diff mbox

[3/3] igt/kms_flip: Use new igt_spin_batch

Message ID 20161028154726.17512-4-abdiel.janulgue@linux.intel.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Abdiel Janulgue Oct. 28, 2016, 3:47 p.m. UTC
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@linux.intel.com>
---
 tests/kms_flip.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Ville Syrjälä Oct. 28, 2016, 4:02 p.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 06:47:26PM +0300, Abdiel Janulgue wrote:
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> Signed-off-by: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  tests/kms_flip.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/kms_flip.c b/tests/kms_flip.c
> index 9829b35..13cb262 100644
> --- a/tests/kms_flip.c
> +++ b/tests/kms_flip.c
> @@ -866,10 +866,10 @@ static unsigned int run_test_step(struct test_output *o)
>  		o->current_fb_id = !o->current_fb_id;
>  
>  	if (o->flags & TEST_WITH_DUMMY_BCS)
> -		emit_dummy_load__bcs(o, 1);
> +		igt_spin_batch_wait(drm_fd, 1, I915_EXEC_BLT);
>  
>  	if (o->flags & TEST_WITH_DUMMY_RCS)
> -		emit_dummy_load__rcs(o, 1);
> +		igt_spin_batch_wait(drm_fd, 1, I915_EXEC_RENDER);

NAK That's not going to add the required dependency between the load
and the bo used by the test.
>  
>  	if (o->flags & TEST_FB_RECREATE)
>  		recreate_fb(o);
> -- 
> 2.7.0
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Abdiel Janulgue Oct. 31, 2016, 6:43 a.m. UTC | #2
On 10/28/2016 07:02 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 06:47:26PM +0300, Abdiel Janulgue wrote:
>> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
>> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
>> Signed-off-by: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>>  tests/kms_flip.c | 4 ++--
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/kms_flip.c b/tests/kms_flip.c
>> index 9829b35..13cb262 100644
>> --- a/tests/kms_flip.c
>> +++ b/tests/kms_flip.c
>> @@ -866,10 +866,10 @@ static unsigned int run_test_step(struct test_output *o)
>>  		o->current_fb_id = !o->current_fb_id;
>>  
>>  	if (o->flags & TEST_WITH_DUMMY_BCS)
>> -		emit_dummy_load__bcs(o, 1);
>> +		igt_spin_batch_wait(drm_fd, 1, I915_EXEC_BLT);
>>  
>>  	if (o->flags & TEST_WITH_DUMMY_RCS)
>> -		emit_dummy_load__rcs(o, 1);
>> +		igt_spin_batch_wait(drm_fd, 1, I915_EXEC_RENDER);
> 
> NAK That's not going to add the required dependency between the load
> and the bo used by the test.

Right. For these cases would it be more straightforward to stick to the
auto-tuned rendercopy/blit load operations on the bo instead of
inserting a recursive batch on these situations? Any ideas?

>>  
>>  	if (o->flags & TEST_FB_RECREATE)
>>  		recreate_fb(o);
>> -- 
>> 2.7.0
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Intel-gfx mailing list
>> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/tests/kms_flip.c b/tests/kms_flip.c
index 9829b35..13cb262 100644
--- a/tests/kms_flip.c
+++ b/tests/kms_flip.c
@@ -866,10 +866,10 @@  static unsigned int run_test_step(struct test_output *o)
 		o->current_fb_id = !o->current_fb_id;
 
 	if (o->flags & TEST_WITH_DUMMY_BCS)
-		emit_dummy_load__bcs(o, 1);
+		igt_spin_batch_wait(drm_fd, 1, I915_EXEC_BLT);
 
 	if (o->flags & TEST_WITH_DUMMY_RCS)
-		emit_dummy_load__rcs(o, 1);
+		igt_spin_batch_wait(drm_fd, 1, I915_EXEC_RENDER);
 
 	if (o->flags & TEST_FB_RECREATE)
 		recreate_fb(o);