@ 
 			reg = <0x100>;
 			cci-control-port = <&cci_control2>;
 			cpu-idle-states = <&CLUSTER_SLEEP_LITTLE>;
+			capacity-dmips-mhz = <516>;
 		};
 
 		cpu3: cpu@3 {
@@ -63,6 +66,7 @@ 
 			reg = <0x101>;
 			cci-control-port = <&cci_control2>;
 			cpu-idle-states = <&CLUSTER_SLEEP_LITTLE>;
+			capacity-dmips-mhz = <516>;
 		};
 
 		cpu4: cpu@4 {
@@ -71,6 +75,7 @@ 
 			reg = <0x102>;
 			cci-control-port = <&cci_control2>;
 			cpu-idle-states = <&CLUSTER_SLEEP_LITTLE>;
+			capacity-dmips-mhz = <516>;
 		};
 
 		idle-states {