Message ID | 1480693134-31324-4-git-send-email-bgolaszewski@baylibre.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Good to see you again Bartosz :) On 02-12-16, 16:38, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > This function is broken - its second argument is an index to the freq > table, not the requested clock rate in Hz. It leads to an oops when > called from clk_set_rate() since this argument isn't bounds checked > either. > > Fix it by iterating over the array of supported frequencies and > selecting a one that matches or returning -EINVAL for unsupported > rates. > > Also: update the davinci cpufreq driver. It's the only user of this > clock and currently it passes the cpufreq table index to > clk_set_rate(), which is confusing. Make it pass the requested clock > rate in Hz. > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> > --- > arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++---- > drivers/cpufreq/davinci-cpufreq.c | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c > index a55101c..92e3303 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c > @@ -1179,14 +1179,28 @@ static int da850_set_armrate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long index) > return clk_set_rate(pllclk, index); > } > > -static int da850_set_pll0rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long index) > +static int da850_set_pll0rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate) > { > - unsigned int prediv, mult, postdiv; > - struct da850_opp *opp; > struct pll_data *pll = clk->pll_data; > + struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq; > + unsigned int prediv, mult, postdiv; > + struct da850_opp *opp = NULL; > int ret; > > - opp = (struct da850_opp *) cpufreq_info.freq_table[index].driver_data; > + for (freq = da850_freq_table; > + freq->frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END; freq++) { > + /* requested_rate is in Hz, freq->frequency is in KHz */ > + unsigned long freq_rate = freq->frequency * 1000; > + > + if (freq_rate == rate) { > + opp = (struct da850_opp *)freq->driver_data; > + break; > + } > + } > + > + if (opp == NULL) > + return -EINVAL; > + > prediv = opp->prediv; > mult = opp->mult; > postdiv = opp->postdiv; > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/davinci-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/davinci-cpufreq.c > index b95a872..d54a27c 100644 > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/davinci-cpufreq.c > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/davinci-cpufreq.c > @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ static int davinci_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int idx) > return ret; > } > > - ret = clk_set_rate(armclk, idx); > + ret = clk_set_rate(armclk, new_freq * 1000); > if (ret) > return ret; I haven't checked the internal of davinci or the way rate is changed now, but from cpufreq's perspective, fee free to add my: Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
On Friday 02 December 2016 09:08 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > This function is broken - its second argument is an index to the freq > table, not the requested clock rate in Hz. It leads to an oops when > called from clk_set_rate() since this argument isn't bounds checked > either. > > Fix it by iterating over the array of supported frequencies and > selecting a one that matches or returning -EINVAL for unsupported > rates. > > Also: update the davinci cpufreq driver. It's the only user of this > clock and currently it passes the cpufreq table index to > clk_set_rate(), which is confusing. Make it pass the requested clock > rate in Hz. > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> > --- > arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++---- > drivers/cpufreq/davinci-cpufreq.c | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c > index a55101c..92e3303 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c > @@ -1179,14 +1179,28 @@ static int da850_set_armrate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long index) > return clk_set_rate(pllclk, index); > } > > -static int da850_set_pll0rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long index) > +static int da850_set_pll0rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate) > { > - unsigned int prediv, mult, postdiv; > - struct da850_opp *opp; > struct pll_data *pll = clk->pll_data; > + struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq; > + unsigned int prediv, mult, postdiv; > + struct da850_opp *opp = NULL; > int ret; > > - opp = (struct da850_opp *) cpufreq_info.freq_table[index].driver_data; > + for (freq = da850_freq_table; > + freq->frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END; freq++) { > + /* requested_rate is in Hz, freq->frequency is in KHz */ > + unsigned long freq_rate = freq->frequency * 1000; A small optimization here. Instead of multiplying potentially every frequency in the table by 1000, you could divide the incoming rate down to KHz. This will also avoid the need for 'freq_rate'. Should have noticed this earlier. Sorry about that. Thanks, Sekhar
2016-12-05 9:45 GMT+01:00 Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>: > On Friday 02 December 2016 09:08 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: >> This function is broken - its second argument is an index to the freq >> table, not the requested clock rate in Hz. It leads to an oops when >> called from clk_set_rate() since this argument isn't bounds checked >> either. >> >> Fix it by iterating over the array of supported frequencies and >> selecting a one that matches or returning -EINVAL for unsupported >> rates. >> >> Also: update the davinci cpufreq driver. It's the only user of this >> clock and currently it passes the cpufreq table index to >> clk_set_rate(), which is confusing. Make it pass the requested clock >> rate in Hz. >> >> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> >> --- >> arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++---- >> drivers/cpufreq/davinci-cpufreq.c | 2 +- >> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c >> index a55101c..92e3303 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c >> @@ -1179,14 +1179,28 @@ static int da850_set_armrate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long index) >> return clk_set_rate(pllclk, index); >> } >> >> -static int da850_set_pll0rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long index) >> +static int da850_set_pll0rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate) >> { >> - unsigned int prediv, mult, postdiv; >> - struct da850_opp *opp; >> struct pll_data *pll = clk->pll_data; >> + struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq; >> + unsigned int prediv, mult, postdiv; >> + struct da850_opp *opp = NULL; >> int ret; >> >> - opp = (struct da850_opp *) cpufreq_info.freq_table[index].driver_data; >> + for (freq = da850_freq_table; >> + freq->frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END; freq++) { >> + /* requested_rate is in Hz, freq->frequency is in KHz */ >> + unsigned long freq_rate = freq->frequency * 1000; > > A small optimization here. Instead of multiplying potentially every > frequency in the table by 1000, you could divide the incoming rate down > to KHz. This will also avoid the need for 'freq_rate'. Should have > noticed this earlier. Sorry about that. > > Thanks, > Sekhar I thought about it, but figured the multiplication would be safer. I will change it if you prefer this version. Best regards, Bartosz Golaszewski
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c index a55101c..92e3303 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c @@ -1179,14 +1179,28 @@ static int da850_set_armrate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long index) return clk_set_rate(pllclk, index); } -static int da850_set_pll0rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long index) +static int da850_set_pll0rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate) { - unsigned int prediv, mult, postdiv; - struct da850_opp *opp; struct pll_data *pll = clk->pll_data; + struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq; + unsigned int prediv, mult, postdiv; + struct da850_opp *opp = NULL; int ret; - opp = (struct da850_opp *) cpufreq_info.freq_table[index].driver_data; + for (freq = da850_freq_table; + freq->frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END; freq++) { + /* requested_rate is in Hz, freq->frequency is in KHz */ + unsigned long freq_rate = freq->frequency * 1000; + + if (freq_rate == rate) { + opp = (struct da850_opp *)freq->driver_data; + break; + } + } + + if (opp == NULL) + return -EINVAL; + prediv = opp->prediv; mult = opp->mult; postdiv = opp->postdiv; diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/davinci-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/davinci-cpufreq.c index b95a872..d54a27c 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/davinci-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/davinci-cpufreq.c @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ static int davinci_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int idx) return ret; } - ret = clk_set_rate(armclk, idx); + ret = clk_set_rate(armclk, new_freq * 1000); if (ret) return ret;
This function is broken - its second argument is an index to the freq table, not the requested clock rate in Hz. It leads to an oops when called from clk_set_rate() since this argument isn't bounds checked either. Fix it by iterating over the array of supported frequencies and selecting a one that matches or returning -EINVAL for unsupported rates. Also: update the davinci cpufreq driver. It's the only user of this clock and currently it passes the cpufreq table index to clk_set_rate(), which is confusing. Make it pass the requested clock rate in Hz. Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> --- arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++---- drivers/cpufreq/davinci-cpufreq.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)