==== 8< ======== 8< ======== 8< ======== 8< ====
one can immediatelly see an UBSAN warning:
UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in crypto/algif_hash.c:187:7
variable length array bound value 0 <= 0
CPU: 0 PID: 15949 Comm: syz-executor Tainted: G E 4.4.30-0-default #1
...
Call Trace:
...
[<ffffffff81d598fd>] ? __ubsan_handle_vla_bound_not_positive+0x13d/0x188
[<ffffffff81d597c0>] ? __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds+0x1bc/0x1bc
[<ffffffffa0e2204d>] ? hash_accept+0x5bd/0x7d0 [algif_hash]
[<ffffffffa0e2293f>] ? hash_accept_nokey+0x3f/0x51 [algif_hash]
[<ffffffffa0e206b0>] ? hash_accept_parent_nokey+0x4a0/0x4a0 [algif_hash]
[<ffffffff8235c42b>] ? SyS_accept+0x2b/0x40
It is a correct warning, as hash state is propagated to accept as zero,
but creating a zero-length variable array is not allowed in C.
Fix this as proposed by Herbert -- do "?: 1" on that site. No sizeof or
similar happens in the code there, so we just allocate one byte even
though we do not use the array.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> (maintainer:CRYPTO API)
Reported-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
---
crypto/algif_hash.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
@@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ static int hash_accept(struct socket *sock, struct socket *newsock, int flags)
struct alg_sock *ask = alg_sk(sk);
struct hash_ctx *ctx = ask->private;
struct ahash_request *req = &ctx->req;
- char state[crypto_ahash_statesize(crypto_ahash_reqtfm(req))];
+ char state[crypto_ahash_statesize(crypto_ahash_reqtfm(req)) ? : 1];
struct sock *sk2;
struct alg_sock *ask2;
struct hash_ctx *ctx2;