| Message ID | 1481753438-3905-2-git-send-email-agustinv@codeaurora.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 05:10:36PM -0500, Agustin Vega-Frias wrote: > ACPI extended IRQ resources may contain a Resource Source field to specify > an alternate interrupt controller, attempting to map them as GSIs is > incorrect, so just disable the platform resource. > > Since this field is currently ignored, we make this change conditional > on CONFIG_ACPI_GENERIC_GSI to keep the current behavior on x86 platforms, > in case some existing ACPI tables are using this incorrectly. > > Signed-off-by: Agustin Vega-Frias <agustinv@codeaurora.org> > --- > drivers/acpi/resource.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/resource.c b/drivers/acpi/resource.c > index 56241eb..76ca4e9 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/resource.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/resource.c > @@ -43,6 +43,18 @@ static inline bool acpi_iospace_resource_valid(struct resource *res) > acpi_iospace_resource_valid(struct resource *res) { return true; } > #endif > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_GENERIC_GSI > +static inline bool is_gsi(struct acpi_resource_extended_irq *ext_irq) > +{ > + return ext_irq->resource_source.string_length == 0; > +} > +#else > +static inline bool is_gsi(struct acpi_resource_extended_irq *ext_irq) > +{ > + return true; > +} > +#endif Well, patch is simple there is not much to say other that on the firmware side I honestly do not see many options, either we remove the ifdeffery above and make the check unconditional (ie we do check on x86/ia64 too instead of always returning true) and see if things hold up on x86 (at least we try) or we will never know and will never be able to use this on x86 if there will ever be need. It would be certainly weird to find out that a descriptor has a resource_source pointer put there by mistake (because that's what we are talking about, things work on x86/ia64 by ignoring the resource_source pointer so any string there is just an unfortunate mistake AFAICS). I am quite tempted to remove the ifdef and make the is_gsi() check effective on x86/ia64 too. Lorenzo > + > static bool acpi_dev_resource_len_valid(u64 start, u64 end, u64 len, bool io) > { > u64 reslen = end - start + 1; > @@ -470,9 +482,12 @@ bool acpi_dev_resource_interrupt(struct acpi_resource *ares, int index, > acpi_dev_irqresource_disabled(res, 0); > return false; > } > - acpi_dev_get_irqresource(res, ext_irq->interrupts[index], > + if (is_gsi(ext_irq)) > + acpi_dev_get_irqresource(res, ext_irq->interrupts[index], > ext_irq->triggering, ext_irq->polarity, > ext_irq->sharable, false); > + else > + acpi_dev_irqresource_disabled(res, 0); > break; > default: > res->flags = 0; > -- > Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. on behalf of the Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. > Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project. > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hi Lorenzo, On 2016-12-16 11:24, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 05:10:36PM -0500, Agustin Vega-Frias wrote: >> ACPI extended IRQ resources may contain a Resource Source field to >> specify >> an alternate interrupt controller, attempting to map them as GSIs is >> incorrect, so just disable the platform resource. >> >> Since this field is currently ignored, we make this change conditional >> on CONFIG_ACPI_GENERIC_GSI to keep the current behavior on x86 >> platforms, >> in case some existing ACPI tables are using this incorrectly. >> >> Signed-off-by: Agustin Vega-Frias <agustinv@codeaurora.org> >> --- >> drivers/acpi/resource.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++- >> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/resource.c b/drivers/acpi/resource.c >> index 56241eb..76ca4e9 100644 >> --- a/drivers/acpi/resource.c >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/resource.c >> @@ -43,6 +43,18 @@ static inline bool >> acpi_iospace_resource_valid(struct resource *res) >> acpi_iospace_resource_valid(struct resource *res) { return true; } >> #endif >> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_GENERIC_GSI >> +static inline bool is_gsi(struct acpi_resource_extended_irq *ext_irq) >> +{ >> + return ext_irq->resource_source.string_length == 0; >> +} >> +#else >> +static inline bool is_gsi(struct acpi_resource_extended_irq *ext_irq) >> +{ >> + return true; >> +} >> +#endif > > Well, patch is simple there is not much to say other that on the > firmware side I honestly do not see many options, either we remove the > ifdeffery above and make the check unconditional (ie we do check on > x86/ia64 too instead of always returning true) and see if things hold > up > on x86 (at least we try) or we will never know and will never be able > to > use this on x86 if there will ever be need. > > It would be certainly weird to find out that a descriptor has a > resource_source pointer put there by mistake (because that's what we > are > talking about, things work on x86/ia64 by ignoring the resource_source > pointer so any string there is just an unfortunate mistake AFAICS). > > I am quite tempted to remove the ifdef and make the is_gsi() check > effective on > x86/ia64 too. I wouldn't be opposed to that. I added the #ifdef out of abundance of caution, but if the x86 folks agree and we can get sufficient testing to ensure this doesn't break anything I'd like to remove it too. Thanks, Agustin > > Lorenzo > >> + >> static bool acpi_dev_resource_len_valid(u64 start, u64 end, u64 len, >> bool io) >> { >> u64 reslen = end - start + 1; >> @@ -470,9 +482,12 @@ bool acpi_dev_resource_interrupt(struct >> acpi_resource *ares, int index, >> acpi_dev_irqresource_disabled(res, 0); >> return false; >> } >> - acpi_dev_get_irqresource(res, ext_irq->interrupts[index], >> + if (is_gsi(ext_irq)) >> + acpi_dev_get_irqresource(res, ext_irq->interrupts[index], >> ext_irq->triggering, ext_irq->polarity, >> ext_irq->sharable, false); >> + else >> + acpi_dev_irqresource_disabled(res, 0); >> break; >> default: >> res->flags = 0; >> -- >> Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. on behalf of the Qualcomm >> Technologies, Inc. >> Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a >> Linux Foundation Collaborative Project. >>
On 2016/12/15 6:10, Agustin Vega-Frias wrote: > ACPI extended IRQ resources may contain a Resource Source field to specify > an alternate interrupt controller, attempting to map them as GSIs is > incorrect, so just disable the platform resource. > > Since this field is currently ignored, we make this change conditional > on CONFIG_ACPI_GENERIC_GSI to keep the current behavior on x86 platforms, > in case some existing ACPI tables are using this incorrectly. > > Signed-off-by: Agustin Vega-Frias <agustinv@codeaurora.org> > --- > drivers/acpi/resource.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/resource.c b/drivers/acpi/resource.c > index 56241eb..76ca4e9 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/resource.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/resource.c > @@ -43,6 +43,18 @@ static inline bool acpi_iospace_resource_valid(struct resource *res) > acpi_iospace_resource_valid(struct resource *res) { return true; } > #endif > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_GENERIC_GSI > +static inline bool is_gsi(struct acpi_resource_extended_irq *ext_irq) > +{ > + return ext_irq->resource_source.string_length == 0; As pointed out by Lorenzo, if the interrupt resource is a Resource Producer, it's not GSI, so maybe the code needs to be updated as - return ext_irq->resource_source.string_length == 0; + return ext_irq->resource_source.string_length == 0 && + ext_irq->producer_consumer != ACPI_PRODUCER; Thanks Hanjun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hi Hanjun, On 2017-01-17 07:15, Hanjun Guo wrote: > On 2016/12/15 6:10, Agustin Vega-Frias wrote: >> ACPI extended IRQ resources may contain a Resource Source field to >> specify >> an alternate interrupt controller, attempting to map them as GSIs is >> incorrect, so just disable the platform resource. >> >> Since this field is currently ignored, we make this change conditional >> on CONFIG_ACPI_GENERIC_GSI to keep the current behavior on x86 >> platforms, >> in case some existing ACPI tables are using this incorrectly. >> >> Signed-off-by: Agustin Vega-Frias <agustinv@codeaurora.org> >> --- >> drivers/acpi/resource.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++- >> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/resource.c b/drivers/acpi/resource.c >> index 56241eb..76ca4e9 100644 >> --- a/drivers/acpi/resource.c >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/resource.c >> @@ -43,6 +43,18 @@ static inline bool >> acpi_iospace_resource_valid(struct resource *res) >> acpi_iospace_resource_valid(struct resource *res) { return true; } >> #endif >> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_GENERIC_GSI >> +static inline bool is_gsi(struct acpi_resource_extended_irq *ext_irq) >> +{ >> + return ext_irq->resource_source.string_length == 0; > > As pointed out by Lorenzo, if the interrupt resource is a Resource > Producer, > it's not GSI, so maybe the code needs to be updated as > > - return ext_irq->resource_source.string_length == 0; > + return ext_irq->resource_source.string_length == 0 && > + ext_irq->producer_consumer != ACPI_PRODUCER; Agreed. I'll add the check. Thanks, Agustin
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/resource.c b/drivers/acpi/resource.c index 56241eb..76ca4e9 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/resource.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/resource.c @@ -43,6 +43,18 @@ static inline bool acpi_iospace_resource_valid(struct resource *res) acpi_iospace_resource_valid(struct resource *res) { return true; } #endif +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_GENERIC_GSI +static inline bool is_gsi(struct acpi_resource_extended_irq *ext_irq) +{ + return ext_irq->resource_source.string_length == 0; +} +#else +static inline bool is_gsi(struct acpi_resource_extended_irq *ext_irq) +{ + return true; +} +#endif + static bool acpi_dev_resource_len_valid(u64 start, u64 end, u64 len, bool io) { u64 reslen = end - start + 1; @@ -470,9 +482,12 @@ bool acpi_dev_resource_interrupt(struct acpi_resource *ares, int index, acpi_dev_irqresource_disabled(res, 0); return false; } - acpi_dev_get_irqresource(res, ext_irq->interrupts[index], + if (is_gsi(ext_irq)) + acpi_dev_get_irqresource(res, ext_irq->interrupts[index], ext_irq->triggering, ext_irq->polarity, ext_irq->sharable, false); + else + acpi_dev_irqresource_disabled(res, 0); break; default: res->flags = 0;
ACPI extended IRQ resources may contain a Resource Source field to specify an alternate interrupt controller, attempting to map them as GSIs is incorrect, so just disable the platform resource. Since this field is currently ignored, we make this change conditional on CONFIG_ACPI_GENERIC_GSI to keep the current behavior on x86 platforms, in case some existing ACPI tables are using this incorrectly. Signed-off-by: Agustin Vega-Frias <agustinv@codeaurora.org> --- drivers/acpi/resource.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)